I'm just not sure a system that benefits you and google but not the authors is the best solution to the problem here.
Yes, well, it is.
And there will be further benefits by resetting copyright back to its original duration of 17 years. The rent seekers can take a walk. It is time to stop crippling technology for their benefit at our expense.
The artists who create the material. Like most people who have to actually work for a living, they are too submissive in negotiations, especially now that self publishing is comparatively trivial to past times when physical media was required.
We will never get over this censorship bullshit until we develop robust P2P and distributed services that cannot be taken down without nuking the whole planet. Make it impossible and the problem is solved, end of story.
Sorry, you can only prosecute for action, never speech. The actor is the sole guilty party, no matter what he claims as motivation, whether it's tabloid hearsay or anything else. Censorship still remains the prime evil. Its only purpose is expediency and for the protection of powerful people and institutions. We need to kill off the whole discussion by making censorship impossible with decentralized, P2P type services. That would be the end of the problem and we can move on.
Your projecting your own characteristics onto me again... To be expected I guess, since you must deny the part you play to keep up appearances.
Now, for the viewing audience, feel free to point out anything in my previous post that was incorrect. Since most of us are already accustomed to your regular hand waving, we're not expecting much.
As far as I am concerned your Netflix subscription entitles you to download anything they carry in their library, by whatever means available. Your torrents are paid for. Don't fret over it.
Do you really think a potential employer is going to do some serious digging to find the actual truth once they see "abc drugged and raped xyz"? No way they'll move to the next just-as-qualified person.
And that is what precisely makes him the problem. He is too lazy to dig? Screw him, and sue him every way till Sunday
Censorship is always evil. The leader isn't the problem, the followers are.
Obviously you have no idea since you're just lying, to cover up your own responsibility for voting for quid pro quo candidates... There are plenty of alternatives right there on your ballot, but you will vote for democrats that shill for the insurance industry. You clearly don't "hate" them as much as you let on. You're just putting on a show.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm just not sure a system that benefits you and google but not the authors is the best solution to the problem here.
Yes, well, it is.
And there will be further benefits by resetting copyright back to its original duration of 17 years. The rent seekers can take a walk. It is time to stop crippling technology for their benefit at our expense.
:-) What's wrong with a couple of hundred years? It's still "limited". There's nothing in the law that says it has to be reasonable.
No, that would be weather prediction. Pretty much the same thing though..
Of course it is. Look at you! There's the reality right there
It's a seller's market.
The artists who create the material. Like most people who have to actually work for a living, they are too submissive in negotiations, especially now that self publishing is comparatively trivial to past times when physical media was required.
You're still lying though, in the vain attempt to hide your own responsibility for the results... a simple follower of the crowd, living in denial.
Again?
Free speech for me, but not for thee?
Trump seems to believe so
I mean, wouldn't it be scary if in this world, you cannot say anything that someone would be considered douche?
Like this?
We will never get over this censorship bullshit until we develop robust P2P and distributed services that cannot be taken down without nuking the whole planet. Make it impossible and the problem is solved, end of story.
I have nothing to lose from watching you make a fool of yourself.
Yes, well, a fool rarely has anything to lose he hasn't lost already. So, stay safe in the middle of the herd.
Sorry, you can only prosecute for action, never speech. The actor is the sole guilty party, no matter what he claims as motivation, whether it's tabloid hearsay or anything else. Censorship still remains the prime evil. Its only purpose is expediency and for the protection of powerful people and institutions. We need to kill off the whole discussion by making censorship impossible with decentralized, P2P type services. That would be the end of the problem and we can move on.
Well, you're back to lying to yourself then.
Your projecting your own characteristics onto me again... To be expected I guess, since you must deny the part you play to keep up appearances.
Now, for the viewing audience, feel free to point out anything in my previous post that was incorrect. Since most of us are already accustomed to your regular hand waving, we're not expecting much.
On the contrary! If I were in the business, I would hire her in a New York Second. She definitely left a mark..
By comparison, North Korea stories can be posted in the Idle section. For some reason, I suspect they won't have a successful launch any time soon.
the MPAA itself does not make anything.
That is not true! They produce legislation. It is far cheaper than producing movies
As far as I am concerned your Netflix subscription entitles you to download anything they carry in their library, by whatever means available. Your torrents are paid for. Don't fret over it.
Oh, please! It doesn't stop there. The Ottoman Empire shall rise again!
But you sure as hell don't have any right to prohibit it from coming up on Google. I'll filter my own searches thank you.
Personally, I'm hoping for more widespread circumvention of the whole issue.
Do you really think a potential employer is going to do some serious digging to find the actual truth once they see "abc drugged and raped xyz"? No way they'll move to the next just-as-qualified person.
And that is what precisely makes him the problem. He is too lazy to dig? Screw him, and sue him every way till Sunday
Censorship is always evil. The leader isn't the problem, the followers are.
Only what you do has repercussions, not what you say. The freedom to verbally offend is sacrosanct.
Sticks and stones, baby!
There's not a lot of difference between a microphone and a speaker...
Why does it matter what Li'l Kim does?
These stories are to distract us from even worse enemies (depending on your POV of course)
Obviously you have no idea since you're just lying, to cover up your own responsibility for voting for quid pro quo candidates... There are plenty of alternatives right there on your ballot, but you will vote for democrats that shill for the insurance industry. You clearly don't "hate" them as much as you let on. You're just putting on a show.
Still keeping up with the lie, eh? I suppose that will be your template of excuses. The insurance companies appreciate your vote.