The sad thing is that these days on Slashdot there are many people with such little understanding of technology that they will actually think what you say makes sense.
Bullshit. There is plenty of reason to use HTTPS and eschew HTTP. For one thing it eliminates the need to explain to laypersons, which is most people, how to tell the difference. This reason alone justified it. Worries about snooping and government spying are just icing on the cake.
This is literally nothing like that issue. To "exploit" that issue you already have to have root access. It is the typical "OMFG, if you are root you can get root privs!" cry of the moron without a clue.
Changing providers isn't any better. That is the equivalent of saying if you don't like being a slave you always have the option of changing to a different owner.
You are basing your judgement on what you think is true about C++ and I'm sure you have gained too much of you "understanding" of it reading comments here. Your assumption of extra cost is incorrect, and if you do as I recommend you are far more likely to end up with more efficient and safer code. You should consider going to YouTube and investing a few hours watching Bjarne Stroustrop's excellent presentations. I assure you that 90% of the criticism of C++ Here is bogus, and written by clueless people who don't like C++ because they don't know what they are talking about, and aren't going to educate themselves about C++ because they don't like it.
You can use C++ STL strings which do everything you want and much more. By simply writing your C like code in C++ and doing this your code will be raised to write, easier to read, safer, and perform as well or better. You don't HAVE to use classes. In fact the only difference between a struct and a class in C++ is that members of a class default to private access while in a struct they default to public.
OK. We've seen you go on and on about how a language you don't use or understand is horrible because you saw someone say it on Youtube. Thanks for sharing.
Pimpl is solvable by creating an implementation class and and interface class that has a reference to that class, and if you are crying about memory safety starting with C++ 11 there are smart pointers.
As you have shown the error stems from the programmer, not the language. If you can't easily look at that C code and see that it won't compile then that explains why you find the language difficult. You don't even have beginner level proficiency.
Slashdot Mirror
The sad thing is that these days on Slashdot there are many people with such little understanding of technology that they will actually think what you say makes sense.
Bullshit. There is plenty of reason to use HTTPS and eschew HTTP. For one thing it eliminates the need to explain to laypersons, which is most people, how to tell the difference. This reason alone justified it. Worries about snooping and government spying are just icing on the cake.
Cash me outside?
This is literally nothing like that issue. To "exploit" that issue you already have to have root access. It is the typical "OMFG, if you are root you can get root privs!" cry of the moron without a clue.
Changing providers isn't any better. That is the equivalent of saying if you don't like being a slave you always have the option of changing to a different owner.
Net Neutrality is like pornography... Even if I cannot define it I know it when I see it.
Here is your apology: go fuck yourself you worthless piece of shit.
I guess you opted out of the opportunity to get a clue.
You are basing your judgement on what you think is true about C++ and I'm sure you have gained too much of you "understanding" of it reading comments here. Your assumption of extra cost is incorrect, and if you do as I recommend you are far more likely to end up with more efficient and safer code. You should consider going to YouTube and investing a few hours watching Bjarne Stroustrop's excellent presentations. I assure you that 90% of the criticism of C++ Here is bogus, and written by clueless people who don't like C++ because they don't know what they are talking about, and aren't going to educate themselves about C++ because they don't like it.
Stop talking now. You sound very foolish.
Most of systemd does not run as PID 1. You should forget all the ridiculous shit you "learned" about it here. It makes you sound foolish.
Wierd, because in this case it is neither of those; it is "tumbling".
If nobody claims it how can they confirm it?
Yes, that is why the government is throwing itself for inventing cash.
This has literally nothing to do with secure boot.
We get it. You are clueless. No need to keep driving the point home.
I gather math isn't your bailiwick.
Great way to show that you have literally no clue about systemd, what it does, or why.
I'm glad you found yourself. It's the first step to self improvement!
Holy shit. That was some of the longest rambling incoherent bullshit founded in incompetence and ignorance I have read in quite some time.
C was created well before the www, so that might explain it. Try adding "language" to the search, e.g "go language".
You can use C++ STL strings which do everything you want and much more. By simply writing your C like code in C++ and doing this your code will be raised to write, easier to read, safer, and perform as well or better. You don't HAVE to use classes. In fact the only difference between a struct and a class in C++ is that members of a class default to private access while in a struct they default to public.
OK. We've seen you go on and on about how a language you don't use or understand is horrible because you saw someone say it on Youtube. Thanks for sharing.
Pimpl is solvable by creating an implementation class and and interface class that has a reference to that class, and if you are crying about memory safety starting with C++ 11 there are smart pointers.
As you have shown the error stems from the programmer, not the language. If you can't easily look at that C code and see that it won't compile then that explains why you find the language difficult. You don't even have beginner level proficiency.