It turns out other countries have laws too. Perhaps the violated New Zealand laws? Oh, that's right, We expect foreigners to obey our laws when here, but it is a one way street.
BTW - I have known what you were doing the whole time. You have mod points and have been trolling so you can mod me down each time, thinking that will shut me down. I was letting you screw yourself over, as Slashdot has heuristics to detect that. I wouldn't expect to get mod points for a LONG time:^)
Yes genius.You have enlightened me. I just found a vulnerability in every program written in C! A user could add vulnerable code and recompile and a hacker could then, if he just knew that was done and to which one of the millions of systems it was done, exploit it!
Find me one example of a service owner in any distribution that begins with a number. Now seriously, you are too fucking stupid to be on Slashdot. Go back to 4chan.
Yes, he might surrender root privilege to a *service*. He would then have to not notice a *digit*, not a period. Now all the hacker has to do is find that one system on the internet, with no way to probe for it, and target it, find the root exploit, and use it. Tell me you really aren't as stupid as you appear.
That's not correct. You directing your son to click the button is no different than you directing him to commit a crime. The culpability and responsibility rests with you. You will be held to the contract in the former case and charged with a crime in the latter. Great parenting though!
The best part? Google was far ahead, but that's not possible, because Android is limited because it has more options. The worst part? The world is full of people who will read what he wrote and believe it must be true, because ex-Google guy said it, so no need to even think about it.
Dude, we get it. You are a troll who doesn't understand that it was a theoretical problem with no chance of happening in production, that required a completely incompetent sysadmin to create a custom unit file with a service owner starting with a digit, which no distribution has ever done in the history of Linux. You don't have to keep stressing your incompetence. We figured that out when you couldn't create a Slashdot account. Thanks for the Lulz though!
Swift shows 2,368,939 downloads. Sure, some people download multiple times, but plenty of people is the short answer. Swype is also popular, as are others. I personally also have downloaded alternative music players and messaging apps. There is a lot of added functionality out there. K9 Mail is another great one. File Managers as well. I am on Android, but I'm sure the stock apps aren't best in class on iOS either. Apple wants developers, which they won't have if they "stock block" them.
Wait, are you telling me a former attorney is telling us all how his plan is to implement obscurity based security, and might be a liar? Didn't... see.... that... coming.
... and, start again. If the contract says that any breach of the contract means you are no longer allowed to access the system then continuing to access it after violation of the contract almost certainly *IS* a crime. A meatspace analogy would be if you are allowed to get merchandise and pay later, then violate the contract knowingly and take product from the warehouse anyway you have committed theft.
You forgot the "IANAL". I know this, because if you were you would also know about EULAs and other ways to enter into a contract, including verbal agreement.
That is exactly the situation, except add "I'm not telling you who I am, and have not entered into a contractual relationship with you." Linked in *could* reply with "Sorry, you must tell us who you are and enter into a contractual agreement with us in order for us to send that information ", but they don't. So the only way LinkedIn or anyone else wins this case is with an ignorant judge or one who has been bought. If the defense does their job only the latter is possible.
Which gives them standing in court. It *might* not be a crime but it creates a contract that doesn't exist without it. This is far from the first time a company has tried the old "The Internet doesn't work the same way for us as it does for the rest of the world. Callsies, no take-backs!" defense.
Slashdot Mirror
It turns out other countries have laws too. Perhaps the violated New Zealand laws? Oh, that's right, We expect foreigners to obey our laws when here, but it is a one way street.
BTW - I have known what you were doing the whole time. You have mod points and have been trolling so you can mod me down each time, thinking that will shut me down. I was letting you screw yourself over, as Slashdot has heuristics to detect that. I wouldn't expect to get mod points for a LONG time :^)
Yes genius.You have enlightened me. I just found a vulnerability in every program written in C! A user could add vulnerable code and recompile and a hacker could then, if he just knew that was done and to which one of the millions of systems it was done, exploit it!
Find me one example of a service owner in any distribution that begins with a number. Now seriously, you are too fucking stupid to be on Slashdot. Go back to 4chan.
Yes, he might surrender root privilege to a *service*. He would then have to not notice a *digit*, not a period. Now all the hacker has to do is find that one system on the internet, with no way to probe for it, and target it, find the root exploit, and use it. Tell me you really aren't as stupid as you appear.
That's not correct. You directing your son to click the button is no different than you directing him to commit a crime. The culpability and responsibility rests with you. You will be held to the contract in the former case and charged with a crime in the latter. Great parenting though!
The best part? Google was far ahead, but that's not possible, because Android is limited because it has more options. The worst part? The world is full of people who will read what he wrote and believe it must be true, because ex-Google guy said it, so no need to even think about it.
I haven't been over to the firehose in a long time. Have they added the "+2 Flamebait" option yet?
.. you are even too stupid to break your pattern of replying as AC twice days after nobody is reading the thread. You are "The stupidest trol".
Really dude ....
Hi same guy posting again to try to make it sound like he isn't a lone troll!
Dude, we get it. You are a troll who doesn't understand that it was a theoretical problem with no chance of happening in production, that required a completely incompetent sysadmin to create a custom unit file with a service owner starting with a digit, which no distribution has ever done in the history of Linux. You don't have to keep stressing your incompetence. We figured that out when you couldn't create a Slashdot account. Thanks for the Lulz though!
Swift shows 2,368,939 downloads. Sure, some people download multiple times, but plenty of people is the short answer. Swype is also popular, as are others. I personally also have downloaded alternative music players and messaging apps. There is a lot of added functionality out there. K9 Mail is another great one. File Managers as well. I am on Android, but I'm sure the stock apps aren't best in class on iOS either. Apple wants developers, which they won't have if they "stock block" them.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Wait, are you telling me a former attorney is telling us all how his plan is to implement obscurity based security, and might be a liar? Didn't... see .... that ... coming.
If you mean most people can watch 720p streams in real-time from their cell phone, then you are absolutely correct.
... and, start again. If the contract says that any breach of the contract means you are no longer allowed to access the system then continuing to access it after violation of the contract almost certainly *IS* a crime. A meatspace analogy would be if you are allowed to get merchandise and pay later, then violate the contract knowingly and take product from the warehouse anyway you have committed theft.
How could you have possibly missed "burlesquing a Don"??!?
You forgot the "IANAL". I know this, because if you were you would also know about EULAs and other ways to enter into a contract, including verbal agreement.
That is exactly the situation, except add "I'm not telling you who I am, and have not entered into a contractual relationship with you." Linked in *could* reply with "Sorry, you must tell us who you are and enter into a contractual agreement with us in order for us to send that information ", but they don't. So the only way LinkedIn or anyone else wins this case is with an ignorant judge or one who has been bought. If the defense does their job only the latter is possible.
Which gives them standing in court. It *might* not be a crime but it creates a contract that doesn't exist without it. This is far from the first time a company has tried the old "The Internet doesn't work the same way for us as it does for the rest of the world. Callsies, no take-backs!" defense.
Somebody needs to invent git commands that allow that to be fixed!
I am sorry you were unable to understand what you read, or way it behaves correctly, but that's on you I'm afraid.
Stop looking in the mirror. Problem solved.
I see the idiots who haven't read the bug, or who read it and don't undèstand it, and the trolls with sock puppet accounts, yes.