Sort of. Random idiots can sue on behalf of society (note the lawsuit referenced in paragraph 11 in the complaint) -- but stand a chance of winning only if they have a valid cause of action. In this case, Klayman alleges damages which can neither be substantiated nor proved: an excess of one billion dollars, compensatory and punitive, plus attorney's fees and costs, for assault and negligence. IMHO, the complaint is worth reading as a welcome respite from the inane attempts at humor we've seen here on/. the past day. Best part? Paragraphs 4 and 17, wherein Klayman references "The Social Network" in substantiating Zuckerberg's "questionable business and ethical practices."
Slashdot Mirror
Sort of. Random idiots can sue on behalf of society (note the lawsuit referenced in paragraph 11 in the complaint) -- but stand a chance of winning only if they have a valid cause of action. In this case, Klayman alleges damages which can neither be substantiated nor proved: an excess of one billion dollars, compensatory and punitive, plus attorney's fees and costs, for assault and negligence. IMHO, the complaint is worth reading as a welcome respite from the inane attempts at humor we've seen here on /. the past day. Best part? Paragraphs 4 and 17, wherein Klayman references "The Social Network" in substantiating Zuckerberg's "questionable business and ethical practices."
Share and enjoy,
Ainandil
...what the hell is in the special sauce.