Yeah that's happening to me too. I think my character is level 58 or so, all major quests completed including Dawnguard, and I'm just going through the miscellaneous quest list looking for things to do.
I always find it interesting that a regime we like has "officials" and a regime we don't like has "henchmen."
How about the fact that a country that we're friends with has a government, and the others have regimes? I don't think I've ever seen a US newspaper talking about the Tony Blair regime, or the Francois Hollande regime.
A semiautomatic shotgun reloads just fine. I can pop off all 3 rounds in a couple seconds, easily, just like with a semiautomatic rifle. If I remove the plug then I can pack in several more rounds. Shutguns are a great home defense weapon. I doubt he has a bolt action.410 sitting there.
I figure that if it's 8 times farther than the moon then hopefully it will be in view for a while and we can get some decent shots of it, but I haven't seen any estimates.
I didn't see it in the article, but how long is the event supposed to last? Are we going to be able to resolve anything other than a spot of light moving across the sky?
How do you inject the malware? They don't need to infect everyone and build a map, all they needed to do was seize the server and get the database. They actually had a copy of the database before they even arrested him. I don't see any evidence to suggest that they exploited a vulnerability in the tor browser to spew malware all over the place. Where is an analysis of that malware? Has it gone undetected?
SilkRoad was taken down by exploiting a vuln in the TOR browser and planting malware on users' computers -- maybe this is law enforcement's new trick?
Are you sure about that? I thought it was because they traced the owner's account to a previous post he made when he was getting the thing set up where he included his personal email address.
That's fantastic, truly. I wonder how Monseigneur Georges Lemaitre would feel if he found out that in 2014 that religious groups were actively seeking to have sound science removed from educational materials in favor of religion.
I'll forgive Mr. Newton for that, because he wasn't aware of things like plate tectonics, vulcanology, radiometric dating, etc.
but your logic that no student with a religious upbringing would ever be curious enough about the world to want to study science is faulty.
I understand that it's faulty, it wasn't entirely serious, but I do think that there are certain fields that a strong believer wouldn't find any reason to study. An extreme view of that would even include something like biology or astronomy. If someone thought that their body or the earth or whatever was god's design and that's it, why bother studying it? Why bother to develop a cure for a disease if the disease is part of god's plan? Why bother to study the stars if everything that's important is on this planet?
So, if a State chooses to not teach their children what is accepted in the scientific community, should this be their prerogative? At the same time, a decade later, when their students do not fair well at college, or professionally, they should be comfortable with that aspect to their decisions.
Really now, what do you think the chances are that someone who grew up believing that the planet is 6,000 years old would choose a career in science? I'm all for colleges and universities requiring additional science tests for students from states that teach creationism, but I seriously doubt that a large chunk of those kids are going to decide that science is what they want to do with their lives. Unless they accidentally choose a scientific major thinking that they're going to learn about religion.
One of the best things that Bill Nye said in the recent debate was to encourage people to choose careers in science, and warning that the rash of anti-rationalism is going to have very negative consequences for the US. Those words might have fallen on deaf ears at the creationism museum in Kentucky, but it's the right idea.
Or better yet, Jon Hamm increases his army of embarrassed, out of context, blackmailed and possibly manipulated 'scientists' to on video for his next disastrous debate.
"Early this decade" is not the same as "last decade". The impact happened between 2010 and 2012. That could make it less than 2 years old. On a geologic scale, that is most definitely "new". It's certainly not "old".
It's not though. As stated, many modern uses of missiles have been non-targeted blanket strikes to just randomly destroy buildings or people. That goes for Palestinian strikes, for Al-Qaeda in Iraq just trying to blow up a few things in U.S. bases (well OK mostly they were using mortars and not rockets, but the point is the same and mortars get closer to being rockets all the time).
You're confusing your terms, rockets and missiles are not the same thing, particularly in military terms. The difference is guidance, rockets are not guided. Palestinians are firing rockets (essentially rocket-propelled mortars), not missiles. Therefore, all missiles by definition are for targeted strikes. Rockets are just point and shoot weapons. The Palestinians are trying to field a low-tech version of rocket artillery.
Well, "if implemented properly", any missile defense system would be adequate against any missile. But yeah, if they aren't putting money into developing anti-projectile lasers, then they're probably wasting time and money. Lasers could even protect against artillery or tank shells. If the army could field a tank that has a laser defense system then it would pretty much rule the battlefield, until it meets an energy weapon. Something like this would make a tank pretty unstoppable if it could shoot down other tank rounds. This one looks pretty interesting too, that video reminds me of the weapons command briefings in Freespace 2.
Also how much of a payload can one missile really carry? Not much, good only for targeted strikes.
I think a targeted strike would be the specific purpose of a hypersonic missile, or really any missile for that matter. It's probably also fair to assume that any nation with the capability of developing and fielding a hypersonic missile can also stick a nuclear warhead on it.
I think the downmodding started by legit users once they posted their reply. Whether their reply will end up being worth anything is another issue, but if they've heard the outcry (and it seems like they have), there's no reason to continue bitching until they come back with their new plan.
Yeah, we're not dealing with even a minimally competent "developer" here. Judging from the rest of the thread, he's not the exception.
This is true. If the guy is only using jQuery for ajax functionality, well, why would you do that? Is he targeting IE6? Every browser released in the last 10 years supports XMLHttpRequest, why not just use that? Is the status callback function too hard to figure out? Why bring in all of jQuery's bloat just for ajax? Why not write a quick little ajax function? If he just really wants to use a framework, I would suggest the Vanilla-JS framework, it's really not that difficult to learn and use. And it's really fast.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah that's happening to me too. I think my character is level 58 or so, all major quests completed including Dawnguard, and I'm just going through the miscellaneous quest list looking for things to do.
Would the limo really be moving fast enough to provide the angular velocity necessary to achieve orbit?
I always find it interesting that a regime we like has "officials" and a regime we don't like has "henchmen."
How about the fact that a country that we're friends with has a government, and the others have regimes? I don't think I've ever seen a US newspaper talking about the Tony Blair regime, or the Francois Hollande regime.
Just wait until he finds out that this is going on his permanent record.
a slow loading plaftorm
A semiautomatic shotgun reloads just fine. I can pop off all 3 rounds in a couple seconds, easily, just like with a semiautomatic rifle. If I remove the plug then I can pack in several more rounds. Shutguns are a great home defense weapon. I doubt he has a bolt action .410 sitting there.
I figure that if it's 8 times farther than the moon then hopefully it will be in view for a while and we can get some decent shots of it, but I haven't seen any estimates.
I didn't see it in the article, but how long is the event supposed to last? Are we going to be able to resolve anything other than a spot of light moving across the sky?
Voyager just flew by the planets. A mission specifically to them would see a probe orbiting them for a while to study the planets and moons in depth.
I wouldn't really call that a fake advertisement. It sure is an actual advertisement for Audi. It didn't come from Audi, though.
Belkin purchased Linksys from Cisco last year.
Man, I don't think I was aware of that. So now I have to add Linksys to my list of brands to never purchase? This is getting too confusing.
How do you inject the malware? They don't need to infect everyone and build a map, all they needed to do was seize the server and get the database. They actually had a copy of the database before they even arrested him. I don't see any evidence to suggest that they exploited a vulnerability in the tor browser to spew malware all over the place. Where is an analysis of that malware? Has it gone undetected?
That might explain why it was hosted in Germany.
SilkRoad was taken down by exploiting a vuln in the TOR browser and planting malware on users' computers -- maybe this is law enforcement's new trick?
Are you sure about that? I thought it was because they traced the owner's account to a previous post he made when he was getting the thing set up where he included his personal email address.
Because videos are big.
That's fantastic, truly. I wonder how Monseigneur Georges Lemaitre would feel if he found out that in 2014 that religious groups were actively seeking to have sound science removed from educational materials in favor of religion.
Well, Isaac Newton did
I'll forgive Mr. Newton for that, because he wasn't aware of things like plate tectonics, vulcanology, radiometric dating, etc.
but your logic that no student with a religious upbringing would ever be curious enough about the world to want to study science is faulty.
I understand that it's faulty, it wasn't entirely serious, but I do think that there are certain fields that a strong believer wouldn't find any reason to study. An extreme view of that would even include something like biology or astronomy. If someone thought that their body or the earth or whatever was god's design and that's it, why bother studying it? Why bother to develop a cure for a disease if the disease is part of god's plan? Why bother to study the stars if everything that's important is on this planet?
So, if a State chooses to not teach their children what is accepted in the scientific community, should this be their prerogative? At the same time, a decade later, when their students do not fair well at college, or professionally, they should be comfortable with that aspect to their decisions.
Really now, what do you think the chances are that someone who grew up believing that the planet is 6,000 years old would choose a career in science? I'm all for colleges and universities requiring additional science tests for students from states that teach creationism, but I seriously doubt that a large chunk of those kids are going to decide that science is what they want to do with their lives. Unless they accidentally choose a scientific major thinking that they're going to learn about religion.
One of the best things that Bill Nye said in the recent debate was to encourage people to choose careers in science, and warning that the rash of anti-rationalism is going to have very negative consequences for the US. Those words might have fallen on deaf ears at the creationism museum in Kentucky, but it's the right idea.
Or better yet, Jon Hamm increases his army of embarrassed, out of context, blackmailed and possibly manipulated 'scientists' to on video for his next disastrous debate.
You saw a debate featuring a guy known for being well-hung? Are you sure it wasn't John Hamm? Or the other John Hamm? Perhaps Ken Ham?
I don't read it that way at all. This sounds more like NASA is trying to find a company to build some lunar mining robots for NASA to use.
"Early this decade" is not the same as "last decade". The impact happened between 2010 and 2012. That could make it less than 2 years old. On a geologic scale, that is most definitely "new". It's certainly not "old".
It's not though. As stated, many modern uses of missiles have been non-targeted blanket strikes to just randomly destroy buildings or people. That goes for Palestinian strikes, for Al-Qaeda in Iraq just trying to blow up a few things in U.S. bases (well OK mostly they were using mortars and not rockets, but the point is the same and mortars get closer to being rockets all the time).
You're confusing your terms, rockets and missiles are not the same thing, particularly in military terms. The difference is guidance, rockets are not guided. Palestinians are firing rockets (essentially rocket-propelled mortars), not missiles. Therefore, all missiles by definition are for targeted strikes. Rockets are just point and shoot weapons. The Palestinians are trying to field a low-tech version of rocket artillery.
Well, "if implemented properly", any missile defense system would be adequate against any missile. But yeah, if they aren't putting money into developing anti-projectile lasers, then they're probably wasting time and money. Lasers could even protect against artillery or tank shells. If the army could field a tank that has a laser defense system then it would pretty much rule the battlefield, until it meets an energy weapon. Something like this would make a tank pretty unstoppable if it could shoot down other tank rounds. This one looks pretty interesting too, that video reminds me of the weapons command briefings in Freespace 2.
Also how much of a payload can one missile really carry? Not much, good only for targeted strikes.
I think a targeted strike would be the specific purpose of a hypersonic missile, or really any missile for that matter. It's probably also fair to assume that any nation with the capability of developing and fielding a hypersonic missile can also stick a nuclear warhead on it.
I think the downmodding started by legit users once they posted their reply. Whether their reply will end up being worth anything is another issue, but if they've heard the outcry (and it seems like they have), there's no reason to continue bitching until they come back with their new plan.
Yeah, we're not dealing with even a minimally competent "developer" here. Judging from the rest of the thread, he's not the exception.
This is true. If the guy is only using jQuery for ajax functionality, well, why would you do that? Is he targeting IE6? Every browser released in the last 10 years supports XMLHttpRequest, why not just use that? Is the status callback function too hard to figure out? Why bring in all of jQuery's bloat just for ajax? Why not write a quick little ajax function? If he just really wants to use a framework, I would suggest the Vanilla-JS framework, it's really not that difficult to learn and use. And it's really fast.