Re:cfdisk /dev/sdb; mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb1
on
USB 'Dead Drops'
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I can confirm that this works - I have a usb drive w one fat partition and one ext3. The fat one contains putty, winscp and stuff like that, plus a private ssh key. The ext3 one contains another private ssh key, plus a private gpg key. Never had any problems with windows trying to do anything with the ext3 partition. Linux mounts both of them:)
Why should convicted felons lose the right to vote? What really is the point? Once the sentence is served, the convict should be considered a free man again, with the same rights and responsibilities. If that is deemed inappropriate, he should still be in prison. Why have second class citizenship?
The Linux desktop is dead. Not because Linux sucks, but because the desktop as an important arena for killer apps, is dead. All the killer apps of the latest 10 years have been web based; facebook, twitter, blogging, wikipedia, google mail, google maps, etherpad... The only usage of the desktop nowdays is as a boot loader for a web browser.
Linux, or free software in general, as a delivery platform for killer apps, however, is live and well. Google uses Linux. Wikipedia uses Linux, Facebook uses Linux.
That can be fixed by using some kind of error recovery code. But I still don't see the utility of this. It's just a ROM with random content for every device.
If all you want is random content on my machine that I send multiple times to you, it can be stored in normal undamaged flash and generated in a multitude of ways.
If all you want is data I can't change, on my general purpose machine, sorry, that's not gonna happen - I can just swap the whole chip (or even the whole machine).
if all you want is data I can't change, on my machine that you sold me, you can just use ordinary ROM.
The US and UK are common law countries, and I think that this is something that might differ between common law and civil law (so France might be up to bad stuff here).
In Sweden (a civil law country), we have freedom of evidence - anything can be presented in court as evidence, regardless of how it was obtained. If the police somehow obtains evidence illegaly (e.g. through burglary), that will be prosecuted separately. Since this second case does not affect the original court case, nor is affected by it, the police man / upper chain of command ordering the illegal act will get punished regardless of if the original case is thrown out or the defendant found guilty.
A few days ago I had to get out to a customers' site and rode a taxi there. The taxi driver was a bit talkative, and we ended up discussing his music system - an iPod connected to his car stereo, playing some online station [from random foreign country]. It got it internet connection over wifi from a base-station in his trunk. The base station in turn was hooked up using 3g gsm (the reason for the base station is that there are data-only phone plans that are way cheaper than running your data over your normal phone GSM account herabouts, and that that way he could also hook up his laptop).
In my boat I have a similar solution but with a CDMA-over 450Mhz (the old analog mobile phone frequency) based router, with about the same performance but better coverage out at sea.
Why pervert the normal radio frequencies with digital junk? They're needed for situations where all you have is that old receiver and a reception from hell and really really, badly need that weather report...
And... why the hell didn't you tell her how other people (you, that other guy) perceived her behavior? I mean, the second time when she stayed w you for two days? You know, people don't always know or understand how they are perceived, and if no-one tells them, on a friend-to-friend basis, how are they ever to learn? You should have been very specific too, pointed out things she'd said or done, and then how you interpreted that (knowing now that your interpretation was wrong), then asking her to analyze why you where mislead and why she behaved like she did.
To summarize: Why don't people just _talk_ about stuff like this??!?
He generally seems to have a clue about random stuff. Like he has actually read, and commented on, the political platform of the Swedish political party Piratpartiet. I have, as a direct concequence of his comments, made a motion about sourcecode escrow for our annual meeting this month.
By using the phrase "other peoples" you define the ownership, and any observations about people not respecting said ownership is therefor a tautology.
To apreciate the arguments of both sides, please consider a clean slate - that is, a world without any laws but the ones of physics.
Anything on top of that is a social construct, which might or might not be useful.
To examplify your fallacy: consider the opposite argument "Nothing is new under the sun, all creative work naturally includes inspiration and parts from previous works. Locking new works under a monopoly to reproduce is theft from the collective".
Now, I don't expect you to accept that argument, certainly not, but from a pure logical point of view it is as true as yours. They just happen to be incompatible. So, to derive any kind of objective truth in this matter, the source of the argument must come from outside the domains of these two statements.
Also, several international NGOs have reviewed the document and attested that it seems to be the real thing, given correspondence to previously leaked chapters, the style of writing the stakeholders and other information in the document.
If your country restricts the discussion (free speech) for its citizen of issues currently being discussed by its parliament, it can not have much of a democracy.
Democracy means holding politicians responsible towards the people for their actions and opinions.
Ok, it only works for Linux/UNIX, but.. It's called X. I was doing this using a physical X station (X 11R5, from DEC) connecting to my Linux desktop, sometime around 1998, and it was _old_ tech by then - I had been given the X station by the local uni computer club, which had gotten it from some institution way earlier...
1. Get a degree in chemistry 2. Create artificial "fear hormone" 3. Bottle hormone in spray-flask 4. Spray "on your car" outside airport (and wash car with a piece of cloth) - make sure to spray passers-by 5. ??? 6. Profit!!!!
Ahmen. I'd very much like to se an EU governed the same way e.g. Sweden is governed. That is:
A _short_ constitution (= a few pages), readable and understundable and read by the majority of the population. A directly elected assembly with all the power (no council, no comission). The constituition should only be changeable with two votes with absolute majority, with a general election in between.
As an addition to how Sweden works, the constituition should also directly govern what powers belong to the individual states.
So far, all the nasty surveilance laws have come from the council.
What I wonder is why the designers of DNS put the name in reverse? If the name had been in most-significant-first order, one could have tabcompleted it properly (using history and maybe zonetransfers of smaller zones). Also, if http had included a way to get _parsable_ directory listings, the tab-completion could have gone even further...
But, thinking of that.... many many pieces of software allows you to write URLs directly in a body of text, no tags needed, and finds the URLs and turns them into links, but searching for "://". So, what would you regexp for if all you had was a ":"? Normal text quite often does contain colons....
Or remove support for ports and use SRV records to find the port. Which would have saved us tons of work with named virtual hosts, and allowed us to run multiple SSL sites on the same IP...
"But you can't call that sexism, because that would imply that women were in charge, and making the rules."
And what is your argument against that? Women are after all the ones selecting men for the top price of life - creating a family. As men are the ones selecting women. (I disregard homosexuals here as that is about 5% of the population, and an error of 5% most likely won't destroy my argument)
Women certainly are making the rule that men needs to be macho.
The distribution of power need not be the same in all parts and functions of the society. Average power isn't important, what's important is the power distribution in the context where the sexist behavior occurs.
And sexism does not _have_ to have anything to do with paid-for-employment and industries. You can as well be a sexist at home, or there might be sexist policies in government, education, at the hospital or in NGOs.
There is no such thing as original sin. You are not guilty unless you intentionally, knowingly did it. I grew up with that shit. It made me the strange, over-sensitive person I am.
You do realize that "Linux distros" contain, well, everything you'll ever need? Ref. Ubuntu Studio:P
And the Photoshop equivalent is ZinePaint if you didn't know...:P
The question is'n what the Free Software equivalent is to some unfree software, the question is the other way around; Please tell me what the unfree equivalent to FontForge is... or to Pidgin/libpurple (well, I don't know of any with nearly that many supported protocols), or to Firefox (well, maybe Opera, IE definitely isn't), or Apache (Duh, IIS isn't), or sqlite
And by the way, windows as a server OS? Without LVM and software raid? Come on... And Solaris with ZFS is well, free nowdays...
This is only the beginning. PP has shown that change is possible, that it is possible to reach positions where you can affect actual policies:
The swedish Pirate Party has one member in the European Parliament since this summers' election. This MEP is now one of the 14 MEPs in the group working with the european commission to work out a final solution for the Telecom package.
That'd be damn hard. Python isn't made for sandboxing (google python and sandboxing, or restricted execution, and you'll see). If you did the script language=python implementation the "obvbious" way and just linked in the python interpreter into mozilla, you'd have a security hole big enough for a supertanker. There is Python support for extensions though - google PyXPCOM.
Slashdot Mirror
I can confirm that this works - I have a usb drive w one fat partition and one ext3. The fat one contains putty, winscp and stuff like that, plus a private ssh key. The ext3 one contains another private ssh key, plus a private gpg key. Never had any problems with windows trying to do anything with the ext3 partition. Linux mounts both of them :)
Hasn't that always been the case??
Why should convicted felons lose the right to vote? What really is the point? Once the sentence is served, the convict should be considered a free man again, with the same rights and responsibilities. If that is deemed inappropriate, he should still be in prison. Why have second class citizenship?
The Linux desktop is dead. Not because Linux sucks, but because the desktop as an important arena for killer apps, is dead. All the killer apps of the latest 10 years have been web based; facebook, twitter, blogging, wikipedia, google mail, google maps, etherpad... The only usage of the desktop nowdays is as a boot loader for a web browser.
Linux, or free software in general, as a delivery platform for killer apps, however, is live and well. Google uses Linux. Wikipedia uses Linux, Facebook uses Linux.
That can be fixed by using some kind of error recovery code. But I still don't see the utility of this. It's just a ROM with random content for every device.
If all you want is random content on my machine that I send multiple times to you, it can be stored in normal undamaged flash and generated in a multitude of ways.
If all you want is data I can't change, on my general purpose machine, sorry, that's not gonna happen - I can just swap the whole chip (or even the whole machine).
if all you want is data I can't change, on my machine that you sold me, you can just use ordinary ROM.
D:\>syslinux.exe ...
:P
user@mybox:~>
Fixed that for you
The US and UK are common law countries, and I think that this is something that might differ between common law and civil law (so France might be up to bad stuff here).
In Sweden (a civil law country), we have freedom of evidence - anything can be presented in court as evidence, regardless of how it was obtained. If the police somehow obtains evidence illegaly (e.g. through burglary), that will be prosecuted separately. Since this second case does not affect the original court case, nor is affected by it, the police man / upper chain of command ordering the illegal act will get punished regardless of if the original case is thrown out or the defendant found guilty.
A few days ago I had to get out to a customers' site and rode a taxi there. The taxi driver was a bit talkative, and we ended up discussing his music system - an iPod connected to his car stereo, playing some online station [from random foreign country]. It got it internet connection over wifi from a base-station in his trunk. The base station in turn was hooked up using 3g gsm (the reason for the base station is that there are data-only phone plans that are way cheaper than running your data over your normal phone GSM account herabouts, and that that way he could also hook up his laptop).
In my boat I have a similar solution but with a CDMA-over 450Mhz (the old analog mobile phone frequency) based router, with about the same performance but better coverage out at sea.
Why pervert the normal radio frequencies with digital junk? They're needed for situations where all you have is that old receiver and a reception from hell and really really, badly need that weather report...
And... why the hell didn't you tell her how other people (you, that other guy) perceived her behavior? I mean, the second time when she stayed w you for two days? You know, people don't always know or understand how they are perceived, and if no-one tells them, on a friend-to-friend basis, how are they ever to learn? You should have been very specific too, pointed out things she'd said or done, and then how you interpreted that (knowing now that your interpretation was wrong), then asking her to analyze why you where mislead and why she behaved like she did.
To summarize: Why don't people just _talk_ about stuff like this??!?
Sorry, but he seems to have this time.
He generally seems to have a clue about random stuff. Like he has actually read, and commented on, the political platform of the Swedish political party Piratpartiet. I have, as a direct concequence of his comments, made a motion about sourcecode escrow for our annual meeting this month.
By using the phrase "other peoples" you define the ownership, and any observations about people not respecting said ownership is therefor a tautology.
To apreciate the arguments of both sides, please consider a clean slate - that is, a world without any laws but the ones of physics.
Anything on top of that is a social construct, which might or might not be useful.
To examplify your fallacy: consider the opposite argument "Nothing is new under the sun, all creative work naturally includes inspiration and parts from previous works. Locking new works under a monopoly to reproduce is theft from the collective".
Now, I don't expect you to accept that argument, certainly not, but from a pure logical point of view it is as true as yours. They just happen to be incompatible. So, to derive any kind of objective truth in this matter, the source of the argument must come from outside the domains of these two statements.
Then they'd have to prove that it is a lie.
Also, several international NGOs have reviewed the document and attested that it seems to be the real thing, given correspondence to previously leaked chapters, the style of writing the stakeholders and other information in the document.
If your country restricts the discussion (free speech) for its citizen of issues currently being discussed by its parliament, it can not have much of a democracy.
Democracy means holding politicians responsible towards the people for their actions and opinions.
Ok, it only works for Linux/UNIX, but.. It's called X. I was doing this using a physical X station (X 11R5, from DEC) connecting to my Linux desktop, sometime around 1998, and it was _old_ tech by then - I had been given the X station by the local uni computer club, which had gotten it from some institution way earlier...
1. Get a degree in chemistry
2. Create artificial "fear hormone"
3. Bottle hormone in spray-flask
4. Spray "on your car" outside airport (and wash car with a piece of cloth) - make sure to spray passers-by
5. ???
6. Profit!!!!
Ahmen. I'd very much like to se an EU governed the same way e.g. Sweden is governed. That is:
A _short_ constitution (= a few pages), readable and understundable and read by the majority of the population.
A directly elected assembly with all the power (no council, no comission).
The constituition should only be changeable with two votes with absolute majority, with a general election in between.
As an addition to how Sweden works, the constituition should also directly govern what powers belong to the individual states.
So far, all the nasty surveilance laws have come from the council.
What I wonder is why the designers of DNS put the name in reverse? If the name had been in most-significant-first order, one could have tabcompleted it properly (using history and maybe zonetransfers of smaller zones). Also, if http had included a way to get _parsable_ directory listings, the tab-completion could have gone even further...
http://edu.wu<TAB>
http://edu.wustl
http://edu.wustl.wu<TAB>
http://edu.wustl.wuarchive
http://edu.wustl.wuarchive/p<TAB>l<TAB>d<TAB>f<TAB>
http://edu.wustl.wuarchive/pub/linux/distributions/fedora
But, thinking of that.... many many pieces of software allows you to write URLs directly in a body of text, no tags needed, and finds the URLs and turns them into links, but searching for "://". So, what would you regexp for if all you had was a ":"? Normal text quite often does contain colons....
Or remove support for ports and use SRV records to find the port. Which would have saved us tons of work with named virtual hosts, and allowed us to run multiple SSL sites on the same IP...
"But you can't call that sexism, because that would imply that women were in charge, and making the rules."
And what is your argument against that? Women are after all the ones selecting men for the top price of life - creating a family. As men are the ones selecting women. (I disregard homosexuals here as that is about 5% of the population, and an error of 5% most likely won't destroy my argument)
Women certainly are making the rule that men needs to be macho.
The distribution of power need not be the same in all parts and functions of the society. Average power isn't important, what's important is the power distribution in the context where the sexist behavior occurs.
And sexism does not _have_ to have anything to do with paid-for-employment and industries. You can as well be a sexist at home, or there might be sexist policies in government, education, at the hospital or in NGOs.
There is no such thing as original sin. You are not guilty unless you intentionally, knowingly did it. I grew up with that shit. It made me the strange, over-sensitive person I am.
You do realize that "Linux distros" contain, well, everything you'll ever need? Ref. Ubuntu Studio :P
And the Photoshop equivalent is ZinePaint if you didn't know... :P
The question is'n what the Free Software equivalent is to some unfree software, the question is the other way around; Please tell me what the unfree equivalent to FontForge is... or to Pidgin/libpurple (well, I don't know of any with nearly that many supported protocols), or to Firefox (well, maybe Opera, IE definitely isn't), or Apache (Duh, IIS isn't), or sqlite
And by the way, windows as a server OS? Without LVM and software raid? Come on... And Solaris with ZFS is well, free nowdays...
(Yes, I'm a troll today :)
Gives "exploding laptop" a whole new sense...
This is only the beginning. PP has shown that change is possible, that it is possible to reach positions where you can affect actual policies:
The swedish Pirate Party has one member in the European Parliament since this summers' election. This MEP is now one of the 14 MEPs in the group working with the european commission to work out a final solution for the Telecom package.
That'd be damn hard. Python isn't made for sandboxing (google python and sandboxing, or restricted execution, and you'll see). If you did the script language=python implementation the "obvbious" way and just linked in the python interpreter into mozilla, you'd have a security hole big enough for a supertanker. There is Python support for extensions though - google PyXPCOM.