I really don't understand your choice and I've heared this before. The code base of Chrome is a lot larger and Chrome actually uses more memory (partly because of it's multi process model). So it really does not make a lot of sense.
What I don't get is, he can do it now with an old drive.
But when he's done with this large number of cds he has, he'll have his collection in digital form.
Why does he worry about not having this old drive in a couple of years ?
By that time if he gets an new CD he only has one or very few CDs to do, so the time it takes to do is (almost) irrelevant, right ?
So let's stop talking about the time here.
The DRM issue is a real issue. How do you do that in a couple of years, when your old drive has died. Will you still be able to rip it so you can have a backup copy ?
A thousand times sounds like a lot, so how did things improve for the free software and open source communities who don't have to deal with the Windows platform ?
Or did things only improve for people already tied to the Windows platform, that doesn't sounds like an improvement than.
I'm kinda tired right now and I can't think of anything which improved.
So which software, or pretty much any software really became more efficient ?
Yes, many things get optimised in software, but the total "product" usually supports more hardware or software combinations and has more features and thus becomes slightly more bulky when you look at them year over year.
Totally agree on that one, I have the same experience. Well, I never switches to Chrome, but everytime I try it out that the above conclusion is mine too.
Now have an other look on mobile, where the new IE is all the different forks of Webkit that do not get updates. Replacement rate of mobiles was about ones every 2 years, with smartphones (because they are more expensive) this is going to be higher.
And webdevelopers already use webkit only features. Or are using it in a way which make it webkit only (-webkit *). Even though it already is a standard and other browsers support it.
Yes, these graphics things, like WebGL always work really well for me in Firefox on Linux at home. Strange enough, even better than on Windows at work.
Now that I think about it, I think some company even created a fridge with Internet which uses E17-libraries (called EFL) to provide the GUI/browser experience.
If HP, Dell, Supermicro and others come up with a "standard" which puts all the connectors and indicators of servers on the front, then maybe we could all benefit the same way.
Slashdot Mirror
I really don't understand your choice and I've heared this before. The code base of Chrome is a lot larger and Chrome actually uses more memory (partly because of it's multi process model). So it really does not make a lot of sense.
What I don't get is, he can do it now with an old drive.
But when he's done with this large number of cds he has, he'll have his collection in digital form.
Why does he worry about not having this old drive in a couple of years ?
By that time if he gets an new CD he only has one or very few CDs to do, so the time it takes to do is (almost) irrelevant, right ?
So let's stop talking about the time here.
The DRM issue is a real issue. How do you do that in a couple of years, when your old drive has died. Will you still be able to rip it so you can have a backup copy ?
2013-04-02 to precise.
But you can probably download the daily build right now, the pre-Beta/Aurora in the week of 2013-01-06 or the beta on 2013-02-19.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar
A thousand times sounds like a lot, so how did things improve for the free software and open source communities who don't have to deal with the Windows platform ?
Or did things only improve for people already tied to the Windows platform, that doesn't sounds like an improvement than.
I'm kinda tired right now and I can't think of anything which improved.
So which software, or pretty much any software really became more efficient ?
Yes, many things get optimised in software, but the total "product" usually supports more hardware or software combinations and has more features and thus becomes slightly more bulky when you look at them year over year.
Totally agree on that one, I have the same experience. Well, I never switches to Chrome, but everytime I try it out that the above conclusion is mine too.
It supports both, the behaviour is configurable.
That was hardly voluntary.
This is a small community where a lot of people know each other and knew who did go to collection point.
This probably falls in the category of peerpressure.
The police also had a list of people and people who didn't volunteer would be visited or called by the police to ask why.
Actually, I think this site is pretty clear about when you can start to use a certain property:
http://caniuse.com/#search=border-radius
It lists in what browsers it is supported, if you need to use a prefix and what market share these browsers have in total.
When other browsers start to support -webkit-prefixes, then we are doing it wrong. That way we can never get rid of them every again.
What a stupid idea.
Why is the post I'm replying to modded Score 3, Funny ?
The comment is actually right on the money.
I think the parent means the document provided by the WHATWG, basically the WHATWG version of what they considered to be HTML5.
To be honest, I don't think Microsoft choose not to use clues.
Not using clues was the way everyone did things at the time, for example no one had even suggested to use vendor prefixes yet.
For example Netscape did the same thing.
Now have an other look on mobile, where the new IE is all the different forks of Webkit that do not get updates. Replacement rate of mobiles was about ones every 2 years, with smartphones (because they are more expensive) this is going to be higher.
And webdevelopers already use webkit only features. Or are using it in a way which make it webkit only (-webkit *). Even though it already is a standard and other browsers support it.
* http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/australia/the-webkit-prefix-will-ruin-the-mobile-web/669
Yes, these graphics things, like WebGL always work really well for me in Firefox on Linux at home. Strange enough, even better than on Windows at work.
The good thing about Google is, it attracted many people from academia and other really smart people which try to do real research.
The bad thing is obviously: privacy.
> are not that concerned with her job.
When the woman makes more money than the guy, that attitude sometimes changes.
My guess is 2013.
That is why Windows 8 is gonna be interresting to watch...?
I are badly informed, they crack down on EU companies too, no problem.
If you do business in the EU market and abuse your power as a business, you will be smacked.
Now that I think about it, I think some company even created a fridge with Internet which uses E17-libraries (called EFL) to provide the GUI/browser experience.
E17 runs fine on mobile too, look at Tizen.
Hell, it already ran on the old HP IPaq.
They've been releasing new versions of their libraries regularly for the past few years.
So yes, they will release it soon enough.
I always wondered where the name of the provider Hurricane Electric came from, might as well ask it on this thread ;-)
If HP, Dell, Supermicro and others come up with a "standard" which puts all the connectors and indicators of servers on the front, then maybe we could all benefit the same way.