And anyone who even a little bit honest with themselves have to admit they have seen both types of teachers when they were in school.
But...this program won't work. It is doomed from the start simply by virtue of it being sponsored by the very same people who destroyed the current system.
It is ironic that the Democrats/Leftists/Progressives want to try to fix the educational system now when they have owned it lock, stock, and barrel since the sixties.
EVERYTHING that is wrong with it now is the result of THEIR policies.
The only people who don't understand that the document is expressing opposition to fake methodologies that focus on making the students feel good and are ineffective at teaching, are those who evidently went to a school teaching these methodologies.
They never really look for voter fraud. Even if they did, you can only infer it unless someone actually tries to vote and can't because the log shows they already have. Or, you can infer fraud by looking at the number of people who voted using "provisional" ballots or just look at the vote totals that exceed registered voters. So, their assertions are meaningless.
Photo ID is the only way to have an impact.
But as BMO points out, the real problem is corrupted (*Cough*Chicago*) officials and determined organizations (*cough*Unions).
I wonder if they'll edit the tapes to make it look like people who lost, won and people who won, lost. Then they'll claim some controversy based on that.
The way I was taught is old school but has always served me much better that all these fancy new approaches...which are actually cherry picked and corrupted versions of parts of the old school...
1. Walk in their shoes. How can you hope to provide a solution for their needs unless you really understand their needs...hint, their needs are usually only part of what they tell you.
2. Know where they are going. You have to understand the direction the organization wants to go, because you have to build into your solution the flexibility to get there.
3.Know your self. Don't promise what you can't deliver. Ten years ago, someone might have said having a "Siri" interface is what they want. Some things are not timeline and budget feasible.
4.Live up to your title. Being an "Analyst" does not mean document what they are doing and automate it. Understand what they are doing and why (see #1) but then go the extra step and recognize ways to improve the business process, eliminate unnecessary steps, redirect resources to more productive goals.
5.Analysts are developers and developers are analysts. Good people can do both jobs and can do them at the same time. Monkeys are for writing novels. Every question you have about what needs to be done should be accompanied by "why" it needs to be done.
Companies can't even mine deposits off the ocean floor without scads of people getting their panties in a twist about who "owns" the resources or environmental impacts. Just think what the cluster fuck of jurisdictions would be saying about mining something on mars and bringing it back.
The paperwork would outweigh, literally, whatever ore or refined products you brought back.
1. It reflects the mentality of a once 13 year old girl's father. 2. If you had, you should be prosecuted for statutory rape and then experience the flip side of the relationship with a large man named Tyrone while serving 10-20 years. 3. If you were so lucky, then she should also be sent to jail.
And if she were my daughter, then yes, I would condemn you to castration and death by hanging. But that's just a Dad speaking.
I think the ability to read posts and chats are required simply from a support perspective. How can any of their guys troubleshoot problems without seeing customer data?
Perhaps the issue is if they are held to some kind of confidentiality agreement lick Doctors and Lawyers.
So AT&T can listen to your phone conversations and read your text messages? It all goes through their "Servers" (infrastructure in this case).
Saying FaceBook is a public place means that their Privacy settings are irrelevant. Or does Private not mean Private anymore?
As much as men who molest 13 year girls should be castrated and hung, Facebook shouldn't be doing this unless they make clear in the Terms (and I'd say in big notifications when you sign up) that they will watch what you do and if anything looks suspicious, they'll report you.
Must be that HOT or OBE Math.
And anyone who even a little bit honest with themselves have to admit they have seen both types of teachers when they were in school.
But...this program won't work. It is doomed from the start simply by virtue of it being sponsored by the very same people who destroyed the current system.
It is ironic that the Democrats/Leftists/Progressives want to try to fix the educational system now when they have owned it lock, stock, and barrel since the sixties.
EVERYTHING that is wrong with it now is the result of THEIR policies.
The only people who don't understand that the document is expressing opposition to fake methodologies that focus on making the students feel good and are ineffective at teaching, are those who evidently went to a school teaching these methodologies.
Convicted criminals should not be able to get guns.
Ineligible voters should not be able to vote.
Any questions?
You want people with Alzheimer's to vote?
As far as I'm concerned, if you can't be bothered to register to vote in a timely manner then we don't need you voting.
Voting is a responsibility and it requires a bit more effort than sucking down a soda and munching on Cheetos on your front porch.
They never really look for voter fraud. Even if they did, you can only infer it unless someone actually tries to vote and can't because the log shows they already have. Or, you can infer fraud by looking at the number of people who voted using "provisional" ballots or just look at the vote totals that exceed registered voters. So, their assertions are meaningless.
Photo ID is the only way to have an impact.
But as BMO points out, the real problem is corrupted (*Cough*Chicago*) officials and determined organizations (*cough*Unions).
All Cuomo really had to do was sign an executive order. Everybody knows those overrule legislation now.
For a teenager, a couple of minutes is stretching it a bit.
I wonder if they'll edit the tapes to make it look like people who lost, won and people who won, lost. Then they'll claim some controversy based on that.
The way I was taught is old school but has always served me much better that all these fancy new approaches...which are actually cherry picked and corrupted versions of parts of the old school...
1. Walk in their shoes. How can you hope to provide a solution for their needs unless you really understand their needs...hint, their needs are usually only part of what they tell you.
2. Know where they are going. You have to understand the direction the organization wants to go, because you have to build into your solution the flexibility to get there.
3.Know your self. Don't promise what you can't deliver. Ten years ago, someone might have said having a "Siri" interface is what they want. Some things are not timeline and budget feasible.
4.Live up to your title. Being an "Analyst" does not mean document what they are doing and automate it. Understand what they are doing and why (see #1) but then go the extra step and recognize ways to improve the business process, eliminate unnecessary steps, redirect resources to more productive goals.
5.Analysts are developers and developers are analysts. Good people can do both jobs and can do them at the same time. Monkeys are for writing novels. Every question you have about what needs to be done should be accompanied by "why" it needs to be done.
AT&T DSL service.
AT&T Data services (for phones).
Right...
Companies can't even mine deposits off the ocean floor without scads of people getting their panties in a twist about who "owns" the resources or environmental impacts. Just think what the cluster fuck of jurisdictions would be saying about mining something on mars and bringing it back.
The paperwork would outweigh, literally, whatever ore or refined products you brought back.
Six Strikes
There comes a time when baseball analogies cease to make sense.
1. It reflects the mentality of a once 13 year old girl's father.
2. If you had, you should be prosecuted for statutory rape and then experience the flip side of the relationship with a large man named Tyrone while serving 10-20 years.
3. If you were so lucky, then she should also be sent to jail.
And if she were my daughter, then yes, I would condemn you to castration and death by hanging. But that's just a Dad speaking.
True Dat.
I think the ability to read posts and chats are required simply from a support perspective. How can any of their guys troubleshoot problems without seeing customer data?
Perhaps the issue is if they are held to some kind of confidentiality agreement lick Doctors and Lawyers.
Interesting.
So AT&T can listen to your phone conversations and read your text messages? It all goes through their "Servers" (infrastructure in this case).
Saying FaceBook is a public place means that their Privacy settings are irrelevant. Or does Private not mean Private anymore?
As much as men who molest 13 year girls should be castrated and hung, Facebook shouldn't be doing this unless they make clear in the Terms (and I'd say in big notifications when you sign up) that they will watch what you do and if anything looks suspicious, they'll report you.
Exactly. Any moron who puts critical government functions in "the cloud" ( a stupid marketing term for someone else's servers) should be fired.
Slashdot is humor impaired this morning.
Bill Gates has mod points! Look out!
BIll had tens of billions of dollars and she was the best he could find??
He should be married to some Sports Illustrated swimsuit model or a Victoria's Secret model.
Hey, Your sister called. She's going to be with me tonight. I won't be thinking of you when I'm boning her.
Your mama wanted some but she's too ugly. I hear you take after her.
It's really very simple.
The data shows it has happened in the past. Yes?
During those times, CO2 was low Yes?
It happening now and CO2 is high. Yes?
Warming happened without high CO2 levels it's happening with high CO2 levels.
What does that tell you? That maybe CO2 has little to do with it?
Go ahead, take you ball and run home to mamma. While you are there, try to think about this some.