on less than one gallon of fuel or electric equivalent
This is obviously neglecting the energy required for the initial charge of the batteries. A jet would fare much better if you didn't count the fuel in it's tank when it took off.
IIRC, CFCs were mostly notorious for their longevity in terms of causing damage. Whereas there exist active [carbon|water|etc] cycles for ICE emissions.
But that's a minor point anyways. The big points are:
A) The environmental scientists, EPA, and co are much much much more knowledgeable than us slashdot plebs, so armchair internet criticism is kinda weak to say in the least.
B) In reality, issues with pollution are a "death by 1000 cuts" kind of thing. So any one cut [ie source] is probably "insignificant", but they still need to be dealt with. If only to keep the "death by 1000 cuts" from happening. Think tragedy of the commons, stuff like that.
That's false, even from a basic economics approach. Tax is a burden that's shared between suppliers and consumers and proportioned based on supply and demand elasticity.
Yeah. Take, for instance, the rational numbers and real numbers. Rational numbers are countable infinite, while reals are uncountable infinite. Uncountable infinite sets tend to be larger than countable sets by a factor of about 3-4, although it's gone down a little bit recently since the recession.
lol, I'm a mac user but even I'll never claim that they're the most secure OS. IIRC Apple has an even more horrible track record of addressing bugs than MS.
Of course, the best (and hardest to achieve) security comes from smart vigilant system admin and smart users. The best operating systems can do is to make their work easier and not undercut their efforts (with serious vulnerabilities, autoplay, weak permissions, etc).
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, but if multiple satellites point at the sun then it still gets interference.
What if they completed the hand of nod?
on less than one gallon of fuel or electric equivalent
This is obviously neglecting the energy required for the initial charge of the batteries. A jet would fare much better if you didn't count the fuel in it's tank when it took off.
What, are you going to get a food std or something? :P
Heh, but new bridges don't have to worry about backwards compatibility. :P
Post - gress - skwull. Ain't that hard :P . At least they didn't name it after some obscure dodecasyllabic Aztec god.
Summed up in short: lol cats will be around for a very, very, very long time
Well if your OS is a browser . . . :P
Actually, I would be the first, but it was a complex number so it didn't count. Next time I'll stick to ordered fields, I suppose.
Actually, not anymore. The FDA has recently announced that Swedes are toxic if ingested or inhaled, with an LD50 of 1.3 and 8.9 respectively.
IIRC, CFCs were mostly notorious for their longevity in terms of causing damage. Whereas there exist active [carbon|water|etc] cycles for ICE emissions.
But that's a minor point anyways. The big points are:
A) The environmental scientists, EPA, and co are much much much more knowledgeable than us slashdot plebs, so armchair internet criticism is kinda weak to say in the least.
B) In reality, issues with pollution are a "death by 1000 cuts" kind of thing. So any one cut [ie source] is probably "insignificant", but they still need to be dealt with. If only to keep the "death by 1000 cuts" from happening. Think tragedy of the commons, stuff like that.
Why would you want to cache your RAM to an SSD? :P
Oh, and no love for the robots that risk their lives in place of the soldiers? Jerk.
qbasic runs in windows too.
Hah, protons are so 3 minutes ago. I'm waiting for one that uses neutrons.
That's false, even from a basic economics approach. Tax is a burden that's shared between suppliers and consumers and proportioned based on supply and demand elasticity.
Maybe because this isn't an elevator, and I'll be damned if I'm sharing my precious coffee with anybody. :D
Yeah. Take, for instance, the rational numbers and real numbers. Rational numbers are countable infinite, while reals are uncountable infinite. Uncountable infinite sets tend to be larger than countable sets by a factor of about 3-4, although it's gone down a little bit recently since the recession.
Okay, pretend it says:
:D
"It's so simple a c programmer could do it"
If you don't use it during that time, it will* :D
*(Though I do remember somebody saying that extreme amounts of time between use will actually cause harm to the disk the next time it's used)
Github?
The point with ken's trick was that it's possible to throw in changes that are not *persistent* in the source code.
lol, I'm a mac user but even I'll never claim that they're the most secure OS. IIRC Apple has an even more horrible track record of addressing bugs than MS.
Of course, the best (and hardest to achieve) security comes from smart vigilant system admin and smart users. The best operating systems can do is to make their work easier and not undercut their efforts (with serious vulnerabilities, autoplay, weak permissions, etc).
There's something deeply disturbed in how nature works.
I find the whole matter irrational.