Slashdot Mirror


Nearly 4 Million Bitcoins Lost Forever, New Study Says (fortune.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: According to new research from Chainalysis, a digital forensics firm that studies the bitcoin blockchain, 3.79 million bitcoins are already gone for good based on a high estimate -- and 2.78 million based on a low one. Those numbers imply 17% to 23% of existing bitcoins, which are today worth around $9,700 each, are lost. While others have speculated about the number of lost bitcoins, the Chainalysis findings are significant because they rely on a detailed empirical analysis of the blockchain, where all bitcoin transactions are recorded.

218 comments

  1. Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by nsuccorso · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about the vacuum cleaner bag?

    1. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found at least three of my PGP private keys there.

    2. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      Glove box, don't forget the glove box and the central console, under all the usb cables, candy wrappers, Taco Bell sauce sachets and the long forgotten CD of Barney Rhymes. "I love you. You love me..."

      Tip: If that tune is stuck in your head now, Harvard researchers have found a cure. Painful as it, if you sing/play in your mind till it reaches the end, then it will be gone.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 1

      Try the mayonnaise jar under Funk & Wagnall's porch.

    4. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      if you sing/play in your mind till it reaches the end, then it will be gone.

      [citation needed]

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    5. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Jakubowski recommends ... try engaging with the song, as many people report that actually listening to an earworm song all the way through can help eliminate having it stuck on a loop

      Citation provided.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Thanks! :)

      The article does make that suggestion but also some others that may be less painful:

      Jakubowski recommends trying to distract yourself by thinking of or listening to a different song. If that doesn’t work, try engaging with the song, as many people report that actually listening to an earworm song all the way through can help eliminate having it stuck on a loop.

      Finally, a study published last year in the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology suggests a simple way to disrupt the voluntary memory recollection that gets songs stuck in your head: chew a piece of gum.

      Think I'll try the gum and thinking of another song before going through that ordeal.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    7. Re: Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shish. Boom! Baa.

    8. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You can get rid of any earworm by thinking of Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Major_Disorder · · Score: 1

      You can get rid of any earworm by thinking of Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves.

      You bastard!

      --
      First law of people: People are generally stupid.
    10. Re: Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...then it will be gone.

      The song or your mind?

    11. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      And there's always that song by ELO called "Can't Get It Out Of My Head". They repeat the line all the way through the song.
      And I can't get it out of my head.
      And I can't get it out of my head.
      And I can't get it out of my head.

      Try getting THAT one out of your head! <evil laugh>

    12. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

      In the chair...

    13. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's one exception - it works as an antidote: The Devil Went Down to Georgia. HTH.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I sang it a few times, and I just can't get it to stick.

      I sing, "And I can't get it out of my head," and my brain answers back, "I'm Henry the Eighth I am, Henry the Eighth I am I am, I got married to the widow next door..."

    15. Re:Have They Looked Under the Seat Cushions? by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      My go-to earworm replacer is Jeff Wayne's War of the Worlds theme.
      All together now! "The chances of anything coming from Mars..."

  2. And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    N/t

    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily... I mean, if you owned them and sold them before the whole thing tanked you'd be in a pretty good place right now.

    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is not so new anymore.

      I think it's going to die the same way BSD and Apple have been dying for decades now.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:And nothing of value was lost by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, if you had them, the remaining bitcoins wouldn't have as high of a value either, only the bitcoins in circulation are actually valuable, losing a bitcoin actually increases the overall value of the remaining coins. The problem with the bitcoin-type places is bit-rot. Eventually, over long enough periods there won't be enough bitcoins anymore to go around because they've all rotted away (hard drive failures, owner death, loss of passwords etc) you won't have enough to even divide up.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that company with a nearly trillion-dollar market cap?

    5. Re:And nothing of value was lost by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

      Never considered this. That's actually a solid point.

    6. Re:And nothing of value was lost by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Never considered this. That's actually a solid point.

      No, it's not, unless you are thinking about it in pure theoretical terms.
      The first issue is "over long enough periods" - this could mean anything from "a week from now" to "the cold death of the universe". Any statement involving time tends to become valid "over long enough periods".
      Then, losing active bitcoin is indeed a thing, and it's indeed pushing bitcoin value up, but that's not a cause, it's an effect of the overall total amount of bitcoin being limited, with a known upper limit (21-something million). Then it becomes a matter of offer versus demand, with locked bitcoin being a factor, but it's been a factor already since its inception. With online wallets gaining more and more popularity over time, this issue would diminish.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:And nothing of value was lost by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      you won't have enough to even divide up.

      Bitcoins can be divided. So as the value continues to increase, we can use bit-dimes, bit-pennies, and even smaller units. It will be like the
      Zimbabwean dollar, but in reverse.

    8. Re: And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the fucking point he was making?

    9. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you won't have enough to even divide up.

      Bitcoins can be divided. So as the value continues to increase, we can use bit-dimes, bit-pennies, and even smaller units. It will be like the
      Zimbabwean dollar, but in reverse.

      Yep.
      In the bitcoin environment the base unit isn't a bitcoin, it is the satoshi. One bitcoin is 100,000,000 satoshi.
      Amounts in the blockchain are denoted in satoshi.

    10. Re:And nothing of value was lost by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It can only be divided to 8 decimal places. Given at 6 decimal places, you're already at USD 0.01, it's not that far off from being indivisible, it would already be close to useless for some penny stock trading (which can be as low as USD $0.0001 per trade).

      Sure you can update the protocol and clients but as we've seen, any sort of "split" like that, even when it made sense (because BTC will collapse at the current transaction rates) has been met with serious resistance.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:And nothing of value was lost by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to tell which Bitcoins are toast?

    12. Re: And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send me all your private keys and I will reply with a detailed report...

    13. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Pfft -- what's the big deal? They'll just mint new bitcoins (with slightly less copper each time).

    14. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, a moran? Apple is worth more, today, than it ever has been.

    15. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running OpenBSD on four different devices at home, and just two of them are embedded.

      BSD isn't dead, and far from it!

    16. Re:And nothing of value was lost by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing one giveaway is old wallets which have had zero transactions and gathered bitcoin until a certain moment, then stopped.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I bought one for $4 back in the very beginning.

      I then proceeded to store the wallet on a device that died.

      I have ZERO idea how to recover from that, and it put me off the idea of cyber currency.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:And nothing of value was lost by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      1. Send it to a data recovery service.

      2. Recover wallet.

      3. $8,000+ profit.

      Questions?

    19. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I meant, what if you can't even find the wallet file? Is there a backup anyplace in the transaction chain?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you had them, the remaining bitcoins wouldn't have as high of a value either, only the bitcoins in circulation are actually valuable, losing a bitcoin actually increases the overall value of the remaining coins.

      No, the individual value of a coin went up, but the overall value didn't. If the whole value of all bitcoins was $1000, and you lost $100 worth, now the total purchasing power of the circulating coins is lower. It will eventually re-balance, but it lags behind the whole way.

      Just like, if you increase the currency supply, you increase the total purchasing power temporarily until it re-balances through inflation. That's why it is important to have low but positive inflation.

    21. Re:And nothing of value was lost by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      No - losing the wallet file is akin to losing your physical wallet.

      I acquired 0.05 BTC from the Bitcoin Faucet back when it was worth about a nickel. Forgot about it for years and years till they were back in the news - I had to search through a handful of old drives and PCs for the relevant file.

      Hint: the file is/was named wallet.dat.

    22. Re:And nothing of value was lost by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Update: Cashed out yesterday (11/2/17) for $520.

    23. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll do another search for that!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More like 4 million coins they just assume are lost forever. I'm not sure why everyone assumes Satoshi's original 1 million coins are just lost forever. I'd say he's likely just holding them and playing the long game on it. BTC is still fragile, and if he started cashing them in, people would likely freak out and prices might start plummeting, possibly sending BTC into a death spiral. If one really believes in the long term success of BTC, they'd hold those coins until BTC is a true success, is in use everywhere, and is as ubiquitous as credit cards. Then you can cash them in, people would say "holy shit, those coins WEREN'T lost" but it would have relatively little effect on bitcoin itself.

    Likewise with many of the other "out of circulation" coins. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of those people are just holding them. I'm sure some of it's lost, but I think 4 million is probably wildly overestimating.

    1. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd disagree on two points. First, it's very likely people mined some Bitcoin and forgot about them or at least how to access them. I'm thinking of all my hosting customers that can't ever find their SSL keys after they just bought a certificate (like, a quarter of them probably), and then the following year when they go to renew they've misplaced everything probably half the time.

      Another issue, is that Satoshi is holding on purposely. Wouldn't it look better for Bitcoin if he spent a couple here and there? Instead it looks like even he lost track of them.

    2. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could be sitting on them so he is not found......Lots of people assume bitcoins are anonymous, but really they are not. It is quite trivial to track them down unless extra effort it taken to stay hidden.

      Also I do not think bitcoins will ever become a daily currency for many reasons. However it works great as a means to store value to protect against inflation and to move wealth around.

    3. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it look better for Bitcoin if he spent a couple here and there?

      I don't think so, because then the implication would be stronger that this is just all a scam for him to make money. Not that I don't think it's a scam anyway, but I think people would be a lot more negative about the whole thing if they knew the founder was sitting there on a mountain of potential money just waiting to cash out. You know...like the reaction people have now to the whole Bitcoin Gold pre-mining scam. But with satoshi not spending anything from his original wallet, there's at least this urban legend of the selfless founder who sacrificed great fortune to make bitcoin a success. That's story makes people more likely to take it seriously.

    4. Re:Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is the chosen currency for the black market, the black market in every nation on Earth. That gives it value, but it also means the creator of it would be hunted until the day he died if he left any trace of himself anywhere. I seriously doubt the ~9 billion dollars worth of Bitcoin he has, if he were to cash it all in, would do more than get seized by the US government, get him thrown in jail for life of suicided, and result in the subsequent collapse of Bitcoin. They can't stop something which does every illicit thing on Earth under the name "anonymous," but when they can pin a face on it they can crush it in under a week.

    5. Re: Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd disagree on two points. First, it's very likely people mined some Bitcoin and forgot about them or at least how to access them.

      This is very likely the case. Back at the start when it was worth shit I mined about a dozen BTC. Lost them when I reformatted my computer and didn't even remember until years later when it would have been worth over $1,000.

    6. Re: Incorrect subject by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      I don't think so, because then the implication would be stronger that this is just all a scam for him to make money

      That posits that Satoshi ever thought this project would ever get this far and ever be worth this much (or anything at all). Pretty much no one in the beginning did. It was an experiment.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if he started cashing them in, people would likely freak out and prices might start plummeting, possibly sending BTC into a death spiral.

      Which makes me wonder if this whole "Bitcoin" thing was a Russian experiment to collapse national economies of countries.
      Russia would be immune as their currency is backed by potatoes.

    8. Re:Incorrect subject by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      . BTC is still fragile, and if he started cashing them in, people would likely freak out and prices might start plummeting, possibly sending BTC into a death spiral.

      I would think that the idea that around 30 billion dollars could just be lost would freak people out more

    9. Re:Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . BTC is still fragile, and if he started cashing them in, people would likely freak out and prices might start plummeting, possibly sending BTC into a death spiral.

      I would think that the idea that around 30 billion dollars could just be lost would freak people out more

      I wonder if a greater perceived scarcity will have any effect on the price.

    10. Re: Incorrect subject by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is why the government is throwing itself for inventing cash.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lost private keys, burned coin by sending to the wrong address, hacked by hacker who stole but couldn't retrieve them, endless human errors with the 34 character string in irreversible tx

    12. Re:Incorrect subject by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If we were able to really know the currency usage for all black markets worldwide, I'm pretty sure the U.S. dollar would be at the top of the charts, maybe followed by the Euro, etc. Bitcoin would be near the bottom of that list.

      Using Bitcoin for anything illegal is stupid because as soon as you connect a transaction to a person or account, you can trace ALL transactions on that Bitcoin wallet address.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re: Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is why the government is throwing itself for inventing cash.

      Governments exist to protect people from foreign forces. Then they exist to extract resources from people. It doesn't matter what the reason is, just that the population will accept it. Most people barely understand what Bitcoin is, but if the government came out saying "we caught the primary guy responsible for facilitating the drug trade, human trafficking, and terrorism across the world" then "the government confiscated 9 billion dollars" would barely be mentioned, let alone make a headline.

      Or are you one of those people who believe they tax cigarettes because they have your best interests at heart?

    14. Re:Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      I didn't suggest it wasn't stupid to use Bitcoin for criminal activity, I said it's the primary use. There are approx $6.5b worth of BTC traded daily, most of that is illicit. The global black market is estimated at $1.81t, which would come to a daily volume of a hair under $5b, it's safe to say the majority of that is taking place in BTC these days - especially when you get into the international stuff where it's just easier to clean money and trade between different currencies.

    15. Re:Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Russia would be immune as their currency is backed by potatoes.

      That is political nonsense - everyone knows the Rouble is backed by very large quantities of Vodka^h^h^h^h^h oil and gas.

    16. Re:Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming most transactions are illicit just because the estimated numbers on both sides are close enough.

    17. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops! You could have retired.

      Or, probably crashed the whole bubble selling that much BTC at once.

    18. Re: Incorrect subject by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      It is quite trivial to track them down unless extra effort it taken to stay hidden.

      What bullshit.

    19. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just mine the same ones again? No one else has them.

    20. Re:Incorrect subject by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't know the US Government can seize anyone's money, no matter where on Earth they might be. Or throw anyone in jail, no matter who they are.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    21. Re: Incorrect subject by swillden · · Score: 2

      I'd disagree on two points. First, it's very likely people mined some Bitcoin and forgot about them or at least how to access them.

      This is very likely the case. Back at the start when it was worth shit I mined about a dozen BTC. Lost them when I reformatted my computer and didn't even remember until years later when it would have been worth over $1,000.

      Yep. Talk to a group of people who have been around this stuff for a few years, and you'll find that there are a lot of stories like that. I had 20-30 BTC myself, lost on some hard drive I disposed of years ago.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    22. Re: Incorrect subject by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is the chosen currency for the black market, the black market in every nation on Earth.

      Or that's merely an oft-repeated line of horseshit and bears no resemblance reality whatsoever...

    23. Re: Incorrect subject by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Hardly. Every transaction ever done is recorded in the block chain.

    24. Re: Incorrect subject by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Fine, tell me how much bitcoin I have and what I last spent it on.

      Waiting for your excuses now.

    25. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I've got a few hundred bitcoins that were worth only a few dollars at the time. Sure wish I had my old computer.

    26. Re:Incorrect subject by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      Except that it wouldn't. Bitcoin isn't a legal currency anywhere. What it can be best described as a commodity, like gold or silver. Outside of a limited circle of users if the entire bitcoin market was to implode I doubt it would be more than a quick story on evening news.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    27. Re: Incorrect subject by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the GP doesn't care enough about ASDFnz to put in the effort, and also doesn't have the resources of a government.

      There are some governments who would really like to speak to Satoshi though. If he were to spend some of his bitcoins, which are all very easily identifiable as his, he'd have to show up at a location (cameras), sell to an exchange (IP + bank account or other financial info) or order something (address or PO box + cameras).

      He could launder them, slowly, but even then he'd have to leave an IP address trail which could potentially be backtracked by a sufficiently motivated government.

    28. Re:Incorrect subject by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite I think. The market for bitcoin is basically assuming that $30 billion worth is lost forever. No worries, lost bitcoins just increase the value of the remaining ones.

      The really scary thing is what if those $30 billion dollars worth of bitcoins suddenly become found? Imagine if some anonymous geek suddenly showed up with four or five trillion dollars (~40% of the total existing) that nobody knew about. Now your savings are worth half what they were yesterday.

    29. Re: Incorrect subject by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the GP doesn't care enough about ASDFnz to put in the effort, and also doesn't have the resources of a government

      Why would you need the resources of a Government if it is trivial like he said?

    30. Re: Incorrect subject by Gussington · · Score: 1

      This is very likely the case. Back at the start when it was worth shit I mined about a dozen BTC. Lost them when I reformatted my computer and didn't even remember until years later when it would have been worth over $1,000.

      $120,000 today...

    31. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tracking bitcoin transactions is trivial and anyone could do it.
      Tracing who owns those bitcoin accounts is a little bit harder (but within the abilities of a large government).

    32. Re:Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it can be best described as a commodity,Like POGS or Baseball cards.Maybe In-game Currency. Metals have a use and a value beyond money.

    33. Re: Incorrect subject by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well that still is not what he said.

      The fact is while you can see transactions going back and forth in bitcoin constantly there is no way to use just that information to 'trivially' track anyone's spending or let alone their holdings.

      It is like looking at stock trades and expecting to know who made them just by the fact that you are looking at them. With stock trades, it may be possible to dig deeper and find that information because it is a centralised system but even then there is no guarantee.

      With bitcoin just looking at the transactions provides even less information as to who made them and who they were transacting with and there is no centralised system to dig further into.

      So, to sum it up, the guy is a fool if he thinks peoples transactions are trivial to track and you are a fool to think that Governments are able trivially able to do it as well. It is extremely hard and needs a lot of information from outside of the blockchain that is very hard to find. Look at the darknet markets, sure they get busted every now and then because of their slipups but it is exceedingly rare for their clients to get caught.

    34. Re: Incorrect subject by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And now, over $100k...

    35. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're looking at $100,000 now. Hope you've learnt your lesson and make better backups now.

    36. Re: Incorrect subject by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it bears lots of resemblance to reality. But keep in mind that the black market primarily using bitcoin is not the same as bitcoin being primarily used by the black market.

      Well, and of course I mean specifically the online black market. Of course for physical in-person meetings of any sort, a stack of cash is likely still the main transaction currency.

    37. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Satoshi died?

      If a paper backup of his private key exists, talk about a winning lottery ticket...

    38. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of 2 days ago, itâ(TM)s legal tender in Germany. It been legal tender in Japan for a while.

      https://www.google.com/amp/bigthink.com/ideafeed/in-germany-bitcoin-is-now-legal-tender.amp

    39. Re:Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm assuming most transactions are illicit because Bitcoin is a PitA to use and you have to have some motivation for doing so with exceeds the added effort.

    40. Re: Incorrect subject by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

      You're looking at $100,000 now. Hope you've learnt your lesson and make better backups now.

      Not really, even if I had them I would have sold at $100-$1,000 of total value. I'm not quite arrogant enough to claim I would have expected Bitcoin to become the chosen currency of the black market. I'm too much of a nerd to believe a permanent ledger of transactions would be suitable for a black market currency, or that people would be dumb enough to use it for that. Live and learn, never overestimate the intelligence of your fellow man.

    41. Re: Incorrect subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! I was looking at bitcoins from very early on, and remember after awhile seeing them at 70$ and thinking what a crazy price that was.
      So, if I had 100 bitcoins at 1$, obviously I would have sold some at 100$ or 500$ or 1,000$.

    42. Re:Incorrect subject by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      At this point, selling one coin a month would fund a very nice retirement.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    43. Re: Incorrect subject by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      That is not how this works and you know it.

      The parent AC claimed that "It is quite trivial to track them down unless extra effort it taken to stay hidden" which is what is true. If you do not take the extra effort and thus only rely on the "anonymity" of bitcoin then once some one can track a specific bitcoin transaction to you then they can see every transaction that you have ever done, including every bitcoin that you have ever owned (for the particular wallet that the connected bitcoin was stored in of course).

      The sad part is that you probably already know all this but still felt to argue over semantics.

  5. Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Back in the beginning when you could do that on your home PC in a reasonable period of time.

    Then I formatted the computer to restore the OS, and never thought of the wallet.dat.

    Oh well.

    1. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I could believe this has caused the loss of more than one million bitcoins in aggregate.

    2. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by amalcolm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a BBC article a few years ago about a man trolling though his local rubbish dump looking for a HDD with bitcoins on:
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-w...

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    3. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by adonoman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I had five at one point. Totally forgot about it because it was worth squat. But who are we kidding, I totally would have sold when it hit $10 each anyway for a free $50. This way I at least get to dream of that $50,000 I could've had.

    4. Re: Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is me as well. Would be nice if I had access to what I mined years ago, but I've long since lost any trace.

    5. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Back in the beginning when you could do that on your home PC in a reasonable period of time.

      If you did it back in the beginning, you would have mined multiples of 50 coins.

    6. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the reality for most of the early miners: they probably all cashed out early-ish. There's a few stories of people hanging on to them longer for whatever reason, like that student who lost the password for his wallet, and finally found it when his stash was worth €300k or so. He bought an apartment with it, and good for him... but that same stash would be in the low 8 figures today.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've dumpster dived quite a few PCs, never bothered to look for wallet data on them.

      Did find a whole bunch of movie rips, but none were movies I wanted to see.

    8. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very much this. When you've made a 1000% profit there's little incentive to take the risk waiting for a 10,000% to arrive, especially when money is tight.

    9. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you did it back in the beginning, you would have mined multiples of 50 coins.

      Man, no reason to make me more depressed!

    10. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had five at one point. Totally forgot about it because it was worth squat. But who are we kidding, I totally would have sold when it hit $10 each anyway for a free $50. This way I at least get to dream of that $50,000 I could've had.

      Just like everything else. Nobody who bought Apple stock at $5 in the 90s would've held it for $100, let alone $1000 (pre split) where it is now.

    11. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Think you mean he bought a _condo_. By definition you can't buy an apartment.

    12. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've dumpster-dived a fair number of PCs. It's actually surprising how clean most of them are. Very few user-created files, not a lot of installed software, and very modest collections of photos/music/movies/games/porn/etc. Browsing histories tend to show the computer wasn't used for a lot of web surfing either. Though this may have some selection bias, as many PCs I find don't have harddrives still in them, and I assume the power users are the ones smart enough to make sure a scavenger isn't going to get a hold of their data.

    13. Re:Pretty sure I did mine a bitcoin by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's an American perspective. In England you can own an apartment, though they are more commonly called "flats". I've never heard the term "condo" used in England either.

  6. Supply and demand by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Those numbers imply 17% to 23% of existing bitcoins, which are today worth around $9,700 each, are lost.

    I guess that's one way to drive up the "value" of bitcoins. Fixing the money supply to a finite resource (real or calculated) is by and large not a good idea. Especially one that can be easily lost.

    1. Re:Supply and demand by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Fixing the money supply to a finite resource (real or calculated) is by and large not a good idea

      That depends on your purpose. It's a good idea if you mostly use it for storing your wealth, and doing occasional transactions. It's not a good idea if you want to run a national economy on it. I don't think anybody is trying the latter.

    2. Re:Supply and demand by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      > It's not a good idea if you want to run a national economy on it. I don't think anybody is trying the latter

      Bitcoin is like lupus; it looks different every time it's promoted.

      Indeed, it was not so long ago (even in Internet time) that proponents were claiming you could use Bitcoin alone to get by in the world.

      >It's a good idea if you mostly use it for storing your wealth

      Sticking with the specific case of Bitcoin, and not the general case you appear to be making, no, no it is not. Mostly because Bitcoin has no value beyond speculation, and the hype train could derail at any moment. If you board and disembark from the train at the right time, you could get rich... but every speculation bubble in history has had more people lose than win trying to time that.

    3. Re:Supply and demand by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Mostly because Bitcoin has no value beyond speculation

      Shifting the goal posts, I see.

      every speculation bubble in history has had more people lose than win trying to time that.

      The speculation bubble of gold has been surviving for thousands of years.

    4. Re:Supply and demand by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      Ahh, so you weren't making a general case and you're a Bitcoin lunatic.

      Noted.

    5. Re:Supply and demand by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It worked pretty well for that length of time because more was being mined to make up the difference of increasing wealth and it's still being mined at a thousand tons a year. Once bitcoins are mined out the parallel stops working on a far shorter time scale.

    6. Re:Supply and demand by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      So a follow-up...
      Think when the bubble pops it's all going away? Or do you think it will return to a baseline value and stabilize?

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:Supply and demand by religionofpeas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We're not mining any new van Gogh paintings, and they are still pretty valuable.

    8. Re:Supply and demand by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Think when the bubble pops it's all going away? Or do you think it will return to a baseline value and stabilize?

      It's difficult to tell. It seems there's an unending stream of new kids finding this 'amazing new technology' and jumping in enthusiastically but uncritically - and a portion of those never get past the enthusiasm stage.

      Then there's the 'get rich quick' people, who understand nothing at all about the system but can parrot talking points... they're the ones who would most likely move on to the next scheme when Bitcoin crashes in value.

      Still... I'm not so sure there won't be a significant number of computers running full Bitcoin nodes and continuing the original blockchain for a long, long time, if only for some obscure geek cred. And those remaining users could still use it as currency.

      A small enough group of users doing that and it'd probably have whatever (likely insignificant) value they assign to it at the moment, essentially rendering it even less stable than it is now. You know, "Hey, Joe... can I have a slice of pizza for a bitcoin???"

    9. Re:Supply and demand by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Bitcoins aren't art. There is literally no value to a bitcoin if no one else values it. You may never be able to sell that painting for even a fraction of its purchase price, but you'll still have a painting to look at.

    10. Re:Supply and demand by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      There is literally no value to a bitcoin if no one else values it.

      Correct. Same is true for regular money. To a large extent, it's also true for gold. Gold has some utility value, but most of the price is just expectation that others will value it as much as you do.

      The opposite is true as well. As long as other people are valuing it, why should I not do the same ?

      you'll still have a painting to look at.

      If you just wanted to look at it, you can have a decent artist paint you a good replica for a small fraction of the price. You can't do that with bitcoin.

    11. Re:Supply and demand by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You know, "Hey, Joe... can I have a slice of pizza for a bitcoin?"

      For the first ever so-called official transaction, 10K Bitcoins were exchanged for two pizzas.

      So even if Bitcoin goes down to the value of a slice of pizza, assuming eight slices per pizza, that still means Bitcoin would be worth 625 times as much as the first transaction.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re:Supply and demand by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      If you just wanted to look at it, you can have a decent artist paint you a good replica for a small fraction of the price. You can't do that with bitcoin.

      Well, I could sell you one Dogecoin for one Bitcoin. They're not the same, but it's a pretty good replica since they're both crypto-currencies based on blockchain technologies.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:Supply and demand by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >that still means Bitcoin would be worth 625 times as much as the first transaction.

      To the few using it - in such a scenario there'd be pretty much no place left to use Bitcoin, so it'd be like trading homemade poker chips amongst a small group of friends.

    14. Re:Supply and demand by timholman · · Score: 1

      Still... I'm not so sure there won't be a significant number of computers running full Bitcoin nodes and continuing the original blockchain for a long, long time, if only for some obscure geek cred. And those remaining users could still use it as currency.

      Bitcoin will never completely go away after it crashes. There will always be a new crowd of suckers to fleece.

      Just at look at gold and silver investment scams. Those have been around in various forms for centuries (literally). You can always find some newbie to convince that, "The economy is going to collapse! Invest in gold now! Buy our silver futures now!" I had a friend in college who got suckered into buying silver using credit card debt. It took him years to pay off the money he lost.

      So BTC will hang around, and periodically boom and bust as a new crop of sheep get sheared. But I expect most of the copycat cryptocurrencies will fade into obscurity.

    15. Re:Supply and demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mining bitcoins? A focused effort using a slew of quantum computers to find a high-valued private key could be much more lucrative. Call it metamining.

    16. Re:Supply and demand by Altrag · · Score: 1

      you could use Bitcoin alone to get by in the world.

      For the most part, I don't see why you couldn't. I mean you'd be severely restricting yourself to places that accept bitcoin payments but there's plenty of those out there. Not the majority by any stretch of the imagination of course, but you only really need one grocery store, maybe a gas station if you drive, and a few other such things that are within your ability (and willingness) to commute.

      every speculation bubble in history has had more people lose than win trying to time that.

      But the ones who win, win big. Of course they tend to also be the ones who are already rich since they've got the resources to monitor and track market conditions and therefore have the highest chance of picking the right moment to bail. Its still a bit of a gamble of course, but its the difference between a normal person playing a solid game of blackjack vs a person able to count cards. In the former case sure you can win, but its still stacked in the house' favor. In the latter case you can of course still lose if you run into an unlucky deck shuffle, but your odds are much much better for winning.

  7. People lost a lot on physical bitcoins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The codes on them got damaged locking people people out of them. I bought one for $60 back in 2013 and now cannot realize my gains.

  8. Of all the problems with Bitcoin... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    This is only sort of a problem.

    Much like we don't know exactly how much wealth is hiding under someone's mattress (or stored in the form of precious items that could be sold at any time) yet we still manage to find a value for currency that in modern times more or less represents a fraction of GDP... Bitcoin will find a value regardless of how much is lost.

    If there's confidence a certain percentage of tokens have become permanently inaccessible, their 'confirmed' loss from the Bitcoin economy will encourage the market to share their perceived value among those tokens still accessible.

    It's been a while since I used a Bitcoin client. It used to be that the units were more or less hard coded, so significant inflation or deflation required a client update if you didn't want to deal with large numbers of zeroes. If Bitcoin was actually usable for common purchases that could be a problem.

  9. Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    You know, this makes the whole shit much more appealing. Kinda like the cocoa beans the Aztec used(IIRC, at least one of those cultures around the Mesoamericas), it's perishable wealth. Spend it or watch it rot.

    Good. Spend your bitcoins while you can, make the money change hands. That's what drives an economy, people. The less you're able to save, the better.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Go one better, and make your economy run off of polished spheres of metallic plutonium. The consequences of hoarding wealth in such a system are left as an exercise for the reader. Idea shamelessly stolen from Charles Stross.

    2. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Mr.+Competence · · Score: 1

      Who got it from Larry Niven

      --
      Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
    3. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idea shamelessly stolen from Charles Stross.

      Who may have stolen it from Larry Niven: The Roentgen Standard

    4. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polished discs or better, cubes, would be easier to pile than spheres.

    5. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So Darwin is right already at lower levels of "rich"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: Old money dies in the bitcoin world by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Money that literally KILLS you might be a bit of a hard sell, ya know...

      But Bitcoins are great in this regard. People think they're anonymous, people think that they're "forever", people like it for being the "next big thing", and most of all they'll soon find out that of course they can stuff their bitcoins into their mattresses but that this is dangerous, and that stuffing them into "banks" can be at least as dangerous, and you'll start to see people wanting to get rid of it.

      I think we'll see a test case for Gresham's Law very soon here.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's beginning to feel a lot like late 2000 again. Those who were around then will remember how much hype there was around technology, and how the various stock market indices were constantly hitting new highs. Profit was the last thing that businesses were thinking about; it was all about growth. Even the most outlandish ideas were taken seriously. The future outlook was nothing but pure optimism.

    Then it all came crashing down just a few short months later.

    Just look at the outrageous valuations of so many Silicon Valley companies. Look at this cryptocurrency nonsense, where performing a single transaction requires more energy than an average American home uses in a month. Look at the nonsense coming out of moz://a, especially the silly Rust programming language and the terrible Firefox 57 release.

    There are a lot of people who will be in for a very rude awakening, and it could very well be happening much sooner than they expect!

    1. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      It's beginning to feel a lot like late 2000 again.

      In the year $2000, Amazon was trading for $100 a share, and Apple was going for $4.95

    2. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      you mean late 90's? Tech bubble popped Aug 21, 1999.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even remotely comparable. Bitcoin is more like investing in TCP/IP than it is like investing in Amazon or whatever in 1999.

    4. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it did not. NASDAQ peaked in March of 2000.

    5. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you mean late 90's? Tech bubble popped Aug 21, 1999.

      Much like the stupidity that extended the stock market insanity well into 2008, the .bomb ripple effect was not felt until well into 2000.

      Y2K concerns died about 5 minutes after midnight. After that, it was full steam ahead when it came to marketing vaporous bullshit.

    6. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and what was pets.com trading for? I think that's more along the lines of what he was thinking.

    7. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by dj245 · · Score: 1

      It's beginning to feel a lot like late 2000 again. Those who were around then will remember how much hype there was around technology, and how the various stock market indices were constantly hitting new highs. Profit was the last thing that businesses were thinking about; it was all about growth. Even the most outlandish ideas were taken seriously. The future outlook was nothing but pure optimism.

      Then it all came crashing down just a few short months later.

      Just look at the outrageous valuations of so many Silicon Valley companies. Look at this cryptocurrency nonsense, where performing a single transaction requires more energy than an average American home uses in a month. Look at the nonsense coming out of moz://a, especially the silly Rust programming language and the terrible Firefox 57 release.

      There are a lot of people who will be in for a very rude awakening, and it could very well be happening much sooner than they expect!

      Many tech companies seem incredibly overvalued, but their business model may not be "make/do product/service, obtain currency". Some companies seem to exist only to stay afloat long enough for Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Apple to acquire them.

      Other companies (particularly Tesla) seem like they may remain afloat regardless of the underlying financials. Giving money to Tesla may have a better $ / "environmental return" compared to entities like Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Foundation, or the Sierra Club. If significant numbers of investors are only investing for the "environmental return", the stock price may not matter as much compared to traditional companies.

      Some would argue that even the S&P 500 is overvalued. There are many recent articles arguing on both sides of that question, but I like this one since it walks through all the math and you can draw your own conclusions.

      Regarding cryptocurrencies- they will exist as long as people need an electronic mechanism to hide/launder money and are able to use it for those purposes. We are in a new guilded age and there is plenty of wealth that needs to be secretly hidden or moved around. Money laundering costs money, bitcoin (even with large transaction fees) may be worthwhile to such people.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    8. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily bitcoin doubles pretty fast. I just doubled, pulled out half. If it crashes now I won't have less money than when I started. If it doesn't... then :)

    9. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Look at the nonsense coming out of moz://a, especially the silly Rust programming language and the terrible Firefox 57 release.

      That's a very nice attempt at hijacking a story with a HUGE non-sequitur.

    10. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's beginning to feel a lot like late 2000 again."

      Sigh, people have been saying that every few years since the dot com crash. It doesn't really feel like that. We have had the last 20 years of growth in tech and in the meantime, tech has matured so that like 90% of the developed world uses internet technology every day.

      So its not going anywhere. Booms and busts obviously will occur, same as they always have. But you went from the 90s where most people did not own a computer or have a connection to the internet, to now, where most people do. Its more like the invention of the internal combustion engine. Sure there were some low points such as the world wars, but gasoline powered cars took off and stayed took off, till they are replaced with EV's in the next 20 years that is...

    11. Re:It feels like late 2000 again! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What happened on August 21, 1999? It was a Saturday, so it's not like the markets tanked.

      It was the day before the big GPS week number rollover, but that actually got very little press and had nothing really to do with dotcom crash anyway.

  11. And how many Franklins washed in jean pockets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, I do that all the time, man! If not that, then lighting my blunts. Hm. Maybe that's why I leave them in my pockets. Oh, yeah, totally worthless after wash.

  12. They're not lost, you morons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time you read "bitcoin", replace it with "tulip" and you'll get a better idea of how this will go down.

  13. Does it matter? by sqorbit · · Score: 0

    I might be totally off base here, but does this matter? How many US coins are lost, recycled or destroyed?

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
    1. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2, Informative

      US coins/bills that are lost are simply made again. You can't do that with bitcoin.

    2. Re:Does it matter? by timholman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US coins/bills that are lost are simply made again. You can't do that with bitcoin.

      Which is precisely the point of using money. Money should be a measure and facilitator of economic value and activity, not a finite resource that is intrinsically deflationary. (The historical lessons of gold and silver as deflationary currencies are completely lost on the cryptocurrency crowd.)

      If I write a check for $1000 and give it to someone, and he accidentally destroys the check before cashing it, that $1000 is not "gone". The check had no intrinsic value to begin with. It was just a way to transfer value from me to him. All I need to do is write him another check. But once a BTC is lost, it is gone forever. The Bitcoin ecosystem has become a bizarro world where it makes economic sense for someone to find a way to sabotage your wallet and destroy your keys, as it makes the value of his own BTC that much greater (a la "Goldfinger" in the James Bond movie).

      The use of BTC as "money" has all but disappeared. Average transactions fees are currently above $5 USD. What is left is a speculative frenzy that is going to pop very dramatically. Sure, you might make some money as a speculator right now, but a lot of people will be left holding the bag when BTC crashes.

    3. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US coins/bills that are lost are simply made again. You can't do that with bitcoin.

      No, but you can certainly apply some arbitrary value propped up with hype and bullshit to both.

      USD has been propped up for years on nothing more. Of course, it also helps when you can fake value by just printing more.

    4. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 0

      The historical lessons of gold and silver as deflationary currencies are completely lost on the cryptocurrency crowd

      What lessons ? The gold bubble has popped and people owning a handful of gold coins are now holding the bag ?

    5. Re:Does it matter? by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 0

      Let's try an experiment: go withdraw $10,000 in $100 notes. Burn them, or shred them in a cross-cut shredder. Ask Uncle Sam to go make them again for you, because you "lost" your $10,000.

      Note: I'm a Bitcoin skeptic, but there is no qualitative difference between cash and Bitcoins in your scenario for the average consumer or holder.

    6. Re:Does it matter? by careysub · · Score: 1

      At some point national governments will start issuing their own currency in blockchain form. They will define the parameters, and will do the mining, and issue the BitDollars (or whatever) and the value at issuance will accrue to the Treasury as seigniorage. New issues will be made as needed to maintain a stable currency. This is the real future of cryptocurrency as actual currency, and not a finite pool of speculative assets.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    7. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Burn them, or shred them in a cross-cut shredder. Ask Uncle Sam to go make them again for you

      They will, as long as the damage still allows them to verify them:
      https://www.wikihow.com/Get-Da...

      But I wasn't necessarily talking about the Mint replacing someone's individual coins or bills. What the Fed does is measure inflation. When money disappears from circulation, the inflation rate is reduced, and that causes the Fed to lower interest rates, which causes new money to be created.

    8. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if the digital currency can't be inflated -- which is the entire point of fiat currency. As far as I understand, most (all?) digital currencies are deflationary, which means that the supply is limited by something independent of government. That certainly won't fly. Whatever currency government chooses, one thing you can be absolutely sure of is that government directly controls the supply.

    9. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      At some point national governments will start issuing their own currency in blockchain form. They will define the parameters, and will do the mining

      What's the purpose of a blockchain then ? If there's one centralized trusted party, you might as well keep everything in a simple database.

    10. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The department of the Treasury will issue new notes against burnt or torn notes (even shredded) submitted to them. They use forensics and are very conservative with the estimates of the face value and number of bills. However, destroying US currency intentionally is a crime and they just may prosecute... so I wouldn't try it.

    11. Re:Does it matter? by houghi · · Score: 0

      No, they are not made again. What they do is add new coins and bills. The ones they raplace are the old ones they get back.
      If they do not get them back, it is pure profit.

      How do I know? Because this was clearly explained when it happend to valuta that went over to the Euro. They made a shitload of money that way. In Belgium everything up to 50BEF (1.25EUR) that is found now is worthless as money. This includes bill for 20and 50BEF. Bills from 100BEF can still be exchanged if you have them. So if you have a suitcase filled with them, you can still exchange them.
      If they where lost in e.g. a fire, they are lost, not replaced.

      Car comparison: If you have a 1952 Beetle and it is lost, it is not replaced by a 2017 Beetle, no matter that they make a newer model.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      If they do not get them back, it is pure profit.

      The profit is the replacement.

    13. Re:Does it matter? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      US coins/bills that are lost are simply made again. You can't do that with bitcoin.

      Well there's no process to declare any particular coin/bill as lost and re-issue it, it's more like with gift cards. We can print a thousand IOUs and less than a thousand will ever be redeemed. Personally I hate that practice because it's like giving money, only really inconvenient money where you can pick anything in the store so it's not personal at all but not in that other store that sells it for less or of some other type you like better or something else entirely and it expires. Been there, done that because I didn't have anything I'd like to spend it on right then and there and when I did want/need to buy something I didn't remember I had the damn card. I guess the government is the same, a little extra "free money" they can print.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Does it matter? by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      The US Mint does the same thing and part of the reason that the United States has had commemorative quarters since the 1990's is the seigniorage. In fact that seigniorage is one of the avenues of revenue, although not as much as taxes are.

    15. Re:Does it matter? by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      The profit is the replacement.

      Not quite. The seigniorage is the profit that the government derives from minting money below face value, or if the currency is withdrawn from circulation (ex., by collectors). If the a $100 note is destroyed and replaced by another one then there is no net impact. However, if the note goes into international circulation then it is very profitable since tangible goods and services were exchanged for the note and it likely doesn't return to domestic circulation.

    16. Re:Does it matter? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The profit is the exact amount that was removed from circulation. By spending that profit, the government reintroduces it in circulation. In other words, the lost money is restored.

    17. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how the economy and fractional reserve banking work and the fact that you can vote frankly terrifies me.

    18. Re:Does it matter? by Mr3vil · · Score: 1

      Fire isn't as easy to verify, but let's say a toddler got into your wallet and put some $100's in your cross-cut shredder. You can send the contents of the shredder to the Bureau of Printing and Engraving for mutilated currency redemption. Their forensic experts will sift through the cuttings and identify every bill little Timmy fed the shredder. Here's a full detail of the mutilated currency redemption: https://www.moneyfactory.gov/s... Documenting the fate of every bill printed is as important as replacing it for the person that lost it.

    19. Re:Does it matter? by Mr3vil · · Score: 1

      More specifically the bureau of printing and engraving handles redeeming mutilated currency.

    20. Re:Does it matter? by msi · · Score: 1
  14. Not lost forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoins are never lost "forever."

    They are only lost until it becomes profitable to brute-force private keys.

    1. Re:Not lost forever by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      Why would you brute force your old key while it's the same difficulty to brute for some address with over 1 billion in them... https://bitinfocharts.com/top-... The law of number makes it impossible for now... even with computer billions time faster, would not solve the issue.

    2. Re:Not lost forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They are only lost until it becomes profitable to brute-force private keys.
      This might be a problem market forces can't solve, because of actual energy limitations, not just because hardware isn't there yet.
      So, maybe not "forever," but close enough.

  15. Lost Bitcoins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. Forget bitcoins.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want mine your own crypto currency, you need a motherboard with 19 PCIe 1X slots to plug in 19 GPUs and a couple of 1200W PSUs.

    1. Re:Forget bitcoins.... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      foreach webpage in Internet
              if /bitcoin/
                      post "if you want to mine your own crypto currency you need a motherboard"
                      + link to my product listing

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  17. Lost back when they were free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to hit the bitcoin fountain when you could jackpot 3-5btc a week. The bitcoin fountains were there to generate interest back when a btc was several dozen to a $US or less. But eventually I got bored with an imaginary Cryptonomicon currency which would never go anywhere. I never invested expecting a bailout in '08 and got burned having predicted the housing crash; I also got bored with BTC never expecting the hedge fund asshats to get excited in a niche geek thing which in any case was more tracked and trackable than cellphones and credit cards.
    On several hard disk from the early to mid 2Ks probably in a landfill in the US or Europe between several moves I have what is now worth several 100K-$US in btc, all were free and in the last five years when I finally started looking none were found.

  18. Risky store of wealth by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a good idea if you mostly use it for storing your wealth, and doing occasional transactions

    Bitcoin as a store of wealth? Maybe if you like a HUGE amount of risk on a highly speculative asset.

    It's not a good idea if you want to run a national economy on it. I don't think anybody is trying the latter.

    Listen to bitcoin advocates sometime. More than a few would like to replace all fiat currencies with bitcoin or something similar. Their arguments are largely unconnected to economic reality but they seem to believe them all the same.

  19. Gold by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The speculation bubble of gold has been surviving for thousands of years.

    Which has a lot to do with why we don't base our money supply on the gold standard anymore.

    1. Re:Gold by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Which has a lot to do with why we don't base our money supply on the gold standard anymore.

      I agree, but people are using gold as a safe haven to store wealth, which was my point.

    2. Re:Gold by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      No, people *think* they're using gold as a safe haven to store wealth.

      Historically, gold was an excellent material for currency. Many people have conflated this to mean that gold has intrinsic, universal value. It doesn't.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  20. Moral of the story by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A totalitarian government that wants to inflict maximum damage to cryptocurrency without firing a shot would just have to work on a worm that would target the users' wallets and make them inaccessible. The number of users that would have gone through the steps to enable recovery would probably be shockingly low.

    1. Re:Moral of the story by mu22le · · Score: 1

      The bitcoin market is pretty shallow; if a state wanted to crash it, they could just buy a few millions of them, and then sell everything at once.

    2. Re:Moral of the story by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      they could just buy a few millions of them

      And how much would that cost, do you think ?

    3. Re:Moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next to nothing. The vast majority of these people aren't going to pay taxes on the gains. You imprison them and seize the assets back.

    4. Re:Moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. Most wallets aren't connected to the Internet.

      Incredible how utterly clueless so many Slashdotters are nowadays.

    5. Re:Moral of the story by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of these people aren't going to pay taxes on the gains

      Many of them aren't even US citizens. Good luck taxing them.

    6. Re:Moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Europe doesn't care about taxes at all...

  21. Risk != stable store of wealth by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Over time, the volatility will get less, and the value will stabilize.

    That is a statement of faith, not of fact and is unsupported by any evidence that we could likely agree upon.

    Right now, the risk is high, but potential rewards are high too.

    Yes you can profit from volatility. That however is in direct opposition to the idea that bitcoin is reliable as a store of wealth.

    1. Re:Risk != stable store of wealth by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      That is a statement of faith, not of fact and is unsupported by any evidence that we could likely agree upon.

      Without new events, the value has to stabilize. And you can't have unlimited new events. But note that I didn't exclude the possibility that this value could be $0 :)

      Yes you can profit from volatility. That however is in direct opposition to the idea that bitcoin is reliable as a store of wealth.

      I didn't mean profit from volatility. I mean profit from being an early adopter. Bitcoin is going through a phase of price discovery right now. Once it is stable, and *if* at a price larger than $0, risk-averse people can use it as a store of wealth. If you don't mind some risk, and you can see the potential for further growth, you can get in now.

    2. Re:Risk != stable store of wealth by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      That however is in direct opposition to the idea that bitcoin is reliable as a store of wealth.

      This is the heart of the problem with bitcoin. It is only useful as a currency if it is stable in value. If it were stable in value, most of the get-rich-quick hype would disappear.

  22. I know it will be a stupid quest but??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As computer power increases over the years in say twenty years won't it be possible to brute force the passwords on the lost wallets and re take control of the bitcoin?

    1. Re:I know it will be a stupid quest but??? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  23. No future for BTC? by Elixon · · Score: 1

    How is it solved? If there is maximum of 21,000,000 BTC to be issued... and people keep forgetting wallet passwords and loosing storage drives... Then while the amount of issued BTC is limited the amount of BTC accidents is unlimited.

    I see it as unsustainable due to human error.

    Or can we re-e-print new BTC money?

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
    1. Re:No future for BTC? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      You can divide the remaining bitcoin into smaller units.

    2. Re:No future for BTC? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >How is it solved?

      It's just numbers... so you move the decimal place over and deal with smaller units. There are lots of issues with Bitcoin, this isn't one of them.

      >Or can we re-e-print new BTC money?

      BTC is controlled by whoever owns enough of the network verification capacity to decide which transactions are considered valid and which are not, tempered by a need not to do anything that destroys the underlying confidence of the network users.

      At least, that would work for taking control of abandoned tokens in the ledger. For adding new tokens, I'm not sure if the clients would notice token 21,000,001 shouldn't exist and raise an error. Then again, if you control enough of the network you can simply announce the change along with some song-and-dance about why it's necessary and how it won't be a problem, then push users to adapt. If the world doesn't go along with it, Bitcoin forks and the market becomes unstable (which is not in any player's interest in most scenarios).

    3. Re:No future for BTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thereby driving up the value for those already holding larger units. It's almost like it is by design to benefit early adopters!

    4. Re:No future for BTC? by swb · · Score: 1

      They say this and it makes intuitive sense to me (the way a dollar is made up of 100 cents), but if I stop and think about it, it reminds me of currency devaluation as means of solving hyperinflation. You can just move the decimal point and call a $100 bill a $1 bill, but it doesn't solve the underlying problem.

    5. Re:No future for BTC? by Elixon · · Score: 1

      OK, but how will we know that some bitcoins are practically lost if they are still on the books?

      There will be less BTC in practical circulation which will naturally keep nominal prices of goods pressed down since the BTC will go up virtually indefinitelly... I mean, you buy a flat for 1k BTC and due to this in a year it will cost 0.5k BTC... so it may impact consumption because people will prefere to keep virtual digital numbers on disk drives rather then consume goods... which is not good...

      I am not an economist but I guess it has many implications people even didn't think of yet...

      --
      Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
  24. I gave up early on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mined for a while when it first started... along with the seti @home folding stuff.... it was a hobby. after a while and having it running for a year or so... and the coins were all worth a few dollars total.... you stop running it and forget about it and just "lose" them with old hard drives..... how do i know? cuz thats exactly what i did lol

    oh well.... looks like i'm going to have to work the rest of my life anyway

  25. Lost in the dump - seriously. by saccade.com · · Score: 2

    There is a laptop lost in a UK garbage dump with 7,500 BTC on it. Never getting those back...

  26. Called it. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    As I said before, "All bits, no coin."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  27. Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dollars? by grungeman · · Score: 1

    Honest question. Would you be able to cash in this amount in bitcoin? If so, who would do that?

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  28. ...for two reasons by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I get your implied meaning the other reason you are correct is because these bitcoins are not lost. At some point it is highly probable that the encryption used will become easily breakable on some future, possible quantum computing, device. At this point the coins can be recovered...although the entire encryption behind bitcoin will also be undermined so they will probably be worthless!

    1. Re: ...for two reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin are not worthless because you need to acquire them with actual hard currency...so in effect they are worth something, but then again if you own the printing press then they'll be worth 1/20 / cent or less

    2. Re:...for two reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking about this the other day and wishing I knew more about encryption and breaking it. If there really are a million bitcoins in a single wallet out there, I find it hard to believe you couldn't break the encryption with a $5B investment that promised to double your money. I know you'd need some of that cash left to power the thing, but $5B would seem to buy you about 2 exaflops.

      Then again every time I try to get some real idea of the number of computations involved, the phrase "heat death of the universe" appears...

    3. Re:...for two reasons by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      You are also forgetting the economic argument. It is almost certainly more worthwhile to spend that money mining bitcoins rather than cracking a wallets encryption at the moment.

    4. Re:...for two reasons by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, even if you did manage to recover a million Bitcoins, there's no way you could sell them without crashing the market. Assuming the market hadn't already crashed by the time you managed to recover them.

  29. It's not truely lost until ... by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 1

    ... your mother can't find it. Did you ask your mom where you left your Bitcoins?

  30. Forever is a long time... by slew · · Score: 2

    At some point in time (with the rapid advance of quantum computing), I suspect it may become feasible to perform a salvage operation on the wallet keys to recover the coin...

    Of course "guessing" a 256-bit key is impractical, but I wonder how many of these "lost" coin are protected by mini-private keys that have somewhat weaker than average and might be amenable to a small quantum computer attack.

    Also, although I suspect that some of the coin have never been spent, those that have been spent, it might be interesting to forensically attempt to track them and look for potential weaknesses in the generation of the key itself (many random number generators in wide usage have quite a few weaknesses)...

    1. Re:Forever is a long time... by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      the problem becomes not just guessing the privkey but the resources it takes to attempt a transaction on the network. you can't verify the privkey without attempting a transaction, so an attack on the priv key of a bitcoin address is difficult for that reason.

    2. Re:Forever is a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't true at all--the others on the network have no "special" ability to verify the private key that you don't have, and can't do offline. In fact, if you find another public key that has all the right properties you'll be able to claim the lost funds just as well. (Granted, the odds are against you on that...)

    3. Re:Forever is a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you needed a transaction to verify a private key with the network how would you ever make a new address to receive? it becomes chicken and egg.

      the means of private signing key to public address is well known and does not need to create a transaction to verify. take directory.io ( site seems down, article about it https://www.coindesk.com/bitco... )

      any block explorer can check if a address resulting from to a private key has unspent outputs or skip the network traffic by running a local node modified to index unspent output from all addresses ( https://github.com/bitpay/bitc... ) instead just ones which private keys are held in a wallet file, ie default node.

      lastly in order to show how difficult it is to brute force private keys look at the large bitcoin collider project ( https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/ ) which is a distributed effort working on a puzzle transaction where coins were sent to numerous address with amounts increasing with number of none zero bytes bits.

  31. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Probably not in a single transaction, but if you look at the "Canadian Bitcoin Index you'll see there's between 500 and 900 Bitcoins worth of transaction every day, for those four exchanges alone.

    Let's say 500 Bitcoins with a value of 12K$CAD each, that's 6 million Canadian dollars per day.

    Even if you limit yourself to selling one Bitcoin per hour, that's not even 5% of the total daily exchanges happening in the country.

    Now imagine exchanges in other countries which have a lot more transactions happening every day, you could probably sell 10 or 20 Bitcoins per hour without making a blip on the overall market.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  32. Can't you just split the bit coins by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm not very familiar with it, but it sounds like you can sell fractional coins with pretty high fractional amounts. And that's before we talk about forking or just plain new currencies.

    When the gov't decides to crack down it'll be in the tradtionall fashion, they'll arrest a bunch of drug dealers and money launders (and maybe a few ransomware authors) and that'll tank the price. The value of bitcoin is, like it or not, underpinned by illicit goods. Eventually it'll get too big for it's britches and that'll be that.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Can't you just split the bit coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes, bitcoin as a unit can be split into a hundred millionth of a bitcoin, which is unofficially(?) termed a satoshi unit.
      Technically the satoshi is the actual unit of transfer used in the protocol, so when you see written or displayed "1 bitcoin" that represents a hundred million units in the block chain.

      But when the parent poster refers to making users wallets "inaccessible" I believe they are referring to the wallet file itself.

      For those that manage their own wallet file however, this would require something akin to ransomware that simply doesn't do the ransom part, but seeks out wallet files and encrypts them in another layer which the end user wouldn't have access to.
      This assumes no backups of that file were made, and no recovery keys were generated.

      But I suspect parent poster is correct when assuming most people probably don't have any backups of anything, let alone their wallet file.

      It also seems to me a vast many people using bitcoin these days tend to not even bother with having their own wallet file, but use some service to do it for you.
      This guess is purely from the number of exchanges that make the news either being hacked or doing some shady inside theft job type thing.
      Those exchanges wouldn't have that amount laying around if it wasn't for people storing their wallets with them.

      A government entity could much more easily disrupt the exchanges and have the exact same effect, except on a vastly larger scale and with a 100% success rate compared to going after individuals offline wallet files stored locally.

  33. "Never considered this." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That describes most people's thoughts about money in general.

  34. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reasoning---that other "people" are buying and selling something at some price indicates it's actually worth something---is what causes a bubble. If you understand you're playing hot potato and betting that you're not going to get stuck with it, great. But many of those transaction could easily be a few big miners just pushing the coins around to increase the alleged "volume". Until there's real auditing of many normal, regular people legitimately trading and using the instrument, it's super suspicious.

    I wouldn't be surprised if doing that would crash the market.

  35. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you're right...so it would only take you about 6 years to sell your one million bitcoins.
    AND...you can stick it to the man because you would have used 10 times more value in electricity to process the transactions than the actual transactions are worth!
    What a fantastic currency!

  36. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I say "the man" I mean humanity...take that environment!!

  37. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not quite as simple as this, as many traders are rapidly sitting on both the sell and buy sides of the market, profiting from volatility but putting little upward or downward pressure on the price.

    On the other hand, you can look at market depths such as

    http://bitcoinity.org/markets/gdax/USD

    and see that, given the current order book, you there are bids for 500 bitcoins right now in the $950-970 range, netting nearly 5M. Of course, who knows how the market would react to a big dump.

  38. Room for improvement by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    If I write a check for $1000 and give it to someone, and he accidentally destroys the check before cashing it... All I need to do is write him another check.

    And, to protect yourself from having both checks cashed, you would stop payment on the first check.

    Is it possible that the ability to "stop payment" on a lost coin is a feature that could be added to cryptocurrencies in the future?

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  39. Re:Did they look in the storage closet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This user is a Pedobear Troll. Extremely toxic. Please ignore for your own safety!

  40. Re:Would he really get a low 8 figure sum of dolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and see that, given the current order book, you there are bids for 500 bitcoins right now in the $950-970 range, netting nearly 5M. Of course, who knows how the market would react to a big dump.

    $5.00 in electricity to mine them
    $5,000,000 in profit in selling them
    crashing the Bitcoin bubble.... priceless

  41. I know where my Bitcoins went... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...up my nose. If I had my 2015 Bitcoins back, I would be able to afford a much worse drug habit!