Ok, you've peeked my interest, I'm going off to program a proof of concept using AES 256 CBC, and replacing the least significant data in an image with it. Curious about the % of the image file I can replace while maintaining a high enough image quality to avoid suspicion.
The real trouble here isn't the fact that they may remove wi-fi from the schools, although to be fair that would suck. The danger is that if some kids are experiencing actual symptoms like memory loss and rashes, the real cause goes ignored. Wi-fi as a scapegoat could wind up being a dangerous thing.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok, you've peeked my interest, I'm going off to program a proof of concept using AES 256 CBC, and replacing the least significant data in an image with it. Curious about the % of the image file I can replace while maintaining a high enough image quality to avoid suspicion.
L2 Sarcasm
The real trouble here isn't the fact that they may remove wi-fi from the schools, although to be fair that would suck. The danger is that if some kids are experiencing actual symptoms like memory loss and rashes, the real cause goes ignored. Wi-fi as a scapegoat could wind up being a dangerous thing.
The Internet is a series of tubes...