The Troubles began in the late 1960s and is considered by many to have ended with the Belfast Good Friday Agreement of 1998. However, sporadic violence has continued since then.
Ours, however, only lasted 4-5 years. Which I guess reinforces your point that we can't really meaningfully compare the two (?).
The other side of the coin would be, if the parties are too fluid in their stances, why would I want to vote for anyone if they're likely to switch to the other side of the issue that gained them my vote in the first place?
Not that I'm defending our "dig your heels in and scream NOOOOOO!!!" system:P Although I would settle for the campaign platform actually being followed after election.
Ah. I was having a rather difficult time deciphering your boolean logic. Although if we're talking about an automated filtering process, you just know that there will be false positives and negatives pretty much no matter what, too.
This is what we get when the journalists get ahold of some technical info and start waving it around with the safety off. I assumed from reading the summary that even if the functionality was "permanently disabled", if the code was already built into the browser, you would just have to find the right bits to twaddle in the binary to enable it. Although I guess that is indeed "permanent" for the vast majority of users.
<pedant>How would porn not count as an "artistic value"? And wouldn't putting on a wristband or something technically disqualify you from being "completely nude"?</pedant>
Like they say, "I know porn when I see it." I posit that you can't legally delineate child porn vs. family bathing pictures because the difference is psychological rather than physical.
I have for a long time now assumed that every article summary is out to mislead us somehow (malice vs. incompetence etc.) so I can't say I'm surprised.
Basically the government is complaining that when they told Sprint to bend over and prepare for right violations, they didn't lube up sufficiently before the NSA went to town...
Well if we take that software development observation into account, "More workers make the project take longer," we'd basically be in a race with the heat death of the universe for the project finishing if there were a million people involved.
No, nobody "forgot" how to do it; the hardware simply doesn't exist anymore. It's an implementation detail, not a knowledge gap. (Unless it's the other way around and the summary is wrong while the headline is right.)
Yeah, because obviously they'd design a secure, self-destructing phone to be trivially abusable over USB. I bet it even has autorun enabled by default.
As we're going along here, we seem to be getting tighter security for the cost of a steadily increasing chance of one of these customers accidentally destroying all their data.
Although after watching a show quite a number of times, I'm no longer convinced Mal was this ethical paragon that people make him out to be. He seemed to go out of his way to make his crew think he was about to do something bad and say, "Just trust me." It turned out a minute of screen time later that that *wasn't* what he was going to do, but he seemed to be intentionally misleading.
That, and his whole "you're on the crew, you're family" mantra seemed to be veeeery malleable when he wanted it to be.
Although this reinforces my saying that there's a Firefly quote for every occasion;)
Kind of surprised that nobody brought up this good point earlier in the conversation...
And was this gal at a bar by herself, i.e. not with any friends along? Can't say that sounds like a good idea either, unless you're in a posh restaurant bar or something. (Just observing reality, but I suppose I'll be accused of blaming the victim.)
Slashdot Mirror
The $17 billion Nasa will get in 2014
So that just about pays for one whole Super-Sexy K-9050 Uber-Abrams Mark V, right?
The Troubles began in the late 1960s and is considered by many to have ended with the Belfast Good Friday Agreement of 1998. However, sporadic violence has continued since then.
Ours, however, only lasted 4-5 years. Which I guess reinforces your point that we can't really meaningfully compare the two (?).
The other side of the coin would be, if the parties are too fluid in their stances, why would I want to vote for anyone if they're likely to switch to the other side of the issue that gained them my vote in the first place?
Not that I'm defending our "dig your heels in and scream NOOOOOO!!!" system :P Although I would settle for the campaign platform actually being followed after election.
I would assume they're both named after the Phoenician princess rather than Europa being named after Europe.
Ah. I was having a rather difficult time deciphering your boolean logic. Although if we're talking about an automated filtering process, you just know that there will be false positives and negatives pretty much no matter what, too.
This is what we get when the journalists get ahold of some technical info and start waving it around with the safety off. I assumed from reading the summary that even if the functionality was "permanently disabled", if the code was already built into the browser, you would just have to find the right bits to twaddle in the binary to enable it. Although I guess that is indeed "permanent" for the vast majority of users.
<pedant>How would porn not count as an "artistic value"? And wouldn't putting on a wristband or something technically disqualify you from being "completely nude"?</pedant>
Like they say, "I know porn when I see it." I posit that you can't legally delineate child porn vs. family bathing pictures because the difference is psychological rather than physical.
I have for a long time now assumed that every article summary is out to mislead us somehow (malice vs. incompetence etc.) so I can't say I'm surprised.
Basically the government is complaining that when they told Sprint to bend over and prepare for right violations, they didn't lube up sufficiently before the NSA went to town...
Well if we take that software development observation into account, "More workers make the project take longer," we'd basically be in a race with the heat death of the universe for the project finishing if there were a million people involved.
I think a million is being grossly overoptimistic. Maybe several thousand.
For comparison, there were 1,316 kernel devs involved in Linux 3.2.
http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/...
Sure.
I don't mind paying taxes, I just wish they wouldn't be spent idiotically on unnecessary military bloat and partisan posturing.
No, nobody "forgot" how to do it; the hardware simply doesn't exist anymore. It's an implementation detail, not a knowledge gap. (Unless it's the other way around and the summary is wrong while the headline is right.)
Assuming that the backups have the same or better security and a sufficiently short backup period, sure.
Yeah, because obviously they'd design a secure, self-destructing phone to be trivially abusable over USB. I bet it even has autorun enabled by default.
Yes, we're replacing the capabilities he compromised.
Well that's the problem right there (if true).
As we're going along here, we seem to be getting tighter security for the cost of a steadily increasing chance of one of these customers accidentally destroying all their data.
*"GEMA ist Scheisse" would be the correct way to spell that (or es-tset if you prefer).
You have no chance to survive make your time.
*for no reason
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
Not sure which is worse: you calling someone a faggot for not reason, or not even knowing how to spell it properly...
Although after watching a show quite a number of times, I'm no longer convinced Mal was this ethical paragon that people make him out to be. He seemed to go out of his way to make his crew think he was about to do something bad and say, "Just trust me." It turned out a minute of screen time later that that *wasn't* what he was going to do, but he seemed to be intentionally misleading.
That, and his whole "you're on the crew, you're family" mantra seemed to be veeeery malleable when he wanted it to be.
Although this reinforces my saying that there's a Firefly quote for every occasion ;)
(sig)
Kind of surprised that nobody brought up this good point earlier in the conversation...
And was this gal at a bar by herself, i.e. not with any friends along? Can't say that sounds like a good idea either, unless you're in a posh restaurant bar or something. (Just observing reality, but I suppose I'll be accused of blaming the victim.)