its because no other country would offer safety to a large grew of jews who would want to live there
And somehow evicting Palestinians from land that Jews hadn't controlled for a thousand years was going to make the Jews safe? Apparently that didn't work out. You really want to offer the Jews refuge? Let them come here.
World War ii was a long time ago. Israel is committing atrocities today. They don't get a free pass because of what happened to their ancestors.
I'm not sure where your jew hatred came from but I find it very telling which side you 'pick' and for what reasons.
You can go fuck yourself. I would personally have no problem if every Israeli sought refuge in America. Come here, be my neighbor, and live free from the threat of RPG attacks. Please!
Opposition to Israel is in no way, shape, or form anti-semitism. And fuck you very much for making the suggestion.
Basically I want a game that rewards perseverance without demanding skill.
How is merely putting in time rewarding? In RPGs that's derisively called "grinding". There's no sense of accomplishment when you finish such a game, as there was never any doubt you could do it.
Because of evangelicals. They believe a holy war will preceed the second coming of christ, and so they do everything in their power to start one. There is absolutely nothing rational about our policy towards Israel.
From a point of law the guy was illegally distributing copyrighted material.
The interesting question is whether the guy's computer distributing copyrighted material without his knowledge counts as "the guy illegally distributing copyrighted material". I doubt Germany has statutes that address that particular question, but I could be wrong.
The judge decided a particular case where the user is said to have used Retroshare. You cannot rule that it was set up to defame retroshare. Nowhere did the Court rule that using Retroshare was illegal. It didn't and it was not entitled to.
How does precedent work in Germany? If one user has been found legally liable for his use of retroshare, how does that not endanger every other user of retroshare in Germany?
Your understanding of the science is limited to the scientists who support your beliefs. You haven't looked any further.
If you really believe this, prove it by offering some research to the contrary. If such research exists, I cannot find it. Given the massive propaganda effort to demonize cannabis, if that research existed it would be highly publicized.
No, actually it takes centuries. e.g. American Indians are able to legally collect and consume peyote as part of religious ceremonies, because they've been doing it for centuries. No matter how sincere or deeply felt your religious beliefs, they're not going to let you do the same.
What the hell are you talking about? There's decades of research on impairment caused by cannabis. We've been fighting a war on the drug for decades, and the prohibitionists have been looking for any possible harm they could blame it for. There's lots of research out there on how Cannabis affects driving ability, and it paints a very consistent picture. Cannabis is impairing, but only slightly, and it's well within the impairment we tolerate with other substances. It takes extreme amounts of THC to impair someone as much as a.08 BAC, for example.
That's what the actual research shows. It's favorable to cannabis. And that's why the director of the NHTSA is playing dumb.
If I took you from your home, put you in shackles and lock you in a cage, you wouldn't count that as violence? It's still violence when the state does it, it's just (potentially) justifiable violence.
Diversity means different viewpoints, different perspectives, different approaches. Diverse speakers will appeal to and engage a more diverse audience. Diversity is more interesting.
IF this is true, then any attempt to put on the most interesting conference will necessarily be diverse, without giving a single thought to diversity.
Diversity is a good thing, and it should be deliberately incorporated.
No, by the above argument we don't need to deliberately incorporate diversity. Diversity comes for free simply by looking for interesting ideas. The interesting ideas are the point, diversity in and of itself has no value whatsoever.
Israel is the occupying power in the Gaza Strip. In 2005, as part of what it termed âoedisengagementâ from Gaza, Israel removed its settlements and settlers. Yet despite the redeployment of its troops in 2005, the Israeli army has retained effective control over the Gaza Strip. Israel maintains sole control of Gazaâ(TM)s airspace and territorial waters and does not allow any movement of people or goods in or out of Gaza via air or sea. Israel also continues to exercise a degree of control over Gazaâ(TM)s border with Egypt and Israeli officials have repeatedly made it clear that this border can only be reopened within the framework of a joint agreement with the Palestinian Authority and Egypt.1Israel also continues to control electricity, water and telecommunications in Gaza. It has regularly conducted raids in Gaza, often arresting âoewantedâ men; and carrying out so-called âoetargeted killingsâ, in air strikes which have claimed a high toll on civilians.
Slashdot Mirror
its because no other country would offer safety to a large grew of jews who would want to live there
And somehow evicting Palestinians from land that Jews hadn't controlled for a thousand years was going to make the Jews safe? Apparently that didn't work out. You really want to offer the Jews refuge? Let them come here.
World War ii was a long time ago. Israel is committing atrocities today. They don't get a free pass because of what happened to their ancestors.
I'm not sure where your jew hatred came from but I find it very telling which side you 'pick' and for what reasons.
You can go fuck yourself. I would personally have no problem if every Israeli sought refuge in America. Come here, be my neighbor, and live free from the threat of RPG attacks. Please!
Opposition to Israel is in no way, shape, or form anti-semitism. And fuck you very much for making the suggestion.
What exactly would you do if after in the interest of peace you gave someone some land
"Gave"? Israel partially withdrew from occupied territory, that's not exactly a gift.
Because the magical man in the sky told them to.
Where does skill come in?
Basically I want a game that rewards perseverance without demanding skill.
How is merely putting in time rewarding? In RPGs that's derisively called "grinding". There's no sense of accomplishment when you finish such a game, as there was never any doubt you could do it.
Because of evangelicals. They believe a holy war will preceed the second coming of christ, and so they do everything in their power to start one. There is absolutely nothing rational about our policy towards Israel.
From a point of law the guy was illegally distributing copyrighted material.
The interesting question is whether the guy's computer distributing copyrighted material without his knowledge counts as "the guy illegally distributing copyrighted material". I doubt Germany has statutes that address that particular question, but I could be wrong.
The judge decided a particular case where the user is said to have used Retroshare. You cannot rule that it was set up to defame retroshare. Nowhere did the Court rule that using Retroshare was illegal. It didn't and it was not entitled to.
How does precedent work in Germany? If one user has been found legally liable for his use of retroshare, how does that not endanger every other user of retroshare in Germany?
The onscreen keyboard is a low priority for KDE desktop, because it's a desktop OS, not one intended for tablets.
I imagine, given the title of his post, that tablets are not his first concern.
Personally, I'm just amazed that a sports story is interesting for once. I think that's a first.
If you haven't noticed, the discussion is on impairment of driving ability. Too bad you can't blame that on drugs, you're just naturally stupid.
Fuck you and your terrorism fear mongering. Seriously, just fuck you. People like you are a far bigger threat to our freedom than any terrorist.
Not true at all. If this were true, there would be legal psychedelic churches in every city in the country. None exist.
Your understanding of the science is limited to the scientists who support your beliefs. You haven't looked any further.
If you really believe this, prove it by offering some research to the contrary. If such research exists, I cannot find it. Given the massive propaganda effort to demonize cannabis, if that research existed it would be highly publicized.
No, actually it takes centuries. e.g. American Indians are able to legally collect and consume peyote as part of religious ceremonies, because they've been doing it for centuries. No matter how sincere or deeply felt your religious beliefs, they're not going to let you do the same.
What the hell are you talking about? There's decades of research on impairment caused by cannabis. We've been fighting a war on the drug for decades, and the prohibitionists have been looking for any possible harm they could blame it for. There's lots of research out there on how Cannabis affects driving ability, and it paints a very consistent picture. Cannabis is impairing, but only slightly, and it's well within the impairment we tolerate with other substances. It takes extreme amounts of THC to impair someone as much as a .08 BAC, for example.
That's what the actual research shows. It's favorable to cannabis. And that's why the director of the NHTSA is playing dumb.
It's to keep students from cutting class!
If they don't want to be there, they have no business being there. Let the truant kids do what they want, and let those interested in learning learn.
Unfortunately, there is no freedom of logic in the constitution. Rationalists actually have less rights than the religious in the US.
It's called the field sobriety test. If you can't tell that someone has consumed too much, then they haven't consumed too much.
Because actual data, which we've been collecting for decades contrary to the assertion of the NHTSA, doesn't support fear mongering.
I just really hope fork lift drivers in the big box hardware stores are careful and don't use right before their shift.
I guarantee you, every warehouse worker that wants to be stoned on the job is already stoned on the job.
If I took you from your home, put you in shackles and lock you in a cage, you wouldn't count that as violence? It's still violence when the state does it, it's just (potentially) justifiable violence.
Diversity means different viewpoints, different perspectives, different approaches. Diverse speakers will appeal to and engage a more diverse audience. Diversity is more interesting.
IF this is true, then any attempt to put on the most interesting conference will necessarily be diverse, without giving a single thought to diversity.
Diversity is a good thing, and it should be deliberately incorporated.
No, by the above argument we don't need to deliberately incorporate diversity. Diversity comes for free simply by looking for interesting ideas. The interesting ideas are the point, diversity in and of itself has no value whatsoever.
Somneone should tell Amnesty International.