To be fair, he claims to have access to shoulder launched air to ground missiles. The fact that less than a week ago he went through check in procedures at a naval base but never went through the check out procedures certainly gets my imagination going... especially if I were a helicopter pilot assigned to look for him. Though I of course understand that gaining access to the armory isn't the same as gaining entrance to the base.
I read it myself, doesn't seem all that onerous - Of course, I'm one of the seemingly small handful of people who realize the medical industry is exactly the same as any other retail operation, and thus I have a right as a patient to tell any doctor who gets too nosy about my personal life to go fuck him/herself.
is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price.
Um, yes, that is the defination of cybersquatting, according to the document that you linked to.
No - you're failing to parse the definition of terms such as bad faith and trademark.
But, taking the high(er) road: this is a website that uses his name, is entirely about his career, and affects him materially. I think there can be only 2 fair outcomes: a C&D asking them to close shop and dissolve, or to hand the domain over to him.
So, if someone wrote a book (or movie, or any other form of media that disseminates information) that used a politician's name, was entirely about his career, and affected him materially, you think it would be appropriate to shut down the publisher, or force them to hand over the publishing rights?
To slap the chicken with a lawsuit for not purchasing a license to their method of relocating livestock from one side of a tarmac surface to the other via bipedal forward kinetics patent
"... an idea five Amazon inventors came up with..."
It took five of them to come up with this brilliance??? Amazon must have some stellar intellects...
On the other hand, it does open up a new avenue for the old joke setup;
How many Amazon inventors does it take...
- to screw in a lightbulb? 5 - one to screw it in, one to file a patent on the process of rotating an object until it is seated in a socket, and 3 more to pat each other on the back.
It's not the 90's anymore... you can load a page that's connected to dozens of different services that are almost completely independent of each other and the page you're on.
If you let others insert scripts into your pages they can steal your visitors.
Maybe it'll make sites think about who they script src from.
One of the bad things I've noticed recently is that HSBC is including objects from third party organisations in their ebanking login pages. I do wonder if any thought has gone into the security of such things, or if HSBC simply don't care (my experience of banks tells me that none of them have a single clue when it comes to internet security).
"No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people."
So what you are trying ot say is that most people are stupid, so cellphone radiation is harmless
Uh, no, you inferred that all on your own, presumably because you take an unpopular position in this debate, and therefore every mention is seen as either support or an attack.
What I'm trying to say is that nobody ever lost money betting on the fact that most people are stupid, and I stand by it.
Last I checked, you could go and build a Dell laptop and choose Windows 7. You may have to use the business line of laptops, but they all give that option.
I'm curious as to how Dell's recent decision to go private would affect that possibility...
Yes, I realize how madly impractical that is, but you have to admit, you would more than likely have the bitchin-est lappy anyone at your school has ever seen!
Slashdot Mirror
To be fair, he claims to have access to shoulder launched air to ground missiles. The fact that less than a week ago he went through check in procedures at a naval base but never went through the check out procedures certainly gets my imagination going... especially if I were a helicopter pilot assigned to look for him. Though I of course understand that gaining access to the armory isn't the same as gaining entrance to the base.
According to the LAPD themselves, 2 rocket launchers were surrendered during the December "Turn in Your Guns" drive...
surveillance that is implied by Obamacare
Well this should be amusing. What the frack are you babbling about now?
Probably the clause that states physicians aren't required to or prohibited from asking about firearm ownership.
I read it myself, doesn't seem all that onerous - Of course, I'm one of the seemingly small handful of people who realize the medical industry is exactly the same as any other retail operation, and thus I have a right as a patient to tell any doctor who gets too nosy about my personal life to go fuck him/herself.
From the article you linked to:
is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price.
Um, yes, that is the defination of cybersquatting, according to the document that you linked to.
No - you're failing to parse the definition of terms such as bad faith and trademark.
In other words, Microsoft did to MikeRoweSoft exactly what they claimed MikeRoweSoft was going to do to them.
Fuckin' Classy.
But, taking the high(er) road: this is a website that uses his name, is entirely about his career, and affects him materially. I think there can be only 2 fair outcomes: a C&D asking them to close shop and dissolve, or to hand the domain over to him.
So, if someone wrote a book (or movie, or any other form of media that disseminates information) that used a politician's name, was entirely about his career, and affected him materially, you think it would be appropriate to shut down the publisher, or force them to hand over the publishing rights?
Are you aware of how insane that concept sounds?
Not to mention the fact that if you put http://mikerowesoft.com/ into a browser, it takes you to... Microsoft's website.
Reverse cybersquatting?
This is exactly the definition of cybersquatting.
As a matter of fact, No, it's not.
Why did the 5 Amazon inventors cross the road?
To slap the chicken with a lawsuit for not purchasing a license to their method of relocating livestock from one side of a tarmac surface to the other via bipedal forward kinetics patent
I rent ebooks...
FTFY.
And, oddly enough, I still pay a full purchase price for that rental service (sometimes higher than the cost of a paper copy)
Precisely why I have a standing ban on ebooks. That is, until I can get my automatic book scanner built
"... an idea five Amazon inventors came up with ..."
It took five of them to come up with this brilliance??? Amazon must have some stellar intellects...
On the other hand, it does open up a new avenue for the old joke setup;
How many Amazon inventors does it take...
- to screw in a lightbulb?
5 - one to screw it in, one to file a patent on the process of rotating an object until it is seated in a socket, and 3 more to pat each other on the back.
I rent ebooks...
FTFY.
Facebook did not "Break major websites".
This.
Facebook broke Facebook, and some third party sites were affected.
It's not the 90's anymore... you can load a page that's connected to dozens of different services that are almost completely independent of each other and the page you're on.
For some reason, that makes me a sad panda... :(
If you let others insert scripts into your pages they can steal your visitors.
Maybe it'll make sites think about who they script src from.
One of the bad things I've noticed recently is that HSBC is including objects from third party organisations in their ebanking login pages. I do wonder if any thought has gone into the security of such things, or if HSBC simply don't care (my experience of banks tells me that none of them have a single clue when it comes to internet security).
HSBC launders money for drug kingpins and terrorists.
You should really find a new bank.
What does it weigh in hand grenades?
And just like that, I have a new favorite system of measurement.
Is this why we have such miserable weather over here in Ireland?
No, that's just god punishing you for being Irish.
Bazinga!
"No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people."
So what you are trying ot say is that most people are stupid, so cellphone radiation is harmless
Uh, no, you inferred that all on your own, presumably because you take an unpopular position in this debate, and therefore every mention is seen as either support or an attack.
What I'm trying to say is that nobody ever lost money betting on the fact that most people are stupid, and I stand by it.
Last I checked, you could go and build a Dell laptop and choose Windows 7. You may have to use the business line of laptops, but they all give that option.
I'm curious as to how Dell's recent decision to go private would affect that possibility...
Thoughts?
Why not build your own, Ben Heck style?
Yes, I realize how madly impractical that is, but you have to admit, you would more than likely have the bitchin-est lappy anyone at your school has ever seen!
So this means that they can't legally do 'metered billing,' as the meter is known and proven to be inaccurate, right?
right?
anybody?
No, but LastPass does!
...
2013, and still no viable way of punching someone via TCP/IP...
lol
... and don't give me that 'muscle memory' crap, if you're rotating passwords like you should, muscle memory doesn't even come into the picture.
Only if you hunt and peck for everything.
FWIW, it took me about half the time to type the above line than it takes to type my current 12 semi-random character password.
We should have legislation prohibiting cleartext and unsalted password storage. At least for any site that handles money.
Personally, I'm surprised PCI doesn't require this already.
WTF is up with many tablets not having an SD slot?
Probably tablet makers not wanting to pay their tithe to Microsoft for the use of its file system patents.
Another fine example of how the current iteration of the patent process is helping consumers... get screwed.
Love the double-entendre in your post title, btw.