Network censors still do hold on to an important role.
First of all, they do ensure that there is a "safe spot" from the sex, language, and violence. Many people trying to raise very young children want to keep a certain set of taboos rather than showering them with ideals that were created for the purpose of selling movie tickets. And, sometimes, watching programs with sex, language, and violence running amok can get just plain tiring. Sure, that candy bar in the vending machine tastes great and is easy to snarf, but don't try to live off of it. Aren't there times when you would prefer an apple?
Also remember that the censors and those supporting the censors are out supporting something that they believe deeply in. Even if there is an answer that is quick and easy (like switching to a cable station), is there something wrong with trying to uphold an ideal? Just because network censors may be smaller in population to the free-for-all cable broadcasters, that's no reason to give up.
It's like Free Software in a way. The idea is upheld by those who believe deeply in it, but they are somewhat small in population. Should we give up just because there are so many mega-corporations speaking against it?
I'm not pro-censorship or anti-free-speech, but I think that we should be reminded to use our right to free speech responsibly.
Slashdot Mirror
Network censors still do hold on to an important role.
First of all, they do ensure that there is a "safe spot" from the sex, language, and violence. Many people trying to raise very young children want to keep a certain set of taboos rather than showering them with ideals that were created for the purpose of selling movie tickets. And, sometimes, watching programs with sex, language, and violence running amok can get just plain tiring. Sure, that candy bar in the vending machine tastes great and is easy to snarf, but don't try to live off of it. Aren't there times when you would prefer an apple?
Also remember that the censors and those supporting the censors are out supporting something that they believe deeply in. Even if there is an answer that is quick and easy (like switching to a cable station), is there something wrong with trying to uphold an ideal? Just because network censors may be smaller in population to the free-for-all cable broadcasters, that's no reason to give up.
It's like Free Software in a way. The idea is upheld by those who believe deeply in it, but they are somewhat small in population. Should we give up just because there are so many mega-corporations speaking against it?
I'm not pro-censorship or anti-free-speech, but
I think that we should be reminded to use our
right to free speech responsibly.