That would be an awesome outcome, but I just don't see it happening, people for whatever reason think that voting third party is throwing away your vote.
If everyone like me (not a D in Maryland that always goes D) would just vote third party instead of throwing away their vote on the loser, imagine what would happen. If the popular vote was 40% third party, but the electoral college elected R or D, it would tear the country apart though.
What she did was illegal, and what she did should disqualify her from having a clearance. Far less connected people have done much the same and gotten 2 years probation and $7500 fine. Petraeus did much the same and got 2 years probation and $100,000 fine. There is plenty of evidence of her breaking the law. The problem is that no one will prosecute it because Hillary is rich enough to afford lawyers that could get her off, and it would just make it look political.
Clearly there are two sides to this issue: 1) balls in your mouth and 2) dicks in your ass.
You totally should have swapped those. Clearly it would be two balls in the mouth and one dick in the ass...
After the break, we'll be joined by Eric Trump to explain why his father totally wasn't being anti-semitic by using that jew star.
Take a look at the picture (it is easy to find on Google), and please point out how in any way using the Star of David was the least anti-semitic. The graphic artist that made the picture should have used a five pointed star, but it is in no way anti-semitic to use a six pointed star instead, just poor judgement.
Unfortunately, as many have said before me, Hillary could shoot someone on live TV, and the DNC would rail against the victim for getting in her way. They don't care what she does, she is the anointed queen of the DNC.
10 years in prison is undesirable sentence for online copyrighting.
I suppose if there was a penalty for copyrighting, we wouldn't have the music/film/book industries pushing for laws against copying copyrighted work as there would be no more copyrighted work.
Hint, copyrighting is the act of registering a copyright, which is something the media industry does every day.
Technically, you can make a story that looks very much like a Disney story, but with your own video, dialog, characters and names. You could even make your own Cinderella if you wanted, as long as you didn't use the Disney characters.
Both of your examples are examples of fair use in the US. However, both of your examples would cause a DMCA notice despite being clear cases of fair use.
Actually, AC is wrong for an entirely different reason. In the case AC mentions, you own the computer and are giving up the password which is granting access. In the story, it was an employee who was not someone who was allowed to authorize the access.
Four times now? No wonder Whipslash wants to get rid of you, I guess it is the same as everyone else. Spam is annoying when it comes in through email, where it is simple to just delete, but on Slashdot, you just piss off the audience, you don't even get through to the people you are targeting.
I can set someone as foe and make all foes show as -6 moderation, but that only shows for me, not everyone else. You can also be down-modded for trolling or posting off topic and get bad karma which makes it harder to make good posts, but that isn't banning either.
You don't have an account for the same reason APK refuses to use his account; you don't want to be held accountable for what you post.
Also increased drag, decreased lift, reduced gas mileage, more to break, increased staff requirements (which might balance out by number of passengers). The people coming up with this idea don't have any clue about how to design aircraft, they are art students, not engineers.
When I hand that responsibility over to a program then all bets are off.
If you are handing off responsibility to a program that explicitly tells you to not do so, it sounds like you are the one at fault, not the program. The Tesla Autopilot Agreement you have to agree to to enable autopilot tells you pretty explicitly that you are supposed to pay attention while the car is driving. This feature is never expected to allow you to hand over responsibility, in fact exactly like an aircraft autopilot.
It's pure bullshit. Highway driving has about 1/4 the death rate of all driving.
I agree, that statement is pure bullshit. Where did you get that statement from, because the statistics do not agree with you.
Show me any statistics that show Highway driving only accounting for 1/4 of the driving death rate. I'll bet you can't come up with it, as likely the statistic is 1/4 of all accidents occur on a highway, not death, as deaths are far more likely to happen on a highway due to the speed factors.
Exactly. In fact, all autopilot (in a plane) does for you is travels from point to point to point while maintaining the preset altitude. It will happily fly into anything in its way and has no way of even "knowing" that there is a mountain in the way. The radar is not attached to the autopilot.
No, that title falls to the Seychelles. Perhaps you should look at the numbers before blathering off about what the US is the worst at? At least make sure what you are saying is actually true.
I will however agree, the US incarcerates way too many, we should just institute the death penalty more often...
Joking aside, if we would legalize drug usage, it would knock out half the prison population. If people really care about incarceration rates, they should stop voting in "tough on crime" prosecutors.
In the US, insurance companies can only raise your rates for things you are at fault for. They cannot raise your rates for vandalism or car theft as you didn't cause it to happen.
In a roundabout way, vandalism and car theft raise everyone's rates as they make the area more risky which raises the base rates for insurance in the area; but, you cannot personally have your rates raised for something like this, it has to happen through everyone getting higher rates.
Slashdot Mirror
So, whenever the FBI and the Justice Department don't prosecute someone you don't like,
Did you miss the part where Comio said that she DID break the laws/regulations?
It isn't about liking or not, she broke the law, she should be charged.
I agree, she is far worse in every way, therefore she is greater at being a terrible choice.
That would be an awesome outcome, but I just don't see it happening, people for whatever reason think that voting third party is throwing away your vote.
If everyone like me (not a D in Maryland that always goes D) would just vote third party instead of throwing away their vote on the loser, imagine what would happen. If the popular vote was 40% third party, but the electoral college elected R or D, it would tear the country apart though.
http://www.politifact.com/trut...
What she did was illegal, and what she did should disqualify her from having a clearance. Far less connected people have done much the same and gotten 2 years probation and $7500 fine. Petraeus did much the same and got 2 years probation and $100,000 fine. There is plenty of evidence of her breaking the law. The problem is that no one will prosecute it because Hillary is rich enough to afford lawyers that could get her off, and it would just make it look political.
Clearly there are two sides to this issue: 1) balls in your mouth and 2) dicks in your ass.
You totally should have swapped those. Clearly it would be two balls in the mouth and one dick in the ass...
After the break, we'll be joined by Eric Trump to explain why his father totally wasn't being anti-semitic by using that jew star.
Take a look at the picture (it is easy to find on Google), and please point out how in any way using the Star of David was the least anti-semitic. The graphic artist that made the picture should have used a five pointed star, but it is in no way anti-semitic to use a six pointed star instead, just poor judgement.
Unfortunately, as many have said before me, Hillary could shoot someone on live TV, and the DNC would rail against the victim for getting in her way. They don't care what she does, she is the anointed queen of the DNC.
10 years in prison is undesirable sentence for online copyrighting.
I suppose if there was a penalty for copyrighting, we wouldn't have the music/film/book industries pushing for laws against copying copyrighted work as there would be no more copyrighted work.
Hint, copyrighting is the act of registering a copyright, which is something the media industry does every day.
Technically, you can make a story that looks very much like a Disney story, but with your own video, dialog, characters and names. You could even make your own Cinderella if you wanted, as long as you didn't use the Disney characters.
Both of your examples are examples of fair use in the US. However, both of your examples would cause a DMCA notice despite being clear cases of fair use.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ??
or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ??
I am sure you are legally allowed to touch boobies, but the question is will the booby allow you to touch it?
Actually, AC is wrong for an entirely different reason. In the case AC mentions, you own the computer and are giving up the password which is granting access. In the story, it was an employee who was not someone who was allowed to authorize the access.
Four times now? No wonder Whipslash wants to get rid of you, I guess it is the same as everyone else. Spam is annoying when it comes in through email, where it is simple to just delete, but on Slashdot, you just piss off the audience, you don't even get through to the people you are targeting.
Because posting your garbage three times will make people see the light of day?
Grow up APK, your software and solution totally suck, and don't protect half as well as a proper solution of DNS or Ad blocking software.
Well, TBH, Macs have hosts files too, and they are just as useless for what APK wants everyone to do.
Users banning other users? What crack are you on?
I can set someone as foe and make all foes show as -6 moderation, but that only shows for me, not everyone else. You can also be down-modded for trolling or posting off topic and get bad karma which makes it harder to make good posts, but that isn't banning either.
You don't have an account for the same reason APK refuses to use his account; you don't want to be held accountable for what you post.
Well, three lefts make a right...
Apparently it is your fault that you choose not to sue the person committing fraud against you.
https://www.alibaba.com/produc...
Somehow I don't think that is really CE CEC or FDA approved as the picture implies.
Also increased drag, decreased lift, reduced gas mileage, more to break, increased staff requirements (which might balance out by number of passengers). The people coming up with this idea don't have any clue about how to design aircraft, they are art students, not engineers.
When I hand that responsibility over to a program then all bets are off.
If you are handing off responsibility to a program that explicitly tells you to not do so, it sounds like you are the one at fault, not the program. The Tesla Autopilot Agreement you have to agree to to enable autopilot tells you pretty explicitly that you are supposed to pay attention while the car is driving. This feature is never expected to allow you to hand over responsibility, in fact exactly like an aircraft autopilot.
It's pure bullshit. Highway driving has about 1/4 the death rate of all driving.
I agree, that statement is pure bullshit. Where did you get that statement from, because the statistics do not agree with you.
Show me any statistics that show Highway driving only accounting for 1/4 of the driving death rate. I'll bet you can't come up with it, as likely the statistic is 1/4 of all accidents occur on a highway, not death, as deaths are far more likely to happen on a highway due to the speed factors.
Exactly. In fact, all autopilot (in a plane) does for you is travels from point to point to point while maintaining the preset altitude. It will happily fly into anything in its way and has no way of even "knowing" that there is a mountain in the way. The radar is not attached to the autopilot.
What would you call it when the hard drive crashes or the circuit bored goes up in a cloud of smoke?
America has the highest incarceration rate in the world, much much higher than China, Russia, Iran, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
No, that title falls to the Seychelles. Perhaps you should look at the numbers before blathering off about what the US is the worst at? At least make sure what you are saying is actually true.
I will however agree, the US incarcerates way too many, we should just institute the death penalty more often...
Joking aside, if we would legalize drug usage, it would knock out half the prison population. If people really care about incarceration rates, they should stop voting in "tough on crime" prosecutors.
(rate will go up, never file for little stuff)
In the US, insurance companies can only raise your rates for things you are at fault for. They cannot raise your rates for vandalism or car theft as you didn't cause it to happen.
In a roundabout way, vandalism and car theft raise everyone's rates as they make the area more risky which raises the base rates for insurance in the area; but, you cannot personally have your rates raised for something like this, it has to happen through everyone getting higher rates.