Slashdot Mirror


User: plut4rch

plut4rch's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
30
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 30

  1. Bluetooth? on Top 10 Disappointing Technologies · · Score: 1

    "Everything is better with Bluetooth." -Dr Sheldon Cooper

  2. Re:So what the hell is it? on Interview With UIzard Creator Ryu Sunt-tae · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Something nobody has heard of."

  3. Re:So does this mean on Measuring the User For CPU Frequency Scaling · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like a Turbo button but with your mind!

  4. Re:No thanks on For Building DIY Droids, It Helps to Live In Japan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Guess you'll have to move along.

  5. Re:Not involving tritium? on Ultra-Dense Deuterium Produced · · Score: 1

    That is true. However, most of the Tritium produced in the DD reaction would be burned off before leaving the reactor. This means that the advanced Tritium handling facilities of JET, for example are not required. This does make it 'cleaner' in a way, and means that the tritium is not 'involved' in the reaction per se - it kinda... appears in the reaction and most of it goes away afterwards. I think this is what is being implied here - no tritium is needed to start the reaction, nor are the handling facilities needed. DD is much cheaper than a DT reaction. However, DT is better for power production, and commercial fusion reactors will probably use the DT fuel mix. ITER will be running DT, and JET set its record with a DT mix, and will probably run more DT experiments in the future. Most reactors run DD however, because of its cost advantages, it's a little cleaner due to the lack of tritium handling required, and is useful for simulations.