I have no intention of interpreting the statute, when United States Code says "United States means a Federal corporation."
If I am wrong, then how can "United States" own land in the United States of America? How can State of California own most of California? How can State of Oregon be a landlord over Oregon? United States is a corporation, and everyone thinks its a classification. They are all corporations; only people can own land, corporations aren't what walks on foot. United States has a President, it can hold monetary instruments, invest, profit, it can go bankrupt: United States is a corporation from Washington District of Columbia; even so, any code bears witness of incorporation whereas that United States is not a party to the Constitution of the United States but exists as a legal fiction in equity. Searching through Constitution Society, it appears that it is separate from the States united.
You surmise all corporations must suffix their name with "Corporation", such as Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or it's not a corporation? That isn't a regulation to names, but a trade-mark.
Then you go about drawing where none is drawn for jurisdiction. If you try to reference code to law, it will not match; code only needs to be compliant with law, it is encryption so as to not tresspass on another law that it means to be compliant with. In codes, did you not know that quoted material is acknowledging foreign matter and is not a patent to subjection? You've quoted nothing, but have only your codetalk to construe and re-define somthing that is already self-explanatory in the code. And to that code, which I have no patent, I quote "United States means a Federal corporation" and that is all I have to say about that. "United States" has no jurisdiction, only investors. In United States Code, it acnkowledges a feud between the United States and the United States of America; is somthing smelling fishy yet? When this country had gone through its disorders in uncertain times, how do you expect it to re-organize?
You shouldn't suggest what you will never quote. Federal Rules of Evidence is a code sold by the United States Congress. If you need to use it, then that means you are not a party to the Constitution. Rules from a foreign feud in Columbia are a foreign suggestion to neighboring states, but evidence is just plain and peaceful common sense.
I showed the content of USCODE, and am being slandered by you.
How's that tinfoil hat fitting? First, just because you see the word "corporation" used in a sentence doesn't mean that somehow it's a business being run by investors just like whatever private-sector company you love to hate.
You didn't read. "United States" is being used as a noun, and is completely different from plural the United States. Is that I have greater comprehension that you lie that I am wearing a tinfoil hat? The USCODE authors have yet to acknowledge any error.
Then you start trying to define words other than their use in the Law of Nations. Then you try to redefine "federal" to somthing else. Use the etymology. When if I write "apple", it doesn't mean a computer; "Apple" is the construment for a computer that you are looking for.
The sections of code you're reading don't convey anything at all like what you're saying they do, and you of course know that. What you're trying to do is increase the "evil" quotient associated with the word "corporation" just because it's fashionable to do so, and because when that works, you can then tie that word to people you don't like (politically, for example), and spare yourself the trouble of having to actually explain rationally what you don't like. It's like using the word "witch" 400 years ago - a catch-all instant condemnation (but only for other people already caught up thinking that way).
Stop insulting for curses not written. I am not conveying anything than what is not already said and done; I'm only pointing that there is admiralty, equity, and law; If you can't comprehend the nature of a dispute, then you wouldn't know. A corporation is for limiting liability; if you think that is evil, then don't create one. I didn't say I hated corporations. If every word I've written is hate to you, then I hope not to offend. Think of me as an entomolgist; I just classify based on behavior; "United States" is a corporation, the United States approaches in admiralty, the United States of America is de jure. I didn't write anything with one element of hate.
I think it is becoming fashionable to the day for people to accuse eachother of hating corporations. I'm not the conspiracy theorist that you want me to be.
"United States" means a Federal corporation. United States is not the United States. United States is a noun, while the United States is plural.
And when I quoted the requirements for instrumentatlities; oaths, affirmations, declarations, affidavits; tranceiver utilities:
(1) If executed without the United States [...] "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America...
(2) If executed within the United States [...] "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury...
What I intend to show is that if you are not in the United States, then you are in the United States of America. That USCODE is patent to United States, and it is only acknowledging that fact relative to the code; first citing United States requirements explicitly, then falling-through to acknowledge that it is chartered from the United States of America. Doesn't that seem strange to you? It's like there is a boat called the "United States" floating on the High Seas known as the United States of America; if you jump citizenship, then you're in the United States of America and all its sharks (the people). This explains all the admiralty flag law. I've found that the United States is foreign, not allowed anywhere near the United States of America, and is host to a corporation "United States" from within the Washington District of Columbia. Is Hawaii part and parcel to America?
To give some force that one United States and another United State of America are in admiralty, consider these two public notices...1, and 2. I'm just saying, it looks like fishy fishing. I didn't volunteer to be an employee or citizen of either the United States or the United States of America; I'm just born on soil at California; peace, love, groovy (not grovily).
I face the fact that China and United States are agressive competitors. China has a list of banned books, and U.S. Congress has a list of banned books. Freeom of speach obviously does not apply to either of them.
The people, as a majority, on the other hand, seem to always be the outspoken critic that takes the back-seat. How can the people choose a government above them that doesn't correspond to reality? Simply because all government today is implemented in corporate form. I've looked across the Constitution for China, and it is verry sadenning to see it explicitly dedicate powers to various entities that perhaps could not be immediatly changed but by revolution, and worse is it bares false witness of itself by saying China is a "Socialist Republic" every other sentence.
United States, however, is separate from the United States of America because according to Title 28 Section 3002 15a, "United States" is a Federal corporation. And thus the struggle in America is just this; you have federal government and then you have a federal corporation called "United States" in that federal government. About 200 years ago, after the Constitution for the United States of America was written, it was declared by Benjamin Franklin to be a Republic simply by observing the text: not WE THE PEOPLE of the such-and-such STATE of state, but "the people" hold all authority and power and can assign duties to statesmen. Then, a certain "We, the People" emerged, separate from the people.
Cites,
Title 28, Section 3002
(15) "United States" means-- (A) a Federal corporation;
Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form: (1) If executed without the United States: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)". (2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)"
(puts on Satan hat) You would think Unix environmentalists would want DRM, so to help Microsoft develop a better Unix that would better manage file permitions than a combination of read, write, and execute for a single person and a group.
As much as DRM could hurt people, with the little overlord in me, DRM could be used to hurt Microsoft just as well because 1)I bought Microsoft Windows DRM edition, 2)There is no support contract with Microsoft that is enforcable or legitimately active, 3)I own the software and am a shareholder, 4)Microsoft doesn't own the software anymore because they have sold it to me, 5)I do not give Microsoft permition to administer the data on this harddrive. (removes Satan hat)
All that has previously been held as valid in a court. DRM: whoever gets their hands on userID 0 is in control of the King's Banc (bench); count your blessings, dispel the curses.
How about lawful (non-commercial) downloads? It's only commercial if you are using it for commercial purposes. And accordingly, if the download is influenced by third-party interference, then regulation is all-together not applicable.
I use an OS for lawful purposes. Consider non-commercial commercial software. The same can be said about freedom of speach opposing commercial speach, a justice of the peace opposing a Policy Officer, and a man that catches fish to eat (survive) opposing a commercial fisherman.
Commerce is not lawful, it is legal! Don't get in the law merchandise trap: someone selling you laws, because they aren't among We the People and have no standing in the Constitution!
I know of only a couple California Citizens. Only said state Citizens are a party to the Bill of Rights. 14th amendment "citizens of the United States" is not legitimate.
That de-facto State of California has a corporation called "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" created by U.S. Congress, its postal trademark is "CA", and it is in federal jurisdiction by application of ZIP code (Zone Improvement Plan).
"California" is the de-jure state. If you were actually a state Citizen, then it would not say "citizen of the United States" and any oath or swearing you committ would not print "citizn of the United States."
This however is all without regard to the pre-eminence of states all-together; American inhabitants, the original countrymen; born on soil and have no debt/allegiance because they are lawful. You can't go to prison when you have no SSN...no you can't go to prison without a Social Security Number. To be a California Citizen, you aren't allowed to use any title of nobility or gift from the United States.
What would you do when you saw Jesus Christ on a cracker? There was a recent news about someone actually finding just that! Confound my search, I can't find it, but someone else found Jesus...a cracker jack...
You have such a sincere and well-drawn text, that I feel obligated to respond. Your presence honors me.
Aroused what who? Are you talking about one of those cases where Apple sicced their legal vultures on someone who was mimicing their UI graphics? We can debate till the cows come home the ethics of that aspect of copyright law, but I believe that one falls under the heading of "defend it or lose it." And whoever told you that the only reason to use OS X is to have your interface pixels arranged in that order is probably still happily plugging away with Windows ME.
It's all about looks. Wasn't a recent Slashdot article about IT employees being disliked when they have tattoos (skins/kernel patches) and multiple bodily peircings (kernel holes/virus infection sights/security gaps)? People want software that appeals to their eyes, not the truth of the matter. Most people creating themes for a window manager are not capable of defending themselves in such a intellectual battle. No less, many people produce themes because such a battle occuring will not be targeted at the actual software; a theme can be deleted, rather than a custom-tailored window managing subsystem mimic removed. How did you know I was posting through Windows98+Firefox because this combination is faster than WindowsXP+Firefox on this energy-efficient architecture.
I've been following Apple for years (used to be key to my career), and I don't remember such a thing.
I do, however remember that as part of an out-of-court settlement, they bought $160 million worth of non-voting stock shares (which they later sold at quite a healthy profit). To this day it's hard to find exact info on which case that settled, the two most likely are for snaking QuickTime code for use in WiMP and for snaking NeXT kernel code for use in WinNT (and by the time NeXT's lawsuit was settled, Apple owned them, hence Apple getting the settlement).
Do you actually think a overly successful corporation could be so desperate and lacking "innovative ideas" that it would sneak a competitor's software into its own without asking "When and who gave us this brilliant thing"? Look at these companies! They have a base of lawyers payed more than their actual software programmers! I could see a way for corporations to gift eachother funds just by "sneaking" copyright code into eachothers products, acting as though it's stolen, and then re-imbursing (read gift for "lost profits." With todays corporate ladder, working under-the-counter in corporate persona is just as easy as giving someone a day in court to settle on a price. Are you expecting to need some money in the future? Hey, let us graft some code on our software branch and you can sue us for it when you need the money. Didn't you ever wonder why such statutory (read fake) "law" needs to be activated as though it is dormant until otherwise? Physics laws, Chemistry laws; they're all around us, interpreted that we can comprehend the nature, and always contributing to the effect of our actions. Corporations however; they can re-adjust gravity. With such large corporations, being self-funding, and all-aware as a thousand-eyed ten-horned monster, would use every bit of assurance to its survival and such beasts in commerce know that deception works just as much in war as it does in the appearance of peace.
The FUD is strong in this one, Master Ballmer.
Woo woo woo woo woo! Bannana! Give Bannana! Did you look at the beautiful woman in the red dress? Look again! Stupidity is just as much a distraction as lust. Steve Ballmer could accomplish his goals no less in a red dress if not!
As for the TCPA/DRM thing, that's the one aspect of the Apple/Intel deal that truly worries me. I can only hope you're as wrong about that as you are about everything else in your post. I fear you're not, though.
And I distinctly remember no less than two years ago, an independent author of a GUI theme was sued by Apple to remove circulation of a certain WindowMaker theme (not KDE, not Gnome, not IceWM) because it completely aroused the end-users perspective to the GUI that it justified not buying a Apple Mac OSX machine. Seriously, if that is all the division between an OS can be, I welcome free software allowing people to move to any architecture they see capable to their needs.
Many people do not realize that Apple is actually a worse corporate proprietor than Microsoft. Considering all these years that Microsoft has been unable to migrate x86 hardware design away from its legacy XT closet, Apple is jumping into the world with a completely new and recent re-implementation with Intel -- perhaps a feat Microsoft couldn't attempt without someone waving monopoly flames. Remember when Microsoft donated USD 160 million to Apple? Was that to keep the smallest competitor out of bankrupty and far from the predatory grips of anti-monopoly laws?
The trend to migrate from the legacy XT PC design has been as recent as when Intel started marketing the beleagured "Plug 'N' Play" API. 3DLabs, no more than three years ago when disclosing its VP graphics chipset to compete with nVidia's GeForce vertex and pixel technology we see today, exclaimed to be migrating away from the VGA BIOS compatibility; none else would be compatible to post in VGA text modes! Of'course, the plan is postponed because freedom can be a stubborn mule... It's all just one big software ploy shadowed by the tempting of advertisers to push new trends and remove competition to a select few supra-corporations with closed intelect -- all to compete with the theory "progress." This is all real! Old, but open standards, are being replaced with proprietary solutions that are clearly not in the interests of the people and companies buying the property.
Yeah, I've looked at computer software the same way as the parent poster had summarized. It's just a struggle between gifted people to press their ideas in codified form onto various competing subdomains of software; criticized by the most calculated, unethical, inconsistent, and undeserving interpretations of data known as the GUI: this + that + this theme + this scheme >= closed_proprietary_solution(TM).
Hello TCPA, you're in the BIOS as an option that can be disabled! When will that option become an unconditional statement or command that serves none but quash the living trust and will? I see Apple and Intel positioning with a hidden Microsoft to perform a corporate sneek.
The man maintanes XScreensaver package, going all the way back and perhaps beyond 1998! The package itself has been tailored by KDE and Gnome over the years. I learned all I need to know about Linux, way back in year 1999 (IIRC), when I was tempted to a manual Linux From Scratch kernel 2.4 and glibc 2.1.3 build and was untarred (not emerged:D) victorious on a Dual Pentium Pro 200MHz system in no more than 40 strait hours! Har, I had no hair on me chest then, but by jumpin Jehova it grew in me pits -- confounded!
As a "chinese" poster exclaimed a few posts earlier, the will of the party need not write its laws; it en-forces them, perhaps evenly in same precision as (no oath) COPS and related Policy officers on Americans.
And given the political atmosphere in America, with those United States employees tresspassing on foreign landings and soils, when is the B(W)ill of the people to be pressed and acknowledge that none may subvert the freedom of press? Taiwan takes a lot of crap from China for such a small dispute as having a line drawn in the sand with water, yet Microsoft (corporation) is not indebted to screen a foreigne state religion with a neighboring foreign state religion.
Microsoft, as well as every software development group, needs to stop recognizing and acknowledging these feuds; beginning with taking all the names for countries and states, thier inhabitants and citizens, and military, out of the software and allowing the person or licensee to dedicate or deed the software by whatever is willfully typed. I keep saying to everyone that I am not a citizen of the United States because that is a contract I didn't volunteer and as well it would mean I am in equal registry with a State in their own union; I am not supposed to type anything "United States" or "United States of America" because it has nothing to do with my predominance as a Citizen to this California. When the "Terrorists" crumbled the twin-towers, I don't go around spreading filthy thoughts and suggesting ideas to influence a foreign event that occurred three thousand miles away -- I don't put all my eggs in the same tower, so that dispute in New York isn't to force me into some draft; that's not Mecca. Stop forcing me and everyone to associate or use a name for a overlay of a country just because it matches a timezone! The same can be said for website logs and registration; I don't live in "CA"; my Citizenship is to California, not "CA" of "United States." Stop the ussurpation! Let the people speak their alignment! Let the people put a picture of their flag and the country or state for which it stands!
Remove all politics from software development, and allow the people unrestricted use to dedicate it to use; we just want stable computing. Get all the registration crap out of software! I don't live in "CA"! CA-CA-CAckadoodledoo
Not to add any value to this grand slashvertisement; but according to propoganda, the VP series of 3DLabs graphics acceleraters are designed with no less than thirty and two smaller independent processors in a single core. Nothing more is said about the technology, other than "they work together." And wouldn't you know it, they are no longer advertising the fact on that 3dlabs.com website. Hmmm...
Carly is a precision weapon. She sucks intellect and craps bankruptcy. Somewhere there is a secret dossier of her in Intel corporation that is under the name "The Cleaner." I can face the fact that one well-placed bomb can cause unrecoverable disaster; Carly Fiorina was the bomb, and there is nothing left but the sideshow performers that bleed through the cracks.
It sucks, man! She sucked Compaq dry! Alpha 21464...gone! Alpha 21464 is the only one with fine-tuned adherance to Rambus, and its gone and replaced with @#*^$@#^$* (whatever you want to call the buzzword of today's x86 third second-cousin hick wife)
You'ld think some of these scientists were modest, but they named this plant "Amorphophallus", interpreted in English -- I think we can believe whatever we want to believe on this one. I'm not saying it. Obviously some people can be so deprived as to give out bad latin words for innocent plants, or maybe this does have a correlation with a certain odor... Take a shower, geeks! And take a cold shower, at that!
When I was in High-Schrool, holding me back was my hand in mechanically writing such long equations on paper just for the sake of showing "work" as they called it. I am verry much self taught, and I don't learn by repetition but by application. I need to find the use of Calculus in nature and apply it to keep fresh in my head or the knowledge decays.
I can see a future where all the simple mathematics opperands are removed from calculators and somehow only complex math could be used; in such a motto by whatever Committee on education, exclaiming that anyone that can't find the cube root of 3 on paper doesn't deserve to exist. Worse, I expect calculators (most-likely HP) to be redesigned with RFID capability so a "master unit" could disable certain functions. It's outright stupidity on the part of "educators", and the truth of that matter that these "educators" of today are incapable of inspiring students to learn so they influence inferior courts to coerce attendance to sub-18 years young people that usually already have a career-worthy job worth warding away from illegal aliens (if you believe they exist, that is).
Wouldn't it be a blessing if students were blessed with the ideal of voluntary attendance? Some of my family and friends over in Austin Texas are being coerced with their children into "voluntarily" attending those fake courts; you know, when a student can't bring their D to a C, then everyone but the teacher is penalized by fines. At the beginning and end of the court, you are forced to voluntarily sign an agreement granting jurisdiction and all that crap; children are disrespected with military-like shouting and walking into a fortified-fence prison-like compound of temporary trailer buildings. That education sure isn't inspiring any: from a bunch of derelict, morally bankcrupt job-security wanting goons. It seems like all the unconstitutional/encroachments relating to every part of society, such as DMV, FDA, FBI, CIA, all appeared on Our watch. Ever wonder how such institutions were pulverized back to lawyer hell 200 years ago? I collect law books, and what little material I've found that was published before 1850 is such an inspiring read I think any depressed student should read. Truth conquers, isn't that truth?
I said it once and I'll say it again, it's less a website when it hosts a media layer construing actual content. I doubt Google can't grep through flash content and make any OCR of it. The recent feat of all search engines was offering a converted PDF to HTML. Flash is for entertainment, not documents.
<DonaldTrumpHoldingKnifeToMyNeck> Post it, Gregory. Anyone that insults statistics will get a visit from me. If you don't post it, I'll buy all of PrimeTime and you'll be watching Survivor and DeadlyChallenge 'till 2012. No more History Channel, no more NASA channel, maybe I'll even buy Transmeta and dub their next chip the TRUMP and have Steve Ballmer advertise it (*Hint) </DonaldTrumpHoldingKnifeToMyNeck>
That "Federal code" you are quoting is describing the behaviour of an operating system. For all your wants and needs, quote somthing that dictates the behavior of software as much as you want. You have yet to discern the intent of my post; hackers or whatever you want to call them, they ARE authenticating! Just the conclusion of that previous sentence unremarkably sets your post to silense. Who can you believe to give true testimony on who authenticated correctly with a server, some half-baked "Adminstrator" or a server log? The code you cite is an unjustified paradigm shift. Let's talk about software affirming honest and truthful authorization, people notwithstanding unless they break into a room and physically Hack-hack-hack the computer to peices like a Hun or Goth or...or...a troll.
Well diffence between hacking and breaking and entering are somewhat simular. The only diffence is no physical damage to system, and potentially no logical damage as well. But that is where the difference stops.
Yep, no physical damage is the problem; so many defaced websites can be restored by so-many documents about fluffy bunnies. If you intend intellectual property law to be applicable in citing for remedy, then freedom is lost. I suggest burning your webpage on a CDROM or protected by a hardware read-only mechanism. As this post's subject begins, can a switch (1 or 0) be broken? I'ld be entertained to see people suing eachother for causing bad-sectors on their block devices.
If I owned a shop and I closed the door and forgot to lock it and turn on the security system. But put the closed sign up at the end of the day and a guy walked in and robbed me blind. And the next day we found the theif he would still be arrested for stealing or if he read my books he would still be guilty of corprate esponage.
Affirmativ captain; you removed the ships sale, closed the LARBOARD (port of entry), silenced and battoned the STARBOARD (doused the lights on display), you set a flag for C-L-O-S-D and flew the YANKEE (dragging anchor), and you are confused what to do when a tresspasser walks in the front door? Captain, I want not mutiny to enter your cabin; dispense some godly canons already; be it canonical law, or a firearm; remedy the situation, man! Admiralty law is just as applicable on soil as it is on sea. How do you suppose that imposter "United States", a Title 28 Section 3002 15b "federal corporation" from the District of Columbia, uses salvage rights to steal your private property or dictate limited use and conditions to your property?
Or say I have a convirtible and I locked the door but left the top open. And he just reached around and unlocked my doors and hotwired my car (Or even if I left the keys in). He stole my car. If cought he would be tried for grand theft auto. Even if he returned the car at the end of the day he will still be arested for steeling my car.
Is your car private property or has it been deeded for commercial use by hired hands? When someone steels my car, I send them a Bill demanding silver for compensation because as I say to the DMV I also say to police and related tresspassers that it is NOT-FOR-SALE or to be used commercially. Just to build some scope in your imagination of my character, I have no keylocks or ignition key on my car; it's just as old world common sense, you just press a button and the engine turns. The same can be intended of a bicycle, a moped, etc. If someone takes your server, send them a bill. If they don't pay, send a court order for compensation. These days, someone is always assuming your property is for sale; just play along, give them a bill; squeeze some lawful money out of their presumption that you have a business license and have dedicated that property in dispute for retail.
Just because your victim is stupid it doesn't make comitting a crime right.
There are no victims in commerce, only debtors.:D You need to remind your persecutors that they don't have to be caught stealing if they've merelly forgotten to pay for the property they needed to use. You are a great poster, BTW; there is much love in you.
It's a statistic, and judging by the frontpage on google, every advertiser should take a hint that people want simplicity. Can we dump holy water on the flames of hell caused by shockwave advertisements, or websites consisting of one single image with URL mapping its regions? After-all, Google can't profile a website that is more a media center than a DOCUMENT.
He stole nothing, he physically broke into nothing, he has seen nothing, he has been caught holding nothing. When crappy everyday news press start labeling everyone a "hacker" I think this world is run by Joseph Goerbles. It takes alot of relative merit to hold a label of any kind. For one, IP addresses belong to the ISP, not the subscriber; the software properly authenticated and was allowed access. I do it all the time at Slashdot: sometimes I auth as Anonymous Coward with the password "frommyparentsbasementIstabtheetaco"; Someone changes it to somthing else everytime it is posted though.
Information crimes
If it needs to be a secret, don't hold the secrets on a network-accessible computer or you're asking for someone with authentication to publicize the material. When I speak of "proper authentication", I speak on the train of thought that probability can be just as valid as authentication; guess a number and use it. I'm just using plain English, no in-fancy federal-code talk trying to conceal common-sense law in pounds upon pounds of codified indirect procedure used to anyone's bereft. You'ld think people just love eachother for accessing their server, and you're assumed to be not hostile until proven hostile. George Noory's information COASTTOCOASTAM.COM has the same crap, and I don't see anyone making commercial gain other than plastering stupid secret shit on baseball caps and shirts. Oh, that must be sooo detrimental to take secret information and make a fat cult of pudgy geeks that just gossip about trinagles in the sky. I know Slashdot makes many federal-like assumptions to its viewers; thinking we read hardware advertisements and the advertisements within the topic of those advertisements.
The day those appointed to serve as "Government" can conceal information is the day the people are ussurped by lies. Look at how many spy and nuclear secret threats were feared by those supposes people appointed as "Government", and its they that have mis-used the technology the most!
Interesting. An advertisment, disguised as an Apple article, disguised as a Linux topic. Interesting.
... and a dupe on top of that.
We discussed this earlier this week when Dvorak trie d to piss on everyone's parade with the same opinion.
It was BS then. Its BS now. All Apple on x86 does is give street cred to the idea of switching away from the Bitch from Redmond. Eveeryone else benefits at that point.
In other news - the sun shines, the earth rotetes, life goes on.
There! Now I've mastered the blockquoted blockquote and duped a most-likely duped post complaining of a duplication of an already duped article disguised to advertise duplicating of Apple OSX on IBM duped PeeSees. Those Intel people are just a bunch of clones.
I totally agree with this statement, why not make one graphics layer for all applications like Mac OS X, instead of GTK, GTK2, QT, etc, etc.
Say, that's a great idea! I hope you borrow the best features from each one, mangle it together, and call it GQTK2++. Sure, you're bound to be flamed to support all those pesky architectures, resulting in various code-branching, then after two years all your once-jedi buddies would break-away because they think you've lost your edge, but then it'll all implode when GTK and Mac OSX and whatever other mimicry assimilated inyou your project will be uber-created in your competitors biggest product. Then someone with the same spirit you once had those five years earlier will come along and complain abouth the uber-creator's software, and he'll create his own and open it to all the geeks of Poor kingdom under the title "GuhnooberOeSS-eXP++--." I'm behind you, man! So far behind that you can't see me yet, but I'm behind you! It'll be free, as in beer, right?
Slashdot Mirror
I have no intention of interpreting the statute, when United States Code says "United States means a Federal corporation."
If I am wrong, then how can "United States" own land in the United States of America? How can State of California own most of California? How can State of Oregon be a landlord over Oregon? United States is a corporation, and everyone thinks its a classification. They are all corporations; only people can own land, corporations aren't what walks on foot. United States has a President, it can hold monetary instruments, invest, profit, it can go bankrupt: United States is a corporation from Washington District of Columbia; even so, any code bears witness of incorporation whereas that United States is not a party to the Constitution of the United States but exists as a legal fiction in equity. Searching through Constitution Society, it appears that it is separate from the States united.
You surmise all corporations must suffix their name with "Corporation", such as Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or it's not a corporation? That isn't a regulation to names, but a trade-mark.
Then you go about drawing where none is drawn for jurisdiction. If you try to reference code to law, it will not match; code only needs to be compliant with law, it is encryption so as to not tresspass on another law that it means to be compliant with. In codes, did you not know that quoted material is acknowledging foreign matter and is not a patent to subjection? You've quoted nothing, but have only your codetalk to construe and re-define somthing that is already self-explanatory in the code. And to that code, which I have no patent, I quote "United States means a Federal corporation" and that is all I have to say about that. "United States" has no jurisdiction, only investors. In United States Code, it acnkowledges a feud between the United States and the United States of America; is somthing smelling fishy yet? When this country had gone through its disorders in uncertain times, how do you expect it to re-organize?
You shouldn't suggest what you will never quote. Federal Rules of Evidence is a code sold by the United States Congress. If you need to use it, then that means you are not a party to the Constitution. Rules from a foreign feud in Columbia are a foreign suggestion to neighboring states, but evidence is just plain and peaceful common sense.
You didn't read. "United States" is being used as a noun, and is completely different from plural the United States. Is that I have greater comprehension that you lie that I am wearing a tinfoil hat? The USCODE authors have yet to acknowledge any error.
Then you start trying to define words other than their use in the Law of Nations. Then you try to redefine "federal" to somthing else. Use the etymology. When if I write "apple", it doesn't mean a computer; "Apple" is the construment for a computer that you are looking for.
Stop insulting for curses not written. I am not conveying anything than what is not already said and done; I'm only pointing that there is admiralty, equity, and law; If you can't comprehend the nature of a dispute, then you wouldn't know. A corporation is for limiting liability; if you think that is evil, then don't create one. I didn't say I hated corporations. If every word I've written is hate to you, then I hope not to offend. Think of me as an entomolgist; I just classify based on behavior; "United States" is a corporation, the United States approaches in admiralty, the United States of America is de jure. I didn't write anything with one element of hate.
I think it is becoming fashionable to the day for people to accuse eachother of hating corporations. I'm not the conspiracy theorist that you want me to be.
And when I quoted the requirements for instrumentatlities; oaths, affirmations, declarations, affidavits; tranceiver utilities:
What I intend to show is that if you are not in the United States, then you are in the United States of America. That USCODE is patent to United States, and it is only acknowledging that fact relative to the code; first citing United States requirements explicitly, then falling-through to acknowledge that it is chartered from the United States of America. Doesn't that seem strange to you? It's like there is a boat called the "United States" floating on the High Seas known as the United States of America; if you jump citizenship, then you're in the United States of America and all its sharks (the people). This explains all the admiralty flag law. I've found that the United States is foreign, not allowed anywhere near the United States of America, and is host to a corporation "United States" from within the Washington District of Columbia. Is Hawaii part and parcel to America?
To give some force that one United States and another United State of America are in admiralty, consider these two public notices...1, and 2. I'm just saying, it looks like fishy fishing. I didn't volunteer to be an employee or citizen of either the United States or the United States of America; I'm just born on soil at California; peace, love, groovy (not grovily).
The people, as a majority, on the other hand, seem to always be the outspoken critic that takes the back-seat. How can the people choose a government above them that doesn't correspond to reality? Simply because all government today is implemented in corporate form. I've looked across the Constitution for China, and it is verry sadenning to see it explicitly dedicate powers to various entities that perhaps could not be immediatly changed but by revolution, and worse is it bares false witness of itself by saying China is a "Socialist Republic" every other sentence.
United States, however, is separate from the United States of America because according to Title 28 Section 3002 15a, "United States" is a Federal corporation. And thus the struggle in America is just this; you have federal government and then you have a federal corporation called "United States" in that federal government. About 200 years ago, after the Constitution for the United States of America was written, it was declared by Benjamin Franklin to be a Republic simply by observing the text: not WE THE PEOPLE of the such-and-such STATE of state, but "the people" hold all authority and power and can assign duties to statesmen. Then, a certain "We, the People" emerged, separate from the people.
Cites,
Title 28, Section 3002
Title 28, Section 1746
...on a world and global scale.
(puts on Satan hat)
You would think Unix environmentalists would want DRM, so to help Microsoft develop a better Unix that would better manage file permitions than a combination of read, write, and execute for a single person and a group.
As much as DRM could hurt people, with the little overlord in me, DRM could be used to hurt Microsoft just as well because 1)I bought Microsoft Windows DRM edition, 2)There is no support contract with Microsoft that is enforcable or legitimately active, 3)I own the software and am a shareholder, 4)Microsoft doesn't own the software anymore because they have sold it to me, 5)I do not give Microsoft permition to administer the data on this harddrive.
(removes Satan hat)
All that has previously been held as valid in a court. DRM: whoever gets their hands on userID 0 is in control of the King's Banc (bench); count your blessings, dispel the curses.
How about lawful (non-commercial) downloads? It's only commercial if you are using it for commercial purposes. And accordingly, if the download is influenced by third-party interference, then regulation is all-together not applicable.
I use an OS for lawful purposes. Consider non-commercial commercial software. The same can be said about freedom of speach opposing commercial speach, a justice of the peace opposing a Policy Officer, and a man that catches fish to eat (survive) opposing a commercial fisherman.
Commerce is not lawful, it is legal! Don't get in the law merchandise trap: someone selling you laws, because they aren't among We the People and have no standing in the Constitution!
Just letting you know...
I know of only a couple California Citizens. Only said state Citizens are a party to the Bill of Rights. 14th amendment "citizens of the United States" is not legitimate.
That de-facto State of California has a corporation called "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" created by U.S. Congress, its postal trademark is "CA", and it is in federal jurisdiction by application of ZIP code (Zone Improvement Plan).
"California" is the de-jure state. If you were actually a state Citizen, then it would not say "citizen of the United States" and any oath or swearing you committ would not print "citizn of the United States."
This however is all without regard to the pre-eminence of states all-together; American inhabitants, the original countrymen; born on soil and have no debt/allegiance because they are lawful. You can't go to prison when you have no SSN...no you can't go to prison without a Social Security Number. To be a California Citizen, you aren't allowed to use any title of nobility or gift from the United States.
Just letting you know...
What would you do when you saw Jesus Christ on a cracker? There was a recent news about someone actually finding just that! Confound my search, I can't find it, but someone else found Jesus...a cracker jack...
Stop the Christ Cracker Slave Trade!
Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick! I want to see that!
Dude, Jesus is l33t. He's been everywhere; even on urinal targets.
It's all about looks. Wasn't a recent Slashdot article about IT employees being disliked when they have tattoos (skins/kernel patches) and multiple bodily peircings (kernel holes/virus infection sights/security gaps)? People want software that appeals to their eyes, not the truth of the matter. Most people creating themes for a window manager are not capable of defending themselves in such a intellectual battle. No less, many people produce themes because such a battle occuring will not be targeted at the actual software; a theme can be deleted, rather than a custom-tailored window managing subsystem mimic removed. How did you know I was posting through Windows98+Firefox because this combination is faster than WindowsXP+Firefox on this energy-efficient architecture.
Do you actually think a overly successful corporation could be so desperate and lacking "innovative ideas" that it would sneak a competitor's software into its own without asking "When and who gave us this brilliant thing"? Look at these companies! They have a base of lawyers payed more than their actual software programmers! I could see a way for corporations to gift eachother funds just by "sneaking" copyright code into eachothers products, acting as though it's stolen, and then re-imbursing (read gift for "lost profits." With todays corporate ladder, working under-the-counter in corporate persona is just as easy as giving someone a day in court to settle on a price. Are you expecting to need some money in the future? Hey, let us graft some code on our software branch and you can sue us for it when you need the money. Didn't you ever wonder why such statutory (read fake) "law" needs to be activated as though it is dormant until otherwise? Physics laws, Chemistry laws; they're all around us, interpreted that we can comprehend the nature, and always contributing to the effect of our actions. Corporations however; they can re-adjust gravity. With such large corporations, being self-funding, and all-aware as a thousand-eyed ten-horned monster, would use every bit of assurance to its survival and such beasts in commerce know that deception works just as much in war as it does in the appearance of peace.
Woo woo woo woo woo! Bannana! Give Bannana! Did you look at the beautiful woman in the red dress? Look again! Stupidity is just as much a distraction as lust. Steve Ballmer could accomplish his goals no less in a red dress if not!
And I distinctly remember no less than two years ago, an independent author of a GUI theme was sued by Apple to remove circulation of a certain WindowMaker theme (not KDE, not Gnome, not IceWM) because it completely aroused the end-users perspective to the GUI that it justified not buying a Apple Mac OSX machine. Seriously, if that is all the division between an OS can be, I welcome free software allowing people to move to any architecture they see capable to their needs.
Many people do not realize that Apple is actually a worse corporate proprietor than Microsoft. Considering all these years that Microsoft has been unable to migrate x86 hardware design away from its legacy XT closet, Apple is jumping into the world with a completely new and recent re-implementation with Intel -- perhaps a feat Microsoft couldn't attempt without someone waving monopoly flames. Remember when Microsoft donated USD 160 million to Apple? Was that to keep the smallest competitor out of bankrupty and far from the predatory grips of anti-monopoly laws?
The trend to migrate from the legacy XT PC design has been as recent as when Intel started marketing the beleagured "Plug 'N' Play" API. 3DLabs, no more than three years ago when disclosing its VP graphics chipset to compete with nVidia's GeForce vertex and pixel technology we see today, exclaimed to be migrating away from the VGA BIOS compatibility; none else would be compatible to post in VGA text modes! Of'course, the plan is postponed because freedom can be a stubborn mule... It's all just one big software ploy shadowed by the tempting of advertisers to push new trends and remove competition to a select few supra-corporations with closed intelect -- all to compete with the theory "progress." This is all real! Old, but open standards, are being replaced with proprietary solutions that are clearly not in the interests of the people and companies buying the property.
Yeah, I've looked at computer software the same way as the parent poster had summarized. It's just a struggle between gifted people to press their ideas in codified form onto various competing subdomains of software; criticized by the most calculated, unethical, inconsistent, and undeserving interpretations of data known as the GUI: this + that + this theme + this scheme >= closed_proprietary_solution(TM).
Hello TCPA, you're in the BIOS as an option that can be disabled! When will that option become an unconditional statement or command that serves none but quash the living trust and will? I see Apple and Intel positioning with a hidden Microsoft to perform a corporate sneek.
The man maintanes XScreensaver package, going all the way back and perhaps beyond 1998! The package itself has been tailored by KDE and Gnome over the years. I learned all I need to know about Linux, way back in year 1999 (IIRC), when I was tempted to a manual Linux From Scratch kernel 2.4 and glibc 2.1.3 build and was untarred (not emerged :D) victorious on a Dual Pentium Pro 200MHz system in no more than 40 strait hours! Har, I had no hair on me chest then, but by jumpin Jehova it grew in me pits -- confounded!
As a "chinese" poster exclaimed a few posts earlier, the will of the party need not write its laws; it en-forces them, perhaps evenly in same precision as (no oath) COPS and related Policy officers on Americans.
And given the political atmosphere in America, with those United States employees tresspassing on foreign landings and soils, when is the B(W)ill of the people to be pressed and acknowledge that none may subvert the freedom of press? Taiwan takes a lot of crap from China for such a small dispute as having a line drawn in the sand with water, yet Microsoft (corporation) is not indebted to screen a foreigne state religion with a neighboring foreign state religion.
Microsoft, as well as every software development group, needs to stop recognizing and acknowledging these feuds; beginning with taking all the names for countries and states, thier inhabitants and citizens, and military, out of the software and allowing the person or licensee to dedicate or deed the software by whatever is willfully typed. I keep saying to everyone that I am not a citizen of the United States because that is a contract I didn't volunteer and as well it would mean I am in equal registry with a State in their own union; I am not supposed to type anything "United States" or "United States of America" because it has nothing to do with my predominance as a Citizen to this California. When the "Terrorists" crumbled the twin-towers, I don't go around spreading filthy thoughts and suggesting ideas to influence a foreign event that occurred three thousand miles away -- I don't put all my eggs in the same tower, so that dispute in New York isn't to force me into some draft; that's not Mecca. Stop forcing me and everyone to associate or use a name for a overlay of a country just because it matches a timezone! The same can be said for website logs and registration; I don't live in "CA"; my Citizenship is to California, not "CA" of "United States." Stop the ussurpation! Let the people speak their alignment! Let the people put a picture of their flag and the country or state for which it stands!
Remove all politics from software development, and allow the people unrestricted use to dedicate it to use; we just want stable computing. Get all the registration crap out of software! I don't live in "CA"! CA-CA-CAckadoodledoo
Not to add any value to this grand slashvertisement; but according to propoganda, the VP series of 3DLabs graphics acceleraters are designed with no less than thirty and two smaller independent processors in a single core. Nothing more is said about the technology, other than "they work together." And wouldn't you know it, they are no longer advertising the fact on that 3dlabs.com website. Hmmm...
Carly is a precision weapon. She sucks intellect and craps bankruptcy. Somewhere there is a secret dossier of her in Intel corporation that is under the name "The Cleaner." I can face the fact that one well-placed bomb can cause unrecoverable disaster; Carly Fiorina was the bomb, and there is nothing left but the sideshow performers that bleed through the cracks.
It sucks, man! She sucked Compaq dry! Alpha 21464...gone! Alpha 21464 is the only one with fine-tuned adherance to Rambus, and its gone and replaced with @#*^$@#^$* (whatever you want to call the buzzword of today's x86 third second-cousin hick wife)
You'ld think some of these scientists were modest, but they named this plant "Amorphophallus", interpreted in English -- I think we can believe whatever we want to believe on this one. I'm not saying it. Obviously some people can be so deprived as to give out bad latin words for innocent plants, or maybe this does have a correlation with a certain odor... Take a shower, geeks! And take a cold shower, at that!
When I was in High-Schrool, holding me back was my hand in mechanically writing such long equations on paper just for the sake of showing "work" as they called it. I am verry much self taught, and I don't learn by repetition but by application. I need to find the use of Calculus in nature and apply it to keep fresh in my head or the knowledge decays. I can see a future where all the simple mathematics opperands are removed from calculators and somehow only complex math could be used; in such a motto by whatever Committee on education, exclaiming that anyone that can't find the cube root of 3 on paper doesn't deserve to exist. Worse, I expect calculators (most-likely HP) to be redesigned with RFID capability so a "master unit" could disable certain functions. It's outright stupidity on the part of "educators", and the truth of that matter that these "educators" of today are incapable of inspiring students to learn so they influence inferior courts to coerce attendance to sub-18 years young people that usually already have a career-worthy job worth warding away from illegal aliens (if you believe they exist, that is). Wouldn't it be a blessing if students were blessed with the ideal of voluntary attendance? Some of my family and friends over in Austin Texas are being coerced with their children into "voluntarily" attending those fake courts; you know, when a student can't bring their D to a C, then everyone but the teacher is penalized by fines. At the beginning and end of the court, you are forced to voluntarily sign an agreement granting jurisdiction and all that crap; children are disrespected with military-like shouting and walking into a fortified-fence prison-like compound of temporary trailer buildings. That education sure isn't inspiring any: from a bunch of derelict, morally bankcrupt job-security wanting goons. It seems like all the unconstitutional/encroachments relating to every part of society, such as DMV, FDA, FBI, CIA, all appeared on Our watch. Ever wonder how such institutions were pulverized back to lawyer hell 200 years ago? I collect law books, and what little material I've found that was published before 1850 is such an inspiring read I think any depressed student should read. Truth conquers, isn't that truth?
...there is a port of a (Flash) bullshit generator. Too bad there hasn't been a port to LISP, or eMacs for that matter.
I said it once and I'll say it again, it's less a website when it hosts a media layer construing actual content. I doubt Google can't grep through flash content and make any OCR of it. The recent feat of all search engines was offering a converted PDF to HTML. Flash is for entertainment, not documents.
<DonaldTrumpHoldingKnifeToMyNeck>
Post it, Gregory. Anyone that insults statistics will get a visit from me. If you don't post it, I'll buy all of PrimeTime and you'll be watching Survivor and DeadlyChallenge 'till 2012. No more History Channel, no more NASA channel, maybe I'll even buy Transmeta and dub their next chip the TRUMP and have Steve Ballmer advertise it (*Hint)
</DonaldTrumpHoldingKnifeToMyNeck>
Ok. OK. YOU're FIRED.
That "Federal code" you are quoting is describing the behaviour of an operating system. For all your wants and needs, quote somthing that dictates the behavior of software as much as you want. You have yet to discern the intent of my post; hackers or whatever you want to call them, they ARE authenticating! Just the conclusion of that previous sentence unremarkably sets your post to silense. Who can you believe to give true testimony on who authenticated correctly with a server, some half-baked "Adminstrator" or a server log? The code you cite is an unjustified paradigm shift. Let's talk about software affirming honest and truthful authorization, people notwithstanding unless they break into a room and physically Hack-hack-hack the computer to peices like a Hun or Goth or ...or...a troll.
Yep, no physical damage is the problem; so many defaced websites can be restored by so-many documents about fluffy bunnies. If you intend intellectual property law to be applicable in citing for remedy, then freedom is lost. I suggest burning your webpage on a CDROM or protected by a hardware read-only mechanism. As this post's subject begins, can a switch (1 or 0) be broken? I'ld be entertained to see people suing eachother for causing bad-sectors on their block devices.
Affirmativ captain; you removed the ships sale, closed the LARBOARD (port of entry), silenced and battoned the STARBOARD (doused the lights on display), you set a flag for C-L-O-S-D and flew the YANKEE (dragging anchor), and you are confused what to do when a tresspasser walks in the front door? Captain, I want not mutiny to enter your cabin; dispense some godly canons already; be it canonical law, or a firearm; remedy the situation, man! Admiralty law is just as applicable on soil as it is on sea. How do you suppose that imposter "United States", a Title 28 Section 3002 15b "federal corporation" from the District of Columbia, uses salvage rights to steal your private property or dictate limited use and conditions to your property?
Is your car private property or has it been deeded for commercial use by hired hands? When someone steels my car, I send them a Bill demanding silver for compensation because as I say to the DMV I also say to police and related tresspassers that it is NOT-FOR-SALE or to be used commercially. Just to build some scope in your imagination of my character, I have no keylocks or ignition key on my car; it's just as old world common sense, you just press a button and the engine turns. The same can be intended of a bicycle, a moped, etc. If someone takes your server, send them a bill. If they don't pay, send a court order for compensation. These days, someone is always assuming your property is for sale; just play along, give them a bill; squeeze some lawful money out of their presumption that you have a business license and have dedicated that property in dispute for retail.
There are no victims in commerce, only debtors.
It's a statistic, and judging by the frontpage on google, every advertiser should take a hint that people want simplicity. Can we dump holy water on the flames of hell caused by shockwave advertisements, or websites consisting of one single image with URL mapping its regions? After-all, Google can't profile a website that is more a media center than a DOCUMENT.
/ducks
vi
He stole nothing, he physically broke into nothing, he has seen nothing, he has been caught holding nothing. When crappy everyday news press start labeling everyone a "hacker" I think this world is run by Joseph Goerbles. It takes alot of relative merit to hold a label of any kind. For one, IP addresses belong to the ISP, not the subscriber; the software properly authenticated and was allowed access. I do it all the time at Slashdot: sometimes I auth as Anonymous Coward with the password "frommyparentsbasementIstabtheetaco"; Someone changes it to somthing else everytime it is posted though. Information crimes If it needs to be a secret, don't hold the secrets on a network-accessible computer or you're asking for someone with authentication to publicize the material. When I speak of "proper authentication", I speak on the train of thought that probability can be just as valid as authentication; guess a number and use it. I'm just using plain English, no in-fancy federal-code talk trying to conceal common-sense law in pounds upon pounds of codified indirect procedure used to anyone's bereft. You'ld think people just love eachother for accessing their server, and you're assumed to be not hostile until proven hostile. George Noory's information COASTTOCOASTAM.COM has the same crap, and I don't see anyone making commercial gain other than plastering stupid secret shit on baseball caps and shirts. Oh, that must be sooo detrimental to take secret information and make a fat cult of pudgy geeks that just gossip about trinagles in the sky. I know Slashdot makes many federal-like assumptions to its viewers; thinking we read hardware advertisements and the advertisements within the topic of those advertisements. The day those appointed to serve as "Government" can conceal information is the day the people are ussurped by lies. Look at how many spy and nuclear secret threats were feared by those supposes people appointed as "Government", and its they that have mis-used the technology the most!
There! Now I've mastered the blockquoted blockquote and duped a most-likely duped post complaining of a duplication of an already duped article disguised to advertise duplicating of Apple OSX on IBM duped PeeSees. Those Intel people are just a bunch of clones.
Say, that's a great idea! I hope you borrow the best features from each one, mangle it together, and call it GQTK2++. Sure, you're bound to be flamed to support all those pesky architectures, resulting in various code-branching, then after two years all your once-jedi buddies would break-away because they think you've lost your edge, but then it'll all implode when GTK and Mac OSX and whatever other mimicry assimilated inyou your project will be uber-created in your competitors biggest product. Then someone with the same spirit you once had those five years earlier will come along and complain abouth the uber-creator's software, and he'll create his own and open it to all the geeks of Poor kingdom under the title "GuhnooberOeSS-eXP++--." I'm behind you, man! So far behind that you can't see me yet, but I'm behind you! It'll be free, as in beer, right?