Why not just run all the programs in the same OS. I put the DNS server and the NTP server and the Mail server and the Web server in one box without VMs. You can still take down the whole place by unplugging one box so don't worry about lacking a kill switch.
If you fail to report who this hoster is, you are covering up THEIR violations, and could be liable if someone who suffers damages as a result finds out you were covering it up.
But the hateful and stupid people in the legal system could bring charges against YOU for "hacking" (even though it can be argued that all you were doing is verifying the security of YOUR OWN data... and found the security to be defective).
Does this company claim to be secure? If they do, they are COMMITTING FRAUD! Whistle blower time.
Leave and do NOT tell them why. Just leave.
Then at some later date establish anonymous identity and report them as insecure in a public forum. State in that public forum that if they wish to show the public that they are secure, then should make a post in their own blog (surely they have one) that denies the security risks and backs up that denial with a statement that authorizes you to publish your exploit without any risk.
The RCMP mounties that arrived are also stupid and need to be fired. There is NO justification whatsoever for destroying property in this case. They CAN unlock the handcuffs to remove the backpack. If they don't know that then that itself proves their stupidity. They should not have stupid people working for RCMP.
It's time for an internet based promotion to boycott this mall.
Because this mall does exist, there, it will limit the level of alternative retail businesses that can operate in the community. If they are going to ban people because of mall management's own stupidity, which is effectively harming such people, then really this mall needs to be shut down. That's hard to do. But a boycott could help return the harm, hopefully to an equal percentage.
People in the community need to call up the individual stores in the mall and make complaints about the mall management, and tell those stores that they will seek to shop elsewhere.
I'm moving my instances and volumes from us-east-1* to use-west-{1,2}* just to be safe. The us-east-1 region has been rather unstable this year. I don't think will survive this.
MitM success means opaque fail. If you want opaque, you must prevent MitM. If the transit has no MitM opportunity, then what's the point of opaque in the first place.
Don't list any old legacy languages on your resume. Only list the latest ones that you actually know and want to work with. You'll get fewer offers, but what you do get should be higher quality.
In a virtual world, you put on your roller blades, and administer a failing data center. Level 1 is your home LAN. Level 2 is a law office and all the attorneys want the morning's court briefs immediately because court starts in 45 minutes and the file server screen says "RAID array offline". Level 3 is a small ISP. Level 4 is AWS. Level 5 is Google. Good luck!
And then there's the 'D' word. The first thing I would NOT do if I ran for any political office is do a debate. I especially would not do one on TV. And, oh, BTW, I've worked in TV studios and master control before. I'm not afraid of TV studios. I've been on the air in a couple of community shows on regular broadcast TV stations, too (not the ones I worked at). The issue is that debates themselves are a horrible medium to get the message out through. People are focusing on who can out-talk the other guy. It's like the people that tune in to a car race to see the crashes instead of who wins.
The political race should be about whose position is agreed on by most people, not who came up with the best one liner. This is why I'm NOT watching ANY of the debates. I can find out from the news the next day who "won" the debate. But that doesn't really mean anything.
Oh, if you are wanting to know who I will vote for, for President... it's the Irish guy.
DRM for things like movies works without a legal mandate. That's because the most popular movies come encrypted in a way that makes them unviewable unless the DRM system decrypts. You can LEGALLY make a video player without any DRM. It just won't know how to play the encrypted ones, so it won't have a big market. There are NON-DRM videos, too... like the ones out of your own camera. You can make them on your computer and some are even sold commercially in non-recordable silver format. But the DRM works because the most popular content is DRM protected.
For something all new like 3D printing, it can matter just how popular commercial content becomes. The content is still a digital file, and it can be encrypted. Then the market will end up deciding how many 3D printer models will include the DRM. And even those that do may be able to turn it off (oops, can't print the DRM protected models, now). And UN-protected model files probably will just never engage any of the protections... unless... the industry mandates using the detection system in order to get the rights to use the DRM license. That is not going to happen unless it becomes popular to have the DRM to be able to print the DRM-protected stuff.
There is a greater risk of calling for a law to mandate this, as compared to movies (movies is an old market entering a new age that the movie business doesn't understand, whereas 3D printers is a new emerging market that has a huge sourcing in small business that is more mentally agile). There are good arguments against such a law. Let the market decide is the leading one (it rules the movie on media market). Ask Ron Paul to intervene. Maybe even the Republicans will live up to their often touted mantras of a free market. Democrats are the greatest risk for this as they are likely to want to restrict printing guns (especially on non-metal materials).
Slashdot Mirror
Use OpenStack and you won't even need this.
I totally agree. Just populate your racks and pick some for "special duty" (and put your DNS, NTP, and monitoring daemons on there).
Why not just run all the programs in the same OS. I put the DNS server and the NTP server and the Mail server and the Web server in one box without VMs. You can still take down the whole place by unplugging one box so don't worry about lacking a kill switch.
Great. Then we can knock out the data center by unplugging just one box. Brilliant plan.
If you fail to report who this hoster is, you are covering up THEIR violations, and could be liable if someone who suffers damages as a result finds out you were covering it up.
But the hateful and stupid people in the legal system could bring charges against YOU for "hacking" (even though it can be argued that all you were doing is verifying the security of YOUR OWN data ... and found the security to be defective).
Does this company claim to be secure? If they do, they are COMMITTING FRAUD! Whistle blower time.
Leave and do NOT tell them why. Just leave.
Then at some later date establish anonymous identity and report them as insecure in a public forum. State in that public forum that if they wish to show the public that they are secure, then should make a post in their own blog (surely they have one) that denies the security risks and backs up that denial with a statement that authorizes you to publish your exploit without any risk.
The RCMP mounties that arrived are also stupid and need to be fired. There is NO justification whatsoever for destroying property in this case. They CAN unlock the handcuffs to remove the backpack. If they don't know that then that itself proves their stupidity. They should not have stupid people working for RCMP.
It's time for an internet based promotion to boycott this mall.
Because this mall does exist, there, it will limit the level of alternative retail businesses that can operate in the community. If they are going to ban people because of mall management's own stupidity, which is effectively harming such people, then really this mall needs to be shut down. That's hard to do. But a boycott could help return the harm, hopefully to an equal percentage.
People in the community need to call up the individual stores in the mall and make complaints about the mall management, and tell those stores that they will seek to shop elsewhere.
Well, at least you need to put off trying to regain the colonies for a few days.
I'm moving my instances and volumes from us-east-1* to use-west-{1,2}* just to be safe. The us-east-1 region has been rather unstable this year. I don't think will survive this.
Oh, but it is fraud when there is a claim that it is innovation when in fact it is not. The court system just looks the other way.
MitM success means opaque fail. If you want opaque, you must prevent MitM. If the transit has no MitM opportunity, then what's the point of opaque in the first place.
... my delicate compiz configuration or I will get mad and whine.
Don't list any old legacy languages on your resume. Only list the latest ones that you actually know and want to work with. You'll get fewer offers, but what you do get should be higher quality.
In a virtual world, you put on your roller blades, and administer a failing data center. Level 1 is your home LAN. Level 2 is a law office and all the attorneys want the morning's court briefs immediately because court starts in 45 minutes and the file server screen says "RAID array offline". Level 3 is a small ISP. Level 4 is AWS. Level 5 is Google. Good luck!
They found out what the capacity of the whole network is, and divided by the number of people that could potentially buy a smart phone.
A Slashdot story about how they are bad.
... if I didn't do anything wrong. THEY should first prove I did.
... the L4 and L5 points.
The real issue is apps with malicious design intentions ... like ones that track your activity for advertising.
And then there's the 'D' word. The first thing I would NOT do if I ran for any political office is do a debate. I especially would not do one on TV. And, oh, BTW, I've worked in TV studios and master control before. I'm not afraid of TV studios. I've been on the air in a couple of community shows on regular broadcast TV stations, too (not the ones I worked at). The issue is that debates themselves are a horrible medium to get the message out through. People are focusing on who can out-talk the other guy. It's like the people that tune in to a car race to see the crashes instead of who wins.
The political race should be about whose position is agreed on by most people, not who came up with the best one liner. This is why I'm NOT watching ANY of the debates. I can find out from the news the next day who "won" the debate. But that doesn't really mean anything.
Oh, if you are wanting to know who I will vote for, for President ... it's the Irish guy.
,,, his web site commentary just because I don't want to give out my identity to some third party web site?
... elimination of stupid people in the Middle East.
If it insults Islam, then don't watch it. Problem solved. The infidels won't care.
As for the First Amendment in the USA, it will stay. The Second Amendment protects it. If you don't like that, then try some economic sanctions.
The computers I worked on from 1976 to 1991 didn't have a BIOS yet they managed to come up just fine.
How about an HTTP link. GIT can do that.
Right!
DRM for things like movies works without a legal mandate. That's because the most popular movies come encrypted in a way that makes them unviewable unless the DRM system decrypts. You can LEGALLY make a video player without any DRM. It just won't know how to play the encrypted ones, so it won't have a big market. There are NON-DRM videos, too ... like the ones out of your own camera. You can make them on your computer and some are even sold commercially in non-recordable silver format. But the DRM works because the most popular content is DRM protected.
For something all new like 3D printing, it can matter just how popular commercial content becomes. The content is still a digital file, and it can be encrypted. Then the market will end up deciding how many 3D printer models will include the DRM. And even those that do may be able to turn it off (oops, can't print the DRM protected models, now). And UN-protected model files probably will just never engage any of the protections ... unless ... the industry mandates using the detection system in order to get the rights to use the DRM license. That is not going to happen unless it becomes popular to have the DRM to be able to print the DRM-protected stuff.
There is a greater risk of calling for a law to mandate this, as compared to movies (movies is an old market entering a new age that the movie business doesn't understand, whereas 3D printers is a new emerging market that has a huge sourcing in small business that is more mentally agile). There are good arguments against such a law. Let the market decide is the leading one (it rules the movie on media market). Ask Ron Paul to intervene. Maybe even the Republicans will live up to their often touted mantras of a free market. Democrats are the greatest risk for this as they are likely to want to restrict printing guns (especially on non-metal materials).