Is this the same place that was in an uproar about licensing drones all over the US? There are people who seem to think that anyone should be able to use drones except the government. Interesting dichotomy there.
RC Plane: no camera and needs to be in direct line of sight of the operator. Drone: real time camera and can be operated out of line of sight of the operator.
I am not a biologist, so these version numbers are meaningless to me... But that still reads like 70% unused research capacity.
Where is it stated that the sequence would only be released to trusted institutes in the US? This also assumes that all research institutes would want to do research on this topic. It would seem to me that every institute working on the same thing would be a lot of duplication.
I would hope so, but I am not sure who gets to decide trustworthiness.
Any decision is better than "we trust everyone in the world".
I guess you missed the point that slavery, human experimentation and vivisection have all been done in the pursuit of science while puppies and candy have not.. The creation of weapons of mass destruction is science but it is not a good thing.
Is the problem with the protocol or the implementation of that protocol?
Mr. Crain ran his security test on his open-source DNP3 program and didn't find anything wrong. Frustrated, he tested a third-party vendor’s program to make sure his software was working. The first program he targeted belonged to Triangle MicroWorks, a Raleigh, North Carolina based company that sells source code to large vendors of S.C.A.D.A. systems. It broke instantly.
If the vulnerability is not in an open source implementation but is in third party vendor implementation then it looks like an implementation problem not a protocol problem.
"DD" = destroyer "G:" = guided missile "1000" = Generally warships are numbered sequential but they moved to an easily identifiable number to designate a new generation of ships.
The design of the Zumwalt solves that problem by using off-the-shelf hardware—mostly IBM blade servers running Red Hat Linux—and putting it in a ruggedized server room.
An example of a very bottable aspect of WoW is resource farming. Design a bot that goes between known ore nodes and mines them. When bags are full go to the auction house and put it up for auction. Sell the gold for real money. This can go on 24/7 with a bot. This can be done with any gatherable resource in WoW. The problems are as follows; 1. Node are unavailable for players actually playing the game 2. Auction house prices are driven down due to the abundance of auctions so it is not useful for real players to farm. 3. Auction house prices for rare items are driven up because rich/stupid people can buy gold for read money. Economics are a small but important part of WoW and most other MORPGs.
Another possibility is a healer bot. Make a bot that follows another character that heals them when they are hurt. You play one character but are basically vulnerable.
There are also leveling bots for those who want to sell high level characters or just don't want to play low level characters.
The parents of the child who killed herself should have been monitoring their own kids internet access, should not have allowed the facebook account to begin with. Should not have allowed the kid to have a cell phone,
So your solution is to cut the victim off from all social contact to protect them from a couple of bullies. That cure could just as well have caused the same outcome.
You are playing his game. For example, you say he finds his toys if you take them away. Put them in a locked container. If he breaks in, make him pay for the replacement and do it again. Try grounding him. If he want to go somewhere or lay with someone say no and tell him why.
Ultimately, it's better to teach your child to make smart choices than to micromanage and microlegislate them...
True but there is a balance between the two. It is hard to teach consequences when a child has no empathy.
The truth is that kids have their own little privately-run societies in school (on a social plane) that the adults are quite powerless to have any real control over. And by granting them access to the internet, they wield a weapon that can be used to cause great harm to one another on that plane.
Adults do not have control but they do have a lot of influence.
There is the rub. The parents were informed of the bullying long before the suicide occurred and did nothing. they did not restrict their child's access to the internet in any way; internet motoring or taking away a cell phone. Had the bullies been grounded for a couple of months with no internet access except for school work I bet it would have stopped quite quickly. Perhaps some education on the consequences of bullying and the possibility of being responsible fore someone's death. Maybe having mandatory Bully Education classes much like mandatory driver's ed classes for traffic violations. It is not a perfect solution but it is much better than parents throwing up their hands and saying "we have no power".
Considering it went through a medical approval process I bet all failure modes have been looked at. Just because an article does not enumerate every test done does not mean that they have not been done.
From a purely technological standpoint, these two scenarios are exactly the same: an employee copies user data and gives it to an outside party.
Looking at something from only one standpoint does not give a complete picture of the situation. There might be issues from other standpoints that make the view very different. Taken from a technical standpoint the following are equal;
Speeding tickets vs extortion. (They both require payment of money on demand) Incarceration vs kidnapping (both are restrictions on liberty) search warrant vs burglary (both entail unwanted entry and removal of property) public service vs slavery (both are forced unpaid labour)
The main difference between the two is that one is legal and the other is not. We give the government many legal powers that private citizens do not have.
How is that going to happen when the research into industrial scale fusion will be delayed till after 2028?
Eventually the aim is to develop steady-state plasmas, which will yield information relevant to industrial-scale fusion-power generation. It is experiments relating to the understanding of longer-pulse and steady-state ITER plasmas that are most likely to be delayed beyond 2028.
Even this one does not say we will be using electricity generated by fusion power in 15 years
Eventually the aim is to develop steady-state plasmas, which will yield information relevant to industrial-scale fusion-power generation. It is experiments relating to the understanding of longer-pulse and steady-state ITER plasmas that are most likely to be delayed beyond 2028.
Basically they say they can generate power by 2028 but not at a scale that can be used industrially. Even the research on industrial scale will have to wait till after that and there is no estimate on how long it will take. They didn't shorten th time; they just changed the target. There is a big difference between "generate power" and "generate power in an industrial scale and decrease reliance on fossil fuels".
The only link that I found between the NNR vaccine and death is in Japan. The issue is that they administered expired vaccines and their vaccine used the Urabe strain which is not used in the UK.
NHS these days, "Pregnancy is not an Illness", ergo, you need almost no medical care to give birth
Do you have any references for that leap? I looked it up and the references I have found to that phrase is in literature like this.
Pregnancy is not an illness and the majority of women remain well throughout their pregnancy. In fact, research shows that most women who work are healthier during their pregnancy than those who do not work.
It is about the ability to work while pregnant and has nothing o do with the level of care during delivery.
you are encouraged to give birth at home.
According to this NHS page the choice is up to the parent. It looks like they give a pretty balanced picture of the choice between the options.
Slashdot Mirror
By that same logic you shouldn't license urban dogs because you can't license urban raccoon. You regulate what you can.
I see it as a drone once it has autonomous functionality. Simple FPV (first person view) doesn't qualify in my book
Is a Predator a drone? It is continually piloted from the ground.
Drones have existed for quite a while too.
Heck RC pilots have been using video feeds to fly drones for quite awhile as well.
FTFY
Is this the same place that was in an uproar about licensing drones all over the US? There are people who seem to think that anyone should be able to use drones except the government. Interesting dichotomy there.
RC Plane: no camera and needs to be in direct line of sight of the operator.
Drone: real time camera and can be operated out of line of sight of the operator.
See the difference?
I am not a biologist, so these version numbers are meaningless to me... But that still reads like 70% unused research capacity.
Where is it stated that the sequence would only be released to trusted institutes in the US? This also assumes that all research institutes would want to do research on this topic. It would seem to me that every institute working on the same thing would be a lot of duplication.
I would hope so, but I am not sure who gets to decide trustworthiness.
Any decision is better than "we trust everyone in the world".
I guess you missed the point that slavery, human experimentation and vivisection have all been done in the pursuit of science while puppies and candy have not.. The creation of weapons of mass destruction is science but it is not a good thing.
Is the problem with the protocol or the implementation of that protocol?
Mr. Crain ran his security test on his open-source DNP3 program and didn't find anything wrong. Frustrated, he tested a third-party vendor’s program to make sure his software was working. The first program he targeted belonged to Triangle MicroWorks, a Raleigh, North Carolina based company that sells source code to large vendors of S.C.A.D.A. systems. It broke instantly.
If the vulnerability is not in an open source implementation but is in third party vendor implementation then it looks like an implementation problem not a protocol problem.
"DD" = destroyer
"G:" = guided missile
"1000" = Generally warships are numbered sequential but they moved to an easily identifiable number to designate a new generation of ships.
The design of the Zumwalt solves that problem by using off-the-shelf hardware—mostly IBM blade servers running Red Hat Linux—and putting it in a ruggedized server room.
Many servers are running Linux not Lynx.
An example of a very bottable aspect of WoW is resource farming.
Design a bot that goes between known ore nodes and mines them. When bags are full go to the auction house and put it up for auction. Sell the gold for real money. This can go on 24/7 with a bot. This can be done with any gatherable resource in WoW.
The problems are as follows;
1. Node are unavailable for players actually playing the game
2. Auction house prices are driven down due to the abundance of auctions so it is not useful for real players to farm.
3. Auction house prices for rare items are driven up because rich/stupid people can buy gold for read money.
Economics are a small but important part of WoW and most other MORPGs.
Another possibility is a healer bot. Make a bot that follows another character that heals them when they are hurt. You play one character but are basically vulnerable.
There are also leveling bots for those who want to sell high level characters or just don't want to play low level characters.
The parents of the child who killed herself should have been monitoring their own kids internet access, should not have allowed the facebook account to begin with.
Should not have allowed the kid to have a cell phone,
So your solution is to cut the victim off from all social contact to protect them from a couple of bullies. That cure could just as well have caused the same outcome.
You are playing his game. For example, you say he finds his toys if you take them away. Put them in a locked container. If he breaks in, make him pay for the replacement and do it again. Try grounding him. If he want to go somewhere or lay with someone say no and tell him why.
Ultimately, it's better to teach your child to make smart choices than to micromanage and microlegislate them...
True but there is a balance between the two. It is hard to teach consequences when a child has no empathy.
The truth is that kids have their own little privately-run societies in school (on a social plane) that the adults are quite powerless to have any real control over. And by granting them access to the internet, they wield a weapon that can be used to cause great harm to one another on that plane.
Adults do not have control but they do have a lot of influence.
There is the rub. The parents were informed of the bullying long before the suicide occurred and did nothing. they did not restrict their child's access to the internet in any way; internet motoring or taking away a cell phone. Had the bullies been grounded for a couple of months with no internet access except for school work I bet it would have stopped quite quickly. Perhaps some education on the consequences of bullying and the possibility of being responsible fore someone's death. Maybe having mandatory Bully Education classes much like mandatory driver's ed classes for traffic violations. It is not a perfect solution but it is much better than parents throwing up their hands and saying "we have no power".
Considering it went through a medical approval process I bet all failure modes have been looked at. Just because an article does not enumerate every test done does not mean that they have not been done.
The analogy is far off the mark.
From a purely technological standpoint, these two scenarios are exactly the same: an employee copies user data and gives it to an outside party.
Looking at something from only one standpoint does not give a complete picture of the situation. There might be issues from other standpoints that make the view very different. Taken from a technical standpoint the following are equal;
Speeding tickets vs extortion. (They both require payment of money on demand)
Incarceration vs kidnapping (both are restrictions on liberty)
search warrant vs burglary (both entail unwanted entry and removal of property)
public service vs slavery (both are forced unpaid labour)
The main difference between the two is that one is legal and the other is not. We give the government many legal powers that private citizens do not have.
There seems to be a contradiction between this illustration and the following quote, both which appeared in the article;
"One common problem is porosity - small air bubbles in the product. Rough surface finishing is an issue too," he said.
It would seem that a rough porous ball bearing would not be that effective.
I made a mistake. I read 2130 as 2030 so you are probably close.
How is that going to happen when the research into industrial scale fusion will be delayed till after 2028?
Eventually the aim is to develop steady-state plasmas, which will yield information relevant to industrial-scale fusion-power generation. It is experiments relating to the understanding of longer-pulse and steady-state ITER plasmas that are most likely to be delayed beyond 2028.
Even this one does not say we will be using electricity generated by fusion power in 15 years
Eventually the aim is to develop steady-state plasmas, which will yield information relevant to industrial-scale fusion-power generation. It is experiments relating to the understanding of longer-pulse and steady-state ITER plasmas that are most likely to be delayed beyond 2028.
Basically they say they can generate power by 2028 but not at a scale that can be used industrially. Even the research on industrial scale will have to wait till after that and there is no estimate on how long it will take. They didn't shorten th time; they just changed the target. There is a big difference between "generate power" and "generate power in an industrial scale and decrease reliance on fossil fuels".
Do you get a refund on you fir insurance is there is no fire?
The only link that I found between the NNR vaccine and death is in Japan. The issue is that they administered expired vaccines and their vaccine used the Urabe strain which is not used in the UK.
In the case of children, parents sometimes need to make decisions on their behalf,
The parents are making the decision. The problem is that the parents are split on that decision and the court weighed in to break the tie.
References? What was the rate? Also perfectly healthy people have died after contracting measles, mumps or rubella.
NHS these days, "Pregnancy is not an Illness", ergo, you need almost no medical care to give birth
Do you have any references for that leap? I looked it up and the references I have found to that phrase is in literature like this.
Pregnancy is not an illness and the majority of women remain well throughout their pregnancy. In fact, research shows that most women who work are healthier during their pregnancy than those who do not work.
It is about the ability to work while pregnant and has nothing o do with the level of care during delivery.
you are encouraged to give birth at home.
According to this NHS page the choice is up to the parent. It looks like they give a pretty balanced picture of the choice between the options.