Do a google asshole. Find any post I made using a conservitive web site. I have always tried to find credible web sites with no political ties for any link that I provided.
The only posts I have ever seen here blasting people for their sources were from liberals. And now you hypocrit liberals have the balls to do the same thing you complain about.
Again, the only good liberal is a fucking dead one.
Conservitive sources are never to be beleived where liberal sources always should be.
And no you cunt, I do not read Fox news. But I fucking hate hypocrits like you. Your a primary example why I hate liberals. Your also a primary example why I feel the only good liberal is a dead one.
Can't wait till you become a good little liberal. I'll make sure I piss on your fucking grave when you do.
There wouldn't be a problem, now would there be. What a concept, no shit.
These comments from people that claim the government is dishonest. Again, the double standards of/. Don't do as I do(being dishonest), do as I say(be honest).
Mind clarifying WHAT caused the shut down? Was it illegal tactics, which was the original posters point? You know, was the site ddos'd by the MMPA?
Anti-piracy misfire takes down online TV network
INTERNET
May 30, 2008|Joseph Menn | Times Staff Writer
One of the most popular Internet-based television networks was shut down all weekend, a casualty in the entertainment industry's fight against pirated material.
The outage at Revision3, which features shows such as "Diggnation" and others targeted at techies, highlighted the risks of serious collateral damage in the usually invisible but bare-knuckled technological war between copyright holders and pirates.
You link does not back up the original post in any way or form. We are talking about ILLEGAL tactics here. Stay on topic.
From June 1, 2007, Sweden bans all website attacks, like DoS attacks. Sweden calls it a crime to program computers to automatically click on the same page thousands of times. This comes in response to the attacks on the Swedish national police website and other government websites. Attackers can be found guilty and receive up to 2 years in prison. The new law declares both automatic and manual DoS attacks illegal. Prosecutors will have to show the court that the attack was of criminal intent and that it was intended to damage a computer system. Simply trying to launch an attack is also to be considered criminal act.
Denial-of-service attacks and the law
In the Police and Justice Act 2006, the United Kingdom specifically outlawed denial-of-service attacks and set a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.[40]
In the US, they can be a serious federal crime under the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 with penalties that include years of imprisonment, and many countries have similar laws.[citation needed]
an act of aggression (as one against a person who resists); "he may accomplish by craft in the long run what he cannot do by force and violence in the short one"
ferocity: the property of being wild or turbulent; "the storm's violence"
a turbulent state resulting in injuries and destruction etc.
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Violence is the expression of physical or verbal force against self or other, compelling action against one's will on pain of being hurt.
Worldwide, violence is used as a tool of manipulation and also is an area of concern for law and culture which take attempts to suppress and stop it....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence
Hmmm, I see more than one example in these definactions of violence not being physical. Verbal assault being one. I wonder what you consider these ddos attacks other then another form of verbal assault?
Or do you have a different dictionary then what I have?
I fail to see the point of your argument. I pointed out that ddos attacks cause business's lose money/profit. Servers are a business tool, just like a fax and a phone. You lose the ability to use it, you lose the ability to conduct business.
Your post, if you want to call it that. Had nothing to do with the loss of income. Your point is about free merchandise. Guess what, I'm not giving away free merchandise with my server. Your friendly ddos attack took my server off line. I'm losing money, and I have to lay people off because of it. Thank you for your non violent temper tantrum.
Your post shows your just a child that can't play by the rules. If you can't have something for free, you are going to throw your little temper tantrum. Guess what child, the grown ups have ruled. In multiple countries to boot. Your not getting your toys for free. Get off your fucking ass, get a job. And pay for your toys like the rest of the adults do., Otherwise, go without or go to jail. Because thats exactly where you belong. In jail for your attacking someone else's property with your DDOS attack.
Your business place gets DoS/DDoS to the point they can not conduct business. Loss of business means loss of income to pay your salary if you work for them. Until the DoS/DDoS attack ends, your out of work.
You now have no income to feed your family. Non violent enough for you?
Under the sharia, repeated theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand, administered under anesthetic.
Aggravated theft can be punished by cross-amputation of a hand and a foot. Such cases have been unusual, but Amnesty International reported four of them in 1986. In 1990 fewer than ten hand amputations took place, at least five of which were administered to foreigners.
National Safety Council estimates at least 28% of traffic accidents are caused by cell phones.
Washington, DC – The National Safety Council announced today that it estimates at least 28% of all traffic crashes – or at least 1.6 million crashes each year – are caused by drivers using cell phones and texting. NSC estimates that 1.4 million crashes each year are caused by drivers using cell phones and a minimum of 200,000 additional crashes each year are caused by drivers who are texting. The announcement came on the one-year anniversary of NSC’s call for a ban on all cell phone use and texting while driving.
My biggest problem is not spam. But people that get infected with key loggers or other data gathering tools which give up everything about them. Loss of income, loss of privacy.
If you receive a notice of high bandwidth usage after a pattern of never going over a specific amount in a month. Whats your problem?
Profiling of bandwidth use would be a very good tool. And I feel completely legitimate. Your a 68 year old parent who is using 40 gig a month of bandwidth. This is after a pattern over several years of only 1 gig a month. You think that shouldn't be questioned???
And based on your snotty response to the previous person. Yes, I expect you to flame me. Go for it, I'm waiting with a reply already typed.
How about Apple puts in a fix to automatically deny this access, UNLESS the app itself overrides that position?
Apple can say they resolved the issue and now it is solely on the application itself for overroding the setting. This also would not make the user constantly verify they want to do something, UNLESS the application itself requested that type of input.
By the way, I hate apple as much as I hate Microsoft.
there are billions of people working harder than him, for pennies a day. Hard work has nothing to do with that amount of money.
And that statement can be easily applied to every single poster on this web site. Want to bet that we all don't want higher taxes? Or what, because Balmer makes more than us his value to society is less.
The ones that became millionaires from the stock market? That is called research, determination to be in it for the long haul. If it is luck, they made that luck themselves. How are they profiting off the losses of others? Seriously? Explain that one?
The first link, the people that were taking the business world by storm? Hard work maybe? Both in coming up with an idea, marketing the idea, and also getting finance to produce the idea? Again, how are they profiting off the losses of others?
Are you telling me that if I take the time to research out my investments, and invest wisely? I am profiting off the losses of others? Why, because I've identified stocks that will increase in value????
Or are you telling me that if I have an idea, like sliced bread or the iPhone. I find companies that are willing to invest in this idea and produce it. How am I profiting off the loss of others?
Lastly, you would be surprised how "liberal" I am not.
I find that statement hard to believe when you
make statements such as this.
Additionally, if more people become millionaires during a recession, aren't they profiting off of the loses of others?
With original whiz kids like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs paving the way, a new generation of entrepreneurs is putting their own spin on success -- and making a lot of money along the way. How did they do it? While they may have taken slightly different paths, these young millionaires all found a way to turn unique ideas into lucrative ventures.
Want to tell these individuals they only have their money because of their parents?
Lol, I love it when I can use your own liberal publicans against your quite obvious liberal comments
A stock market rebound helped the world's ranks of millionaires climb 17 percent to 10 million, while their collective wealth surged 19 percent to $39 trillion, nearly recouping losses from the financial crisis, according to the latest Merrill Lynch-Capgemini world wealth report.
I would have preferred using the irs.gov or census.gov web sites to prove my point. But I fully admit that its more fun using a liberal rag to prove my point.
The point of my post??? To prove this statement full of shit.
Um, no, rich people are rich because their parents are rich, and their friends are rich, and they get lucky.
Slashdot Mirror
Do a google asshole. Find any post I made using a conservitive web site. I have always tried to find credible web sites with no political ties for any link that I provided.
The only posts I have ever seen here blasting people for their sources were from liberals. And now you hypocrit liberals have the balls to do the same thing you complain about.
Again, the only good liberal is a fucking dead one.
Conservitive sources are never to be beleived where liberal sources always should be.
And no you cunt, I do not read Fox news. But I fucking hate hypocrits like you. Your a primary example why I hate liberals. Your also a primary example why I feel the only good liberal is a dead one.
Can't wait till you become a good little liberal. I'll make sure I piss on your fucking grave when you do.
There wouldn't be a problem, now would there be. What a concept, no shit.
These comments from people that claim the government is dishonest. Again, the double standards of /. Don't do as I do(being dishonest), do as I say(be honest).
Thanks for the reply. And your correct, there is no such thing as a legal ddos attack.
Again, thanks for the clarification.
Mind clarifying WHAT caused the shut down? Was it illegal tactics, which was the original posters point? You know, was the site ddos'd by the MMPA?
Anti-piracy misfire takes down online TV network INTERNET May 30, 2008|Joseph Menn | Times Staff Writer One of the most popular Internet-based television networks was shut down all weekend, a casualty in the entertainment industry's fight against pirated material. The outage at Revision3, which features shows such as "Diggnation" and others targeted at techies, highlighted the risks of serious collateral damage in the usually invisible but bare-knuckled technological war between copyright holders and pirates.
You link does not back up the original post in any way or form. We are talking about ILLEGAL tactics here. Stay on topic.
Bull shit. You are stopping people from making a living. That is harm caused.
Lets add Sweeden to another nation that considers ddos attacks illegal.
Hackers Given A Message: DoS is a Crime
From June 1, 2007, Sweden bans all website attacks, like DoS attacks. Sweden calls it a crime to program computers to automatically click on the same page thousands of times. This comes in response to the attacks on the Swedish national police website and other government websites. Attackers can be found guilty and receive up to 2 years in prison. The new law declares both automatic and manual DoS attacks illegal. Prosecutors will have to show the court that the attack was of criminal intent and that it was intended to damage a computer system. Simply trying to launch an attack is also to be considered criminal act.
To bad your of the minority opinion and most law makers agree with my opinion.
Denial-of-service attacks and the law
Denial-of-service attacks and the law In the Police and Justice Act 2006, the United Kingdom specifically outlawed denial-of-service attacks and set a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.[40] In the US, they can be a serious federal crime under the National Information Infrastructure Protection Act of 1996 with penalties that include years of imprisonment, and many countries have similar laws.[citation needed]
screw the mpaa. they've been shown to ddos torrent sites, spam them, use quasi legal methods via companies like mediadefender.
citation needed. And please. Not some blog by a torrent hoster that he got ddosed. Fuck, he could have been dossed by his competition.
Ok, you take your toys and go home. You offered nothing to the conversation.
Hmmm, I see more than one example in these definactions of violence not being physical. Verbal assault being one. I wonder what you consider these ddos attacks other then another form of verbal assault?
Or do you have a different dictionary then what I have?
I fail to see the point of your argument. I pointed out that ddos attacks cause business's lose money/profit. Servers are a business tool, just like a fax and a phone. You lose the ability to use it, you lose the ability to conduct business.
Your post, if you want to call it that. Had nothing to do with the loss of income. Your point is about free merchandise. Guess what, I'm not giving away free merchandise with my server. Your friendly ddos attack took my server off line. I'm losing money, and I have to lay people off because of it. Thank you for your non violent temper tantrum.
Your post shows your just a child that can't play by the rules. If you can't have something for free, you are going to throw your little temper tantrum. Guess what child, the grown ups have ruled. In multiple countries to boot. Your not getting your toys for free. Get off your fucking ass, get a job. And pay for your toys like the rest of the adults do., Otherwise, go without or go to jail. Because thats exactly where you belong. In jail for your attacking someone else's property with your DDOS attack.
Your business place gets DoS/DDoS to the point they can not conduct business. Loss of business means loss of income to pay your salary if you work for them. Until the DoS/DDoS attack ends, your out of work.
You now have no income to feed your family. Non violent enough for you?
Or is it only there should be no punishment for laws you disagree with?
And if it happened to YOU because someone doesn't agree with your opinion. No matter what the topic? Is it still ok?
lol, I deserved that. You are quite correct that some countries do chop off your hand for theft.
Saudi Arabia Crime and Punishment\
Under the sharia, repeated theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand, administered under anesthetic.
Aggravated theft can be punished by cross-amputation of a hand and a foot. Such cases have been unusual, but Amnesty International reported four of them in 1986. In 1990 fewer than ten hand amputations took place, at least five of which were administered to foreigners.
When was jail ever reserved just for.
Whatever happened to jail/prison being a place to keep dangerous people away from society?
What time in history. Citation required to prove that point.
Seriously. Theft has ALWAYS been jail time.
National Safety Council estimates at least 28% of traffic accidents are caused by cell phones.
Washington, DC – The National Safety Council announced today that it estimates at least 28% of all traffic crashes – or at least 1.6 million crashes each year – are caused by drivers using cell phones and texting. NSC estimates that 1.4 million crashes each year are caused by drivers using cell phones and a minimum of 200,000 additional crashes each year are caused by drivers who are texting. The announcement came on the one-year anniversary of NSC’s call for a ban on all cell phone use and texting while driving.
The Washingtpost story links to http://www.nsc.org/Pages/Home.aspx
I don't know, I think that is a large percentage of traffic accidents. That story was from 01/2010.
Not saying I agree with the proposed law, but your statement made me curious to see what the number of accidents due to cell phones really was.
My biggest problem is not spam. But people that get infected with key loggers or other data gathering tools which give up everything about them. Loss of income, loss of privacy.
I think everyone lose's track of that fact.
If you receive a notice of high bandwidth usage after a pattern of never going over a specific amount in a month. Whats your problem?
Profiling of bandwidth use would be a very good tool. And I feel completely legitimate. Your a 68 year old parent who is using 40 gig a month of bandwidth. This is after a pattern over several years of only 1 gig a month. You think that shouldn't be questioned???
And based on your snotty response to the previous person. Yes, I expect you to flame me. Go for it, I'm waiting with a reply already typed.
How about Apple puts in a fix to automatically deny this access, UNLESS the app itself overrides that position?
Apple can say they resolved the issue and now it is solely on the application itself for overroding the setting. This also would not make the user constantly verify they want to do something, UNLESS the application itself requested that type of input.
By the way, I hate apple as much as I hate Microsoft.
there are billions of people working harder than him, for pennies a day. Hard work has nothing to do with that amount of money.
And that statement can be easily applied to every single poster on this web site. Want to bet that we all don't want higher taxes? Or what, because Balmer makes more than us his value to society is less.
Look at forum posts. They are always screaming they can't wait till the older generation dies off because of the way they vote.
The ones that became millionaires from the stock market? That is called research, determination to be in it for the long haul. If it is luck, they made that luck themselves. How are they profiting off the losses of others? Seriously? Explain that one?
The first link, the people that were taking the business world by storm? Hard work maybe? Both in coming up with an idea, marketing the idea, and also getting finance to produce the idea? Again, how are they profiting off the losses of others?
Are you telling me that if I take the time to research out my investments, and invest wisely? I am profiting off the losses of others? Why, because I've identified stocks that will increase in value????
Or are you telling me that if I have an idea, like sliced bread or the iPhone. I find companies that are willing to invest in this idea and produce it. How am I profiting off the loss of others?
Lastly, you would be surprised how "liberal" I am not.
I find that statement hard to believe when you make statements such as this.
Additionally, if more people become millionaires during a recession, aren't they profiting off of the loses of others?
From a liberal source to boot.
America's New Millionaires: 11 People Under 35 Who Have Taken The Business World By Storm
With original whiz kids like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs paving the way, a new generation of entrepreneurs is putting their own spin on success -- and making a lot of money along the way. How did they do it? While they may have taken slightly different paths, these young millionaires all found a way to turn unique ideas into lucrative ventures.
Want to tell these individuals they only have their money because of their parents?
Lol, I love it when I can use your own liberal publicans against your quite obvious liberal comments
Number Of Millionaires Grew Amid Recession
A stock market rebound helped the world's ranks of millionaires climb 17 percent to 10 million, while their collective wealth surged 19 percent to $39 trillion, nearly recouping losses from the financial crisis, according to the latest Merrill Lynch-Capgemini world wealth report.
I would have preferred using the irs.gov or census.gov web sites to prove my point. But I fully admit that its more fun using a liberal rag to prove my point.
The point of my post??? To prove this statement full of shit.
Um, no, rich people are rich because their parents are rich, and their friends are rich, and they get lucky.