Jeeze! It couldn't be easier! You follow their record, and if they act corruptly, you vote them out of office and try a new guy, then vote them out if they are no better. What you don't do, in case you are really interested, is reelect the crook into office for 40 years.
If there was some sort of indicator...
Are you serious? There are voting records and campaign 'contributors' listed all over the place. If you have any suspicions at all you don't vote for the person until he opens up his books. I do not understand the difficulty here. And if you want to make it really simple, vote out the incumbent party entirely. Whatever you do, the choice is always yours. If you vote for corruption, don't be surprised when you get it, and don't blame the person for winning your vote, especially if you vote for him again in the next cycle. In such cases, I can only ridicule the voter.
This whole blame thing definitely fascinates me. People are doing every single thing they can to evade their responsibility for the government they elect. The problem goes back to ancient times and beyond and is well documented, but still, in light of our 'new' information age, it is quite a sight to see how little people progress.
Are you one of those people that think publicly available encryption actually works? Well, I'm sure you're in good company, even if you are wrong. Dream on, my friend. It gives you purpose.
It already has been imposed everywhere, crapflooders vs. firewalls, You are so deluded if you think you are hiding anything. And to see you blather on about China and Iran just shows you are regurgitating mass media BS, hardly anything thoughtful on the subject.
"proportional"... "winner takes all"... None of that matters. The fact is that corrupt politicians get enough votes to win. There is only one place where those votes come from, the voters. If they can't control themselves, it is nobody's fault but their own.
The use of encryption can be easily controlled by licensing its use. The service providers will be given the appropriate white list. There is no 'argument', that would be your personal fantasy. They is only influence, and how to apply it. You're looking for something that isn't there. And I don't care if you respond or not. I'm posting for the rest of the audience to decide. Have a good day yourself, sir. I have a good day every day.
Right, so people must save themselves, and seek out the better alternative instead of rewarding the corruption for a 'piece of the pie'. Playing along only prolongs the misery. And maybe it's time to recognize a fatal flaw of majority rule while the majority remains so dazzled.
Still I wouldn't be broken up, if neither ever was ever elected president.
It only takes a majority of votes to make it happen. Simple math. Just get the non voters to unite on somebody, and voila! All I am hearing here is just more blame passing for ones' own failures.
:-) Even the shallowest thinkers see that you continue to play the blame game. You will accomplish nothing until you recognize the role you play as an enabler of corruption when you vote for it. And for the rest of the viewing audience (since you can't be bothered), ask yourselves what does the successful politician have to 'learn', besides, of course, keep on doing what made them successful to begin with? Do you shock the dog when it obeys your commands?
Pfft! Things will only get as bad as people let it. The power is theirs (yours). Use it or lose it, just don't complain about it. When your actions and words collide, it only makes you all sound like idiots and naive fools. At which point only mockery and ridicule serve any purpose. Your government is your fault. Accept and embrace it.
You have to put up some feeble resistance at least. The fact is that the corrupt parties (Labour/Tory, republican/democrat, etc) still get the vast majority of votes. That is what needs to be addressed, not the small divisions between them. Everybody in the US is still blaming Nader for Bush's victory in 2000, which is bullshit. Bush won because he got the votes. I don't care about the divisions within the opposition.
where I live, they gould put up a gorilla for election and it would win if it had the right coloured rosette!!
Exactly my point, if you don't want the gorilla in office, don't vote for him. And if he wins, don't blame the gorilla, or the party that fronts him. It is not their fault. On the contrary, their style of salesmanship and reasons for success should be studied in business school, or more correctly in psychology classes.
And your VPNs and Tor packets will be simply dropped. All the power you want depends on the amount of kinetic energy you can control. The words are bullshit.
Slashdot Mirror
She's too powerful and her political allies are too powerful.
Does that mean she has your vote? Does she really have that kind of power that nobody can resist?
I don't know any way of figuring that out.
Jeeze! It couldn't be easier! You follow their record, and if they act corruptly, you vote them out of office and try a new guy, then vote them out if they are no better. What you don't do, in case you are really interested, is reelect the crook into office for 40 years.
If there was some sort of indicator...
Are you serious? There are voting records and campaign 'contributors' listed all over the place. If you have any suspicions at all you don't vote for the person until he opens up his books. I do not understand the difficulty here. And if you want to make it really simple, vote out the incumbent party entirely. Whatever you do, the choice is always yours. If you vote for corruption, don't be surprised when you get it, and don't blame the person for winning your vote, especially if you vote for him again in the next cycle. In such cases, I can only ridicule the voter.
This whole blame thing definitely fascinates me. People are doing every single thing they can to evade their responsibility for the government they elect. The problem goes back to ancient times and beyond and is well documented, but still, in light of our 'new' information age, it is quite a sight to see how little people progress.
:-) What did I 'lose'?
Are you one of those people that think publicly available encryption actually works? Well, I'm sure you're in good company, even if you are wrong. Dream on, my friend. It gives you purpose.
It already has been imposed everywhere, crapflooders vs. firewalls, You are so deluded if you think you are hiding anything. And to see you blather on about China and Iran just shows you are regurgitating mass media BS, hardly anything thoughtful on the subject.
"proportional"... "winner takes all"... None of that matters. The fact is that corrupt politicians get enough votes to win. There is only one place where those votes come from, the voters. If they can't control themselves, it is nobody's fault but their own.
The use of encryption can be easily controlled by licensing its use. The service providers will be given the appropriate white list. There is no 'argument', that would be your personal fantasy. They is only influence, and how to apply it. You're looking for something that isn't there. And I don't care if you respond or not. I'm posting for the rest of the audience to decide. Have a good day yourself, sir. I have a good day every day.
Who cares what the 'law' says? Just find a way around it, and let the tyrants cry.
Just find a way to circumvent it and the problem is solved
Your social 'realities' are entirely man made, easily formed into whatever image you desire. Either there is free will, or there isn't.
Right, so people must save themselves, and seek out the better alternative instead of rewarding the corruption for a 'piece of the pie'. Playing along only prolongs the misery. And maybe it's time to recognize a fatal flaw of majority rule while the majority remains so dazzled.
Still I wouldn't be broken up, if neither ever was ever elected president.
It only takes a majority of votes to make it happen. Simple math. Just get the non voters to unite on somebody, and voila! All I am hearing here is just more blame passing for ones' own failures.
:-) Even the shallowest thinkers see that you continue to play the blame game. You will accomplish nothing until you recognize the role you play as an enabler of corruption when you vote for it. And for the rest of the viewing audience (since you can't be bothered), ask yourselves what does the successful politician have to 'learn', besides, of course, keep on doing what made them successful to begin with? Do you shock the dog when it obeys your commands?
The voting public are sheeple...
That would make it their own fault then. A power broker has no power if nobody listens.
Clinton opponents
Have you seen the people running 'against' her? They are actually out there to make her look good!
Gotta love the voting public. They pick nothing but disastrous candidates for 'both' sides.
Pfft! Things will only get as bad as people let it. The power is theirs (yours). Use it or lose it, just don't complain about it. When your actions and words collide, it only makes you all sound like idiots and naive fools. At which point only mockery and ridicule serve any purpose. Your government is your fault. Accept and embrace it.
You have to put up some feeble resistance at least. The fact is that the corrupt parties (Labour/Tory, republican/democrat, etc) still get the vast majority of votes. That is what needs to be addressed, not the small divisions between them. Everybody in the US is still blaming Nader for Bush's victory in 2000, which is bullshit. Bush won because he got the votes. I don't care about the divisions within the opposition.
where I live, they gould put up a gorilla for election and it would win if it had the right coloured rosette!!
Exactly my point, if you don't want the gorilla in office, don't vote for him. And if he wins, don't blame the gorilla, or the party that fronts him. It is not their fault. On the contrary, their style of salesmanship and reasons for success should be studied in business school, or more correctly in psychology classes.
There are, however, a core of authoritarians who see no problem with removal of privacy. Just not most of us.
On the contrary, it is the majority of those who vote that brought you this situation. If it weren't, this wouldn't be a problem.
We will never know until there is sufficient resistance. In the meantime, suck it up. This world is your making.
And your VPNs and Tor packets will be simply dropped. All the power you want depends on the amount of kinetic energy you can control. The words are bullshit.
Damn thing better shit gold bricks or it'll end up in the glue factory...
So, round and around and around we go.
Where the world's headed, nobody knows.
Not true. The voters select the candidates. If they only take what is spoon fed, it is their own fault.
The government does not turn a country towards Nazism. The people do, with their votes. That's how it worked back then too.
...figure out where the attackers actually are.
It's coming from M's office.
Yeah, but c'mon... "Red Button" Autonomy
That's just too cool. Everybody should have one of those.