My guess would be that they wanted to use the Scala Agents. Perhaps the Lamdas in the Agents but Agents are built for telecom work. That is where the Akka libraries are helpful. But if they were early adopters Akka libraries would not have been released.
While I would oppose this law as written the Utah Supreme Court was correct. I am sure there is nothing in the Utah Constitution that makes this law wrong. The Legislators of most if not all States have made laws based on corporate interests. They do it for short term gain. This benefits the independent car dealerships, which I am sure have a strong lobby. The franchise protection laws are there to force independence from the companies. Cutting out the middle man for the States might not make cars cheaper to buy and that money would be heading out of state to the company.
You want the law changed then take it up with your state legislators.
If you want to complain that room taxes are too high because governments have overinflated the actual costs of bearing hotel traffic (whether in the vehicular or commercial sense, or in fact both) then I'm open to the debate, but there is a real financial cost to supporting that business which differs from that of a normal rental market.
What I am insinuating is that to pay for Lucus Oil Stadium, Marion county (Indianapolis) and all surrounding counties have increased taxes to any restaurant or bar and a tax on hotel rooms. Rather than lose some revenue on the room tax the government will make a law that charges the same tax on AirBnB rentals. Then they will not lose revenue and this is all about revenue...not noise.
The local governments are not making this rule/law based on concern for the noise level of neighborhoods. They are making it because they want travelers staying at hotels that pay room taxes. I expect a law will come that charges AirBnB renters the same room tax that the hotels pay. Someone has to pay for Lucus Oil Stadium.
Trump has enough of a base to force House Republicans to back him or face getting kicked out. Please refer to Paul Ryan's dip in popularity in his home district when he crossed Trump.
The Senate as well but less likely as they have longer terms. The problem with the coattails pulling these people into office is that they have some issues pissing off the person wearing the coat.
It is less about the wage then about health insurance. Companies can pay a contractor the same wage but it ends up being cheaper because the insurance.
Companies are adjusting their PR to give Trump apparent wins so he will lay off of them. Ford did the same thing. Both companies have had their plans set for a year or more but the PR changes. Yes IBM is hiring American workers in place A and yes they are laying off more American workers in place B to expand over seas.
Carrier is saving $65M in salary and benefits on moving to Mexico. The only regulations that are hurting them are the ones that say you need to give employees health insurance.
Conservationism, by Reagan's definition, was slow change not no change. He ( and others) felt that progressives wanted change too quickly. Modern Republicans have lost this in their zeal for the purist form of Conservationism.
And Trump is not a Conservative nor a Republican in his views. He is a Populous or Nationalist ( depending on the day of the week and what crowd he is talking to).
Are you saying that he just said things to get elected that he does not believe in!!! I am stunned and shocked that you would paint him like a common politician.
The non-politicians are even worse. The white supremacists, the alt-right hatemongers, the members of his own family.
Looks like he will have to be forced to give up his business interests, but he has made it abundantly clear that he intends to use the presidency to enrich himself anyway.
There is no law that says the President has to give up his business interests. There IS a law for all of his cabinet to do so. Trump could legally run his business from the White House.
Now his comment that the President has no conflict of interest ( because he is the President) sounds just like Nixon saying that when the President does it it is not illegal.
Your daughter's "reproductive rights" will be fine, we just won't have to pay for her abortions if she chooses to have them.
The Hyde amendment makes it illegal to spend federal money on abortion so that has not been a problem since 1976. Allowing women the option is becoming more of a problem.
I feel he will be just like Bush 43. A lot of nothing but will have 3 or 4 things to propose. Everything else, he will take his lead from the House on whatever they want to try to pass. The House will line up their wishlist and hope they can get it past the Senate. All depends on how scared the Dems in the Senate are for thier seats if they oppose them.
The fact that the argument keeps changing should tell anyone everything they need to know.
Not to mention we're still in a cold period.
And the notion that there's some global temperature that climate is "supposed to be' is patently unscientific and ignorant of history.
The data shows we SHOULD be in a cold phase but the Earth has been warming rapidly compared to the last 10,000 years. The last time the average temperature rose 1c rapidly it took 900 years. Since the Industrial Revolution( roughly 1850s) the average temperature has risen a bit over 1C.
You can insist that given the great complexity of the Earth's ecosystem, scientists could not possibly know what will happen. They can theorize about weather change and some are right and some are wrong. But there is no doubt that the average temperature is rising and some areas close to the equator will start to be come uninhabitable in 20-30 years.
. Startup culture isn't for the young either; you really have to have the fraternity/sorority member personality type to work there so as people age they're less likely to trade salary for beer pong or free dinner.
I disagree that it is not for the young. They want people who can work 70-100 hours a week. Those people do not have families. If they do their wife does not work. Or if they both work then they have no kids. Startups should have no problem with a 30% turnover rate or higher.
An excellent point which gets closer to the question that Cuban brought up. If the Stock Market is deemed to be unfair in it's trades, people will stop putting their money into it. It will not matter if it is fair or not if the perception is that it is unfair for the "average" investor.
Ford is a big Sun/IBM shop. I worked for a company that made the CAD/CAM system that Ford used. They have a lot of Sun and IBM machines just to run that. The computers were tied into some M$ but we did work in IRIX and ported to Solaris and IBM. I think they became a big Java shop as well.
This is more than likely a loss for Sun than M$.
Re:What can 60 billion dollars buy?
on
A New Kind of War
·
· Score: 1
I do not doubt that Iran or Iraq or both are the money behind these attacks. I would bet that Iraq will receive some of the reprisal. Perhaps more than Afganistan(sp?)
Bret Scrocroft pointed out that we need to drain the swamp(Iraq's money), to kill the mosquitoes( Osama)
I would talk to a lawyer but IIRC you can not sign away your rights. That "contract" is not worth the paper it is printed on. You can not sign away your right to sue or take legal action.
Re:It might be interesting-
on
OS X on x86?
·
· Score: 1
IIRC, I saw an interview with Woz and he was asked this question. He said that it would not be released for polictical reason.
I read this as MS will not support the Mac if Apple competes with Microsoft.
Slashdot Mirror
My guess would be that they wanted to use the Scala Agents. Perhaps the Lamdas in the Agents but Agents are built for telecom work. That is where the Akka libraries are helpful. But if they were early adopters Akka libraries would not have been released.
While I would oppose this law as written the Utah Supreme Court was correct. I am sure there is nothing in the Utah Constitution that makes this law wrong. The Legislators of most if not all States have made laws based on corporate interests. They do it for short term gain. This benefits the independent car dealerships, which I am sure have a strong lobby. The franchise protection laws are there to force independence from the companies. Cutting out the middle man for the States might not make cars cheaper to buy and that money would be heading out of state to the company.
You want the law changed then take it up with your state legislators.
Someone has to pay for Lucus Oil Stadium.
If you want to complain that room taxes are too high because governments have overinflated the actual costs of bearing hotel traffic (whether in the vehicular or commercial sense, or in fact both) then I'm open to the debate, but there is a real financial cost to supporting that business which differs from that of a normal rental market.
What I am insinuating is that to pay for Lucus Oil Stadium, Marion county (Indianapolis) and all surrounding counties have increased taxes to any restaurant or bar and a tax on hotel rooms. Rather than lose some revenue on the room tax the government will make a law that charges the same tax on AirBnB rentals. Then they will not lose revenue and this is all about revenue...not noise.
The local governments are not making this rule/law based on concern for the noise level of neighborhoods. They are making it because they want travelers staying at hotels that pay room taxes. I expect a law will come that charges AirBnB renters the same room tax that the hotels pay. Someone has to pay for Lucus Oil Stadium.
This is why you cut funding to the FDA so we can get more drugs and treatments to the patients quicker and then check to see if they work.
Trump has enough of a base to force House Republicans to back him or face getting kicked out. Please refer to Paul Ryan's dip in popularity in his home district when he crossed Trump.
The Senate as well but less likely as they have longer terms. The problem with the coattails pulling these people into office is that they have some issues pissing off the person wearing the coat.
It is less about the wage then about health insurance. Companies can pay a contractor the same wage but it ends up being cheaper because the insurance.
Another Trump victory! All hail the chief!
Companies are adjusting their PR to give Trump apparent wins so he will lay off of them. Ford did the same thing. Both companies have had their plans set for a year or more but the PR changes. Yes IBM is hiring American workers in place A and yes they are laying off more American workers in place B to expand over seas.
Carrier is saving $65M in salary and benefits on moving to Mexico. The only regulations that are hurting them are the ones that say you need to give employees health insurance.
Conservationism, by Reagan's definition, was slow change not no change. He ( and others) felt that progressives wanted change too quickly. Modern Republicans have lost this in their zeal for the purist form of Conservationism.
And Trump is not a Conservative nor a Republican in his views. He is a Populous or Nationalist ( depending on the day of the week and what crowd he is talking to).
Are you saying that he just said things to get elected that he does not believe in!!! I am stunned and shocked that you would paint him like a common politician.
The non-politicians are even worse. The white supremacists, the alt-right hatemongers, the members of his own family.
Looks like he will have to be forced to give up his business interests, but he has made it abundantly clear that he intends to use the presidency to enrich himself anyway.
There is no law that says the President has to give up his business interests. There IS a law for all of his cabinet to do so. Trump could legally run his business from the White House.
Now his comment that the President has no conflict of interest ( because he is the President) sounds just like Nixon saying that when the President does it it is not illegal.
Your daughter's "reproductive rights" will be fine, we just won't have to pay for her abortions if she chooses to have them.
The Hyde amendment makes it illegal to spend federal money on abortion so that has not been a problem since 1976. Allowing women the option is becoming more of a problem.
I feel he will be just like Bush 43. A lot of nothing but will have 3 or 4 things to propose. Everything else, he will take his lead from the House on whatever they want to try to pass. The House will line up their wishlist and hope they can get it past the Senate. All depends on how scared the Dems in the Senate are for thier seats if they oppose them.
The fact that the argument keeps changing should tell anyone everything they need to know.
Not to mention we're still in a cold period.
And the notion that there's some global temperature that climate is "supposed to be' is patently unscientific and ignorant of history.
The data shows we SHOULD be in a cold phase but the Earth has been warming rapidly compared to the last 10,000 years. The last time the average temperature rose 1c rapidly it took 900 years. Since the Industrial Revolution( roughly 1850s) the average temperature has risen a bit over 1C.
You can insist that given the great complexity of the Earth's ecosystem, scientists could not possibly know what will happen. They can theorize about weather change and some are right and some are wrong. But there is no doubt that the average temperature is rising and some areas close to the equator will start to be come uninhabitable in 20-30 years.
http://xkcd.com/1732/
NoScript is #1 for me.speeds up browsing by stopping all of the crap js from running unless you want it
. Startup culture isn't for the young either; you really have to have the fraternity/sorority member personality type to work there so as people age they're less likely to trade salary for beer pong or free dinner.
I disagree that it is not for the young. They want people who can work 70-100 hours a week. Those people do not have families. If they do their wife does not work. Or if they both work then they have no kids. Startups should have no problem with a 30% turnover rate or higher.
The question should be asked why don't cable companies compete in the same markets? Why do the consumers have no choice now?
An excellent point which gets closer to the question that Cuban brought up. If the Stock Market is deemed to be unfair in it's trades, people will stop putting their money into it. It will not matter if it is fair or not if the perception is that it is unfair for the "average" investor.
Ford is a big Sun/IBM shop. I worked for a company that made the CAD/CAM system that Ford used. They have a lot of Sun and IBM machines just to run that. The computers were tied into some M$ but we did work in IRIX and ported to Solaris and IBM. I think they became a big Java shop as well.
This is more than likely a loss for Sun than M$.
I do not doubt that Iran or Iraq or both are the money behind these attacks. I would bet that Iraq will receive some of the reprisal. Perhaps more than Afganistan(sp?)
Bret Scrocroft pointed out that we need to drain the swamp(Iraq's money), to kill the mosquitoes( Osama)
I would talk to a lawyer but IIRC you can not sign away your rights. That "contract" is not worth the paper it is printed on. You can not sign away your right to sue or take legal action.
IIRC, I saw an interview with Woz and he was asked this question. He said that it would not be released for polictical reason.
I read this as MS will not support the Mac if Apple competes with Microsoft.