'Whine' 'whine' 'buzzword' 'buzzword' 'get off my lawn' 'whine' 'whine' 'buzzword' 'whine' 'buzzword'. I'm surprised he didn't mention how they would also be able to shift paradigms and provide synergy as well.
Does the left have to physically threaten all their opponents?
Holy conclusion jumping, Batman! Why do you imply he's a leftist for stating that people whose water got contaminated due to fracking might not like guys like these professors? I see nothing political in that statement.
He probably didn't hear about it since neither Fox News nor the right-wing talk radio pundits like Limbaugh would have mentioned how the professors were shown to have done nothing wrong. That way they can continue to beat the Climategate controversy drum while their base froths at the mouth.
He'a definitely trolling since the professors in the Climategate controversy were earwd of wrongdoing by multiple parties who investigated the matter. The GP is just another butthurt denialist.
So the take away here is that these geologists at the University of Texas are ethical, even the appearance of impropriety is enough for them to step down.
Which is not what happened heree. They hid their conflict of interest while writing and after publishing their paper. They only stepped down because they got caught. If you think they resigned completely of their own choice is hilariously naive.
But when professors funding research through climate change alarmism are caught red handed manipulating data at the University of East Anglia and Pennsylvania State University they just hang in there.
*yawn* Climategate was a manufactured controversy by oil industy shills. Maybe you missed it but the professors were acquitted of any wrongdoing by multiple independent parties who investigated the matter in both the UK and the US. That is why they still have their jobs unlike the professors in this case.
This wouldn't have happened on the Windows Store and probably not on Play Store as well(you can always sell an APK directly for sideloading or use one of the 3rd party stores on Android).
The play store takes 30% cut of both app purchases and in-app purchases. Google banned using 3rd party payment processors for in-app purchases more than 6 month ago so they could enforce getting their cut. Also, the only major 3rd party store of Android that the average person would have ever heard of is Amazon's and it also takes a 30% cut of all purchases.
Well, you aren't forced to use Google's Plat store
But if you want to reach 90%+ of all devices you'll have it on the play store.
there are others,
Like Amazon who also takes a 30% cut of all sales?
and side loading is allowed as well.
Of which very few people are going to ever do.
You are also not forced to go through Google for in-app purchases I believe. Both of these services are set up so that it is convenient, and you *want* to use it. You are not forced to.
Nope. Google prohibits using 3rd party payment processors for in-app purchases. Google is acting no different than Apple.
If the complaints are about Apple taking a 30% cut of in-app purchases how exactly is Android an alternative? Google takes a 30% cut for both app purchases and in-app purchases as well. Yet somehow only Apple is "evil" for doing this.
Read the article. You would pay around $99 upfront then pay off the rest of the balance in chunks per month and you still get the same value plan as if you had brought an off contract phone. So you're getting the upfront savings of subsidizing but over the life of service you're still saving hundreds over Verizon, AT&T, etc.
>$30 a month for "unlimited" data (up top 5 gigs at "4g")
No, they have a true unlimited plan with no caps or throttling. With 500 minutes it's $59.99/month or $69.99/month if you want unlimited talk. The only thing is that it doesn't allow tethering.
Slashdot Mirror
So basically his post can be summed up as:
'Whine' 'whine' 'buzzword' 'buzzword' 'get off my lawn' 'whine' 'whine' 'buzzword' 'whine' 'buzzword'. I'm surprised he didn't mention how they would also be able to shift paradigms and provide synergy as well.
the tight labor market would cause their existing wages to rise
That's a good joke.
I'm still kinda wondering how the clamshell case will support the iPad 4th gen.. which, to my knowledge, isnt for sale yet?
Te 4th gen iPad has been for sale since November 2nd. Also, it has the same dimensions as the 3rd generation.
And where do they claim that? Specifics please.
Lying for the greater good and lying for money are equally as unethical.
But PAI was not lying.
Does the left have to physically threaten all their opponents?
Holy conclusion jumping, Batman! Why do you imply he's a leftist for stating that people whose water got contaminated due to fracking might not like guys like these professors? I see nothing political in that statement.
He probably didn't hear about it since neither Fox News nor the right-wing talk radio pundits like Limbaugh would have mentioned how the professors were shown to have done nothing wrong. That way they can continue to beat the Climategate controversy drum while their base froths at the mouth.
"Cleared" not "earwd"
He'a definitely trolling since the professors in the Climategate controversy were earwd of wrongdoing by multiple parties who investigated the matter. The GP is just another butthurt denialist.
So the take away here is that these geologists at the University of Texas are ethical, even the appearance of impropriety is enough for them to step down.
Which is not what happened heree. They hid their conflict of interest while writing and after publishing their paper. They only stepped down because they got caught. If you think they resigned completely of their own choice is hilariously naive.
But when professors funding research through climate change alarmism are caught red handed manipulating data at the University of East Anglia and Pennsylvania State University they just hang in there.
*yawn* Climategate was a manufactured controversy by oil industy shills. Maybe you missed it but the professors were acquitted of any wrongdoing by multiple independent parties who investigated the matter in both the UK and the US. That is why they still have their jobs unlike the professors in this case.
Yes but is MySQL webscale yet?
explain to them how Apple's pricing works.
Yes, explain to them that it works exactly like Google Play, Amazon's App Store, etc. Basically, this is biased outrage.
This wouldn't have happened on the Windows Store and probably not on Play Store as well(you can always sell an APK directly for sideloading or use one of the 3rd party stores on Android).
The play store takes 30% cut of both app purchases and in-app purchases. Google banned using 3rd party payment processors for in-app purchases more than 6 month ago so they could enforce getting their cut. Also, the only major 3rd party store of Android that the average person would have ever heard of is Amazon's and it also takes a 30% cut of all purchases.
Well, you aren't forced to use Google's Plat store
But if you want to reach 90%+ of all devices you'll have it on the play store.
there are others,
Like Amazon who also takes a 30% cut of all sales?
and side loading is allowed as well.
Of which very few people are going to ever do.
You are also not forced to go through Google for in-app purchases I believe. Both of these services are set up so that it is convenient, and you *want* to use it. You are not forced to.
Nope. Google prohibits using 3rd party payment processors for in-app purchases. Google is acting no different than Apple.
Flamebait? For copying and pasting straight from Google?
If the complaints are about Apple taking a 30% cut of in-app purchases how exactly is Android an alternative? Google takes a 30% cut for both app purchases and in-app purchases as well. Yet somehow only Apple is "evil" for doing this.
Transaction fees for app purchases:
For applications that you choose to sell in Google Play, the transaction fee is equivalent to 30% of the application price.
In app purchases:
The standard 30% transaction fee applies to in-app transactions on Google Play.
So pretty much the typical review from MichaelJRoss. He'll point out lots lf flaws and still give it a 7-9 score.
No one is saying he deserves to be killed. Also, how do you know he hasn't done this crime?
Wrong. They are letting you pay off the cost of the phone via small monthly payments so you don't have to pay full MSRP upfront unless you want to.
No, you're not. They're refarming their 1900mhz AWS to support the iPhone. So they are adding spectrum to their 4g service to improve speeds.
Read the article. You would pay around $99 upfront then pay off the rest of the balance in chunks per month and you still get the same value plan as if you had brought an off contract phone. So you're getting the upfront savings of subsidizing but over the life of service you're still saving hundreds over Verizon, AT&T, etc.
The 1900mhz refarm is to support HSPA+ on the iPhone not 3g.
>$30 a month for "unlimited" data (up top 5 gigs at "4g")
No, they have a true unlimited plan with no caps or throttling. With 500 minutes it's $59.99/month or $69.99/month if you want unlimited talk. The only thing is that it doesn't allow tethering.
However I'm sure there are a few places left like Sprint maybe and a handful of others in some areas.
Sprint has had the iPhone since the 4S eelease last year.
Legere mentioned offering the iPhone for $99 and then allowing customers to pay off the rest in monthly increments.
FTFA