it's nice to be directly able to intervene the politics.
I don't doubt it, but it's worth noting that the quality of the decisions made by the electorate isn't uniformly high -- there was that embarrassing business with the minarets...
An application specific password is meant to be given to the application once and then never typed again, heavily reducing the chance of it being compromised.
If it's kept in persistent storage by the application, that actually increases the chance of it being compromised. Rather than logging keystrokes or peeking at RAM or man-in-the-middling the application in some way, you can just read a file.
To think that he's some kind of forest-destroying air-blackening capitalist is about the furthest from the truth as you can get. Check your assumptions.
His heart is pure, so his free money scheme has no externalities? All righty, then.
3) Arm society, making the murderer less effective.
Or making murder even more common. Hard to say.
Re:Uh...it's still there, you know
on
The Web We Lost
·
· Score: 2
You run the risk of losing control of your site content if you have a server in the corner, too, because someone might break into it. For that matter, it might be stolen by burglars.
People turn little video clips into animated GIFs for joke purposes. Theyâ(TM)re not posting MNG (or whatever the carefully designed and basically unused animated PNG format was called) to their Tumblrs.
With vehicles moving at 300 km/h on it, you're going to need a bit more segregation than a painted line, if only to keep other traffic from being sucked into the wake of the "super bus."
Though that event could certainly still happen in the future - and at that point the implication would be true.
On the off chance that you're not trolling: this is why people tend to end their conversations with you by wincing in agony and shouting, "Oh, fuck you."
Who profited from this? So far it seems the Liberals have...
Sabotage your own candidates in close races so that, a year later, they might get to run again in a by-election? I've accused the Liberals of not really wanting to win, but that's ridiculous.
but the phone was registered to a pierre poutine of separist street Quebec - would the Conservatives do that?
The person who registered the burner phone was a bit of an ass, apparently. I used to know a Tiny Tory who would have loved that joke — not that I'd want to help anyone pin this multi-riding scheme on poor old alleged ballot box toucher Michael Sona, who's terrible at looking innocent but incorrectly placed to have masterminded the scheme.
If you're calling someone a liar who has not in fact lied...
The implication was that Ignatieff had returned to the United States following his failed leadership stint. Since he hasn't, really, the implication was false.
After the Conservatives were convicted, the NDP settled and repaid.
Did the NDP blow anywhere near as much hot air in denying any wrongdoing as the Conservatives did? Conservatives and their supporters were carrying on about Elections Canada being out to get them, and how dare anyone question the propriety of their practices... basically the same tone that they're taking now.
Which happened under the previous Liberal administration.
A lot of high-handed and infuriating stuff happened under the previous Liberal administration, and eventually they got stuck with the "arrogant and corrupt" label and lost. (They also collapsed due to petty leadership infighting.)
Ever heard the tale of the boy who cried wolf?
Yeah, at the end, it turns out that there was a wolf, and it ate all of the town's sheep.
Incumbency, plus the major opposition party sabotaging itself with infighting in the last two elections ("Wahh, I don't want to win if he's the leader.").
That said, we will kick a party out based on a corruption scandal â" if we can find a replacement. As much as I'd enjoy an NDP/Green coalition, what's really going to happen, eventually, is that the Liberals will recover with an electable leader and sell the concept of the Conservatives as arrogant and corrupt. I think Rae could do it absent punditry spending the whole campaign declaring him unelectable, but that's like saying that an empty balloon would float if it had helium in it.
Odd, cause the NDP were fessing up to it according to the National Post.
Rae was NDP back when he was premier of Ontario, but he's federal Liberal leader now.
...none of the parties are looking that great lately...
I certainly hope you're not trying to put the Vickileaks Twitter prank, a protest against the provisions of Bill C-30, in the same category as scumbag election tampering. One hurt the feelings of a cabinet minister who'd just called everyone who didn't support his stupid bill child molesters; the other was an attempt to stop people from voting.
I really wish they'd do something more productive.
The Conservative agenda proceeds apace, with an austerity budget — hey, everyone's doing it, great excuse to gut the public sector — out in a week or so.
A committee will get formed that, after lengthy discussion...
It's worth noting that Elections Canada is investigating, and they have burned the Conservatives before (on the so called "in-and-out" campaign spending limit violations). This won't go away entirely based on a committee of politicians meeting in camera and deciding that everything's dandy.
And with so many calls, has there been any attempt to cross-reference them with phone logs to try to figure out where the calls originated from?
Oh, yes. The most hilarious detail is a burner phone registered to "Pierre Poutine, Separatist Street, Joliette Quebec." It's one of our best/worst political scandals in a generation.
Slashdot Mirror
Tell me more about can a chat bot plus big data really produce anything beyond a creepy, awkward facsimile?
Racism on your part, I figure.
I don't doubt it, but it's worth noting that the quality of the decisions made by the electorate isn't uniformly high -- there was that embarrassing business with the minarets...
If it's kept in persistent storage by the application, that actually increases the chance of it being compromised. Rather than logging keystrokes or peeking at RAM or man-in-the-middling the application in some way, you can just read a file.
His heart is pure, so his free money scheme has no externalities? All righty, then.
Netcraft confirms it.
Or making murder even more common. Hard to say.
You run the risk of losing control of your site content if you have a server in the corner, too, because someone might break into it. For that matter, it might be stolen by burglars.
Still no Unicode support here at Slashdot, I see, speaking of outdatedness.
People turn little video clips into animated GIFs for joke purposes. Theyâ(TM)re not posting MNG (or whatever the carefully designed and basically unused animated PNG format was called) to their Tumblrs.
Actually, if that's the case, he needs to charge for the online component, and then the pirates are just helping with distribution.
It might be almost like the old days of cartridge rentals, but it's exactly like shareware.
With vehicles moving at 300 km/h on it, you're going to need a bit more segregation than a painted line, if only to keep other traffic from being sucked into the wake of the "super bus."
Batteries make about as much sense as the rest of the concept — gimmicky car is gimmicky.
Because if he didn't kill himself that very day, it isn't a plausible cause?
On the off chance that you're not trolling: this is why people tend to end their conversations with you by wincing in agony and shouting, "Oh, fuck you."
The most likely scenario is that a by-election would be called.
Sabotage your own candidates in close races so that, a year later, they might get to run again in a by-election? I've accused the Liberals of not really wanting to win, but that's ridiculous.
The person who registered the burner phone was a bit of an ass, apparently. I used to know a Tiny Tory who would have loved that joke — not that I'd want to help anyone pin this multi-riding scheme on poor old alleged ballot box toucher Michael Sona, who's terrible at looking innocent but incorrectly placed to have masterminded the scheme.
The implication was that Ignatieff had returned to the United States following his failed leadership stint. Since he hasn't, really, the implication was false.
Did the NDP blow anywhere near as much hot air in denying any wrongdoing as the Conservatives did? Conservatives and their supporters were carrying on about Elections Canada being out to get them, and how dare anyone question the propriety of their practices... basically the same tone that they're taking now.
A lot of high-handed and infuriating stuff happened under the previous Liberal administration, and eventually they got stuck with the "arrogant and corrupt" label and lost. (They also collapsed due to petty leadership infighting.)
Yeah, at the end, it turns out that there was a wolf, and it ate all of the town's sheep.
Incumbency, plus the major opposition party sabotaging itself with infighting in the last two elections ("Wahh, I don't want to win if he's the leader.").
That said, we will kick a party out based on a corruption scandal â" if we can find a replacement. As much as I'd enjoy an NDP/Green coalition, what's really going to happen, eventually, is that the Liberals will recover with an electable leader and sell the concept of the Conservatives as arrogant and corrupt. I think Rae could do it absent punditry spending the whole campaign declaring him unelectable, but that's like saying that an empty balloon would float if it had helium in it.
Rae was NDP back when he was premier of Ontario, but he's federal Liberal leader now.
I certainly hope you're not trying to put the Vickileaks Twitter prank, a protest against the provisions of Bill C-30, in the same category as scumbag election tampering. One hurt the feelings of a cabinet minister who'd just called everyone who didn't support his stupid bill child molesters; the other was an attempt to stop people from voting.
The Conservative agenda proceeds apace, with an austerity budget — hey, everyone's doing it, great excuse to gut the public sector — out in a week or so.
It's worth noting that Elections Canada is investigating, and they have burned the Conservatives before (on the so called "in-and-out" campaign spending limit violations). This won't go away entirely based on a committee of politicians meeting in camera and deciding that everything's dandy.
Orientation note for foreigners: it's really more like three or four.
Oh, yes. The most hilarious detail is a burner phone registered to "Pierre Poutine, Separatist Street, Joliette Quebec." It's one of our best/worst political scandals in a generation.