Microsoft supposes people will simply all jump to Bing because a few websites don't get indexed by Google.
What it probably didn't notice, is that nobody really realizes this, and just goes to another news website the search pops up instead. To me it just seems that both Murdoch and Microsoft are loosing cash. I'm pretty happy with this.
The title should be: "Ex-Astronaut Developing Plasma Rocket To Make Money" and Summary: "[Insert summary here]. This could help revitalize NASA if successful."
EA's games could cost 25% of their actual price, if she made no advertisements. Wouldn't much more people be interested in giving out just a few bucks (a fraction of the cost today) for high quality games? I mean, if they at least sold the same amount of copies, they would have _more_ profit! How much they rely on distracte people reading outdoors then game news in newspapers/magazines?
DOH everyone knows they don't wait the same, but you are forgetting about the magnetic effect. 1's are magnets pointed up and 0 pointed down. Thus 0s actually weight more because of earth's magnetic field. Aha.
Oh thats an easy one... it's 0 - the mass of the least massive particle(s). The least energy is just as easy if you understand anything of quantum mechanics, not information theory: the least energy you can have a a quanta, so the least energy is Plank's Constant x 8 quadrillion (8 petabits), which is aproximately 8 eV s, which is somewhat a pretty number;).
However, another question arises: how do you store light? You sure need a medium for it to be usable, and the question is how much that medium weights...
Moreover, I don't even kow if we currently have technology for storing light. First thing comes to mind are 2 paralel mirrors perfectly aligned, but there is thermal loss and imperfections loss there.
Another crazy thing that comes to mind are black holes: then can trap light in 'orbit' around it... which is lossless - problem solved. Now I just need a black hole.
Like this is the only way to protect emails published on the web from spambots...
I could list a few, but my favourite is to publish a well done (not easily broken) captcha img in some host I have easy acess to.
If I want I can just delete that image, or add an expiration timers so that after a few days that image won't show up anymore.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh really, mister Tzu?
Microsoft supposes people will simply all jump to Bing because a few websites don't get indexed by Google.
What it probably didn't notice, is that nobody really realizes this, and just goes to another news website the search pops up instead. To me it just seems that both Murdoch and Microsoft are loosing cash. I'm pretty happy with this.
Not only the summary is incorrect.
The title should be:
"Ex-Astronaut Developing Plasma Rocket To Make Money"
and Summary:
"[Insert summary here]. This could help revitalize NASA if successful."
Though I recognize wouldn't be so appealing.
EA's games could cost 25% of their actual price, if she made no advertisements. Wouldn't much more people be interested in giving out just a few bucks (a fraction of the cost today) for high quality games? I mean, if they at least sold the same amount of copies, they would have _more_ profit! How much they rely on distracte people reading outdoors then game news in newspapers/magazines?
Never heard of osmotic pressure? It's not that complicated. (O.P. = iMRT) Just convert that pressure into electric energy...
please read monopole's post \/
DOH everyone knows they don't wait the same, but you are forgetting about the magnetic effect. 1's are magnets pointed up and 0 pointed down. Thus 0s actually weight more because of earth's magnetic field. Aha.
Oh thats an easy one... it's 0 - the mass of the least massive particle(s). The least energy is just as easy if you understand anything of quantum mechanics, not information theory: the least energy you can have a a quanta, so the least energy is Plank's Constant x 8 quadrillion (8 petabits), which is aproximately 8 eV s, which is somewhat a pretty number ;).
However, another question arises: how do you store light? You sure need a medium for it to be usable, and the question is how much that medium weights...
Moreover, I don't even kow if we currently have technology for storing light. First thing comes to mind are 2 paralel mirrors perfectly aligned, but there is thermal loss and imperfections loss there.
Another crazy thing that comes to mind are black holes: then can trap light in 'orbit' around it... which is lossless - problem solved. Now I just need a black hole.
Like this is the only way to protect emails published on the web from spambots... I could list a few, but my favourite is to publish a well done (not easily broken) captcha img in some host I have easy acess to. If I want I can just delete that image, or add an expiration timers so that after a few days that image won't show up anymore.