I can certainly appreciate your point but I would posit that (personally) getting so many false alerts as to make the alerts fade into the background is close to getting none at all -- in the end I (and I suspect others) just don't pay attention to them. (Well, this is specifically about weather alerts, I live in a rural area where amber alerts are pretty rare due to population density.)
Okay. But within one week of getting the update on my iphone that enabled these alerts, I got 7 flash flood warnings. This is in an area that hasn't had a flood or flash flood in... I don't know, 50 years? This is about the NWS wanting to cover their ass on the 1% chance that if a flash flood does occur, they can say "we warned ya". That isn't very useful when it's an alert per day. I promptly just turned it off.
true, but how many laptops/desktops etc. are swiped by meth heads just looking to flip on cl or pawn. in those cases, they won't know/care how to pull a hd out.
Yeah, fair enough, but he was one of the very few people who sold his shitty company at the peak of the dot.com bubble who was able to think ahead enough to actually keep his fortune.
Someone who doesn't listen directly to a conference call, but instead reads a transcript released by the company after the event doesn't have the information as soon as other people, but the SEC doesn't consider that "unfair", even though there are often limitations on who can particpate in those conference calls. There is no barrier that limits someone from "liking" a company on Facebook, so the information is just as "public" as any other release of information. If the SEC doesn't realize this, then they are going to have some serious challenges to the ancient ways they regulate public companies.
Ding, ding -- this is a perfect summary of the whole thing. I am not sure if the SEC is just clueless, incompetent and bureaucratically enforcing reg FD or if they are trying to maintain the advantage that professional investors have in the actual implementation of the reg. Either way, the whole thing is bizarre.
I understand that what you're arguing for (oversight) is likely a realistic and practical process that could indeed reduce serious errors of judgement, however, a committee isn't a guarantee against injustice; it is entirely possible that all the branches of government could sign off on a killing that is unjust (e.g. How would you like to be a black man in the 1950s American South facing a committee of those in power?).
For twilight I think it is banned (partially) due to religious groups.
You are correct that religious groups do stupid shit like this. Speaking as an (individual) religious person though, I would say that if my kid(s) couldn't tell the fucking difference between a vampire and God, I would have to conclude the problem is more on how I've raised them than due to the existence of vampire fiction.
Or maybe there is someone, somewhere who once worked at HP, was considered pretty good at his job, but was "let go" over circumstances that were, perhaps, somewhat overstated at the time.
The upshot is that millions of lower income families are going to get internet -- that's a Good Thing(TM).
In my experience, these kind of things never amount to anything though. Comcast will make it hard to find out about, difficult to sign up for and onerous to stay eligible.
Whenever they can gracefully exit from the program (likely defined by whatever agreement they made) they will issue a press release trumpeting how the program wasn't really popular (of course, by design) and how existing customers will be transitioned to another tier of service, which, itself, is really a fantastic value.
Ugh, I can already see the fucking smarmy press release in my mind.
His viewpoint is basically "if you're not breaking the law, what do you have to worry about?"
People who say this always seem to forget that, one day, there might be laws that are well worth breaking; that in order to keep your humanity, you will have to break.
Just to rifle through the last few months of news: what if you were Libyan under Gaddafi or Egyptian under Mubarak? I would be glad, were I in that situation, not to have a fucking device in my car reporting my whereabouts in a governmentally accessible manner.
I think the whole idea of protecting rights is to do so for the future, not necessarily for the present.
(a) Because it is a report card on you/your team. It is the summation of what everyone in the business community at large thinks of you. With a declining stock price, you are the bloke at the conference who got a very public "F". Conversely, with a rising price, you are a rock star. Purely psychological (in this context) but powerfully so.
(b) Less intangible: If your price is low for long enough, you can be replaced as CEO.
Is the problem really Wikileaks or is it that fucking prat Assange? He was the one who pissed of The Guardian and NYT so badly they don't want anything to do with him.
What you need is someone who can run Wikileaks without all the ego. Someone who can be sensible (e.g. redact names of informants in leaked documents) but be steadfast about publishing what comes in without making it all about him/her.
Do you realize that at least 80% of the population in the US likely could not figure out how to pair a bluetooth keyboard to a tablet? It might as well not exist for the majority of consumers.
Slashdot Mirror
I can certainly appreciate your point but I would posit that (personally) getting so many false alerts as to make the alerts fade into the background is close to getting none at all -- in the end I (and I suspect others) just don't pay attention to them. (Well, this is specifically about weather alerts, I live in a rural area where amber alerts are pretty rare due to population density.)
Okay. But within one week of getting the update on my iphone that enabled these alerts, I got 7 flash flood warnings. This is in an area that hasn't had a flood or flash flood in ... I don't know, 50 years? This is about the NWS wanting to cover their ass on the 1% chance that if a flash flood does occur, they can say "we warned ya". That isn't very useful when it's an alert per day. I promptly just turned it off.
true, but how many laptops/desktops etc. are swiped by meth heads just looking to flip on cl or pawn. in those cases, they won't know/care how to pull a hd out.
Yeah, fair enough, but he was one of the very few people who sold his shitty company at the peak of the dot.com bubble who was able to think ahead enough to actually keep his fortune.
Someone who doesn't listen directly to a conference call, but instead reads a transcript released by the company after the event doesn't have the information as soon as other people, but the SEC doesn't consider that "unfair", even though there are often limitations on who can particpate in those conference calls. There is no barrier that limits someone from "liking" a company on Facebook, so the information is just as "public" as any other release of information. If the SEC doesn't realize this, then they are going to have some serious challenges to the ancient ways they regulate public companies.
Ding, ding -- this is a perfect summary of the whole thing. I am not sure if the SEC is just clueless, incompetent and bureaucratically enforcing reg FD or if they are trying to maintain the advantage that professional investors have in the actual implementation of the reg. Either way, the whole thing is bizarre.
I understand that what you're arguing for (oversight) is likely a realistic and practical process that could indeed reduce serious errors of judgement, however, a committee isn't a guarantee against injustice; it is entirely possible that all the branches of government could sign off on a killing that is unjust (e.g. How would you like to be a black man in the 1950s American South facing a committee of those in power?).
I can't help thinking that more people would buy a $700 tablet for $99 than would have just brought it for $99
That is a really good point. I think a certain amount of the frenzy for the TouchPad was the fact that people felt like they were getting a deal.
For twilight I think it is banned (partially) due to religious groups.
You are correct that religious groups do stupid shit like this. Speaking as an (individual) religious person though, I would say that if my kid(s) couldn't tell the fucking difference between a vampire and God, I would have to conclude the problem is more on how I've raised them than due to the existence of vampire fiction.
The rest is still unlimited.
That is true, but for how long? This move strikes me as a precursor to smartphone caps. After all, where will you go if you don't like it?
Or maybe there is someone, somewhere who once worked at HP, was considered pretty good at his job, but was "let go" over circumstances that were, perhaps, somewhat overstated at the time.
The upshot is that millions of lower income families are going to get internet -- that's a Good Thing(TM).
In my experience, these kind of things never amount to anything though. Comcast will make it hard to find out about, difficult to sign up for and onerous to stay eligible.
Whenever they can gracefully exit from the program (likely defined by whatever agreement they made) they will issue a press release trumpeting how the program wasn't really popular (of course, by design) and how existing customers will be transitioned to another tier of service, which, itself, is really a fantastic value.
Ugh, I can already see the fucking smarmy press release in my mind.
His viewpoint is basically "if you're not breaking the law, what do you have to worry about?"
People who say this always seem to forget that, one day, there might be laws that are well worth breaking; that in order to keep your humanity, you will have to break.
Just to rifle through the last few months of news: what if you were Libyan under Gaddafi or Egyptian under Mubarak? I would be glad, were I in that situation, not to have a fucking device in my car reporting my whereabouts in a governmentally accessible manner.
I think the whole idea of protecting rights is to do so for the future, not necessarily for the present.
(a) Because it is a report card on you/your team. It is the summation of what everyone in the business community at large thinks of you. With a declining stock price, you are the bloke at the conference who got a very public "F". Conversely, with a rising price, you are a rock star. Purely psychological (in this context) but powerfully so.
(b) Less intangible: If your price is low for long enough, you can be replaced as CEO.
But I have a hard time imagining Hulu or Netflix rolling out an HTML5 UI anytime soon.
Discrete Windows/iOS/Android apps for anything requiring DRM and HTML5 video in browser for everything else?
Is the problem really Wikileaks or is it that fucking prat Assange? He was the one who pissed of The Guardian and NYT so badly they don't want anything to do with him. What you need is someone who can run Wikileaks without all the ego. Someone who can be sensible (e.g. redact names of informants in leaked documents) but be steadfast about publishing what comes in without making it all about him/her.
just a bluetooth keyboard for the tablets
Do you realize that at least 80% of the population in the US likely could not figure out how to pair a bluetooth keyboard to a tablet? It might as well not exist for the majority of consumers.