Yeah, that's the reason for his allergy too: his brain has developed an ability to interpret the data from the radio waves. That much BS will make just about anyone sick;-)
Terrible as in "I don't like it" or as in "there's something wrong with the page"? I'm just wondering, because I'm also using Firefox 3.5 and I think the page looks great; not only is it pretty, but it's also nicely readable.
That's actually not rare at all. For example Firefox went (briefly) to 0.10 after the 0.9 series. It merely depends on whether you think of the version as a decimal number with a fraction or as two (or more) numbers, separated by a dot.
Slashdot Mirror
Wait... are you saying that Windows is the socialist operating system?
Yeah, that's the reason for his allergy too: his brain has developed an ability to interpret the data from the radio waves. That much BS will make just about anyone sick ;-)
Works just fine for me on Firefox 3.5 running on Ubuntu 9.04.
Considering that I've got none of those fonts installed on my computer, I'd say "yes" ;)
Terrible as in "I don't like it" or as in "there's something wrong with the page"? I'm just wondering, because I'm also using Firefox 3.5 and I think the page looks great; not only is it pretty, but it's also nicely readable.
That's actually not rare at all. For example Firefox went (briefly) to 0.10 after the 0.9 series. It merely depends on whether you think of the version as a decimal number with a fraction or as two (or more) numbers, separated by a dot.