Slashdot Mirror


Former Employee Stole Ford Secrets Worth $50 Million

chicksdaddy writes "A ten year veteran of US automaker Ford pleaded guilty in federal court on November 17 to charges that he stole company secrets, including design documents, valued at between $50 million and $100 million, and shared them with his new employer: the Chinese division of a US rival of Ford's. Xiang Dong ('Mike') Yu admitted to copying some 4,000 Ford Documents to an external hard drive, including design specifications for key components of Ford automobiles, after surreptitiously taking a job with a China-based competitor in 2006. Yu, who took a job for Beijing Automotive Company in 2008, was arrested during a stopover at Chicago in October, 2009. The FBI seized his Beijing Automotive-issued laptop, and an analysis found 41 stolen Ford specification documents on the hard drive. He faces five to six years in prison and a $150,000 fine (PDF)."

236 comments

  1. Wake up, people. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    valued at between $50 million and $100 million

    That's probably an inflated value. When companies get burned like this, they generally vastly overstate the value of the stolen goods.

    and shared them with his new employer: the Chinese division of a US rival of Ford's.

    Hello boys and girls. Can you say "tip of the iceberg?" I knew you could.

    He faces five to six years in prison and a $150,000 fine (PDF).

    Good. And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Wake up, people. by toastar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good. And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      8 years

      http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/04/chinese-court-sentences-geologist-tortured-state-security-agents-years-jail-1624851947/

    2. Re:Wake up, people. by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good. And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      Playing Devil's advocate here: so we can commit injustice and that's okay, because another country's injustices justify it?

      I'm not claiming that this punishment is too harsh or too lenient for that matter. I'm not familiar enough with this incident nor do I know why this is a criminal matter and not a civil tort. So I won't make that judgment. Instead, I'm asking you this because I just don't understand your reasoning.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Wake up, people. by mbone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bet that hypothetical American Engineer would avoid stop-overs in Beijing.

    4. Re:Wake up, people. by Nursie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      FTFS - "Chinese division of a US rival of Ford's."

      Sounds like american companies doing it to each other, to me.

    5. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inflated? I don't think so. I'm sure just taking the final specifications and design documents of just a few models of cars had at least $100 million in R&D dollars to make them. Are the documents themselves worth that much, no. But to create them from scratch could take that much money

    6. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you arrive at that question from the gp's comment?

      The point made was rhetorical: it may seem like a harsh punishment, but the punishment if the situation were reverse would obviously be harsher. You really don't understand the reasoning when comparing China and America?

    7. Re:Wake up, people. by jms · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suppose that by failing to elaborate on how they came up with the value, they invite speculation.

      Sometimes, when asked the value of a document, companies will give a figure that corresponds to the cost of producing that document. In other words, if you were to add up all the engineer-hours involved in designing a car, it might add up to $50-$100M. Since Ford is not deprived of access to their own design (because they still have copies of it), this does not represent $50-$100M losses to Ford. They could be saying that, by stealing the design, the Chinese company saved themselves $50-$100M in engineering costs, but that explanation isn't really complete, because the design was manufactured, so the Chinese company could easily buy one and reverse engineer it. So, by stealing the design, the Chinese company at the most saved themselves the cost of a full reverse-engineering job on the Ford car. This might still be a substantial figure. However, automobile manufacturers regularly buy each others products and reverse engineer them anyway, to keep track of what the competition is doing, so the Chinese auto company's engineers were probably already pretty familiar with the basic Ford design before they stole the documents. They probably had already done most of the reverse engineering. These documents let them fill in the gaps in their knowledge.

      This has damaged Ford to the extent that the design revealed trade secrets that the Chinese car company might not have been able to reverse engineer from existing cars. This might allow them to improve their cars to the extent that some number of people choose to buy Chinese cars instead of Fords. That is the real value of the stolen documents and might be worth $50-$100 million or more.

    8. Re:Wake up, people. by magarity · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Chinese division of a US rival of Ford's."

      Sounds like american companies doing it to each other, to me.

      All the manufacturing companies in China must be majority owned by a local Chinese company which is owned by Chinese citizens. So it may be a joint venture partnership "division" of a US rival who owns a large chunk, but no, it is not just two US companies involved.

    9. Re:Wake up, people. by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Do you think it's unlikely that this info went upstream, to the US parent company though? Seems feasible to me.

    10. Re:Wake up, people. by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It could also be that the design docs were from the manufacturing process rather than the product itself. The process engineering behind a plant could easily be worth significantly more than even $100M because the plants today cost upwards of $1B to design, build, and furnish and the lifetime efficiency gains for a well engineered plant can also reach into the billions.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Wake up, people. by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did you arrive at that question from the gp's comment?

      The point made was rhetorical: it may seem like a harsh punishment, but the punishment if the situation were reverse would obviously be harsher. You really don't understand the reasoning when comparing China and America?

      Oh, I get it. I just think it's invalid. I'll try to clarify.

      And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      If I believe that a punishment is too harsh, it's because the punishment doesn't fit the crime. How someone else would punish the same crime is a separate discussion. If the USA fined people ten million dollars for jaywalking, I would say that's too harsh even if I knew that China executed people for jaywalking. One is simply too harsh to a high degree, and the other is too harsh to an exceedingly high degree.

      The only relativity I recognize as important is that which exists between the punishment and the crime. That means I am in no danger of thinking that one abuse is legitimate merely because worse abuses are known to occur. I don't view concepts like justice and injustice (among others) as trade goods that have a value or a "going rate" which is set by the market conditions. I consider that a requirement of free thought.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    12. Re:Wake up, people. by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Hi. Can you say "bargaining chip"? These guys are traded more often than baseball players. High drama screaming for a Hollywood screen play

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    13. Re:Wake up, people. by DJLuc1d · · Score: 0

      8 years and a bunch of torture, not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones.

    14. Re:Wake up, people. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      More to the point, if they actually implement any of this stuff, it'll be an open secret the moment they start producing it, right? I mean, we're not talking about some fabulous machine that produces cars - we're talking about the cars themselves, which anyone can buy and tear down. If I'm wrong, I'd appreciate someone who understands the industry letting me know, but it seems that the product engineering is the one part of car manufacturing that you can't possibly hide. Right?

    15. Re:Wake up, people. by aliquis · · Score: 1, Interesting

      8 years and a bunch of torture, not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones.

      Which one is worse?

      JK, I know your opinion, but seriously US prisons don't seem very great, your rehabilitation system seem to suck, everything is over-crowded and you probably make people worse. Stop with putting drug users into prison (people who are deep into it may need some rehabilitation I guess, but not the Cops OMGIT'SAPIECEOFMARIJUANA!! DOWN ON THE GROUND!) and crap like NBC dateline.

      (Oh, he wanted to meet and have sex with a seventeen year old girl!? TEH HORRORZ! Over here in Sweden the age is 15 and actual pedophilia is with pre-pubertal humans. Why is attraction to attractive people a crime? =P)

    16. Re:Wake up, people. by TheScreenIsnt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      It seems to me that what some other country would do to a similar criminal is irrelevant. If North Korea were involved, would that justify a still harsher punishment?
      How about this: the punishment is fair because the guy is a crook and the crime wasn't petty (though as an automotive engineer in R&D I would agree that it was less consequential than advertised).

    17. Re:Wake up, people. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Guess I could had asked who kills the most people to. Guess China wins, but only the fact you actually DO kill them .. Nor that much good can come from serial killers.

      Funny if China catches up and the US becomes worse in comparision in this area ..

    18. Re:Wake up, people. by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Oh you messed up big prepared to be modded down to hell. (to save the children of course)

    19. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones.

      yeah, over there you get fed meals and 2 hours later you are hungry again, thus subjecting you to the torture of near-constant hunger. in America, prison is a Club Med-esq paradise where free anal sex is given to you...even if you didn't ask for it (now THAT'S service!) :)

    20. Re:Wake up, people. by cjanota · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One thing to consider is that what you believe to be fair punishment for a crime likely has some basis on what culture you were brought up in and how "tough" on crime that culture is.

      --
      You can fix anything with duct tape and sticks.
    21. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon 8 years in a Chinese Jail, getting betten up, is better than 5 years in US prison, getting raped by your cell mate and leaving with Hiv/Aids.

    22. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a subcontractor to some large corporations, I possess large amounts of drawings and documents on their inventory. Hosted on various encrypted backup disks at home and in a locker at my bank.

      This is actually prescribed and ordained in the contract - I am obliged to retain all data minimum ten years by the standard scripture of our common contractors' law - and most if not all of those drawings were made by myself, but I doubt that my clients ever read the fine print and it would not surprise me at all if they would get mad if they found out. I know I had some situations where I got weird looks when I mentioned looking things up when not at my client's location.

      Still, it's kind of weird if someone objects to me possessing drawings on equipment that I designed myself.

    23. Re:Wake up, people. by diegocn · · Score: 1

      FYI - Original article reads "the Chinese division of a US rival of Ford's" - My guess is GM, since they are the only other auto manufacturer in China.

      It's surprise me every time that anything related to negative side of China instantly turns some intelligent minds here into some Chinese bashing moobs.

    24. Re:Wake up, people. by cusco · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm just mystified what documents Ford might have possibly produced that could be worth more than a couple million. Any advanced technology that they use is licensed from someone else, their vehicles differ only slightly from any other mediocre vehicle on the road, their mileage and durability is below average. Only their marketing is better than some of the competition, and they contract that out.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    25. Re:Wake up, people. by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe not american, still accusation is theft of state secrets: 10 years prison.

      http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/rio-tintos-stern-hu-jailed-10-years/story-e6frg9df-1225847088979

    26. Re:Wake up, people. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Plus a fine of RMB 1 mln (approx USD 150,000).

      Sorry for replying to myself, was too quick in posting.

    27. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do

      What the Chinese do or do not do as punishment is irrelevant to a discussion over whether the punishment fits the crime. For example, if the Chinese are extremely unjust in applying punishment, that does not mean we are OK to be somewhat less unjust; we should be just in our punishments regardless of the actions of other nations.

    28. Re:Wake up, people. by notknown86 · · Score: 1

      8 years and a bunch of torture, not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones.

      I will mention it:

      8 years being tortured in a Chinese prison vs 5 years being raped in an American prison.

    29. Re:Wake up, people. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I kind of doubt they would. Possession of the stolen information has a stack of laws against it here in the US. Corporate America would prefer to ignore any indiscretions on the part of foreign corporations, especially where it's in their best interest.

          I have to wonder what the terribly expensive secrets were though. Most automobile parts are reverse engineered rather rapidly. Check our your local auto parts store, and see how many aftermarket options there are for any given part. For most parts, you'll find several aftermarket companies producing identical replacements.

          If I were them, I'd be more concerned with the outsourced factories selling parts made for that manufacturer, to third parties at a more competitive price. It happens an awful lot. I can't say that I've bought more than a dozen OEM parts for any cars that I've worked on.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    30. Re:Wake up, people. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      I dunno, do you get raped by the other inmates in Chinese prisons?

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    31. Re:Wake up, people. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the cars (haven't actually owned a car in 20 years) but I can say the Ranger is a damned nice little truck. Rides good, low maintenance, MPG is just okay but it does have a good hauling and towing capacity, and from the looks of the large fleets owned by everyone from my local cableco to NAPA auto parts they must be doing SOMETHING right on that model.

      As for TFA, if they stole the automation and plant designs I could easily see it ringing up that high a bill. Automated plants are seriously expensive, and a well designed plant can generate large savings which can be passed on to the consumer with lower prices. Even though China is full of cheap labor now they won't always be (just look at Japan) so having the plans on how to build a more efficient auto plant without having to sink the R&D could give them a pretty decent edge.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    32. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably... but it would hurt less....

    33. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if he did. I doubt he would bring evidence with him. The Chinese would be happy to manufacture some however.

    34. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8 years and a bunch of torture, not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones.

      yep I would take a chinese prison over an American one any day too. I can take a beating, gang rape though is likely to be soul destroying.

    35. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I want ALL prisoners to be beat up AND raped...I don't care where they're being held!

    36. Re:Wake up, people. by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      which is unfortunate. He made a good post.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    37. Re:Wake up, people. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Bad laws != bad prisons. Plus, we're talking about China here. You think American laws are harsh, they put people to death for things like drug smuggling. Oh and sex with underaged girls? In China: death. Counterfeiting or fraud? Death again. It may not be used in the majority of cases, but it's always an option, and bear in mind that the justice system in China is entirely authoritarian. No jury, no media, no public access unless the state wishes it. Most trials are just a formality of an hour or so and then it's off to prison or the firing squad. The US justice system has problems, but trying to equate it with China's is fucking laughable. You're just another knee-jerk America-hater.

      Why don't you take the time to look into the comparitive health of inmates in China vs. the US? Some US prisons may be crowded, but they're not as disease-ridden as China's.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    38. Re:Wake up, people. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it was so bold of him to point out how America imprisons people for drug offences. Clearly that makes them so much worse than China where drug smugglers can be fucking summarily executed after a jury-less show trial. These things are so equivalent and parallel I don't know why I couldn't see it before.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    39. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there rape in Chinese prisons? I can't quite see chinese people sinking that low. Asian's typically tend not be openly homosexual.

    40. Re:Wake up, people. by JamesP · · Score: 1

      I agree

      And by the way, what kind of "secrets" are that?!

      How they are going to screw up their next models?
      How they are going to keep pushing gas guzzling SUVs after SUVs?
      The design of the new models? (hint: they're going to look like exactly the same as last years model)

      Really guys, really...

      Sometimes I think that some companies have overall lower intelligence than others. Like, stealing "secrets" for '1+1'

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    41. Re:Wake up, people. by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      What the Chinese do or do not do as punishment is irrelevant to a discussion over whether the punishment fits the crime. For example, if the Chinese are extremely unjust in applying punishment, that does not mean we are OK to be somewhat less unjust; we should be just in our punishments regardless of the actions of other nations.
      Be sure to tell that to all the people who point out the US still has the death penalty and is one of the few 1st world nations to do so.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    42. Re:Wake up, people. by derspankster · · Score: 0

      Give him the chair!

    43. Re:Wake up, people. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      It could also be that the design docs were from the manufacturing process rather than the product itself. The process engineering behind a plant could easily be worth significantly more than even $100M because the plants today cost upwards of $1B to design, build, and furnish and the lifetime efficiency gains for a well engineered plant can also reach into the billions.

      That, and its a lot harder to buy one of your competitors' manufacturing plants and reverse engineer it. Plus you have to pay customs getting the plant off the boat into the country... its just a big mess.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    44. Re:Wake up, people. by sorak · · Score: 1

      He faces five to six years in prison and a $150,000 fine (PDF).

      Good. And before we judge if that seems too harsh a punishment, I would ask if anyone knows what the Chinese government would do to an American engineer who did the same thing to a Chinese company.

      I'd say it depends on the real value of what he stole. If he stole something valued at 100 million, then giving it back and paying a fine equal to 0.15% of that amount seems like a slap on the wrist.

      I do disagree with the notion that we should judge our actions based on how China's laws work. Had he been from a country where this is legal, it wouldn't make sense to let him go, or reduce his sentence, so we shouldn't argue for a tougher sentence because he is from a country where such is the norm.

    45. Re:Wake up, people. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that "Asian's" are different from any other humans in this respect? Did you just get here from Alpha Centuari?

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    46. Re:Wake up, people. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Last time I watched Cops, they let the girl go. She had walked out of a bar, gotten in her car, hit a police car, and then driven away smoking marijuana.

      The cops chased them down and then made sure they had someone to come pick them up and told them that they should smoke at home. This was in Vegas.

      The time before that was like you say though, the cops were front ending petty drug user's cars and impounding them, taking people in a bad spot in life (I'm told smart people don't buy drugs from strangers on the street) and removing their ability to get to work, in addition to locking them up for a bit.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    47. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...This has damaged Ford to the extent that the design revealed trade secrets that the Chinese car company might not have been able to reverse engineer from existing cars. This might allow them to improve their cars to the extent that some number of people choose to buy Chinese cars instead of Fords. That is the real value of the stolen documents and might be worth $50-$100 million or more.

      Actually, this may be a good thing for Ford... anyone familiar with the dubious quality of the Chinese knockoff knows that Ford has nothing to worry about. In fact, after the chinese plastic starts eating holes though people's clothing and chinese car paint is found to be laced with lead, people may actually start to believe that at Ford, Quality is Job One. :)

    48. Re:Wake up, people. by Danse · · Score: 1

      What the Chinese do or do not do as punishment is irrelevant to a discussion over whether the punishment fits the crime. For example, if the Chinese are extremely unjust in applying punishment, that does not mean we are OK to be somewhat less unjust; we should be just in our punishments regardless of the actions of other nations.

      Be sure to tell that to all the people who point out the US still has the death penalty and is one of the few 1st world nations to do so.

      Who needs to compare it with the rest of the world? Just pointing out the serious problems in our own legal system should be sufficient to show that it's highly irresponsible to put anyone to death based on the results of that system.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    49. Re:Wake up, people. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      > So, by stealing the design, the Chinese company at the most saved themselves the cost of a full reverse-engineering job on the Ford car.

      THIS.

      Car parts are relatively simple to make. Making a part that lasts under every possible environmental condition without failing or performing out of spec, that's complicated and takes, literally, years of research. Type acceptance for a part usually takes a year. If it's electronic, sometimes two to three. Engines can take half a decade. Most of that time is spent testing, and re-testing, and re-testing again. The total cost of bringing a single engine to market runs into the hundreds of millions of dollars - which is why it's a big deal when a car company introduces a new engine.

      If you are a start-up car company and someone brings you a blueprint to an engine that's already tested and ready to be put into production - that's worth a fortune.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    50. Re:Wake up, people. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a consumer electronics company. A few years ago they sent a small delegation to China and Korea looking for companies to mass-produce a complicated electronic gadget.

      They visited a Chinese government owned and operated facility, showed them a prototype of what they wanted built, then were offered a tour of the plant. While they were walking around, one of the delegates ran back to the conference room to get his cell phone. A couple of factory employees had taken apart the prototype and were taking pictures of the internals. Needless to say, the company went with a Korean manufacturer.

      The Chinese don't play fair. This attitude is institutionalized.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    51. Re:Wake up, people. by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      While prison is a far cry from fun times US prisons are for the most part quite safe and not very horrible for the inmates. One of my good friends works as a prison guard, they are actually quite limited in how they are allowed to respond to situations in the interest of inmates not being harmed, sometimes even to the detriment of the guards' ability to defend themselves. The inmates get food of similar if not better quality to food served in public schools, cable TV, workout equipment and a lot more available to them. Granted the situation at a super-max will probably be a little different but I'd much rather be thrown in jail here than in China any day.

    52. Re:Wake up, people. by cusco · · Score: 1

      GM just sold the Hummer line and factory the Chinese last year. The country lacked a light truck line, which is really all the Hummer is when you strip off the body. Now they have a highly automated functioning assembly line to examine at their leisure, rather than a bunch of plans that need to get altered in the field to adjust for reality (doubt that an executive would be bright enough to steal the 'As-Builts' rather than the originals).

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    53. Re:Wake up, people. by rundgong · · Score: 1

      I suppose that by failing to elaborate on how they came up with the value, they invite speculation.

      My guess is there were design documents worth about 25 bucks, but then he accidentally copied 2 mp3 files containing the music for Fords next tv commercial. That copyright infringement is making up the rest of the $50 million

    54. Re:Wake up, people. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      As someone else said, "8 years and a bunch of torture, not to mention the difference in Chinese prisons vs American ones" - not to mention the fact that the geologist divulged information which is not possible for the US (or anyone but China) to directly exploit due to it being in China.

      The leaked Ford documents, on the other hand, are human R&D and (likely) almost immediately applicable to production. They could turn around a month later with the ability to make a Ford duplicate.

      Meh. On the plus side, I suppose it's possible we'll see inexpensive late-model replacement parts on the market soon for Fords.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    55. Re:Wake up, people. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Since Ford is not deprived of access to their own design (because they still have copies of it), this does not represent $50-$100M losses to Ford.

      Yes; yes it does.

      If I design something - spending a year of my life doing so, say - and it is stolen from me directly, with the resulting stolen design being used for production, I have lost the economic potential thereof.

      It's just as if I have my chief war strategists design me a new weapon, and it's design is stolen by the enemy. The strategic value of said weapon is now not only marginal at best, but the enemy is able to use it against me.

      Arguably, the loss in money would be twice (or more) the actual production costs, minimum: not only have I lost the strategic edge (the end goal of what those man hours represent, and what was really being paid for) but my competitor now has been fortified by an equal amount of R&D. That R&D may have (and probably would have, because original ideas are rare and specifics are hard) cost the competitor significantly more to produce - never mind reproduce (reverse engineer).

      Realistically (IMO), the actual damages for physical things like this should be based on the production costs, loss of market capitalization (which wouldn't be able to be determined for some time, requiring a window for additional damages to be added), and what it would realistically cost to reverse engineer said documents. That is a hell of a lot more than $100 million.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    56. Re:Wake up, people. by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Wow.. Good thing he didn't steal any music or he would be looking at fines in the millions rather just a 150,000$.. What is the world coming to.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    57. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Execution for drug smugglers with large quantity of heroin is well deserved.

    58. Re:Wake up, people. by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      I admit I am hypothesizing here, but if you can pay the right people off (bribery), you will not be getting executed for drugs in China.

    59. Re:Wake up, people. by causality · · Score: 1

      One thing to consider is that what you believe to be fair punishment for a crime likely has some basis on what culture you were brought up in and how "tough" on crime that culture is.

      The first step to becoming a free-thinking person is to question everything you were raised to believe, from your parents, family, culture, schooling, government, churches, etc, and then to reject everything that doesn't make sense. I don't care how old you are; you're not really an adult until you have done this.

      All of the impressionable sheeple with their so conveniently malleable minds is precisely why society is so fucked up today, to put it bluntly.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    60. Re:Wake up, people. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You still have a couple of points are probably right in that US prisons are atleast better than chinese ones. And even of what I am, or well, I don't hate the US, but your prisons don't seem to work too great and I've got the impression lots of people are in prison thanks to drug (ab)use and nothing very serious.

      Anyway:

      but they're not as disease-ridden as China's.

      So everything is fine then ;)

      I like the prison Norway had, probably not for the badest of badasses, but anyway. Island outside of Oslo, 3-4 km to the shore of Oslo if I remember things right. You spend your prison time on the island, have a house to live in, no fences, no guards, can even swin over to Oslo and escape if you wanted to, but if you do and they catch you the next time you probably don't get to live on the same island.

      Anyway, think summer vaccation, think greenhouses and growing crops, outdoor baths, non-asphalted roads, bicycle tours or whatever. A true escape from the harsh life you may eventually had lived before and a place to get perspective on life / how you want to live it.

      The guy running the prison seemed weird though, I think one of the inmates had killed his parents (the prison chief) with a chainsaw or something such, and now he let him work with a chainsaw in the forrest... Talk about giving them the other cheek (or whatever the biblical sentence would be in english), he must have some issues in his brain himself to :)

    61. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not too harsh at all. we are at war with a fascist ideology that seeks to destroy us. If i supported it for any purpose, i would suggest the death penalty for the traitor. turning over any us corporation secrets to a chinese company is turning them over to the chinese government. since we are subsidizing the car industry here, its partially property of the us govt.

    62. Re:Wake up, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >This might allow them to improve their cars to the extent that some number of people choose to buy Chinese cars instead of Fords.

      Personally, I'd never buy either.

    63. Re:Wake up, people. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Actually:

      Million, has been moderated Insightful (+1).
      It is currently scored Insightful (2).

      Million, has been moderated Troll (-1).
      It is currently scored Troll (1).

      Million, has been moderated Interesting (+1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (2).

      Million, has been moderated Interesting (+1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (3).

      Million, has been moderated Flamebait (-1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (2).

      Million, has been moderated Overrated (-1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (1).

      Million, has been moderated Offtopic (-1).
      It is currently scored Offtopic (0).

      Million, has been moderated Underrated (+1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (1).

      Million, has been moderated Interesting (+1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (2).

      Million, has been moderated Overrated (-1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (1).

      Million, has been moderated Troll (-1).
      It is currently scored Troll (0).

      Million, has been moderated Underrated (+1).
      It is currently scored Interesting (1).

      People don't seem to be able to agree ;)

  2. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this a criminal offense? Seems to me it's an internal problem within Ford that they trusted untrustworthy people. I could understand Ford taking him to court for damages numbering in the millions of dollars, but why is the enforcement agency of the federal government (the FBI) involved in this matter?

    1. Re:Why by toastar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you real asking why is theft illegal?

    2. Re:Why by TheLink · · Score: 1

      It's not theft.

      It's breach of trust.

      --
    3. Re:Why by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Why is this a criminal offense? Seems to me it's an internal problem within Ford that they trusted untrustworthy people. I could understand Ford taking him to court for damages numbering in the millions of dollars, but why is the enforcement agency of the federal government (the FBI) involved in this matter?

      I think you just answered your own question. "damages numbering in the millions of dollars." If they say the documents were worth what they probably are worth, the Feds most likely wouldn't take an interest.

      This has happened before. A few decades ago, some youthful crackers logged on to a Bell System server and downloaded some documents. The phone company immediately brought in law enforcement, claiming the documents were worth (if memory serves) some fifty grand. That was to interest the Feds: below a certain point they don't care. Personally, I think the cops ought to charge the company execs who make such outrageous claims.

      In this case, it turned out that anyone could call up and order said papers for a few bucks. But the phone company wanted to make an example, so they lied to the cops.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Why by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      I thought the conses here would lead to people just calling this copyright infringement, since surely he copied the documents and did not steal them...

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    5. Re:Why by istartedi · · Score: 1

      why is the enforcement agency of the federal government (the FBI) involved in this matter?

      Because economic espionage is a Federal crime.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    6. Re:Why by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2, Informative

      > It's not theft. It's breach of trust.

      According to the press release (also linked above), it's theft of trade secrets:

      http://www.justice.gov/usao/mie/press/2010/2010-11-17_xyu.pdf

      I assume it's also a breach of his employment contract. (Which would be relevant to a civil case by Ford against him.)

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    7. Re:Why by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Either way, there wasn't anything physically stolen, just IP. So if it's copyrighted they could go after him for that in civil court, or if it's just a trade secret there could be some sort of breach of contract, which would also be civil?

      The only way I could see this being a criminal offence would be if it was against the state, so they could portray it as treason, no?

      Maybe I'm mistaken. Seems odd though.

    8. Re:Why by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me it's an internal problem within Ford that they trusted untrustworthy people.

      I suppose you have a magic solution that tells who is trustworthy and who is not? Are you selling any such snake oil? There are several different ways to reduce the problem, but until there is some kind of deep brain scan that can learn the thoughts and motivations of a person, I don't think there is even a shot at eliminating the risk of hiring untrustworthy people. And even then, an employer that uses that is probably not an employer that many people would want to work for.

    9. Re:Why by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Informative

      When trade secrets are involved it's called theft, not copyright infringement.

      "Theft" is when the original owner is deprived by the action. In this case, the trade secrets were stolen, because the original owner was deprived of the secret (as its not secret any more).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    10. Re:Why by afidel · · Score: 1

      And also a civil case by Ford against his employer and possibly criminal penalties against the employer for inducement to steal trade secrets which can carry punitive fines.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Why by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      It was a secret. Now it's no longer a secret. The original owner was deprived of a secret. Therefore, it's theft.

      Your use of "physically stolen" to define theft is too narrow. Instead ask "did the original owner lose something?" If so, it's theft.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    12. Re:Why by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The U.S. Economic Espionage Act of 1996, which became effective on January 1, 1997, makes theft or misappropriation of trade secrets a federal crime.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God! I'd better give back those liberated 1982 Fiesta bumper plans, while I still can.

    14. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you have a magic solution that tells who is trustworthy and who is not? Are you selling any such snake oil?

      As a matter of fact, he does. And it works, you can trust me.

    15. Re:Why by guspasho · · Score: 1

      How does a company's trade secret get such a special status as to warrant FBI involvement? I don't understand this, which makes it appear to me that the FBI is working for Ford.

    16. Re:Why by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Oops. I found the answer in other branches of this thread. The Economic Espionage Act of 1996. Got it.

      I really need to incorporate myself. It seems that you get more rights that way.

  3. How did they catch him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this one of those times where security steals someone's laptop to look on it randomly, or did they already know what he did and have a warrant for his arrest?

  4. A word to the wise ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    The FBI seized his Beijing Automotive-issued laptop, and an analysis found 41 stolen Ford specification documents on the hard drive.

    Dear "Mike",

    When you get out, and if you decide to again play industrial spy, try this

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:A word to the wise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, even better, encrypt all your partitions (well, except /boot) with https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Dm-crypt. In Debian you can easily do this during the install.

    2. Re:A word to the wise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot, where the "entertainment wants to be free" corps give thieves tips on how to better perpetrate scumbaggery. Nice.

    3. Re:A word to the wise ... by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Talk about amateur night.
      Although I doubt you'll be able to withhold password from the FBI, they'll get it from you or you'll rot in jail anyhow.

      dm-crypt works excellent though.

      According to the summary he stole the files in 2006, and was busted with the files on his laptop on a stopover in 2009. WTF? Might want to just leave stuff like that on the server in china, once you've got it...

    4. Re:A word to the wise ... by grub · · Score: 1


      Damn Slashdot thieves! It's not like just anyone could... oh... google for disk and partition encryption software!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:A word to the wise ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      When you get out, and if you decide to again play industrial spy, try this

      Or this: s/Ford/Mike/g

    6. Re:A word to the wise ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Although I doubt you'll be able to withhold password from the FBI

      Store the data on a small partition, use login 'me', create user 'mike' with UID 0/group wheel/sudo-added user, let mikes shell write /dev/random onto said partition + over-write partition table in the background and overwrite and remove the shells rc-file?

      Maybe they don't login. What do I know :)

      Put an explosive charge within the HDD.

    7. Re:A word to the wise ... by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the first thing they would do when they seize something like a laptop is take the HD out and do a bit by bit copy of the entire disk without executing any code from the original machine. Even if you have something which wipes the disk if you boot in the wrong way, they will have a full bit prefect copy for them to try again.

      You would need a way which wipes the data before the disk can be copied which means a way of wiping the data if the HD is removed, you joked about putting an explosive charge in but I think it would have to be some sort of bespoke hardware hack.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    8. Re:A word to the wise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encryption only proves you have something to hide... http://xkcd.com/538/

    9. Re:A word to the wise ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Although I doubt you'll be able to withhold password from the FBI, they'll get it from you or you'll rot in jail anyhow.

      Probably not. The most recent Federal ruling on that topic of which I am aware was very clear: the judge said that passwords are off-limits if they're in your head. Just don't write them down: then they're fair game for a legal search.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:A word to the wise ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, where the "entertainment wants to be free" corps give thieves tips on how to better perpetrate scumbaggery. Nice.

      First off, I'm not a member of this imaginary "corps" of yours, and secondly, this discussion has nothing whatsoever to do with entertainment and third, I didn't even recommend a top-of-the-line solution. Besides, the point I was making was that the guy was an idiot.

      Not to stray too far off-topic, but your comment shows a certain lack of insight into the subject of copyright infringement, so you might want to get up to speed on that before jumping in again.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:A word to the wise ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Although I doubt you'll be able to withhold password from the FBI

      Store the data on a small partition, use login 'me', create user 'mike' with UID 0/group wheel/sudo-added user, let mikes shell write /dev/random onto said partition + over-write partition table in the background and overwrite and remove the shells rc-file?

      Maybe they don't login. What do I know :)

      Put an explosive charge within the HDD.

      I'd recommend thermite instead. You don't want to kill anyone: that just puts you into a whole 'nother category of criminal (unless you can successfully blame the explosion on a defective battery!) All you want to do is melt the drive into slag.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    12. Re:A word to the wise ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Although I doubt you'll be able to withhold password from the FBI, they'll get it from you or you'll rot in jail anyhow.

      I remember that case was from a Slashdot story: the guy was allegedly observed viewing child pornography by a pair of Customs agents. They confiscated his laptop, but the idiots let him close the lid or power it down (I forget which.) He'd encrypted the drive, and when the agents demanded his password he refused to turn it over. It went to court, and the judge ruled that law enforcement may not demand that, and that was that. So civil liberties aren't quite dead: I'd say it's still better to encrypt that not.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  5. Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going to by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    have bad power steering pumps and short life torque converters from now on?

    (sorry, had to go there, the problems I've had to deal with on my own/families/friends Fords the most)

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  6. I doubt that penalty is compelling by mbone · · Score: 1

    Let's see, steal $ 75 million USD worth of stuff. 10% "finders feee" seems reasonable. So, with a 6 year sentence, that's over $ 1 million USD / year. (The fine is of course irrelevant in this scenario.)

    I bet a lot of people would sign up for that.

    1. Re:I doubt that penalty is compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd trade six years in the slammer for $7.5 million tax free. Not quite enough to retire off of at age 30, but enough that you could work 10 hrs a week part time for the rest of your life if you didn't invest it wisely, or use it to start an auto parts mfg company for that chinese automaker.

    2. Re:I doubt that penalty is compelling by Formalin · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the actual value is considerably less than they claimed, though.

    3. Re:I doubt that penalty is compelling by konohitowa · · Score: 1

      Good thing he didn't P2P them. The amount would have run into the trillions.

    4. Re:I doubt that penalty is compelling by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Good thing he didn't P2P them. The amount would have run into the trillions.

      I wonder what the US military price their Iraq and Afghanistan reports at ;)

    5. Re:I doubt that penalty is compelling by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Actually it wouldn't. The statutory damages for sharing a single song is at least $200, typically a minimum of $750. The statutory damages for "sharing" a single piece of top secret company information is a maximum of $150,000. More than that and you have to prove damages.

  7. Augh! They blew the op! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fools! The CIA spent months trying to get those documents to the Chinese. How are we going to trick them into building shoddy cars that nobody will want to buy now?

  8. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    have bad power steering pumps and short life torque converters from now on?

    or V6 engines that die prematurely due to head gasket failure?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  9. Plain old corporate spying ... or is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... a $150,000 fine is puny compared to what he probably made from the sale. This could be a perfect example of government sponsored corporate terrorism :) aka spying.

  10. Pffft...amateur... by afabbro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Small potatoes

    "Lopez was head of purchasing for GM and defected abruptly to VW in 1993. GM accused Lopez of masterminding the theft of more than 20 boxes of documents on research, manufacturing and sales. The world's largest international corporate espionage case officially ended in 1997, when VW admitted no wrongdoing but settled the civil suit by agreeing to pay GM $100 million in cash and spend $1 billion on GM parts over seven years.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Pffft...amateur... by DavMz · · Score: 1

      Now I know why the Golf Mk4 is the poorest of the series.

    2. Re:Pffft...amateur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True.

      Anyone stupid enough to store the stolen documents from an American company inside a Chinese company issued notebook and trying to pass through the checkpoint of an American airport is nothing short of sheer idiocy.

      In this age of multi-Gigabyte portable storage space (online and off), and 256-bit crypto, what is this idiot actually thinking?

    3. Re:Pffft...amateur... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains the rapid decline in quality of VW vehicles which started in the mid-late 90's. What were they thinking?

  11. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Of course. Part of the skill of a good engineer is to ensure the parts fail as soon as possible after the warranty expires.

  12. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    have bad power steering pumps and short life torque converters from now on?

    or V6 engines that die prematurely due to head gasket failure?

    Head gaskets are called engine failure now?

  13. ITSEC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to put on our ITSEC/Business hats: How much of this stuff did he need to do his job? And if he didn't need it, why did he have read access to it?

  14. Common Sense.... by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
    "Ford Design Documents?" ... "$100 million"...

    LOL

    90's-era Ford's weren't exactly the pinnacle of world-class engineering.

    Now if they claimed $100 million dollars in plans to trick consumers into buying three transmissions, two alternators, and four water pumps for every car they sold, I'd maybe believe it...

    1. Re:Common Sense.... by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Because as well all know, the turn around on any new R&D is 1-3 months tops, nothing is ever the fruition of 5-10years R&D.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    2. Re:Common Sense.... by Obyron · · Score: 1

      So your counterargument is that Ford sucked 20 years ago? My head hurts.

      --
      --Obyron
    3. Re:Common Sense.... by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
      Yes...and given that I keep cars for up to 15 years - It's going to take more than a new Radio with "Microsoft Technology" (1-3 month R&D Cycle) to wow me back into a Ford.

      Prove to me that you car will last that 10 or 15 years - like my Hondas - and my Toyotas - and *then* we will talk. Don't try to bullshit me with a Consumer Reports survey that goes 3 years back - or a JD Power & Associates study that measures **INITIAL** quality.

      That kind of reputation *does* take 20 years to shake, sorry to say!

  15. In short.... by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    FORD = Found On Road Dead

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:In short.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer "Fucker Only Runs Downhill" myself. I would never buy or be caught driving one.

    2. Re:In short.... by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's see 1997 Taurus 225k miles, 2001 Taurus 250k miles, 2001 Sable only 185k miles so far. Of course the common thread is all three had the Duratec V6, one of the best engines ever made. It helps to do your homework =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:In short.... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      It helps to do your homework

      Yes, it does. Just because the Duratec engine did not have problems doesn't mean that other Ford V6s did not.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:In short.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix Or Repair Daily

    5. Re:In short.... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      All Bundys Dodge, 0 miles.

    6. Re:In short.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not die as long as you Fix Or Repair Daily.

    7. Re:In short.... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Funny enough the Essex's twin the Buick 3800 also had head gasket problems at about the same time due to a similar redesign effort despite being separated for almost 20 years (Ford copied a late 70's Buick design to make the original Essex). At least Ford didn't also have the cracking intake manifold problems that GM did. I guess that's what happens when you try to bring an engine design that started in the early 1960's into the 21st century instead of doing a clean sheet design like the Duratec though even that is getting a bit long in the tooth. I guess the ecoboost variants may give them some life through increased fuel economy by lowering needed displacement for similar power:weight ratios.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:In short.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Wow, you drive a lot. My 99 Neon *only* has 301k miles on it & I do about 100 miles a day during the week.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:In short.... by afidel · · Score: 1

      They were all used when I got them, the 97 had 125k when I got it, the 99 taurus (mistakenly listed at 2001) had 85k and the Sable had 65k. My dad who sold me the first two has done 100k miles in as little as 22 months before.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  16. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ford's been doing better. Over the last decade, they've built up some engineer teams in Europe (is it flamebait to say they are better because they are away from US unions?) who really are doing top notch work. The Fusion, for example, ranked #1 in its category for reliability. The Mustang has 300 horsepower at 30 MPG. I own a Honda, but if Ford continues the direction they're going, my next car may well be a Ford. Now if only they would do something about that horrid logo.....

    --
    Qxe4
  17. Thank goodness those weren't MP3s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would have been, what, 40 times as much in fines?

  18. i also invite you to wake up, person by hildi · · Score: 0

    50 million dollars? wall street credit derivatives traders, and management, destroyed their entire companies, and they never had so much as Geraldo knock on their door. they wouldn't wipe their ass with 50 million dollars. they stole --TRILLIONS-- from their own companies, investors, and most of all, the taxpayers of the entire planet, and they got off scott free. they are still working in the same field. and slashdot has not done a story on it.

  19. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I guess replacing a head gasket is a normal occurrence on a domestic vehicle. Yes I do consider that an engine failure due to the amount of labor involved.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  20. Property Theft by jkeelsnc · · Score: 1

    Well, he got his due. Thats about all I can say. For playing this game he gets the slammer where he belongs. Enough jobs have already been lost to China as it is. Ford has greatly improved their products recently and they have a right to protect and prosecute on lost IP like this. This means american jobs and so I am all for what happened. Maybe Chinese will think twice again before trying to steal trade secrets and plans. Go make your own and stop worrying about what ours are.

    1. Re:Property Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to jail/prison being a place to keep dangerous people away from society? You know, like murderers, rapists, arsonists, bombers, ACTUAL (key word) theft, etc. Instead, what fills prisons around the country is a bunch of people who just want to get high on their drug of choice that isn't nicotine, caffeine or alcohol, people who breach company contracts/trust and infringe copyrights like this guy. Add in software patents and the ridiculous length of copyright law in this world of extremely quick, easy and limitless copying, and this world is fucked--simple as that. And then you consider that people committing these "crimes" get put in the same place as those truly dangerous people... yeah, this world is fucked.

    2. Re:Property Theft by Malenx · · Score: 1

      lolz... shut up. Jail has always been a place to punish people for any crime the general public decides to create.

      This Utopian Jail where only bad guys by your standard are sent too has never existed. Go back to your pot.

    3. Re:Property Theft by pgmrdlm · · Score: 0

      When was jail ever reserved just for.

      Whatever happened to jail/prison being a place to keep dangerous people away from society?

      What time in history. Citation required to prove that point.

      Seriously. Theft has ALWAYS been jail time.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    4. Re:Property Theft by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Theft has ALWAYS been jail time.

      I heard in some places they just chop off your hand[1].

      I don't know about other people, but I'm quite attached to my hands :).

      [1] I doubt there's someone standing by to reattach it for you. Hmmm maybe in the future they could preserve it and when you've served your time and been a good boy they'll reattach it back? Heck, I'd certainly be on my best behaviour if it means getting my hand back even if it'll only be 80% as good as before...

      --
    5. Re:Property Theft by pgmrdlm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lol, I deserved that. You are quite correct that some countries do chop off your hand for theft.

      Saudi Arabia Crime and Punishment\

      Under the sharia, repeated theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand, administered under anesthetic.

      Aggravated theft can be punished by cross-amputation of a hand and a foot. Such cases have been unusual, but Amnesty International reported four of them in 1986. In 1990 fewer than ten hand amputations took place, at least five of which were administered to foreigners.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  21. Jump on the Cloud Everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on everybody.
    Have all of your professional dialogs and emails and other creative or confidentially secret business files hosted on THE CLOUD.
    You can trust all these big corporations who grow larger and larger, monopolizing everything from healthcare to off shoring jobs.

    And when these cloud companies secretly lift your creation and sell it to one of their buddies who has more resources than you to get your stolen creation out the door, what are you going to do about it.
    Nothing, all you'll say is damn. And then your ruined. Have fun with you patent wars, lawyers and careless cloud habits.

    Loose Lips Sink Ships

    What do you think Capitalism is?
    You wanna earn a living and make a buck, STFU and stay off the cloud, if you know what is good for you.

    I swear people have no clue on how to avoid drama.

  22. White Collar Vs Pilfering From Giants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $150,000 dollar fine for $50,000,000 theft while if you steal a song valued at $.99 you get a $60,000 fine. Seems about right.

    1. Re:White Collar Vs Pilfering From Giants by jonsmirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was $1.92M for 24 songs so $80,0000. Using the same ratio - $50M * 80,000 = $4 trillion. It seems fair. We should apply that judgement against China and take one of their provinces as settlement.

    2. Re:White Collar Vs Pilfering From Giants by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Funny

      I vote for Hong Kong.

    3. Re:White Collar Vs Pilfering From Giants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just void their US debt holdings and we'd have almost 25% of it.

  23. H1Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says he was hired in '97. Can't find H1B stats going back that far, but Ford certainly has an affinity for H1B product engineers (http://www.h1bwage.com/employer.php?q=28339&sortby=1). You get whatcha pay for.

  24. FBI? O RLY? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Why was the FBI and taxpayer money involved?

  25. Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This story come right on the heals of that other slashdot story: "Malaysian Indicted After Hacking Federal Reserve."

    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/11/22/1446256/Malaysian-Indicted-After-Hacking-Federal-Reserve

    I guess US companies are saving a bundle by putting so much trust in foreign nationals.

    These two stories are hardly unique.

    Sure, offshoring jobs has ruined the careers, and lives, of countless Americans, but look at the money that the US companies are saving!

    1. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They have no choice. There simply is not enough home grown engineering talent.

    2. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Maybe if US companies hired more Americans, more Americans would train to engineers?

      Also, where do you get that insane "information" about there not being enough home grown engineering talent?

    3. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by microbee · · Score: 1

      Americans do not abandon science and engineering because they couldn't get the jobs. They abandon them because they are hard and do not earn enough money. Why be a hardworking engineer when you can basically steal everyone's money legally at Wall Street, or be a lawyer?

    4. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, are you, the US, champions of free trade and what not, saying that you want to adopt protectionist policies on your workforce while forcing the rest of the world to have free trade on products?

    5. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I do on campus recruiting, primarily for EEs and CSEs, only about 20% of those who apply are US Citizens. For resumes submitted online, it's closer to 2%.

    6. Re:Are US companies wise to trust in foreigners? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Where do you get this BS? Need I remind you of the all amazing accomplishments in science and technology that have come the US? Need I further remind you that essentially nothing comes these 3rd world nations that the US uses for cheap labor?

      Name me a major computer software company from India, or even China?

      Compare that to the US: Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, etc.

  26. Industrial Espionage by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was working at a defense contractor, they would tell us in training about industrial espionage being a huge problem. And not just by other companies.

    I would surmise that most American companies are blissfully unaware about the threat they face.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  27. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least their anti-lock breaks will be tip-top.

  28. Re:FBI? O RLY? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    Why was the FBI and taxpayer money involved?

    Because taxes are paid on profit. And profits are earned through technological advantage. And technology that is stolen from the US eliminates that advantage.

    Alternately, one of the primary purposes of government is to protect people's rights, like the right not to be robbed. (haha j/k no one actually believes that anymore do they?)

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  29. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Head gaskets are called engine failure now?

    When the head gasket failure results in large quantities of coolant going into the oil followed by rapid failure of the main bearings, yes. You will see from the linked page that the repair bills from these failed head gaskets could be up to $4000. It was a common problem on Ford V6s built during the '90s.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  30. Ford designs? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    The government should be giving this guy a medal, not prosecuting him. By sending those designs and documents to China, he single-handedly set their automotive industry back by at lease a decade.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  31. Re:FBI? O RLY? by macraig · · Score: 1

    You must be right. Lord knows that corporations never robbed anybody and we have government to thank for that.

  32. Good thing he didn't share a few music files by bobgap · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or he'd REALLY get nailed, not the slap on the wrist he's getting1

  33. Ford Secrets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like what?
    How to make a car that falls apart sitting in your driveway?
    Or how to take a 2012 model car and make the interior of it look like a car's interior made in the 80's?
    Or how to charge premium prices for sub-standard part's and quality?

  34. Apparently for him... by twoears · · Score: 1

    Stealing was Job 1.

  35. old news by Malenx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is how Chinese companies generally innovate, they steal the information so they don't have to invent it themselves. We were constantly trained to keep eyes out for people stealing confidential and classified information when I worked on some Air-force Systems. Even back then, we were told the greatest threat was people being bought out by the Chinese, the US government were already dealing with tons of them trying to steal military technology. They are so far behind, they would generally do anything to try and close the gap, since they couldn't invent it quick enough themselves.

    1. Re:old news by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you don't know about Boeings long stint with industrial espionage earlier this decade? In 2003 they enticed a DoD employee to pass them extensive confidential details of a rivals bid to supply the USAF with tanker aircraft, sparking a criminal investigation within the DoD and punitive measures against Boeing. Again in 2003 Lockheed successfully sued Boeing over allegations that a former Lockheed employee took significant quantities of confidential and proprietary Lockheed corporate documentation to Boeing when he switched companies in 1998, and Boeing used those documents to secure several high profile government contracts. Boeing was found guilty by the DoD and stripped of its contracts, fined $500m and banned from bidding for two years.

      If you think its just the Chinese that do this, think again - the Boeing/Lockheed case has startling similarities to this one, don't you think...

    2. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing it wasn't relevant to his anecdote, or to this story. This story is about China stealing trade secrets. His anecdote was about being warned about the Chinese stealing trade secrets. We weren't talking about Boeing. Run along now.

  36. You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by HW_Hack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - hard at work stealing our information and creative processes. People (that includes politicians + CEOs) just tend to forget that China is not some quaint country that has rules of law and enforces those laws. This is a state run government and economy - anything goes to enrich the state and acrue power. We've already sent most of our production machines over there - now they are coming back to collect any intellectual property they can grab as well.

    They are starting to eat our lunch and will shortly just take our lunch money

    And contrary to some comments -- Ford makes some damn fine vehicles -- I dearly miss my 2001 F-150 4x4 - great truck

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
    1. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by Deflatamouse · · Score: 0

      If your F-150 was that great, why are you not driving it any more? Perhaps you didn't Fix Or Repair it Daily?
      I still drive my 2001 Toyota RAV4 and plan to for 10 more years, hopefully.

    2. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by microbee · · Score: 1

      Like this one?

    3. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      Ford makes some damn fine vehicles

      My '85 E150 with almost 180,000 miles runs like a champ. Just failed smog because the cat failed, but they said the exhaust directly from the engine is clean as a whistle.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    4. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      See my above comment about it not just being the Chinese (Boeing/Lockheed, 2003. Boeing/Airbus, 2003). Your own closet has some skeletons as well...

    5. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by couchslug · · Score: 1

      That's why WE need to do the same thing to compete, and fuse state and business into an international weapon to make money. The Chinese system is more profitable, has brought the people of China vastly more wealth than ever in their history, and took China from a smoking ruin in 1948 to a near-superpower now.

      We must have wealth. Business is war.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by houghi · · Score: 1

      It is not theft. It is copyright infringement.

      It is not as if these companies suddenly are unable to use that information anymore.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by Obyron · · Score: 1

      Actually it's Theft of Trade Secrets. Not Copyright. Not Trademark. Trade Secrets. That other branch of intellectual property law that doesn't get dusted off and discussed too often, because you're less likely to find it on a torrent tracker. The problem isn't that they've "lost" the information. They haven't. The problem is that that information can represent 50-100 million dollars worth of engineering efforts that the other team will not have to pay for, which damages the competitive environment, fucks with profit margins, and means that a whole slough of automotive engineers will not be employed for a few years. The guy's basically being charged with a crime against the free market.

      Whether or not you agree with the system or the conclusion (and I'm not 100% sure I do, but can't put my finger on why), it makes sense in context. It's not like he downloaded some pop single that they're playing ad nauseum on the radio and tv, but which magically becomes illegal if you want to play it on your computer.

      --
      --Obyron
    8. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each to their own I guess - Top Gear tested the F150 a few years back and lambasted it as the worst vehicle they'd ever tested.

    9. Re:You can bet there are many more Chinese spys - by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Here, here! Ford seems to have the best reliability of most manufacturers, and has for a long time. I've rarely heard a "new vehicle catastrophic failure" with a Ford, vs. (say) Dodge. Yeah, there've been 'lemons', as there are with all brands - but, unlike the other brands, they make prominence in the news/society due to how many people own them, not the scope of the problems (eg: 2000/2001 Ford Focus).

      I'm personally privy to Ford vehicles made during the 80s (well, and the first year or two of the 1990s), and the 1971-1994 C-series based vans and trucks (Chevy/GMC). They lagged behind Ford designs for a couple years but they caught up and (when dealing with an older vehicle) there's a lot to be said for having a vehicle that has parts made, new, for 14-odd years for multiple vehicles (cost, availability, quality).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  37. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, considering that the workforce in Europe is more unionized than it is here, it probably is.

  38. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by happyhamster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >>Europe (is it flamebait to say they are better because they are away from US unions?)

    Probably yes, because:

    1) Workers in good old Europe have stronger unions than the withering joke the U.S. has.

    2) European workers enjoy a terrific safety net which looks like the great wall of china compared to the spider web the U.S. wage slaves have. Never underestimate explosion of creativity in a geek who feels safe for economic future of his family.

  39. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a shame they abandoned the Straight-6. I have one in my '63 Falcon convertible that hasn't been rebuilt since it was put in the car and sat for 22 years. This summer I replaced a few parts (not anywhere CLOSE to a rebuild) and it started up and has run ever since. A rebuild is coming soon, though, and I have a feeling that it will be good for another 48 years at least.

  40. Let me put it this way... by woolio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me put it this way:

    I work in a high technology company that makes a lot of software.

    If our source code got into the hands of the competition, it would set them back a few decades.

    They would run into so many bugs without knowing the 'workarounds' (or just flat out what to avoid), they wouldn't know what hit them.

    Considering the crap that American car companies design, I think the Chinese are probably just trying to figure out what NOT to do.

    1. Re:Let me put it this way... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Ah, so that's why developers never comment their code - it's to protect industrial secrets!

    2. Re:Let me put it this way... by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      No, no, that would be the case if it were Chrysler or GM product design. But this was the *good* stuff that they stole.

      --
      --Jim (me)
    3. Re:Let me put it this way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a high technology company that makes a lot of software. If our source code got into the hands of the competition, it would set them back a few decades.

      Bill? Is that you Bill Gates?

  41. Re:FBI? O RLY? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    From the FBI's website

    The FBI investigates matters relating to fraud, theft, or embezzlement occurring within or against the national and international financial community. These crimes are characterized by deceit, concealment, or violation of trust and are not dependent upon the application or threat of physical force or violence. Such acts are committed by individuals and organizations to obtain personal or business advantage. The FBI focuses its financial crimes investigations on such criminal activities as corporate fraud, securities and commodities fraud, health care fraud, financial institution fraud, mortgage fraud, insurance fraud, mass marketing fraud, and money laundering. These are the identified priority crime problem areas of the Financial Crimes Section (FCS) of the FBI.

  42. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    This also explains why Ford was the only one of the big-three not begging for cash handouts from your central government. Not sure whether they actually got any bailout money or so, I didn't follow it well enough.

    Anyway. Ford has been selling quite well in Europe for a very long time - many decades. My parents used to own one, and were quite happy with it. They called it the most European American car when it comes to quality, reliability and overall design. American cars have the name to be oversized and overweight expensive gas guzzlers.

    Otoh, all the brands that were mentioned in the stories about GM and Chrysler you can barely find on the roads in Europe. Also in Asia I haven't seen them. It does say something about the quality: Japanese are exporting cars worldwide (and even producing worldwide). European manufacturers exporting big time too, mostly US, also Asia. But American brands other than Ford - very little, if at all.

    I don't know really what the US automakers are doing worse than the competition, but they really have some catching up to do.

  43. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Have you driven the Mustang though? I rented one in Florida a year or two back (V8), and it drove like one of their F150s. Fuel economy doesn't fix other engineering problems.

  44. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    The problem with US unions, especially in the auto industry, has nothing to do with safety net. It has to do with corruption, with keeping incompetent people from being fired, and making the company inefficient. You can tell they are corrupt because over the last year one of their biggest goals has been to get rid of the secret ballot.

    From what I've heard, unions in Europe don't really have these problems. The unions act as a representative of their employees, and do a fairly good job.

    --
    Qxe4
  45. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    What car in that class do you suggest driving? I drove one a few years back, and it did feel a bit heavy, but it certainly beat the GM convertible I tried more recently.

    --
    Qxe4
  46. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Try a Corvette if possible (I'm aware it's a bit above the Mustang's class). Renting is difficult, but buying one isn't that expensive if bought used (C6, the latest generation, go for about $27-29K at Carmax around here with 20-30K miles on them). I used to own a '99 Targa Top and '01 Convertible (both bought used) and they were awesome. Excellent handling and quite a bit of power.

    If that's not your thing, I'd look at the Subaru WRX, a Lexus IS250, a Mini Cooper (++handling), or a Mazda RX-8. I've had great experiences with those vehicles.

  47. Sentence by Andy+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "five to six years in prison and a $150,000 fine"

    Can you imagine how awfully unbalanced it would seem if people got lesser sentences for causing death by dangerous driving?

    1. Re:Sentence by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Surely the judge was thinking that this case would allow the rival company construct cheaper cars by saving R&D costs, thus enabling MORE people to buy a car and cause death by driving dangerously!

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    2. Re:Sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or greater fines for sharing music tracks...

  48. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, all our incompetents are in the hundreds of layers of management. The manual workers, because we abolished promotion-from-the-ranks decades ago, get pretty good at the jobs they will do forever (until they get downsized).

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  49. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

    My slant-six would totally kick your ass. Keep yankin' on your three on the tree.

  50. The story sounds a little too good by beachdog · · Score: 1

    The recitation of facts and circumstances in the press announcement is too tidy and too organized. There must be major undisclosed facts and players associated with this case.

    First of all note this is a "plea bargain". It is a plea bargain where only the prosecutor is saying anything. Note that the defendant and his attorney is saying nothing.

    That means the deal is not justice in the conventional sense of found guilty in open court by a jury.

    Notice, a big feature of this deal is all the punishment falls on one individual. There is no mention of the individual being paid except as in employment wages. The theft claim stops at the individual.

    Note that the facts disclosed appear to be very prettily organized. The person flew to the perfect airport, The evidence found should not have been on any laptop. The files shouldn't have been on any business laptop owned by a Chinese company. The files show just the right access times to prove illegal access. The encryption used is just good enough to prevent casual access. The FBI is just good enough to forensically decrypt the files and perfectly identify the files as originating at Ford.

    At the local courthouse I saw first hand that a lot of criminal prosecutions appeared to be young people pleading "nolo contendre" and accepting rather harsh punishments. I have seen at close hand punishment and criminalization being implemented by the motor vehicles people strictly as an administrative matter that takes the police officer's ticket as nearly incontestable truth.

    One problem is, defence attorneys cost $300 per hour and even some attorneys have a 10 hour minimum.

    Instead of justice, what we have here is the Federal criminal punishments are so exorbitantly draconian that 1 thumb drive of files means much more that 6 to 8 years in prison.

    The government prosecution probably could have locked this hapless engineer up for 90 years.

    The prosecutors negotiated with him to only take away 1/5 of his remaining lifetime in prison.

    The concern I feel is our justice system is being short circuited by a triple problem: The criminal justice system destroys entire families without the damage being ever measured. The triple problems are:
    1. Defence attorneys are generally un-affordable.

    2. The punishments are imperial lockup in duration. There is no penitence and correction philosophy. Simply integer fractions of a lifetime are forfeited for chicken misbehaviors.

      All those years of "get tough on crime" have given us a criminal prosecution system that causes problems because of the scope and severity of the punishments now written in the law.

    3. Prosecutors are getting quick easy long lasting punishments without actually engaging in trial by jury in an open court.

    1. Re:The story sounds a little too good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why anarchy is the best type of democracy.

  51. Very patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That person is a hero. He is ethnic chinese and he served the nation of his own blood. Nothing matters, but race and blood allegiance. America wanted to be a melting pot of nations, so all "goy" races can be dissolved in junk culture and the whole mankind placed under the rule of elite jews, but America failed and Russia failed to implement total jewish world rule with gentiles as slaves. China is the major "goy" superpower, a nation-state and race-state of the 21st century.

  52. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Head gaskets are called engine failure now?

    Shhhh. You might upset the natives.

    You are posting on Slashdot, the place where place where gaming skills are equated with programming ability, living in one's parent's basement is equated with owning a house. If this was the 80's, they would be demanding the government buy everyone a Commodore64 because they are afraid of riding the train home from college.

  53. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it flamebait to say they are better because they are away from US unions?

    No, it's just moronic, as unions are much stronger in Europe and there are much more rights/protections for workers.
    You only come over like a clown parroting anti-union propaganda from FoxNews etc.

  54. Am I the only one whose first thought was by Geminii · · Score: 1

    Geez, how dumb would you have to be to keep documents like that on any computer you personally had access to?

    Come ON, people. If you're going to perform industrial espionage, don't get caught by embarrassing amateur mistakes. No wonder car makers need bailouts if they're hiring sub-par workers like this.

  55. Was this an H1-B employee by any chance? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Returning home, outside US jurisdiction? Just wondering.

    Gotta love those non-compete agreements. The employer can harass you to the end of the earth for simply trying to get a job after being laid off (even if you have no access to "secrets" at all). Meanwhile, if you take a boatload of top-secret material offshore, all they can do is shrug their shoulders and have the legal department send a few nastygrams.

    1. Re:Was this an H1-B employee by any chance? by EricWright · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, put away your xenophobia for 5 minutes to RTFA. He was a naturalized US Citizen who completed his doctorate at UChicago.

    2. Re:Was this an H1-B employee by any chance? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      Spare me the xenophobia crap.

      TFA does not mention citizenship. Maybe a link of a link of a link does, but I never saw it.

      In any event, mentioned H1-B because I have direct knowledge of a case where the employer was shocked...SHOCKED! to discover they had no recourse when an H1-B returned to his home country and brought proprietary information to a competitor.

      Although anyone can leave the country and take trade secrets with them, you have to wonder about the wisdom of giving such secrets to people who have the means, motive, and method to exit the country and leave all of those nifty "trade secret" agreements in the dust.

      Naturalized citizen or not, this guy had no problem getting a job with a Chinese manufacturer in China.

      You don't have to be a xenophobe to understand risk and plan for contingencies.

    3. Re:Was this an H1-B employee by any chance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, put away your xenophobia for 5 minutes to RTFA. He was a naturalized US Citizen who completed his doctorate at UChicago.

      How about you put away your political correctness, cupcake. There's been a trend of engineers of Chinese descent, whether US citizen or not, who have been sending secrets to their ancestral home. No, I'm not going to Google it for you, but the empirical evidence is there.

      If you work the numbers on the entire population I'd wager that foreign born engineers are indeed more likely to loot the store in the interest of companies in their nation of origin.

  56. He did not steal designs, he stole SPECIFICATIONS by dherman · · Score: 1

    He stole SPECIFICATIONS, not designs. Designs on their own are pretty worthless (as you can 3d scan and replicate any physical part). You Can't 3d scan the knowledge used for designing that part.

    Engineering is not mechanical design. It is properly identifying the REQUIREMENTS, and developing a SPECIFICATION which can then be used to ENGINEER a DESIGN. By Stealing the Specifications, it gives a new OEM a major leg up in the engineering process as they can skip the time consuming phase of understanding the customer (See process mentioned prior).

    People need to separate the end product (widgit) from the underlying knowledge to design said widgit

  57. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    My current car is a ford - a mondeo - and I'm perfectly happy with it, power-wise and l/100km-wise as well. My next car will also be a mondeo (if we get them in SA again).

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  58. I have reason to believe by The+Hatchet · · Score: 2, Informative

    That Ford and its competitors have stolen significantly more information than that from independent inventors, small firms, employees, etc. Call it stealing or not, but making millions-billions on others work is immoral and stealing in my book, even if you make them sign something to let you.

    --
    Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    1. Re:I have reason to believe by algoa456 · · Score: 1

      That Ford and its competitors have stolen significantly more information than that from independent inventors, small firms, employees, etc. Call it stealing or not, but making millions-billions on others work is immoral and stealing in my book, even if you make them sign something to let you.

      Wow, you seem to have a lot of dirt on Ford. Don't hide it, publicize it with facts. Or are you jus' sayin'.......

    2. Re:I have reason to believe by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      It's not just Ford. Every major US and most foreign car and car part manufacuters (such as (specifically, those I have dealt with and know for a fact) Delphi, Robert Bosch, Mazda, Honda, Hyundai, Chrysler, Ford, Chevy, etc) work very hard to destroy all hints at innovation that present themselves to them. In addition to fighting innovation, they all have sent me the exact same response, word for word, as if they had all agreed to treat all incoming innovations with the exact same response.

      They basically make up an excuse about worrying that it might be similar to something they are working on so they don't accept outside invention. But in reality there are very simple ways to circumvent such issues, such as Mutual Non-Disclosure agreements. Many other industries, those who like innovation, willingly put forth MNDA agreements and eagerly look at anything. But the car industry fights innovation as if it were to be the end of their industry, instead of the lifeblood of it.

      But that is dealing with outside inventors. All of their employees are inventors and engineers that are given between 29k and 75k a year for their work, even when their work is directly worth millions of dollars. But if you don't work for them, you don't work, at least in many fields. Meaning either you find an angel investor, the 1 in a million shot at doing anything, or you work your life away paying off loans while a few people make millions off of your work, and off of the work of your coworkers. That is well known fact to anyone who has dealt with the industry.

      I would post the letters here, but they would likely just sue me for plagerism.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
  59. First On Race Day! by pbrooks100 · · Score: 1

    I'll admit that the 90's and most 0x's are crap; poor finishes and ugly designs, poor reliability.

    I'm sort of interested in the fact that Consumer Reports has been finding the newer models acceptable. Add in that Ford didn't take/need a bail-out and that the new Taurus and Fiesta actually have some style/fit and finish and I might switch back. I've been driving Honda and Toyota for 10+ years. Considering the Toyota scares along with the Honda ugliness,

    Although I haven't driven a Ford lately...

  60. Stupidity by Inda · · Score: 1

    When I worked for BMW, I visited their UK design centre many times during the developement stage of the X5.

    There was a workshop, big enough for two cars, and it always held two cars. A team of techs would strip the car, measure and digitise the parts. Anyone in the company could borrow any car part they liked complete with drawings.

    I beleive it's called reverse engineering in the game. :p

    Stealing drawings? Laughable.

    When I worked for BMW, inbetween leads for new models, we often did work for Renault, Peugeot and Ford. They obviously supplied us with drawings.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  61. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Balthisar · · Score: 1

    Ford engineers are *not* unionized.

    --
    --Jim (me)
  62. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Timo_UK · · Score: 1

    If you think the US unions are strong then you have not seen the European/German ones! I know somebody who wants VPN access to his company network but the unions would not allow it (they think the company would force him to work from home). This way he has no access to his email on business trips.

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
  63. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beats constantly having every vehicle recalled over lousy engineering techniques...

  64. Re:FBI? O RLY? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    They are often involved when someone is being arrested for a Federal crime.

  65. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    "Corporate espionage": Chinese for "good morning."

  66. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Binestar · · Score: 1

    This also explains why Ford was the only one of the big-three not begging for cash handouts from your central government. Not sure whether they actually got any bailout money or so, I didn't follow it well enough.

    Ford didn't ask for Bailouts because they had just finished mortgaging the company through private sector borrowing because they saw the writing on the wall. They got in just before the available cash in the US tightened up so nothing was being loaned out. Because they had just got a nice cash infusion, Ford was the only company that didn't require a bailout.

    I will be buying Ford when I need a car again just because they didn't need a bailout, even if they were having problems, they handled them on their own.

    --
    Do you Gentoo!?
  67. Outsourcing would have solved that problem by tekrat · · Score: 1

    If the Chinese had waited a few more years, Ford would have *given* them the documents anyhow as part of an offshoring initiative. And what does China hope to gain from these documents? They are going to ignore them anyhow, as each subcontractor cuts a corner or two to maximize profit.

    So you wind up with a car with paper-mache quality steel, that folds the passenger compartment upon impact, with airbags that don't work, and the door handle falls off while still at the dealership.

    Seriously, have you *seen* those Wildfire or Chery cars? Deathtrap wouldn't even begin the describe them, but the problem is: That's the Chinese way. They do not care about quality or adherence to standards.

    While the Japanese followed the American model of the 50's, and built up quality over time, the Chinese are following the American model of the 80's, where everything was crap, and continues to get crappier. Their "innovations" are about how to put cheaper and cheaper substitutes in for what's supposed to be there. I mean, we're talking about a culture that feeds its own people a diet of cardboard and lead if they think they can make a few bucks more from it.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  68. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    its more like they kept the engineers "people who get shit done" away from the executives "people who do anything to enrich themselves"

  69. Why would anyone want to steal from Ford? by CodePwned · · Score: 1

    Of all of the auto manufacturers their parts are the worst. Don't believe me? google it.

  70. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering all the issues with bank failures over in Europe and fears over the Euro, they may not be feeling so safe about the future.

    The problem with a concrete safety net is that, while concrete is hard, it's also heavy. Add in the weight of everyone sitting on it, and it's liable to collapse, and HARD.

  71. Ford and GM Already Sold Out by Kagato · · Score: 1

    It's a small victory for Ford, but both of them sold out us out to China for short term gains. In order to get into China in the first place they had to share all the IP of the vehicles they make in China with other Chinese auto makers. This gave Chinese auto makers a huge leap, and put them only a couple years behind US and European auto makers. I would guess Beijing Automotive Company got greedy and wanted more. American companies are very short sighted. The Germans understand that if you don't make things your economy is all paper. We're getting to the point in the US that the only thing we make is processed food.

    1. Re:Ford and GM Already Sold Out by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      We're getting to the point in the US that the only thing we make is processed food.

      Not even that, maybe. In my local supermarkets I have been seeing more and more food that comes from China. Apparently it's more profitable for our food producers to sell food made here overseas, and import food to sell to us.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  72. Above everything else, this guy is an IDIOT by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Yeah, okay so this guy worked for Ford... Okay it stole some secrets... Okay he delivered them to some Chinese company... these are the accusations made.

    Let's broadly assume he did it for this thought exercise. Let's keep this in mind... Now let's put ourselves in this guys shoes... Even if you thought

    Why would you come back into this country with that material on a competitors laptop? Seriously WTF?

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  73. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    I like the logo. I put a ford badge on my HZ, I like it so much.

  74. Best. Outing. Ever. by toby · · Score: 1

    ;-)

    --
    you had me at #!
  75. Not enough to retire on?? by toby · · Score: 1

    $7.5 million tax free. Not quite enough to retire off of at age 30

    You must have a pretty astronomical cost of living. Most people could very comfortably retire on $2 mil cash.

    --
    you had me at #!
  76. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Good thing it wasn't Dodge he stole stuff from. Chinese vehicles wouldn't have the turn radius capability to navigate their streets, they'd get horrible gas mileage and require heat blankets to start during the winter. And they'd have random things break, like drive shafts.

    ^ all things I've seen be common on Dodges

    Let's not even go there with Toyota.

    (I'm a current owner of multiple Fords which have had the most serious problems be break pad, shock, and strut replacement over 360k lifetime miles for an aggregate total of 3 different vehicles.)

    Anecdotal evidence is pretty useless.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  77. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I lied. I had a '91 Taurus wagon that had the A/C compressor go out around 125k and the water pump around 115k (both on days of negative F temperatures. NOT FUN.)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  78. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    That is really lousy. In America, I heard of one guy who couldn't move a box from the front room to the back room because then the box moving person wouldn't have a job. He had to wait until that person came.

    The biggest complaint I've heard with unions in the US is that they promote people purely based on seniority, and it's hard to get rid of people no matter how incompetent they are. Thus you end up with incompetent people at top and then the competent people get sick of it and go somewhere else.

    --
    Qxe4
  79. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Xiver · · Score: 1

    I can definately attest to the short life torque converters. I have not bought a ford since they screwed me over on fixing one that was still under warranty.

    --
    10: PRINT "Everything old is new again."
    20: GOTO 10
  80. You forget, you don't get things for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Chinese prison, if your family don't pay, you don't eat. If your family don't pay, you don't get bed sheets and blankets on a cold night. If your family don't pay, you don't get replacement clothing when the one on your back is torn. To the Chinese, as a criminal, your life is worthless and you're worthless. They consider themselves to have a massive surplus of humanity after all, and one less is all the better. Unlike US where your death would cause your relatives to make a fuss that may ended up in the news headline, in China one less criminal will only solicit the comment "good riddance." To the Chinese government, the citizens are a burden to be tolerated, but only barely.

  81. Chinese are number one theif by tibetanoikos · · Score: 1

    Chinese will continue to steal. Look at what happen to Seimen. There is a patter in Chinese industries that they began by joint venture with foreign companies and once they got enough exposures, trainings, and tech know-how, they will leave and set up their own company. This is a total IPR theft that China has been doing for so many years. This Ford incident is just a tip of the iceberg.

  82. Yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how's that H-1B visa program working out for ya Ford? Did the labor savings make up for the 50 to 100 large bitch slap that you received from Smith's invisible hand?

  83. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Engineering teams usually aren't made up of UAW members. Ford and GM operate some of the most cutting edge auto factories in the world. However, none are in North America due to the UAW work rules.

  84. Maybe GM is correct by yours+truly+zerocool · · Score: 0

    Maybe GM is correct in its valuation, but it's their engineers who are vastly underpaid on a regular basis.

  85. 150,000$! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Good thing they didn't copy like 24 songs or they would be really screwed!

  86. Re:Does this mean all the Chinese cars are going t by atisss · · Score: 1

    No, but when it fails you will be able to buy perfect copy from china for 1/10 of the original price.