Also as ClamWin as no on-access scanning, I wouldn't recommend it to your average Windows luserrs. I think their was an opensource on-access scanner for Windows which uses clamav-virus-information, but don't remember the name. But the clamav-virus-information isn't as good for desktop-machines as most other offerings. It's however prettty good for mailservers. I'd recommend to any mailserver admin.
Some one will just move your disk to an other machine and replace the true-crypt software with one that doesn't do any checking...
If you stored something in TPM you might have a chance, but if your computer brakes, you'll probably also loose the content of the disk (backups can prevent huge problems with that ofcourse).
I can imagine something else, if your profile is on D: (like all the other data) you don't loose the HKEY_CURRENT_USER so a lot of settings should be preserved.
I think this is, because a lot of their services are offered free and they are looking for more profitable businessmodels. Advertisments is their only really profit machine at this point.
Slashdot Mirror
Also as ClamWin as no on-access scanning, I wouldn't recommend it to your average Windows luserrs. I think their was an opensource on-access scanner for Windows which uses clamav-virus-information, but don't remember the name. But the clamav-virus-information isn't as good for desktop-machines as most other offerings. It's however prettty good for mailservers. I'd recommend to any mailserver admin.
Actually, no1 really cares about the desktop anymore, an example:
http://www.itworld.com/open-source/72634/whats-linux-desktop-mean-when-we-dont-know-what-desktop-anymore
So maybe it'll never happen, you could also say, it has already happend for many, which is true.
Those just use process-namespaces and the same kernel and you are done with it.
Hardly effective, you could still install a keylogger on on the keyboard or record the sounds the person is typing on the keyboard.
Some one will just move your disk to an other machine and replace the true-crypt software with one that doesn't do any checking...
If you stored something in TPM you might have a chance, but if your computer brakes, you'll probably also loose the content of the disk (backups can prevent huge problems with that ofcourse).
My guess is the CentOS-folk have routine meetings, but he is usually not present, now he was.
I noticed the hardware of the netbook they used in the article is also a bit more beefy then 'the original netbooks', especially RAM.
Many have found, if your outside the US, blocking US is much more effective then blocking China and Russia.
Hmm, maybe I don't even want to know the pricetag on that
> But with DNSSEC, I believe we'd all be stuck with one per TLD.
Why do you think it's different as they way it's handled now ?
Good thing they are going to handle the root signing process for DNSSEC as we can all see, they know what they are doing.
If I'm right, their are definitly people ('senior developers') Theo does put trust in to atleast tell him to have an other look.
I wasn't all that serious.
What is cool about this text is, you could claim it for anything and still look smart. ;-)
Rsync is usefull when you don't know anything about the data, if you actually know something about, their is a better way to do it.
I have some doubts about that.
I can imagine something else, if your profile is on D: (like all the other data) you don't loose the HKEY_CURRENT_USER so a lot of settings should be preserved.
Actually IE5.5 is the least buggy IE, IE6 is probably the worst, it's very unpredictable in how it will render/break webpages.
A chair ?
That would be ironic.
Only if Yahoo would sell it, because Yahoo bought it some time ago. And buying Yahoo wasn't something Google was allowed to do.
I think this is, because a lot of their services are offered free and they are looking for more profitable businessmodels. Advertisments is their only really profit machine at this point.
No, no, no, I mean in Asia most software is pirated, if I'm not mistaken, so it's not a sale for Microsoft in that case.
That's why the system should be setup to make regular backups of the home-directory of the user :-)
rsync has patches for inuse files.
Mainframes have 3 levels of virtualization, why do you run all these programs in the same memory space ?