Actually, I was thinking more about occupational exposure to chemicals which are also legal e.g; benzene or formaldehye, which happen to be a components of tobacco smoke.
So a factory owner should be allowed to run a shop that's not in compliance with OSHA regulations as long as it's his intention do so, and all of his employees "agree" to it? Brilliant!
But then they won't have an incentive to get a Real ID!
Seriously though, like so many *privileges* driving has been ingrained as a constitutional right in the minds of many.
"How am I supposed to get to work? And the movies? And..." Well fuck Bob, what made you think it was a good idea to live three hours from everything that you actually want access to?
No soup for you!
(I think that's enough conflation of topics for now)
But seriously, I *really* wish people would stop citing Katrina as evidence of global warming; I know it's a long shot, given just who actually does so. New Orleans was destined to be flooded. Fucking-A man, get it through your thick skulls: That's what happens when you build a city on sinking ground (pumped-out swamp) between three bodies of water in a hurricane-prone floodplain. Especially when the surrounding infrastructure is poorly conceived and unmaintained.
You're assuming that it was a freely floating ice cube with a tether, as opposed to the possibility that it was (in part) a structural extension protruding from the continent i.e; part of its load was not borne by the sea. This article seems to support the latter: http://antarcticsun.usap.gov/oldissues2002-2003/Su n102702/icebergs.html
The debate does not "keep renaming itself." Climate change is an ambiguous term chosen by neo-cons to reframe global warming (a more accurate description) as precisely what this article portrays: more days to eat ice cream, neglecting the fewer days to ski. They're notorious for clouding the minds of the masses with such tactics, compare "partial birth abortion" vs. "late-term abortion." Frank Lutz and his ilk are at best amoral twits, and at worst evil incarnate.
You need to learn a bit more before you rant about such things. It's not hard. Try reading a variety of things, or maybe watching PBS. In fact, there was an excellent (misnamed) series "America at a Crossroads" about Islam recently. It addressed a variety of issues around modern funamentalist Islam including "close mindedness" (which ain't so dissimilar from what you are advocating in your bashing of multi-culturalism and tolerance).
"Freedom of speach doesn't include the rights to criticise, inflame, insult or anything else..." Like fun it doesn't. There are very few things it does not cover, and the exclusions are fairly basic such as inciting to riot, "Kill the president!"...
Now just to get the point across: Fuck Jehovah, Fuck Allah, Fuck Buddah, Fuck Moses and Fuck Xenu too.
"No better"? how about "can provide the same efficiency gains"? Surely you could slap this on a hybrid and the decked out hybrid would be better than the decked out Camaro.
Trademark and copyright are hardly the same thing. You could go and make your own conception of an MTA map and you would be well within your rights. Now, whether or not state and municipal agencies *ought* to restrict access and reuse of goods produced in the public interest is another matter.
As opposed to what *some* journalists do. Yes, there are rather bloggery columnists. But there are also those who practice what might be described as proper journalism: investigative reporting, trying to explain "complicated" things to the hoi polloi...
No, in today's vernacular a blogger is someone whom plays at being a journalist by having a public diary and parroting the thoughts and ideas of others.
Oh wow, so maybe there were two fires Tuesday (as per my earlier post) because there was smoke in the same area (in the tunnels) at 3PM that day.
I also what there is to burn in that area, Longfellow is stone and they say "roof of the bridge", but it's not exactly something you'd see in Madison County. The Herald gives a slightly better idea of the scene.
And your fucking point? This is a tech news site. Information about stupid drivers, and the consequences for those who can't be bothered to take BART or live someplace where they have a saner commute is covered by the usual news outlets. Yes, even all the way over on the other coast we saw stories about the big bad broken bridge, "worst thing since Loma Prieda" (which I was around for). So what? Yeah, okay. We probably only saw the pieces because it happened before it was revealed some dumb football player for "New England" (not MA) was wearing the hat for an NYC baseball team and not Boston's. Nevertheless, it's not tech news, and it's not especially notable. Get over yourself.
I'd actually wager that it started much earlier. I switched from the Green Line to Red at Park Street around 3:00 on Tuesday and there was quite a lot of smoke coming from the outbound end of the tunnel. It wasn't clear what it was, but apparently nobody reported it (including the conductors who have radios). My guess is because they didn't want to bring the system to halt over false alrams "oh noes! smokes! It's anthrax!"
Yeah yeah, so I learned from a coworker in environmental law recently. What's your point? Lawyers can't even write intelligible English, so why should I care that they can't be bothered to keep uo with conventions that actually happen to be relevant?
USSC could expand to any number of things, and only through context is it "apparent" what the author meant. USSC also looks a lot like USMC. (VERA does not have SCOTUS but if you give it USSC it gives you USMC
USSR and USSS)
Q: What do you call a thousand lawyers at the bottom of the sea? A: A good start.
>And I must say, I am amazed at this attempt to diss The WBR. He's the freakin fovnder of the institvte. What are you smoking? Read the thread man, I'm not the OP.
You seem to have missed the point. The light may be off, but the switch is itself is still on. Your TV and computer aren't off, they're actually sleeping. There's no way around it: If the device has to be able to receive signals or make decisions, it's drawing current.
I'm not sure how the hell you arrive at "most people." Most nuclear eningeers and "old guard" maybe. Firstly, switching from one non-renewable to another isn't that bright. Second, fission isn't as much of a win with respect to carbon as you think. There's a hell of a lot of wasted energy in how most stations operate, as well as a lot of embodied energy in the station itself. I'm not sure how metric shitloads of high and low-level wastes is less bad than the occasional (non-endangered) bird kill, or well placed low-head hydro, etc.
If it's not deep pile. Obviously aspirating the mercury coated glass into a cloth filter with lots of high speed air moving across it isn't such a good idea. In general though, these tend to break into large enough pieces that you can pick most of them up safely once you've aired out the room a bit.
Slashdot Mirror
s/(?<=)hy/d/
Actually, I was thinking more about occupational exposure to chemicals which are also legal
e.g; benzene or formaldehye, which happen to be a components of tobacco smoke.
So a factory owner should be allowed to run a shop that's not in compliance with OSHA
regulations as long as it's his intention do so, and all of his employees "agree" to it?
Brilliant!
But then they won't have an incentive to get a Real ID!
Seriously though, like so many *privileges* driving has
been ingrained as a constitutional right in the minds of many.
"How am I supposed to get to work? And the movies? And..."
Well fuck Bob, what made you think it was a good idea to live
three hours from everything that you actually want access to?
No soup for you!
(I think that's enough conflation of topics for now)
How the hell is this OT? Is it novel? No, but it ain't OT.
In trailers that they'll have to buy.
But seriously, I *really* wish people would stop citing Katrina as evidence of global warming;
I know it's a long shot, given just who actually does so. New Orleans was destined to be flooded.
Fucking-A man, get it through your thick skulls: That's what happens when you build a city on
sinking ground (pumped-out swamp) between three bodies of water in a hurricane-prone floodplain.
Especially when the surrounding infrastructure is poorly conceived and unmaintained.
You're assuming that it was a freely floating ice cube with a tether, as opposed to the possibility that it wasu n102702/icebergs.html
(in part) a structural extension protruding from the continent i.e; part of its load was not borne by the sea.
This article seems to support the latter: http://antarcticsun.usap.gov/oldissues2002-2003/S
The debate does not "keep renaming itself." Climate change is an ambiguous term chosen by neo-cons to reframe
global warming (a more accurate description) as precisely what this article portrays: more days to eat ice
cream, neglecting the fewer days to ski. They're notorious for clouding the minds of the masses with such
tactics, compare "partial birth abortion" vs. "late-term abortion." Frank Lutz and his ilk are at best
amoral twits, and at worst evil incarnate.
You've got your labels on backwards.
You need to learn a bit more before you rant about such things. It's not hard. Try reading a variety of things,
t h_without_fear.html
or maybe watching PBS. In fact, there was an excellent (misnamed) series "America at a Crossroads" about Islam
recently. It addressed a variety of issues around modern funamentalist Islam including "close mindedness"
(which ain't so dissimilar from what you are advocating in your bashing of multi-culturalism and tolerance).
http://www.pbs.org/weta/crossroads/ especially http://www.pbs.org/weta/crossroads/about/show_fai
"Freedom of speach doesn't include the rights to criticise, inflame, insult or anything else..."
Like fun it doesn't. There are very few things it does not cover, and the exclusions are fairly basic such as
inciting to riot, "Kill the president!"...
Now just to get the point across: Fuck Jehovah, Fuck Allah, Fuck Buddah, Fuck Moses and Fuck Xenu too.
"No better"? how about "can provide the same efficiency gains"? Surely you could slap
this on a hybrid and the decked out hybrid would be better than the decked out Camaro.
Trademark and copyright are hardly the same thing. You could go and make your own
conception of an MTA map and you would be well within your rights. Now, whether or
not state and municipal agencies *ought* to restrict access and reuse of goods
produced in the public interest is another matter.
As opposed to what *some* journalists do. Yes, there are rather bloggery columnists.
But there are also those who practice what might be described as proper journalism:
investigative reporting, trying to explain "complicated" things to the hoi polloi...
No, in today's vernacular a blogger is someone whom plays at being a journalist
by having a public diary and parroting the thoughts and ideas of others.
I think you have your sort order reversed.
Oh wow, so maybe there were two fires Tuesday (as per my earlier post) because there
was smoke in the same area (in the tunnels) at 3PM that day.
I also what there is to burn in that area, Longfellow is stone and they say
"roof of the bridge", but it's not exactly something you'd see in Madison County.
The Herald gives a slightly better idea of the scene.
And your fucking point? This is a tech news site. Information about stupid drivers,
and the consequences for those who can't be bothered to take BART or live someplace
where they have a saner commute is covered by the usual news outlets. Yes, even all
the way over on the other coast we saw stories about the big bad broken bridge,
"worst thing since Loma Prieda" (which I was around for). So what? Yeah, okay. We
probably only saw the pieces because it happened before it was revealed some dumb
football player for "New England" (not MA) was wearing the hat for an NYC baseball
team and not Boston's. Nevertheless, it's not tech news, and it's not especially
notable. Get over yourself.
I'd actually wager that it started much earlier. I switched from the Green Line to Red
at Park Street around 3:00 on Tuesday and there was quite a lot of smoke coming from
the outbound end of the tunnel. It wasn't clear what it was, but apparently nobody
reported it (including the conductors who have radios). My guess is because they didn't
want to bring the system to halt over false alrams "oh noes! smokes! It's anthrax!"
Yeah yeah, so I learned from a coworker in environmental law recently.
What's your point? Lawyers can't even write intelligible English,
so why should I care that they can't be bothered to keep uo with
conventions that actually happen to be relevant?
USSC could expand to any number of things, and only through context is
it "apparent" what the author meant. USSC also looks a lot like USMC.
(VERA does not have SCOTUS but if you give it USSC it gives you USMC
USSR and USSS)
Q: What do you call a thousand lawyers at the bottom of the sea?
A: A good start.
Heh, I was just coming to say the same thing.
>And I must say, I am amazed at this attempt to diss The WBR. He's the freakin fovnder of the institvte.
What are you smoking? Read the thread man, I'm not the OP.
You seem to have missed the point. The light may be off, but the switch is itself is still on.
Your TV and computer aren't off, they're actually sleeping. There's no way around it: If the
device has to be able to receive signals or make decisions, it's drawing current.
I'm not sure how the hell you arrive at "most people." Most nuclear eningeers and "old guard" maybe.
Firstly, switching from one non-renewable to another isn't that bright. Second, fission isn't as much
of a win with respect to carbon as you think. There's a hell of a lot of wasted energy in how most
stations operate, as well as a lot of embodied energy in the station itself. I'm not sure how metric shitloads of high and low-level wastes is less bad than the occasional (non-endangered) bird kill,
or well placed low-head hydro, etc.
If it's not deep pile. Obviously aspirating the mercury coated glass into a cloth filter with lots
of high speed air moving across it isn't such a good idea. In general though, these tend to break
into large enough pieces that you can pick most of them up safely once you've aired out the room a
bit.
Actually, mercury most affects our health (and that of other beings) in aquatic ecosystems once it
settles out of the air and is methylized.