Yes, it's all move to IPv6 and use a free certificate for every site. Or get rid of Windows XP (because IE on Windows XP is the last browser which doesn't understand, SSL-virtual hosts, called SNI).
5 years ? Really ? It should be shorter (and free or close to free, have a look at how StartCOM does it's business), the reason 5 years is a bad idea is, because the bits can get guessed (brute force). This usually takes a lot of time, but it doesn't have to be and you should use a new one pretty much every year.
You are kidding, right ? "the StartSSL certificate is included by default in Mozilla Firefox 2.x and higher". Which means it was included in 2006, any older browser should probably not be used to be safe, actually maybe not even Firefox 2.x, because it doesn't get any security updates. It is supported by every major (anywhere close to up to date) browser. Except for Opera.
That's why browsers are starting to add things like ForceTLS, which will add an interface so you can tell the browser to only visit a site with SSL and for the website to the tell the browser (for a fixed time) to visit the site only with SSL.
I think if it 'replaces' SSL certificates, it will be used to verify SSL-certificates or something similair. But some say, DNS is modified so much, it will be worse than the SSL-warnings.:-(
The iPhone doesn't have a signed code only policy.
A quote: "Apple supports two platforms. First is HTML5, open and uncontrolled platform. He says the company fully supports it and behind it 100 percent - and stresses that it’s fully open. Second platform is the App Store — a curated platform with more than 225,000 apps and calls it the most vibrant app store on the planet. Interesting reference to curated as a asset of App Store."
If you have a machine which acts as a router to the desktops in the lab (or just a machine or 2) and you have Etherape running it will shop them what is happing. I did notice it doesn't show IPv6 yet, but it could just be a setting.
As the "warriors of the net" these aren't to bad either:
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, it's all move to IPv6 and use a free certificate for every site. Or get rid of Windows XP (because IE on Windows XP is the last browser which doesn't understand, SSL-virtual hosts, called SNI).
Certificate Patrol (an other Firefox add-on) could also be usefull, it tells you when a certificate has changed.
(interresting)
5 years ? Really ? It should be shorter (and free or close to free, have a look at how StartCOM does it's business), the reason 5 years is a bad idea is, because the bits can get guessed (brute force). This usually takes a lot of time, but it doesn't have to be and you should use a new one pretty much every year.
You are kidding, right ? "the StartSSL certificate is included by default in Mozilla Firefox 2.x and higher". Which means it was included in 2006, any older browser should probably not be used to be safe, actually maybe not even Firefox 2.x, because it doesn't get any security updates. It is supported by every major (anywhere close to up to date) browser. Except for Opera.
That's why browsers are starting to add things like ForceTLS, which will add an interface so you can tell the browser to only visit a site with SSL and for the website to the tell the browser (for a fixed time) to visit the site only with SSL.
I think if it 'replaces' SSL certificates, it will be used to verify SSL-certificates or something similair. But some say, DNS is modified so much, it will be worse than the SSL-warnings. :-(
LoL, they don't know how to distribute an internal CA ?
You folks all know why this is right ? I mean what is the use of SSL-encryption if you don't know who your 'talking' to ?
The troll did have one point, the subject, where is AMD/ATI in this article ? Didn't they also have a product in that segment ?
It is from applications which by default send when and where you are. In case of four squares it's the whole idea of the application.
I guess congratulations are in order ?
It's negative for RedHat, they get less money per user/company in the field. So you have to convince more companies/users to use your product.
This is also a negative for the shareholders in this publicly traded company.
On the other hand it does attract customers, which is good for RedHat and the shareholders.
This is the reason why RedHat targets the enterprise market.
To bad their are problems with 32-bit applications which don't always run on it.
Luckily it still has many other things which people can complain about. :-)
I'm still 'supporting' exactly one Windows 9x desktop. :-(
It just has 2 applications though, which won't easily be moved to an other system, but a replacement is in the works.
3 cheers for the BSA ?! ;-)
I don't think anyone can confuse Windows XP with Windows ME. :-)
Yes it was a, really bad one at that, joke
The iPhone doesn't have a signed code only policy.
A quote: "Apple supports two platforms. First is HTML5, open and uncontrolled platform. He says the company fully supports it and behind it 100 percent - and stresses that it’s fully open. Second platform is the App Store — a curated platform with more than 225,000 apps and calls it the most vibrant app store on the planet. Interesting reference to curated as a asset of App Store."
The HTML5 isn't signed. ;-)
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how this would force Microsoft to do anything.
People will just buy a newer Microsoft operating system or even a whole new computer, to 'fix' the problems they are having.
Most likely it was download through an ad-network.
1. Youtube's owners, would be Google
2. lookup the WebM annoucement from Google at Google I/O hint it's about On2/VP8 and Ogg and even Youtube
If you have a machine which acts as a router to the desktops in the lab (or just a machine or 2) and you have Etherape running it will shop them what is happing. I did notice it doesn't show IPv6 yet, but it could just be a setting.
As the "warriors of the net" these aren't to bad either:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbY8Hb6abbg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XH0VgoD5lQ