I'm sorry, but I've seen to many Java systems that needed a large server where just a few php-files and a bytecode cache on a small server would have done it with less server load, would be able to handle more users, would be easier to setup and a lot less code to manage.
It maybe be because of those so called professional programmers and the way they program their applications.
Then again, they don't know how to program in PHP either.
I think each language/tool has it's place and the programmers working on the project need to know and understand the language/tools they are using.
Yes, I've seen that too. I expected it to download new messages from a folder, but when you change to it, it will not have collected the new messages, but TB will automatically check for that folder and finds some.
This is because of the deployment system and profile-settings for IE. Official Firefox doesn't have them. They are working on MSI's for Firefox 4 though. That's the first step.
Nothing will be screwed, everything will keep running, you just need to disable the DNSSEC-validity-checks and you'll have DNS just like before DNSSEC was introduced.
If they keys are lost, you just disable the DNSSEC-extensions on all recursive nameservers and everything will work as it currently does. DNSSEC only adds a crypto-validity-check to DNS.
everything works are before if you turn on the DNSSEC-extensions on your nameserver. Just the validity checks will be off, so you would able to trust the DNS-infrastructure as much as you do now.
"100 Million Facebook Pages Leaked On Torrent Site
A directory containing personal details about more than 100 million Facebook users has surfaced on an Internet file-sharing site. The 2.8GB torrent was compiled by hacker Ron Bowes of Skull Security, who created a web crawler program that harvested data on users contained in Facebook's open access directory, which lists all users who haven't bothered to change their privacy settings to make their pages unavailable to search engines."
"If you pile several tabs into one lump and close that lump w/o thinking, you may realize that you just closed something that you needed--what was it? where is it? how do I get it back? "
Why do you think Firefox has at the bottom of the history-menu a 'recently closed windows'. It's for this situation, it works really well.:-)
And have you considered Firefox Sync / Firefox Home for the iPhone.:-)
So you can not only sync bookmarks, but also history and preferences, it's password-protected and encrypted and normally sent over https so you don't have to worry someone taking a look at your bookmarks.
You don't have to use the Mozilla server, but you can also use your own.
click 'Download Google Chrome' click 'Accept and install' (a standard browser window popups telling you you are downloading a deb-file) click 'open in gdebi installer' click 'install package' it asks for a password the package is installed and it's available in the menu in the top left, under the 'internet' section done
http://www.illumos.org/ seems to be the closest thing to a community still left for the future of OpenSolaris.
Agree.
And it's god awfull slow (to startup) and can't handle large data sets.
I'm sure they are really proud of it.
This is exactly why Facebook optimized PHP (with hiphop: http://wiki.github.com/facebook/hiphop-php/) last.
It really was the least import part when optmizing.
I'm sorry, but I've seen to many Java systems that needed a large server where just a few php-files and a bytecode cache on a small server would have done it with less server load, would be able to handle more users, would be easier to setup and a lot less code to manage.
It maybe be because of those so called professional programmers and the way they program their applications.
Then again, they don't know how to program in PHP either.
I think each language/tool has it's place and the programmers working on the project need to know and understand the language/tools they are using.
And nothing like them, just a few % CPU, nothing to worry about.
My indexed IMAP-cache is 1.4 GB, yes when it was indexing/downloading the first it was slower, but it isn't right now.
It is because of the new indexing and stuff that use with IMAP is actually faster. I'm happy with that.
Yes, I've seen that too. I expected it to download new messages from a folder, but when you change to it, it will not have collected the new messages, but TB will automatically check for that folder and finds some.
1. I don't think Microsoft would like it.
2. Bandwidth at large amounts costs money too
OK, the other alternative is: replace the key with a new key when the keys are lost.
No, this has always been the trend. The settlement didn't have a big impact as I see it.
This is because of the deployment system and profile-settings for IE. Official Firefox doesn't have them. They are working on MSI's for Firefox 4 though. That's the first step.
Obviously not, as this is the largest digital photo. That implies that there is nothing like it.
Nothing will be screwed, everything will keep running, you just need to disable the DNSSEC-validity-checks and you'll have DNS just like before DNSSEC was introduced.
If they keys are lost, you just disable the DNSSEC-extensions on all recursive nameservers and everything will work as it currently does. DNSSEC only adds a crypto-validity-check to DNS.
everything works are before if you turn on the DNSSEC-extensions on your nameserver. Just the validity checks will be off, so you would able to trust the DNS-infrastructure as much as you do now.
It all doesn't matter, if the current keys are lost, all that is needed is to generate a new key for the root.
This whole system is only in place so root-key-upgrades can happen without nameserver-administrators needing to do manual changes.
And in the article it said: IBM stopped doing so.
Something like this maybe ?:
"100 Million Facebook Pages Leaked On Torrent Site
A directory containing personal details about more than 100 million Facebook users has surfaced on an Internet file-sharing site. The 2.8GB torrent was compiled by hacker Ron Bowes of Skull Security, who created a web crawler program that harvested data on users contained in Facebook's open access directory, which lists all users who haven't bothered to change their privacy settings to make their pages unavailable to search engines."
http://www.thinq.co.uk/2010/7/28/100-million-facebook-pages-leaked-torrent-site/
http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/28/1350222/100-Million-Facebook-Pages-Leaked-On-Torrent-Site?art_pos=3
I was thinking of the GUI actually.
"If you pile several tabs into one lump and close that lump w/o thinking, you may realize that you just closed something that you needed--what was it? where is it? how do I get it back? "
Why do you think Firefox has at the bottom of the history-menu a 'recently closed windows'. It's for this situation, it works really well. :-)
And have you considered Firefox Sync / Firefox Home for the iPhone. :-)
So you can not only sync bookmarks, but also history and preferences, it's password-protected and encrypted and normally sent over https so you don't have to worry someone taking a look at your bookmarks.
You don't have to use the Mozilla server, but you can also use your own.
A common example:
On Ubuntu visit this page:
http://www.google.com/chrome
click 'Download Google Chrome'
click 'Accept and install'
(a standard browser window popups telling you you are downloading a deb-file)
click 'open in gdebi installer'
click 'install package'
it asks for a password
the package is installed and it's available in the menu in the top left, under the 'internet' section
done
what is your point ?
Have you tried creating a different Firefox-profile ? Maybe there is something wrong with that.