Ziggo in the Netherlands just like in the US the cable provider (Comcast) is the or one of the biggest Internet providers and most of the Netherlands and US watches digital TV which is also IP-based streaming.
Their network is completely fiber except for the 'last mile' and DOCSIS 3 provided up to over 300 Mbit/s downstream and 120 Mbit/s upstream.
It's pretty obvious they wanted to make it anonymous and it's a hard problem they didn't want to spent all their time on without solving all the other problems.
It's more like obfuscated at this point, it's like more like circumstantial evidence. Probably true, but can't be proven to be 100% correct.
I don't know if it is better, but one fundamantal thing I don't like about the current US democracy is it is basically a 2 party system.
For example I life in the Netherlands, we have a some what different system. After the elections the winning party is the first that is allowed to form a coalition of multiple parties that together form around 50% or more.
I think Internet could help with education. You can bring lots and lots of things to Africa, for example. But eventually they'll have to do it themselves. They will need education to rise above what they are doing now.
I'm sorry, I know where the money for this charity work comes from, it's from a convicted monopoly and the above mentioned charity organisation which does things many individuals would think are not ethical.
Which shows us, IE doesn't even have 50% of the browser market. OK, certain older browsers other than IE might not support HTML5, but a large part of the IE versions do support HTML5.
IE9 has a HTML5-parser, so it clearly supports HTML5.
Actually the HTML5-specification now defined how things should be parsed and fail, that is an improvement. HTML is better than XML/XHTML because it can be displayed before being fully downloaded. Only valid XML should be displayed, that is what the specification says and certain browsers adhere to the specifications.
It's just a matter of time.
They are taking advantage of the situation for as long as possible.
Don't worry, in the US the banks don't get the blame either, they shifted the blame to the shop owners.
But the cable providers will still remain:
Ziggo in the Netherlands just like in the US the cable provider (Comcast) is the or one of the biggest Internet providers and most of the Netherlands and US watches digital TV which is also IP-based streaming.
Their network is completely fiber except for the 'last mile' and DOCSIS 3 provided up to over 300 Mbit/s downstream and 120 Mbit/s upstream.
It's pretty obvious they wanted to make it anonymous and it's a hard problem they didn't want to spent all their time on without solving all the other problems.
It's more like obfuscated at this point, it's like more like circumstantial evidence. Probably true, but can't be proven to be 100% correct.
I think there would actually be an advantage to having both regulated currencies and an unregulated currency.
But judging by this, they don't seem to think the same way.
Lots of large pockets, maybe they are large enough ?
.. and when people from all walks of life sees someone they know and revere, become a victim of that abuse.
I think by then it will be to late.
You have to remember, Android needs more resources to at all on a phone than FirefoxOS. The minimum requirements of FirefoxOS are lower.
So if you buy the cheapest phone, it won't run Android.
Well, that isn't really how webapps are usually build.
But there are existing UI-elements you can use so you don't have to deal with it directly:
http://buildingfirefoxos.com/
I don't think it's completely stupid.
Some people want a smartphone, but didn't want to spend as much money. So they haven't bought one yet.
If cheaper phones are some what popular, maybe they'll bring down the prices of the more expensive phones.
No Mozilla is a non-profit with a mission.
The US isn't even the target market for most of these phones.
I wonder how he configured nginx.
Multiple processes is what nginx would need to get the maximum performance out of a the Quad-core machine.
And he used a different harddisks for Windows than Linux are they of the same type ?
Those are some of the things that come to mind first.
US transit providers in Germany will just forward traffic to the US-agency in Germany.
That has already been in the news.
I don't think Africa should deny the work they do.
I'm just saying I'm not gonna praise Bill Gates or the foundation as some are doing here.
I don't know if it is better, but one fundamantal thing I don't like about the current US democracy is it is basically a 2 party system.
For example I life in the Netherlands, we have a some what different system. After the elections the winning party is the first that is allowed to form a coalition of multiple parties that together form around 50% or more.
I think Internet could help with education. You can bring lots and lots of things to Africa, for example. But eventually they'll have to do it themselves. They will need education to rise above what they are doing now.
I'm sorry, I know where the money for this charity work comes from, it's from a convicted monopoly and the above mentioned charity organisation which does things many individuals would think are not ethical.
And you still believe the US is this fine example of a democracy ?
Linux has device independant caching now:
http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/728209-about-the-linux-kernel-bcache
Less than 50% is HTML5 capable ?
Really, let's look at where you linked.
First of all Net Market Share is the statistics source which are most skewed in IE's favor, always has been. Fine.
The first graph in the article is this one:
http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/combined-2013-07.png
Which shows us, IE doesn't even have 50% of the browser market. OK, certain older browsers other than IE might not support HTML5, but a large part of the IE versions do support HTML5.
IE9 has a HTML5-parser, so it clearly supports HTML5.
IE9 and newer are fairly close and getting closer to a 50% of the total IE-share:
http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ie-2013-07.png
So why you say why IE6, IE7, IE8 has a majority I don't know. 50% of 50% rounded isn't a majority.
Here is the whole story:
https://blog.mozilla.org/tanvi/2013/04/10/mixed-content-blocking-enabled-in-firefox-23/
Actually the HTML5-specification now defined how things should be parsed and fail, that is an improvement. HTML is better than XML/XHTML because it can be displayed before being fully downloaded. Only valid XML should be displayed, that is what the specification says and certain browsers adhere to the specifications.
The Social Media API can be used with any site. It isn't Facebook specific.
IE6, IE7, IE8 "majority of web traffic" ? Not very likely.