Slashdot Mirror


User: multipartmixed

multipartmixed's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,578
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,578

  1. Re:I think my Gmail was hacked because of this on Mozilla Posts File Containing Registered User Data · · Score: 1

    How old is your AMO account database entry? If it's newer than 2009, it's really unlikely they managed to crack the SHA-256.

    It's much more likely that your gmail account got cracked because Chinese hackers spend A LOT of effort in mass-cracking gmail accounts.

  2. Re:Mozilla's public disclosure on Mozilla Posts File Containing Registered User Data · · Score: 2

    > Bonus points if you change your passwords once in a while.

    I change my "Lev6" passwords now and again, and those are the only ones I write down -- because they DON'T have password recovery mechanisms.

    I write them down in my phone, which I keep on me at all times, and a trusted friend knows how to retrieve them in case I get killed.

    The reason I change them now and again is because I occasionally lose my phone... :/

  3. Re:I wonder... on 4chan Has Been DDOSed · · Score: 2

    The NSA and MasterCard

  4. Re:Quoting Homer on Once-Darling Ethanol Losing Friends In High Places · · Score: 1

    > We aren't going to change those factors, no matter how much others think we should. Its a non-starter.

    On the plus side, you might have a climate warm enough to grow Cane Sugar in the corn belt within the next 50 years.

    So, it's not *all* bad news!

  5. Re:Fast Well on Does Typing Speed Really Matter For Programmers? · · Score: 1

    I was trained to touch-type in Canada in 1988. I use almost exactly the fingerings described by your bottom diagram.

    It's possible that I was merely a poor student, however I believe that is also how I was taught.

    The one thing I *don't* do that I was taught is shift-hand alternation; i.e. right-hand shift with left-hand characters, and vice-versa. I tend to over-use the left shift key.

  6. Re:PSTN vs independent VoIP on Skype Slowly Restores Service To Users · · Score: 1

    This is only true for long distance. Telus calls -- or at last those that don't leave the exchange -- are not VoIP. I'd also be surprised to find out that local exchanges were interconnected with VoIP.

  7. Re:likely to have the opposite effect on UK Gov't Wants To Block Internet Porn By Default · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe you just implied that Northern Irish children are too stupid to use a VPN.

    Shame on you! It's people like you that cause Troubles!

  8. Re:good on Stargate Universe Cancelled · · Score: 1

    You bastard, I haven't seen the last season yet!

  9. Re:callus disregard for what mozilla is trying to on Microsoft Is Releasing an H.264 Plugin For Firefox · · Score: 1

    Are you actually trying to tell me that you really believe that microsoft was shipping a browser that could embed ActiveX controls prior to netscape shipping a browser with NPAPI?

    Because I'm pretty damn sure that's not the case. ISTR ActiveX not shipping 'till the 3.0 browsers, but NPAPI shipping with Netscape 2.

  10. Re:callus disregard for what mozilla is trying to on Microsoft Is Releasing an H.264 Plugin For Firefox · · Score: 1

    > why bother with javascript standard, when Microsoft had perfectly
    > good active X systems to tie into native windows apis.

    NPAPI and JavaScript beat ActiveX and VBScript to market.

  11. Re:Just another way of saying on SatPhones — Why Can't They Make It Work? · · Score: 1

    NTT Dokomo deployed AMPS-like cellular in Japan in 1979.

    So I still want to know who the OP claims preceded cellular with satellite.

  12. Re:Just another way of saying on SatPhones — Why Can't They Make It Work? · · Score: 1

    > umm.. the sat phones came before cell phones

    Who had birds up before Inmarsat? Because I'm pretty sure both Dokomo NTT and AT&T had cellular offerings before Inmarsat was installing voice phones in ships.

  13. Why can't the make it work? WTF? on SatPhones — Why Can't They Make It Work? · · Score: 1

    They work just fine.

    Christ, my 10-year Kyocera handset still works like a charm on the Iridium network. It even still holds a half-decent charge!

    Using one is pretty basic

    10 PEEK up
    20 IF you cannot see the sky THEN GOTO some place where you can
    30 DO make phone call WHILE patiently accounting for propagation delay in conversation
    40 END

  14. In-for-MER on 4chan Declares War On Snow · · Score: 1

    Ah something something something YEAH

    A nikity boom boom yeah!

    I hope they don't hack the

    Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO)

    because that's harder to rhyme than Spelling, Tori (Yo!)

  15. Re:can we drop the misandry, and gender commentary on The Woman Who's Making Your Privacy Her Business · · Score: 2

    What's with the poor reading comprehension?

    Paragraph 9, words 20 through 23.

  16. This looks pretty straightforward, to me on Hosting Giants Teaming Against Small Businesses · · Score: 2

    I'll tell you exactly what's going on, I bet.

    This is simple. SoftLayer sells bandwidth to UK2. UK2 sells to the CDN.

    Now, SoftLayer charges 5 times what UK2 does for the same bandwidth. UK2 is clearly in the over-sell-the-bandwidth business.

    Whoever came up with that business model imagined normal website usage, not a CDN. When they were going through the books last week, they noticed they were bleeding serious (and probably dangerous) amounts of cash to one customer. When they looked at the customer, they said, "Holy shit! They are basically re-selling our service! They are leeches bleeding us dry!"

    (normal website usage normally has a peaky usage cycle, CDNs can probably maintain a much flatter line -- and the area under the curve is probably where UK2 pays SoftLayer)

    So, SoftLayer says, "Shit! These guys pissed us off and are costing us big time money! Get them off the network! Update the TOS to get right of them and use the we-can-change-it-to-suit-us clause to do it now!"

    This is a little bit like your local ISP discovering that you are selling WiFi to all your neighbours for a quarter miles around -- they are going to turf you if you refuse to stop, even if they didn't think to add that as a bad behaviour in their TOS.

    (And notice that the NOC poster did say that UK2 said they would take them back if they stopped being a CDN)

  17. Re:Who is Wayne Crookes? on Canadian Supreme Court To Decide If Linking Is Publishing · · Score: 1

    He's an arrogant cocksucker who thinks it's reasonable to ruin the web because somebody pointed out that somebody else said something about him that ruined his feelings.

    Fuck you, Wayne!

  18. Apple, Google Diss the DoD on Apple, Google Diss the DoD Over Mobile Security · · Score: 0

    Dissing the DoD - or, as the article says, "thumbing their noses at" the DoD is not a wise move.

    The Denizens of Doom are a group of hacker-biker crossbreeds. A true Ubermensch, if you will. Piss them off sufficiently, and they will kick your digital ass!

  19. Re:It was? on Oracle Asks Apache To Rethink Java Committee Exit · · Score: 2

    Back-in-the-day, Sun refused to sell me some spanky new E450s because they weren't certified to run Sun Cluster. So I had to buy some (cheaper!) Ultra 2s intead.

    Of course, the E450s were certified by the time the Ultra 2s arrived, I knew damn well certification was right around the corner, and I needed the hardware a good six months before we had to have the cluster live anyhow.

    Then Sun found out that I bought the stuff from my offices in one city, and wanted the stuff delivered to my data center in another. That actually caused a month-long delay on a bunch of the hardware as two Sun "sales regions" fought it out amongst themselves as to who should get the commission.

    Jesus, what a pain dealing with those guys was. Now I deal mostly with a used equipment vendor specializing in off-lease crap who will actually sell me whatever it is I ask for. Way easier. I just pick up the phone, tell him what I want, and a couple of days later it shows up at whatever data center I want.

  20. Re:Afterlife refuge on Iron-Eating Bug Is Gobbling Up the Titanic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just moderate and post at will.

    When smart people like us moderate, the sheeple moderators just copy what we're doing.

    So, as long as a few minutes pass between our moderation and our discussion, our moderation *does* in fact have an effect -- it's just not a direct effect.

  21. Re:DIY hacking tool? on WikiLeaks Defenders Threaten Amazon · · Score: 2

    And a process list which can be longer than the number of sockets you can open at once...

  22. Re:Test drive a Chrome notebook. on Google Unveils Beta Chrome OS Notebook · · Score: 1

    How about Canada?

    I'll do a good job, eh?

  23. Re:What about on Ex-Sun CEO Warns Oracle of Death By Open Source · · Score: 1

    Scott's comments were with a pre-Solaris (SVR4) view point, I think. He makes the case that in the early nineties, Sun was to BSD as RedHat was to Linux today (bubble ignored).

    I think that's a reasonable characterization.

  24. Re:Concentrate on ST perf? What does this mean? on Oracle To Halve Core Count In Next Sparc Processor · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the note -- FWIW those tuning options should work well pretty much anywhere, as he's demonstrating how to turn on whole-application PGO.

    I guess I'm one of the lucky few with no DB workload issues; my DB server hums along at about a ~1.0 load average on a v240 during busy hour.

    Of course, my workload is 98% select, no stored procedures, no triggers, no joins, few transactions...

  25. Re:optmized for Mozilla Kraken on Google Quietly Posts Big JavaScript Engine Update · · Score: 1

    Another way to look at this is that by adding codegen that can do some kind of type specialization that they are seeing similar benefits to Mozilla's tracing JIT. If Kraken happens to benefit most from this class of optimizations, then the observations made could simply be the result of good code on Google's part, with no subterfuge or optimizing-for-the-benchmark going on.