Are they? Lower and middle class households pay far more of their small income as taxes, and it harms them far more than the upper classes. So, how are taxes currently progressive. Please provide links backing any claims you make.
That is not what was said. The distrust is for media that actually resorts to lying to try and smear Trump. There is so much material that requires no lies, but they resort to lies to get what they want.
In reality, the president has tons of control over Wall Street and gas prices.
Wall Street goes up and down based on the Fed's interest rate, which is why they lowered the interest rate during the recession, and again recently when Wall Street shit bricks when the rate was raised, even after the prior warning of months.
Gas prices go up and down based on political posturing with other countries, how easy it is to get oil pumping rights (which he just recently revoked in the Atlantic), and things like refusing the application for oil pipelines that will reduce oil spills from shipping oil by rail, and lower the prices of gas in general.
So, while the president doesn't have levers, he most assuredly has huge control over these things. However, sometimes things don't go the president's way, such as the current oil glut, which Obama wishes wasn't happening as he wants high gas prices. This glut is an intentional reaction to fracking/oil sands, and an attempt to crush Russia's economy.
Because the woman didn't choose to have sex, and who would want to raise the child of a rapist. In the case of failed birth control, an actual choice was made to have sex, which is known to lead to pregnancy.
Funny, because I have seen Obama on numerous occasions refuse to work with the GOP when they have tried to work with him. He even repeatedly shutdown the entire federal government rather than have a discussion with the Republicans in congress. So who isn't working with who?
Um, except what is being said about Hillary is actually true. She ran an email server at home for her official email to avoid possible investigations into her activities. When confronted for the email which is required by law to be turned over she turned over only come of her email after removing half of it as "personal email". In the half of email she turned over, there were 1000s of emails that were marked classified before being sent to her, that somehow became unmarked before she got them. Some of these emails were so blatantly classified, that there is no excuse for her not knowing it was classified information. As secretary of state, it is one of her duties to be able to determine information which should be classified, and classify it appropriately, this is called being an "original classification authority", she has no excuse that she didn't know it was classified information.
Every single sentence above is a FELONY LAW broken. And you think that she is a better candidate because of her policies? I see policies that are blatantly against the best interests of my country, freedom, and the people.
FYI, the past two elections had 6 names on the ballot, not two. There are other options. I am not sure about the other ballots, but I looked those two up recently to make a point.
So, if you are picking Not Clinton, you are better throwing your vote at a third party, if they get enough votes, they get more money for the next election, which could bring about real change. I have no honest expectation that a third party candidate will win the next election, but it seems that this election is the best chance for them to breach 5% or whatever the level is to actually get some notice.
I see abortion as a matter of personal freedom and privacy which is well within the purview of the SCOTUS.
I see abortion as murder, which it is. The choice was made when sex was engaged in. The only time that abortion should be allowed is in cases of rape or where having a child would kill the mother/harm the child. Otherwise, you are murdering someone because they are inconvenient. If you aren't ready to have children, there is always adoption, which helps couples who are unable to have children.
So, who was not doing their job? The Republicans tried to do exactly what has always been done on every bill, negotiate with the other side. Obama called them terrorists and refused to negotiate, so was shut out. As soon as negotiations started, the issue was resolved. You have an odd memory of these issues.
If you don't think a gun will stop a mass shooting, why do we have the secret service protecting the president with guns? Why have police with guns? After all, guns don't stop crime, lets disarm the police.
Do you often think before typing? Gun stop more crime than any other thing, but I guess you think that disarmed people can defend themselves effectively, like in Paris, or Sydney or a Movie theater, or any of the school shootings?
Yeah, because gun nuts totally led to the ineffective laws in the places I mention above...you know the Democratic Party strongholds where they make fun of the NRA as being full of gun nuts?
No effect? They caught Bin Laden, what more effect did you want?
Just because the US government doesn't tell you every little thing they do, doesn't mean that nothing happened. Why would they tell you all the bomb makers caught because of intel from Guantanamo, or other things like that? It is all kept top secret to prevent the source from being exposed.
It is in Ukraine, also, remember there are references in the game to New Little Odessa, which appears to be named after Odessa, which is a Ukrainian city.
The clear intent was that all civilians should have whatever firearm they can get. In the revolutionary war, it was civilian weapons that won the war, as the civilians had rifled firearm while the military could only afford to hand out smoothbore muskets to their recruits. The military arms of the time were far worse than what the majority of civilians already had. So, let's make the rule this:
The military can use any firearm that is allowed to the general populus.
It works so well in Detroit, Baltimore, DC, and other Democratic party strongholds already, so why not.
I live outside of Baltimore, I see it every time I visit Baltimore and DC. The gun laws have not led to a reduction in gun crime, so can we finally acknowledge that they are not working?
Come on, at least all of that is true. You have to make something unbelievable up to actually get into the worst territory.
All joking aside, I have to respond to this:
There's no particular evidence that she's a "corrupt, serially lying manipulator" other than the intensive media campaign saying so being put forth by the Republican machine.
You mean the Republican machine running the FBI that is investigating actual classified information found in the emails? It is hard to screw up worse than that in the government, and if I did half the shit that is coming out, I would already have been through the court system and locked up for life, but I am not as connected as her.
Perhaps you should look into Trump again before you spout off.
a racist, sexist
Much of what you hear is the media mischaracterizing things he says, but I will admit, very likely it is true nonetheless.
pretend businessman with no real accomplishments in business other than multiple bankruptcies and a reality TV show
Wow, I wish I was as poor at business as him, 4 bankruptcies out of 100s of businesses? Building up millions to billions? Yeah, he is a real pretend businessman. What you need to understand is that businesses sometimes fail, and if you look into these, you will find that it is normal stuff. Failing at business is normal, as to make money you take risks, which sometimes don't pan out.
Someone who's incapable of stating a single thought through policy position
Perhaps you should look at his web site?
who thinks the best use of televised debate is talking about his penis.
He didn't start that, just responded to the attack.
FYI, I don't support Trump, I don't support Hillary. I also am shaking my head at this election, but at least slam someone for something they did do, not make shit up about them.
Frankly, either convention could be considered that. After all, look at Hillary's approval rating among Democratic party supporters, and she has been exposed as possibly committing a felony.
Slashdot Mirror
Are they? Lower and middle class households pay far more of their small income as taxes, and it harms them far more than the upper classes. So, how are taxes currently progressive. Please provide links backing any claims you make.
distrusting everyone who hates Trump
That is not what was said. The distrust is for media that actually resorts to lying to try and smear Trump. There is so much material that requires no lies, but they resort to lies to get what they want.
In reality, the president has tons of control over Wall Street and gas prices.
Wall Street goes up and down based on the Fed's interest rate, which is why they lowered the interest rate during the recession, and again recently when Wall Street shit bricks when the rate was raised, even after the prior warning of months.
Gas prices go up and down based on political posturing with other countries, how easy it is to get oil pumping rights (which he just recently revoked in the Atlantic), and things like refusing the application for oil pipelines that will reduce oil spills from shipping oil by rail, and lower the prices of gas in general.
So, while the president doesn't have levers, he most assuredly has huge control over these things. However, sometimes things don't go the president's way, such as the current oil glut, which Obama wishes wasn't happening as he wants high gas prices. This glut is an intentional reaction to fracking/oil sands, and an attempt to crush Russia's economy.
Because the woman didn't choose to have sex, and who would want to raise the child of a rapist. In the case of failed birth control, an actual choice was made to have sex, which is known to lead to pregnancy.
Funny, because I have seen Obama on numerous occasions refuse to work with the GOP when they have tried to work with him. He even repeatedly shutdown the entire federal government rather than have a discussion with the Republicans in congress. So who isn't working with who?
https://slashdot.org/comments....
I link to articles in that comment to support what I just said, so you can't even refute what I said.
Um, except what is being said about Hillary is actually true. She ran an email server at home for her official email to avoid possible investigations into her activities. When confronted for the email which is required by law to be turned over she turned over only come of her email after removing half of it as "personal email". In the half of email she turned over, there were 1000s of emails that were marked classified before being sent to her, that somehow became unmarked before she got them. Some of these emails were so blatantly classified, that there is no excuse for her not knowing it was classified information. As secretary of state, it is one of her duties to be able to determine information which should be classified, and classify it appropriately, this is called being an "original classification authority", she has no excuse that she didn't know it was classified information.
Every single sentence above is a FELONY LAW broken. And you think that she is a better candidate because of her policies? I see policies that are blatantly against the best interests of my country, freedom, and the people.
FYI, the past two elections had 6 names on the ballot, not two. There are other options. I am not sure about the other ballots, but I looked those two up recently to make a point.
So, if you are picking Not Clinton, you are better throwing your vote at a third party, if they get enough votes, they get more money for the next election, which could bring about real change. I have no honest expectation that a third party candidate will win the next election, but it seems that this election is the best chance for them to breach 5% or whatever the level is to actually get some notice.
I see abortion as a matter of personal freedom and privacy which is well within the purview of the SCOTUS.
I see abortion as murder, which it is. The choice was made when sex was engaged in. The only time that abortion should be allowed is in cases of rape or where having a child would kill the mother/harm the child. Otherwise, you are murdering someone because they are inconvenient. If you aren't ready to have children, there is always adoption, which helps couples who are unable to have children.
The Republicans shut down the government rather than work with him, or did that little fact slip your memory?
Are you sure that is the way it went?
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
Or if you mean the budget
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
So, who was not doing their job? The Republicans tried to do exactly what has always been done on every bill, negotiate with the other side. Obama called them terrorists and refused to negotiate, so was shut out. As soon as negotiations started, the issue was resolved. You have an odd memory of these issues.
You don't believe Firefox is better than Internet Explorer, or Edge?
If you don't think a gun will stop a mass shooting, why do we have the secret service protecting the president with guns? Why have police with guns? After all, guns don't stop crime, lets disarm the police.
Do you often think before typing? Gun stop more crime than any other thing, but I guess you think that disarmed people can defend themselves effectively, like in Paris, or Sydney or a Movie theater, or any of the school shootings?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Lets just disarm and let all those with access to guns just kill whoever they please, it seems to work everywhere it is tried.
Yeah, because gun nuts totally led to the ineffective laws in the places I mention above...you know the Democratic Party strongholds where they make fun of the NRA as being full of gun nuts?
No effect? They caught Bin Laden, what more effect did you want?
Just because the US government doesn't tell you every little thing they do, doesn't mean that nothing happened. Why would they tell you all the bomb makers caught because of intel from Guantanamo, or other things like that? It is all kept top secret to prevent the source from being exposed.
Or it was a joke?
Select Start?
http://half-life.wikia.com/wik...
It is in Ukraine, also, remember there are references in the game to New Little Odessa, which appears to be named after Odessa, which is a Ukrainian city.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Wikipedia also says it is Eastern Europe. Do you have any references for it not being in Eastern Europe?
I guess you have never been to an inner city area than?
I've seen many people carrying their gat's in their waistband walking the streets around here.
The clear intent was that all civilians should have whatever firearm they can get. In the revolutionary war, it was civilian weapons that won the war, as the civilians had rifled firearm while the military could only afford to hand out smoothbore muskets to their recruits. The military arms of the time were far worse than what the majority of civilians already had. So, let's make the rule this:
The military can use any firearm that is allowed to the general populus.
It works so well in Detroit, Baltimore, DC, and other Democratic party strongholds already, so why not.
I live outside of Baltimore, I see it every time I visit Baltimore and DC. The gun laws have not led to a reduction in gun crime, so can we finally acknowledge that they are not working?
So, what you are saying is that none of them should be allowed to be president?
Come on, at least all of that is true. You have to make something unbelievable up to actually get into the worst territory.
All joking aside, I have to respond to this:
There's no particular evidence that she's a "corrupt, serially lying manipulator" other than the intensive media campaign saying so being put forth by the Republican machine.
You mean the Republican machine running the FBI that is investigating actual classified information found in the emails? It is hard to screw up worse than that in the government, and if I did half the shit that is coming out, I would already have been through the court system and locked up for life, but I am not as connected as her.
Perhaps you should look into Trump again before you spout off.
a racist, sexist
Much of what you hear is the media mischaracterizing things he says, but I will admit, very likely it is true nonetheless.
pretend businessman with no real accomplishments in business other than multiple bankruptcies and a reality TV show
Wow, I wish I was as poor at business as him, 4 bankruptcies out of 100s of businesses? Building up millions to billions? Yeah, he is a real pretend businessman. What you need to understand is that businesses sometimes fail, and if you look into these, you will find that it is normal stuff. Failing at business is normal, as to make money you take risks, which sometimes don't pan out.
Someone who's incapable of stating a single thought through policy position
Perhaps you should look at his web site?
who thinks the best use of televised debate is talking about his penis.
He didn't start that, just responded to the attack.
FYI, I don't support Trump, I don't support Hillary. I also am shaking my head at this election, but at least slam someone for something they did do, not make shit up about them.
Frankly, either convention could be considered that. After all, look at Hillary's approval rating among Democratic party supporters, and she has been exposed as possibly committing a felony.
Because a metal detector is totally going to stop someone intent on murder.
If you subscribe to the greater good theory, Guantanamo was perfectly acceptable, while anti-vaxxers are flat out evil.