The bottom line is that the DMCA (or parts of it) is unconstitutional, and we want to prove it in court.
I wonder if it is possible to for Joe Schmoe to create a trivial encryption scheme, and his friend Harry Hacker to 'break' it and publish. Then Joe sues Harry, and the whole constitutional shit can be opened up, with all parties playing their proper part, correctly.
If you take any three lines (not parallel), and shift them around without changing their slope, you can make them intersect at a point (unproven, intuitive, verrrry scientific).
So indeed, you do need to know which point to use.
Now, there are three (four?) theorems about interesecting lines in a triangle. Medians, perpendicular midpoint, all that. And it seems at first glance that all of these may have a partner in "non-negative reciprocal theorem" space.
Slashdot Mirror
I had that voice-alteration idea too. But it might not hide your accent, or grammar. How about voice-to-text?
The bottom line is that the DMCA (or parts of it) is unconstitutional, and we want to prove it in court.
I wonder if it is possible to for Joe Schmoe to create a trivial encryption scheme, and his friend Harry Hacker to 'break' it and publish. Then Joe sues Harry, and the whole constitutional shit can be opened up, with all parties playing their proper part, correctly.
Any objections?
If you take any three lines (not parallel), and shift them around without changing their slope, you can make them intersect at a point (unproven, intuitive, verrrry scientific).
So indeed, you do need to know which point to use.
Now, there are three (four?) theorems about interesecting lines in a triangle. Medians, perpendicular midpoint, all that. And it seems at first glance that all of these may have a partner in "non-negative reciprocal theorem" space.
Anyone with time on their hands?
Read: not only can you not trust the next release of windoze, you won't be able to trust it for "years and years." ;o)