I am not a mathematician, I tried to check what is a power law.
But I have found that :
"Vladimir Arnold gave the catastrophes the ADE classification, due to a deep connection with simple Lie groups."
It still seems meaningless to me.
... or intend to be.
If digitizing books is found legal, others should get the same technology, and prepare for it right now.
All these books in all languages may improve search engines, translators, and even feed "chatterbots" with knowledge (AI).
The french should do the same and sue google to save time. But I live in France and I have never heard about any project to consolidate french informatics. French software is about industrial computer science but is invisible in informatics.
France can loose at defending her culture herself. The best example is that giant magnetoresistance is a french discovery but this resistance has been applied and copyrighted by the americans, and now google uses its petabytes storage cloud to sell to the french their own books...
Here is what I appreciate
in Stephen Hawking's confessions.
Our DNA code was mutating by 1 bit a year
but 1 bit of mutation could eliminate many homos...
Now the world publishes 50,000 books a year
and in a way it can select some of us, !
"hundred billion bits of information in books
are garbage" and will select some of us.
Maybe Hawking wants our children to begin DNA engineering, eugenism, and to resolve the schoolbooks selection
and agressive instinct problems too.
In the posts, the meme polemic
is a holism polemic, the necessary egg about our future.
As we feel the present time and the future
there is a necessary embodiement of physics
that cannot simply fade along the centuries to come.
The sense of facts are our axioms.
The reciprocity shows the same idea,
if our current advances nullify the natural selection
then they will become physically weak in average
so it is a good thing to cure ou DNA from weaknesses
to be embodied heathly.... memes have no force by themselves.
The sympathetic effect of the Darwinism window,
from XIX to XX, has set a revolution in creationism,
it is located in the future not in the past.
In our spirit we have to move in time now
to preserve what the 19th lay men knew.
(because the were gentlemen
like captain Jenaway's holo boyfriend)
I really think that Stephen Hawking
has to deal seriously whith these questions
for his work on the details of the big bang.
Is it a 2000 years old embodiement open problem ?
Sorry for being or putting in the details.
Slashdot Mirror
I am not a mathematician, I tried to check what is a power law. But I have found that : "Vladimir Arnold gave the catastrophes the ADE classification, due to a deep connection with simple Lie groups." It still seems meaningless to me.
... or intend to be. If digitizing books is found legal, others should get the same technology, and prepare for it right now. All these books in all languages may improve search engines, translators, and even feed "chatterbots" with knowledge (AI). The french should do the same and sue google to save time. But I live in France and I have never heard about any project to consolidate french informatics. French software is about industrial computer science but is invisible in informatics. France can loose at defending her culture herself. The best example is that giant magnetoresistance is a french discovery but this resistance has been applied and copyrighted by the americans, and now google uses its petabytes storage cloud to sell to the french their own books ...
Here is what I appreciate in Stephen Hawking's confessions. Our DNA code was mutating by 1 bit a year but 1 bit of mutation could eliminate many homos ...
Now the world publishes 50,000 books a year
and in a way it can select some of us, !
"hundred billion bits of information in books
are garbage" and will select some of us.
Maybe Hawking wants our children to begin DNA engineering, eugenism, and to resolve the schoolbooks selection
and agressive instinct problems too.
In the posts, the meme polemic
is a holism polemic, the necessary egg about our future.
As we feel the present time and the future
there is a necessary embodiement of physics
that cannot simply fade along the centuries to come.
The sense of facts are our axioms.
The reciprocity shows the same idea,
if our current advances nullify the natural selection
then they will become physically weak in average
so it is a good thing to cure ou DNA from weaknesses
to be embodied heathly. ... memes have no force by themselves.
The sympathetic effect of the Darwinism window,
from XIX to XX, has set a revolution in creationism,
it is located in the future not in the past.
In our spirit we have to move in time now
to preserve what the 19th lay men knew.
(because the were gentlemen
like captain Jenaway's holo boyfriend)
I really think that Stephen Hawking
has to deal seriously whith these questions
for his work on the details of the big bang.
Is it a 2000 years old embodiement open problem ?
Sorry for being or putting in the details.