There are limits.Its no good, when A punched B in the face, and quickly become anonymous.
Racial discrimination can be tolerated when its personal, but not when its being advocated.
the advocator should not evade its responsibility.
I2P should be a balance and the absolute anonymity should not and will not ever exist.
Within I2P, there is no need for HTTPS, as all traffic is encrypted end-to-end.
Sorry, I had to laugh a bit there. That's VERY naive. In anonymizing networks, HTTPS is the only thing that protects you from possibly corrupt exit nodes by encrypting the traffic between your browser and the destination webserver. To claim I2P doesn't need HTTPS support is misleading or at least ill-phrased.
As far as I know, I2P supports HTTPS tunneling.
It's just that the guy kind enough to run a https-enabled outproxy in I2P hasn't present yet.
Slashdot Mirror
There are limits.Its no good, when A punched B in the face, and quickly become anonymous. Racial discrimination can be tolerated when its personal, but not when its being advocated. the advocator should not evade its responsibility. I2P should be a balance and the absolute anonymity should not and will not ever exist.
From their FAQ:
Sorry, I had to laugh a bit there. That's VERY naive. In anonymizing networks, HTTPS is the only thing that protects you from possibly corrupt exit nodes by encrypting the traffic between your browser and the destination webserver. To claim I2P doesn't need HTTPS support is misleading or at least ill-phrased.
As far as I know, I2P supports HTTPS tunneling. It's just that the guy kind enough to run a https-enabled outproxy in I2P hasn't present yet.