APK, your posts stalking and trolling me are HILARIOUS! Please, keep it up, the attention is wonderful.
Perhaps you should stop hiding behind your fake third party persona? No one thinks that this isn't you stalking all my posts acting like a concerned third party.
You mean where I replied directly to his post? Somehow now I am trolling to reply to what you say APK?
Not lying, as I have proven myself numerous times, not trolling, as you can see by my moderation, and not offtopic as I was responding to the topic your brought up.
However, you following me around all over the place and posting as a third party is offtopic trolling, so keep it up APK.
FYI, his taxes would not show if he was or was not a billionaire, as the only thing that shows on taxes is income, not investments. The only thing you will find in his taxes is how much money he paid himself, and how much taxes he paid on that.
Aww, poor APK, wants me to out myself so he can stalk me in real life. Still not going to happen, you enjoy harassing me here enough as is.
Love how you posted in that first link and tried to sign it as from me. No, I don't even know what the Keystone center is, and doing a little research, it is far off base.
So, as a single father, are you also claiming that I should be able to leave work early to pick up my kids from school? You want equality, so how about the equality of male single parents to female single parents?
Blocking doesn't work when you have someone like Milo Yiannopoulos who will send waves of individual followers to harass you.
I see this claim a lot on here, and have yet to see a single instance of a citation to back up the claim that Milo asked other people to harass anyone. Please, provide a citation to a reputable source that he himself told anyone to do any of that.
I'll wait, I'm sure you have it right on your fingertips as the claim has been made by you and many others.
Kind of funny you link to that, when it clearly shows how racist she was being as well. Or do you think calling people Kikes or fags is suddenly acceptable? Is it acceptable to call for "gas dese goddamn faggots to death"?
You are supporting a racist bigot in her attacks of others, while calling for the censorship of others who point it out. What did Mila say in that thread that was so bad? All I see is him pointing out that she needs to call weight watchers...which is rude, but hardly comparable to suggesting faggots should be gassed to death.
Your front lawn is private property. Unless you are using private messages, or restricting access to your feed, your Twitter feed is public property. This is you complaining about the protesters peacefully protesting in the public areas of a city during the day, not 3 am in your yard.
Oh yeah, running away. Is it running to just give up on explaining the same thing for the 100th time? You don't get it, because you know so little about networking. You don't understand how the hosts file works, but still believe your solution is so much better.
It is not offtopic to respond to what people post about.
So, since you brought it up, I responded. You bring up how no one has ever proven you wrong, so I point out that I have proven you wrong numerous times. You, yet again, still don't even understand enough of the technology you are dealing with to understand why you are wrong, so, instead of admitting your mistakes, you insult me, and call me a liar. Keep it up, I am sure one of these days you will catch me being wrong.
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.
When the FBI director comes out and says 52 classified, 8 TS, 36 Secret, 8 Confidential (at the time of transmission), and 2000 that were later up-classified, as they had not been previously classified, you know you done f'd up. Defending the 2000 as if the other 52 didn't exist makes no sense. It is trying to conceal the nature of the crime by changing the story.
I can only presume that the ACs are paid by Clinton to defend her, as they are just parroting the talking points that were shattered months ago.
Aww, poor APK had his feelings hurt when I proved him wrong.
What does the topic have to do with hosts files that you just had to bring them up? What did the topic have to do with APK that you had to pitch in about how you are superior
You are just mad that I get up modded while you get down modded. I participate in the conversation, while you troll.
The only time I have seen telegraph poles was along I-70 in Maryland, down near Big Pool. They used glass insulators, and it was shaped like an upside down "L".
I am not lying, but no, I have no pictures, as stopping on highways like that to take pictures is an unwise decision. I am not trying to argue, I just think that calling them telegraph poles, after an archaic and outdated technology is odd, as you don't really see actual telegraph lines much anymore, they are a rather rare thing.
You have proven, yet again, that you know nothing about how network stacks work, and that you can only insult and lie about me.
I am not stupid, despite what you try to say.
I am not a ne'er-do-well or a menial.
I have done things, my refusal to demonstrate them is more about you than me. I don't feel like you stalking me in real life like you do here.
I have proven your lack of knowledge in networking repeatedly in this thread and others. You still persist in your assertion that you use a bridge without understanding the first thing about them. You still claim to get around Slashdot's AC limits by using a bridge, as if that is a possibility.
No, I have not contradicted myself, that you think I did points to a serious read comprehension issue on your side. Keep it up, keep the insults coming. I know I am getting to you with my truth when you are forced to break out all the insults.
Aww, now you have to jump to me being brain damaged. So, since you lost the argument, you have to try insulting yet again to make your point? Asperger's Syndrome, and Autism as it is now called is not the result of brain damage, so perhaps you should rethink your attacks, as they make you look ignorant.
So, where is your consideration of the impact of name resolution of every entry not in the hosts file? Where is your consideration of the impact of directing hosts file entries to 0.0.0.0 (as you recommend) and the timeout wait of this (or the impact of running a web server that returns a blank page for every possible query)?
You like to slam adblock, but you don't have to wait for adblock to timeout items that aren't even attempted to retrieve.
With domain name system, you don't have to wait for every query to step through 200k records to have a cache miss that finally times out to public dns, so you get that improved performance. You also don't have to wait for however many records to be stepped through to get to every 0.0.0.0 entry. Domain name systems use a branching tree algorithm (you know, a programming term?) to look up entries, so it doesn't have to process all of the records every time you do a lookup, just the one you are looking for.
APK, your post history shows that you don't know the first thing about networking or how the network stack works. You think that waving away the issues with hosts files will make them not exist, while I am many others have pointed the failings of your solution out to you, you still stick your fingers in your ears and act like you are superior to all, despite having a horrid solution for non security.
Slashdot Mirror
I lurked for years...how I regret that.
3 you too APK, thanks for all the attention, it really makes me feel loved back.
APK, your posts stalking and trolling me are HILARIOUS! Please, keep it up, the attention is wonderful.
Perhaps you should stop hiding behind your fake third party persona? No one thinks that this isn't you stalking all my posts acting like a concerned third party.
You mean where I replied directly to his post? Somehow now I am trolling to reply to what you say APK?
Not lying, as I have proven myself numerous times, not trolling, as you can see by my moderation, and not offtopic as I was responding to the topic your brought up.
However, you following me around all over the place and posting as a third party is offtopic trolling, so keep it up APK.
Who is the defendant? I thought they were suing 84 John Does.
Come on, get it right, he is at 127.0.0.1. That bastard is always trying to hack me.
IP address spoofing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Hillary, is that you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
FYI, his taxes would not show if he was or was not a billionaire, as the only thing that shows on taxes is income, not investments. The only thing you will find in his taxes is how much money he paid himself, and how much taxes he paid on that.
Aww, poor APK, wants me to out myself so he can stalk me in real life. Still not going to happen, you enjoy harassing me here enough as is.
Love how you posted in that first link and tried to sign it as from me. No, I don't even know what the Keystone center is, and doing a little research, it is far off base.
So, as a single father, are you also claiming that I should be able to leave work early to pick up my kids from school? You want equality, so how about the equality of male single parents to female single parents?
Blocking doesn't work when you have someone like Milo Yiannopoulos who will send waves of individual followers to harass you.
I see this claim a lot on here, and have yet to see a single instance of a citation to back up the claim that Milo asked other people to harass anyone. Please, provide a citation to a reputable source that he himself told anyone to do any of that.
I'll wait, I'm sure you have it right on your fingertips as the claim has been made by you and many others.
Kind of funny you link to that, when it clearly shows how racist she was being as well. Or do you think calling people Kikes or fags is suddenly acceptable? Is it acceptable to call for "gas dese goddamn faggots to death"?
You are supporting a racist bigot in her attacks of others, while calling for the censorship of others who point it out. What did Mila say in that thread that was so bad? All I see is him pointing out that she needs to call weight watchers...which is rude, but hardly comparable to suggesting faggots should be gassed to death.
Google translate, and a regular Google search give no clues, I am guessing it doesn't actually have a meaning.
Your front lawn is private property. Unless you are using private messages, or restricting access to your feed, your Twitter feed is public property. This is you complaining about the protesters peacefully protesting in the public areas of a city during the day, not 3 am in your yard.
Oh yeah, running away. Is it running to just give up on explaining the same thing for the 100th time? You don't get it, because you know so little about networking. You don't understand how the hosts file works, but still believe your solution is so much better.
It is not offtopic to respond to what people post about.
https://slashdot.org/comments....
So, since you brought it up, I responded. You bring up how no one has ever proven you wrong, so I point out that I have proven you wrong numerous times. You, yet again, still don't even understand enough of the technology you are dealing with to understand why you are wrong, so, instead of admitting your mistakes, you insult me, and call me a liar. Keep it up, I am sure one of these days you will catch me being wrong.
I don't get this sea of ACs defending her actions.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press...
FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”).
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.
When the FBI director comes out and says 52 classified, 8 TS, 36 Secret, 8 Confidential (at the time of transmission), and 2000 that were later up-classified, as they had not been previously classified, you know you done f'd up. Defending the 2000 as if the other 52 didn't exist makes no sense. It is trying to conceal the nature of the crime by changing the story.
I can only presume that the ACs are paid by Clinton to defend her, as they are just parroting the talking points that were shattered months ago.
She destroyed evidence when she had received a subpoena for it.
https://benghazi.house.gov/sit...
https://benghazi.house.gov/sit...
So, in your mind, deleting emails under a congressional subpoena is normal practice and it is out of the norm to fault Hillary for doing it?
I work in the field you describe, and I gotta tell you, I wouldn't dare run that utility on a mail server after a subpoena was submitted for the data.
Aww, poor APK had his feelings hurt when I proved him wrong.
What does the topic have to do with hosts files that you just had to bring them up? What did the topic have to do with APK that you had to pitch in about how you are superior
You are just mad that I get up modded while you get down modded. I participate in the conversation, while you troll.
I was as much off topic as you APK. Why do you try and claim I am off topic when I am responding to what you posted?
The only time I have seen telegraph poles was along I-70 in Maryland, down near Big Pool. They used glass insulators, and it was shaped like an upside down "L".
I am not lying, but no, I have no pictures, as stopping on highways like that to take pictures is an unwise decision. I am not trying to argue, I just think that calling them telegraph poles, after an archaic and outdated technology is odd, as you don't really see actual telegraph lines much anymore, they are a rather rare thing.
You have proven, yet again, that you know nothing about how network stacks work, and that you can only insult and lie about me.
I am not stupid, despite what you try to say.
I am not a ne'er-do-well or a menial.
I have done things, my refusal to demonstrate them is more about you than me. I don't feel like you stalking me in real life like you do here.
I have proven your lack of knowledge in networking repeatedly in this thread and others. You still persist in your assertion that you use a bridge without understanding the first thing about them. You still claim to get around Slashdot's AC limits by using a bridge, as if that is a possibility.
No, I have not contradicted myself, that you think I did points to a serious read comprehension issue on your side. Keep it up, keep the insults coming. I know I am getting to you with my truth when you are forced to break out all the insults.
Aww, now you have to jump to me being brain damaged. So, since you lost the argument, you have to try insulting yet again to make your point? Asperger's Syndrome, and Autism as it is now called is not the result of brain damage, so perhaps you should rethink your attacks, as they make you look ignorant.
So, where is your consideration of the impact of name resolution of every entry not in the hosts file? Where is your consideration of the impact of directing hosts file entries to 0.0.0.0 (as you recommend) and the timeout wait of this (or the impact of running a web server that returns a blank page for every possible query)?
You like to slam adblock, but you don't have to wait for adblock to timeout items that aren't even attempted to retrieve.
With domain name system, you don't have to wait for every query to step through 200k records to have a cache miss that finally times out to public dns, so you get that improved performance. You also don't have to wait for however many records to be stepped through to get to every 0.0.0.0 entry. Domain name systems use a branching tree algorithm (you know, a programming term?) to look up entries, so it doesn't have to process all of the records every time you do a lookup, just the one you are looking for.
APK, your post history shows that you don't know the first thing about networking or how the network stack works. You think that waving away the issues with hosts files will make them not exist, while I am many others have pointed the failings of your solution out to you, you still stick your fingers in your ears and act like you are superior to all, despite having a horrid solution for non security.