You mean of course that he was *stupid* enough to get elected. He could have lived the rest of his life grabbing pussies and eating "beautiful chocolate cake", but soon he will be sucking dicks and giving his cake to Bubba. It takes a phenomenally stupid motherfucker to blow the free ride he was given and trade it for what he has coming to him now.
He would have to start by learning to read first. He could stare at the Constitution all day, but he certainly couldn't read it in any meaningful way (i.e. understand it.)
This is simply untrue. For example, did you know that you are presumed innocent until trial, after which if you are not found guilty you are not considered innocent? That is every single criminal case, and yes I have had numerous lawyers look me straight in the face and tell me this is true, and that there is no logical inconsistency in that line of "reasoning."
There is no ambiguity here. The software that allows control characters or any other non-alphanumeric characters is the software with the bug, since by your own admission the spec never explicitly states they should be allowed. For extra extra credit, if the spec said they were allowed then it would be the spec that has the bug in it.
A driver drives, a plumber plumbs, and a cook cooks. A cooker also cooks, but a cooker is in fact a device. There are many inconsistencies in the English language, but this isn't one of them.
You are doing it wrong then. You always capitalize words that make up an acronym. As was already pointed out you also capitalize words in titles, save conjunctions and prepositions. So Daylight Savings Time is correct in the title for two different reasons.
It is not true that a person who does cooking is not a cook. Have You really never heard the phrase "too many cooks spoil the broth"? A Chef is a master cook.
Why would I re-explain It? Whitehurst broke it down quite nicely, and even provided links you are clearly too lazy to follow. Every myth that you hear over and over again from the people who are claiming to be Linux experts, and anti-systemd, is exposed in that write-up. The truth, I suspect, is that these idiots either are anti-Linux. The other option is that they are woefully incompetent. People aren't leaving Linux for the BSDs, and if anyone would know Whitehurst would. And despite the claims that they are backing it because 'It is their baby", the truth is if it wasn't worth backing then all the major distributions would not be doing so. To claim that Debian (e.g.) uses it "because Red Hat" is beyond fucking stupid.
Since those things aren't true, you would think my comment would carry more weight, yet it carries the exact same weight. It seems we have found incontrovertible evidence that you have no idea how comments work. Off you go now little troll...
Most people figure they already have that covered by using a password, if they bother to go that far, and "nobody would want to get at any of my files anyway, LOL" If you don't know this then you have never tried to have a discussion about encryption with laymen.
You have a reading comprehension problem combined with literally zero knowledge of systemd. I have investigated it thoroughly as well as put in the relatively minimal effort to understand and leverage it. Everything he said was spot on.
Most normal people are idiots, but not all are, and some abnormal people like yourself are idiots who read what I wrote and decide it said a whole lot of stuff it didn't.
It is ridiculous to say virtually unbreakable security is a bad idea because it will draw more attention. It can draw as much attention as you can imagine, all of which will be I'm the form of: "Hey, get a look at all these ones and zeroes that mean nothing to us and never will"
Everyone who uses encryption uses it in a way that would be considered paranoid by normal people. Normal people don't understand encryption and have no idea they even use it when they do (e.g. https)
Slashdot Mirror
You mean of course that he was *stupid* enough to get elected. He could have lived the rest of his life grabbing pussies and eating "beautiful chocolate cake", but soon he will be sucking dicks and giving his cake to Bubba. It takes a phenomenally stupid motherfucker to blow the free ride he was given and trade it for what he has coming to him now.
Ah, yes ... The "he just looks like a moron, but is secretly a brilliant mastermind" delusion.
It's not an event, it is a state.
Dale Earnhardt Jr. *may* be a tool, but he is certainly not a device.
std::string wrong = "Tell that to Bjarne";
He would have to start by learning to read first. He could stare at the Constitution all day, but he certainly couldn't read it in any meaningful way (i.e. understand it.)
This is simply untrue. For example, did you know that you are presumed innocent until trial, after which if you are not found guilty you are not considered innocent? That is every single criminal case, and yes I have had numerous lawyers look me straight in the face and tell me this is true, and that there is no logical inconsistency in that line of "reasoning."
You have trouble understanding his tweets too I gather.
There is no ambiguity here. The software that allows control characters or any other non-alphanumeric characters is the software with the bug, since by your own admission the spec never explicitly states they should be allowed. For extra extra credit, if the spec said they were allowed then it would be the spec that has the bug in it.
A driver drives, a plumber plumbs, and a cook cooks. A cooker also cooks, but a cooker is in fact a device. There are many inconsistencies in the English language, but this isn't one of them.
Yeah, OK bud. Keep dreaming.
You are doing it wrong then. You always capitalize words that make up an acronym. As was already pointed out you also capitalize words in titles, save conjunctions and prepositions. So Daylight Savings Time is correct in the title for two different reasons.
It is not true that a person who does cooking is not a cook. Have You really never heard the phrase "too many cooks spoil the broth"? A Chef is a master cook.
You are a fucking idiot, but you know that already, don't you, you silly cockaholic you.
It's just like women! I have no way to see what they are thinking, so it makes no difference if I date Courtney Love or Reese Witherspoon, am I right?
They can't crack my encryption. Stop getting your knowledge of encryption from NCIS.
Why would I re-explain It? Whitehurst broke it down quite nicely, and even provided links you are clearly too lazy to follow. Every myth that you hear over and over again from the people who are claiming to be Linux experts, and anti-systemd, is exposed in that write-up. The truth, I suspect, is that these idiots either are anti-Linux. The other option is that they are woefully incompetent. People aren't leaving Linux for the BSDs, and if anyone would know Whitehurst would. And despite the claims that they are backing it because 'It is their baby", the truth is if it wasn't worth backing then all the major distributions would not be doing so. To claim that Debian (e.g.) uses it "because Red Hat" is beyond fucking stupid.
Since those things aren't true, you would think my comment would carry more weight, yet it carries the exact same weight. It seems we have found incontrovertible evidence that you have no idea how comments work. Off you go now little troll ...
Shut the fuck up you ignorant dickwad. Go send an anonymous tweet on instatwat and then suck on a big fat social feature dicksickle.
Most people figure they already have that covered by using a password, if they bother to go that far, and "nobody would want to get at any of my files anyway, LOL" If you don't know this then you have never tried to have a discussion about encryption with laymen.
You are thinking of the Idoru, who was in the Bridge Trilogy , of which ATP was actually the last in the series.
You have a reading comprehension problem combined with literally zero knowledge of systemd. I have investigated it thoroughly as well as put in the relatively minimal effort to understand and leverage it. Everything he said was spot on.
Most normal people are idiots, but not all are, and some abnormal people like yourself are idiots who read what I wrote and decide it said a whole lot of stuff it didn't.
It is ridiculous to say virtually unbreakable security is a bad idea because it will draw more attention. It can draw as much attention as you can imagine, all of which will be I'm the form of: "Hey, get a look at all these ones and zeroes that mean nothing to us and never will"
Everyone who uses encryption uses it in a way that would be considered paranoid by normal people. Normal people don't understand encryption and have no idea they even use it when they do (e.g. https)