Massive? 20-30 ms is less than 1/5th the average reaction time of a college age adult to audio stimulus and around 1/6th of that for visual stimulus. So unless Kim Dotcom is a superhuman, it's unlikely he noticed any such thing unless the current latency he was experiencing was already bordering on high to begin with.
Not from any apps sold via the Amazon Appstore for Android.
You've just changed middlemen. They still take a cut.
The entire point of Apple's closed system is that they are the only publisher of software for the platform. This means they get a cut of sales no matter what.
"Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office. Although the legal orthodoxy is that judges cannot be removed from office except by impeachment by the House of Representatives followed by conviction by the Senate, several legal scholars, including William Rehnquist, Saikrishna Prakash and Steven D. Smith, have argued that the Good Behaviour Clause may, in theory, permit removal by way of a writ of scire facias filed before a federal court, without resort to impeachment.[1]
Which E-mail service would you rather use? The one from a sleazy convicted criminal, but with impenetrable security? Or the one from a company that always rifles through the contents, but promises to only do it for the better good?
A click through ToS would never be upheld. That's before you get to the fact that the person agreeing to the ToS might not even hold copyright to the code and would have no legal right to even make the agreement. There's no way it would hold up in court.
It's also a violation of the Bern Convention. Github cannot legally strip a work of its copyright status just because a license wasn't chosen by the developer. In the countries with public domain it has to be explicitly declared as such by the author.
Ah yes the "But Bill Clinton did it too!!!" defense in reverse. Criticizing Obama for his part in the spying is not saying Repuglicans would be any better. Stop being a partisan shit.
No, a court like FISA can be compatible with them. As long as it's not allowed to be secretive and above public accountability. FISA was created to stop the abuses that Nixon did of abusing the intelligence services to spy on anyone he wanted. And until the Patriot Act it actually did a decent job of that.
Never said anyone should give up. But thinking that the FISA infrastructure will just be swept away with without something having to fill the void is just not realistic.
How is FISA unconstitutional? Congress was imbued with the Constitutional power to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court" in article 1, section 8. The FISA court is an inferior court and thus squarely falls under the powers of Congress to create.
Of course it won't stop them. FISA came about because of Nixon being caught using the intelligence sevices to do spying against his political opponents.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe in part 2 they will freeze roblimo so we have to no longer suffer his shitty posts?
Well of course the freezing would kill you if you were still alive, but you're already dead at that point anyway.
FYI: You can't be cryogenically frozen until you are legally dead.
XNU is a Mach 2.5 kernel with the BSD 4.3 userland layered on top. And it is not "reminiscent of Unix" it is certified Unix.
Actually it really does. Only the researchers installed it before it was pulled.
Massive? 20-30 ms is less than 1/5th the average reaction time of a college age adult to audio stimulus and around 1/6th of that for visual stimulus. So unless Kim Dotcom is a superhuman, it's unlikely he noticed any such thing unless the current latency he was experiencing was already bordering on high to begin with.
Not from any apps sold via the Amazon Appstore for Android.
You've just changed middlemen. They still take a cut.
The entire point of Apple's closed system is that they are the only publisher of software for the platform. This means they get a cut of sales no matter what.
So no different than any other mobile store.
Yes, the demand is only marginally higher than the demand for the Kin. Which is to say as a retail product it would be an enormous flop.
Not more than 10,000 sales would be a huge flop for any OEM or carrier. The Kin, if you remember sold a bit over 7000.
"Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office. Although the legal orthodoxy is that judges cannot be removed from office except by impeachment by the House of Representatives followed by conviction by the Senate, several legal scholars, including William Rehnquist, Saikrishna Prakash and Steven D. Smith, have argued that the Good Behaviour Clause may, in theory, permit removal by way of a writ of scire facias filed before a federal court, without resort to impeachment.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_judge#Tenure_and_salary
Which E-mail service would you rather use? The one from a sleazy convicted criminal, but with impenetrable security? Or the one from a company that always rifles through the contents, but promises to only do it for the better good?
Neither. That's a classic false dilemma.
A click through ToS would never be upheld. That's before you get to the fact that the person agreeing to the ToS might not even hold copyright to the code and would have no legal right to even make the agreement. There's no way it would hold up in court.
I do!
Doesn't really matter since Github can not make a non-US citizen enter into a contract that violates their local laws.
Yes, that "someone" being myself, idiot.
Just a CYA statement in case there was an exception someone could point out.
Wouldn't be legal.
Should be "in many countries" not "in the countries".
It's also a violation of the Bern Convention. Github cannot legally strip a work of its copyright status just because a license wasn't chosen by the developer. In the countries with public domain it has to be explicitly declared as such by the author.
It can't be since "public domain" doesn't even exist in many countries.
Ah yes the "But Bill Clinton did it too!!!" defense in reverse. Criticizing Obama for his part in the spying is not saying Repuglicans would be any better. Stop being a partisan shit.
No, a court like FISA can be compatible with them. As long as it's not allowed to be secretive and above public accountability. FISA was created to stop the abuses that Nixon did of abusing the intelligence services to spy on anyone he wanted. And until the Patriot Act it actually did a decent job of that.
Never said anyone should give up. But thinking that the FISA infrastructure will just be swept away with without something having to fill the void is just not realistic.
How is FISA unconstitutional? Congress was imbued with the Constitutional power to "constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court" in article 1, section 8. The FISA court is an inferior court and thus squarely falls under the powers of Congress to create.
Of course it won't stop them. FISA came about because of Nixon being caught using the intelligence sevices to do spying against his political opponents.