Slashdot Mirror


User: FranTaylor

FranTaylor's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,921
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,921

  1. Re:oh boo who... you have no wifi, pay attention on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    Aren't you supposed to be paying attention to the conference instead of playing Angry Birds or posting photos to facebook or leud comments to twitter?

    aren't you supposed to be your real-time eyes and ears at this conference? we want to see the competitor's machines in action. get over there right away

  2. Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    The way to get around this is to sell the blocking technology to your competition. Money is money, it's not about the blocking.

    just imagine the sales pitch: "warning: you may face heavy fines and criminal contempt charges", yes that is a great incentive

  3. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    so with a full slate of criminals on their management staff, I'm sure their business is doing great

  4. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    Not for causing oil rig explosion that killed people, oil spills, coal ash wash outs, nearly destroying the global financial system, lying about the company prospects... nothing seems to put the top bosses in jail.

    Have any of those people signed consent decrees, agreeing that they are guilty of contempt of court if they violate the decree?

  5. Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    One where I'm going to start a company and make billions of dollars then retire rich after paying $750M in fines and promising a judge that I'll never do it again.

    but first you have to get your mother's permission

  6. Re:Where does the money from the fine go? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember, the primary purpose of justice in the USA is revenge (a.k.a. "retribution"), not restoration.

    yes, in other countries they bring back murder victims from the dead

  7. Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    makes burglary very attractive until that first conviction. Not much of a deterrent to all the other burglar wannabes.

    this is a business model in whose universe?

  8. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 0

    Contempt of court has nothing to do with the FCC.

    Your argument is irrelevant, a judge can put people in jail without a trial if they violate a consent agreement that was signed in his courtroom.

  9. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    that would be the parties that signed the consent decree

  10. Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    even after you've been busted the fine will be less than your profits.

    Violating a consent decree means go straight to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200, no trial. What business is worth that?

  11. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you can find this on google if you look:

    Marvin Chaney, 61, founder of RoboVault, was taken into custody by U.S. Marshals on January 29 on the orders of U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John K. Olson for violation of court orders.

    Brandon bankruptcy attorney O. Reginald Osenton commented, “This goes to show you how important it is to follow carefully a judge's instructions, no matter what type of case you are involved in.”

    Olson issued the arrest order after Chaney and his attorney, Lawrence Wrenn, did not show up for a court hearing on January 17. Appearing shackled before the judge, Chaney said that Wrenn had advised him not to attend the hearing and that he had tried his best to produce the records that had been requested of him.

  12. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    so nothing happens to you in the US when you violate a consent decree? there is no offense? they don't put you in jail? is that what you are saying?

  13. Re:A corporation in jail - that's not gonna happen on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    The day I see a corporation behind bars is the day they'll start to listen.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-19/ex-billionaire-timothy-blixseth-jailed-for-contempt-of-court-1-

    they most certainly do put corporate executives in jail for contempt of court

  14. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 1

    corporations are owned by people, they are responsible for its actions

  15. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: -1, Troll

    near zero for a second offense.

    what part of "immediate jail for contempt of court" don't you understand? there is no trial here, they just come and lock you away.

  16. Re:Where does the money from the fine go? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 4, Funny

    How much of that $750,000 fine goes to the people who had to pay $80/day for Internet service because they couldn't use their WiFi hotspot?

    I'm going to guess the answer is $0

    They can have all of the $80 back after they file a $100 fee

  17. Re:Fine vs profit? on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 5, Informative

    the first fine is a slap on the wrist, but if they continue the next fine will be substantially larger, order of magnitude larger. The FCC might only slap on the wrist for 1st offense, but they get real serious when people don't follow their direct orders.

    they signed a settlement agreement in the court room, so further infractions are really "contempt of court" with immediate jail for the offenders

  18. Re:Did they make more than $750K profit by blockin on FCC Fines Smart City $750K For Blocking Wi-Fi · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA:

    "As part of the settlement, Smart City will cease its Wi-Fi blocking activities"

    They signed a court order, if they keep doing it, it's contempt of court this time.

  19. Re:so... on Revisiting How Much RAM Is Enough Today For Desktop Computing · · Score: 1

    What if you try a more normal load? What if you opened a project in Eclipse or tried to do a build?

    normal people open projects in eclipse and run builds?

  20. Re:Why is this on SlashDot? on Revisiting How Much RAM Is Enough Today For Desktop Computing · · Score: 1

    Oh right, because if I do anything

    yes indeed it all revolves around you

  21. Re:Gaming on Revisiting How Much RAM Is Enough Today For Desktop Computing · · Score: 2

    If you play games, it might be a good idea to get at least 16GB

    How much RAM is necessary if you want to invite your friends over for poker?

  22. Re:Why is this on SlashDot? on Revisiting How Much RAM Is Enough Today For Desktop Computing · · Score: 2

    This article is a joke. What is a "regular user" and why would slashdot care, when none of us are "regular users" ?

    Some of us have lives at home (believe it or not) and some of us don't take our work home with us (believe it or not) and we are actually pretty normal users during off-hours.

  23. Re:Nature of open source on "Father Time" Gets Another Year At NTP From Linux Foundation · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, good thing there is no fragmentation or duplication of effort or competing incompatible layers in open source.

    None at all.

    who is talking about open source in general? Nobody. we are talking about NTP implementations. How much fragmentation is there in NTP implementations? Really? Huh?

    Okay, not that I don't love open source, but you're not making a great argument.

    duh, straw men don't fight back. you put words in their mouth and you argue with those words. haven't you got the basics of bad arguing down yet?

  24. Re:"NTP works just fine" on "Father Time" Gets Another Year At NTP From Linux Foundation · · Score: 1

    TCP is great if you want the accuracy of calling someone on the phone and saying "now".

    this is totally bizarre statement, tcp streams get backed up, packets get retransmitted, data arrives at the client at a completely indeterminate time.

  25. Re:Nature of open source on "Father Time" Gets Another Year At NTP From Linux Foundation · · Score: 1

    Who are you going to charge for the "new releases"?

    There are actually people out there who want features bad enough, that are willing to pay other people to write them. Generally people do not work for free.

    there should be automated testing and if the patch fails it should be sent back

    Yeah that one made me laugh pretty good, assuming that all your tests are perfect and any failures are bad patches.