Only in your imagination. What was allegedly illegal was UC failing to make the content accessible under the terms of the ADA. Nowhere was the content of the videos themselves ever declared illegal.
Your claim is as dumb as trying to say someone declared doctor's offices illegal because one place got sued for allegedly failing to meet ADA requirements.
Reading comprehension fail? The sentence is saying no other alreadyEOLed version has been given this reprieve. Versions that are not EOL obviously fall out of the scope of what was being talked about.
Totally! The media also didn't cover that Obama was a Kenyan-born Muslim who helped found the Muslim brotherhood. It's a good thing we have unsourced right-wing blog circle jerks to give us the real news!/s
That isn't to say he is closeted and gay, but simply saying that someone has a wife is not a definitive statement on their sexuality. Plus the person you responded to is clearly some bigoted troll so fuck them.
I mean, why not chastize Google for all the non-search engine stuff they do
People do, routinely.
or Apple for diversifying into cellphones?
Because iPhones have made 100s of billions of dollars for Apple whereas Mozilla's products outside of Firefox have all been abject failures and have been canceled one after the other?
Slashdot Mirror
Said by someone who has apparently never turned on the frature. It's still terrible.
But you could get almost any defendant to claim that any alleged deficiencies falling under the ADA "are going apeshit with it".
Only in your imagination. What was allegedly illegal was UC failing to make the content accessible under the terms of the ADA. Nowhere was the content of the videos themselves ever declared illegal.
Your claim is as dumb as trying to say someone declared doctor's offices illegal because one place got sued for allegedly failing to meet ADA requirements.
Of course, I block web ads and know not to click on email linkies.
How cute. You think you have to actually click stuff to get malware infections.
Maybe read the submission more closely? This is about Ubuntu server edition support.
This isn't about desktops. It's about LTS on their server edition.
And that matters on the server edition (the thing being discussed) how?
They were clearly being sarcastic. Do you need your sense of humor tuned up?
Reading comprehension fail? The sentence is saying no other alreadyEOLed version has been given this reprieve. Versions that are not EOL obviously fall out of the scope of what was being talked about.
If that were the reason then there is 14.04.
Eye candy on the server edition? What?
Can't tell if austistic or not...
It's this new invention called a joke.
Security fixes?
In many areas it was because they had poor OTAA reception due to issues such as terrain and so the CATV system allowed them access.
Proof? I watch Netflix every day and have never seen such adverts.
Good luck netting any real compensation after paying all the lawyers' costs. That's assuming you can even win.
Totally! The media also didn't cover that Obama was a Kenyan-born Muslim who helped found the Muslim brotherhood. It's a good thing we have unsourced right-wing blog circle jerks to give us the real news! /s
You not using it is the prime sell.
Wow you're so edgy.
10 Years ago, I was working at 1920 x 1200 ... then because of hollywood most of us were forced to 1920 x 1080 and even more absurdly
1920x1080 as TV resolution is more than 20 years old at this point. It predates your 10-year-old 1920x1200 display.
That isn't to say he is closeted and gay, but simply saying that someone has a wife is not a definitive statement on their sexuality. Plus the person you responded to is clearly some bigoted troll so fuck them.
No, Nate Weiner (the founder of Pocket) has a wife.
And so did Little Richard, Rock Hudson, Elton John and numerous other closeted gay men.
Yes it is a success as a niche, toy language.
I mean, why not chastize Google for all the non-search engine stuff they do
People do, routinely.
or Apple for diversifying into cellphones?
Because iPhones have made 100s of billions of dollars for Apple whereas Mozilla's products outside of Firefox have all been abject failures and have been canceled one after the other?