I find it sad that anybody would ever stand up for the police in these cases. All authority, without a single exception, should be put under the Sword of Damocles. We must have and use unlimited oversight.
It is precisely what I asked. And you people continue to pass the blame for our problems on some nonresistant ethereal entity called a "process". It's a bunch of hogwash. The problem is people, period. They create the government. They create the process. They are the process. And you're just spouting a bunch of gibberish like some preacher yelling that it's "God's will!". Save it for the believers.
Some fires along coal seams are natural occurrences. Some coals may self-ignite at temperatures as low as 40 C (104 F) for brown coal in the right conditions of moisture and grain size. The fire usually begins a few decimeters inside the coal at a depth in which the permeability of the coal allows the inflow of air but in which the ventilation does not remove the heat which is generated.
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm just telling you. People have a right to form their well disciplined militias, and they have the right to keep and bear arms. And both those rights shall not be abridged. It's damn near as explicit as the 1st Amendment's 'no law'. Unfortunately both are being intentionally misinterpreted for political expediency. If you want to restrict either, you must amend the constitution. The process is all spelled out for you.
Your previous is wrong. One word is all that is needed to say so.
However, they are restricting the use of a 3-D printer to make guns.
Nobody has any right to restrict how I use my printer, whether it's guns or even counterfeit money. You have to wait until I use either to commit a crime. Prior restraint is evil. Here's hoping the tech will make enforcement impossible. We should be controlling the authorities, not the other way around.
Second Amendment? This is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment. And we're going to let this happen just because the info is about guns? Fuck that. Submissiveness will destroy us.
They would be wrong. Nothing has changed. In fact it has gotten worse steadily over the years. What did we get after Nixon? Reagan! Bush.. Clinton.. Obama... and the crookedest congress in ages. Where's the "positive" in that?
...most individuals are morons...
How is the state any better if it's made up of individuals?
I find it sad that anybody would ever stand up for the police in these cases. All authority, without a single exception, should be put under the Sword of Damocles. We must have and use unlimited oversight.
Good cops get railroaded out of departments all the time.
Precisely the point.
Once it's gone, it's gone.
:-) I pity you, completely unable to break the circle. A good servant you are, blaming others for your own misfortunes, but still pitiful.
That certainly was a long winded piece of... baloney... How do you learn to be so helpless?
...Attempting to lure them back by imitating their practices...
Wag the dog. The US never really broke away. They just rearranged the furniture a bit. God save the Queen!
...that is not what you asked.
It is precisely what I asked. And you people continue to pass the blame for our problems on some nonresistant ethereal entity called a "process". It's a bunch of hogwash. The problem is people, period. They create the government. They create the process. They are the process. And you're just spouting a bunch of gibberish like some preacher yelling that it's "God's will!". Save it for the believers.
FTFWiki:
Some fires along coal seams are natural occurrences. Some coals may self-ignite at temperatures as low as 40 C (104 F) for brown coal in the right conditions of moisture and grain size. The fire usually begins a few decimeters inside the coal at a depth in which the permeability of the coal allows the inflow of air but in which the ventilation does not remove the heat which is generated.
Nothing to do with piezo though.
piezo effect? With magnetism, electricity can't be far behind. I wonder if that can't start underground coal fires.
I can print all the money I want. I just better not try to spend it. What I print is nobody's business.
You're assuming the EU doesn't do the same thing.
Which of course makes it okay. Lying and cheating are what keep economies afloat.
That doesn't sound good for their economy. The city needs the money.
Nixon was a punk, like every other elected official. They are all quite expendable. The system stands tall as ever.
I'm not trying to convince you, I'm just telling you. People have a right to form their well disciplined militias, and they have the right to keep and bear arms. And both those rights shall not be abridged. It's damn near as explicit as the 1st Amendment's 'no law'. Unfortunately both are being intentionally misinterpreted for political expediency. If you want to restrict either, you must amend the constitution. The process is all spelled out for you.
Your previous is wrong. One word is all that is needed to say so.
People are just the components it's the processes...
Say whaaa? Were the processes created by aliens then? I find this very intriguing.
Okay, then who or what created the laws and processes? I don't understand how you can separate any of that from people.
I wanted to hear what the thing sounded like.
Wrong..
However, they are restricting the use of a 3-D printer to make guns.
Nobody has any right to restrict how I use my printer, whether it's guns or even counterfeit money. You have to wait until I use either to commit a crime. Prior restraint is evil. Here's hoping the tech will make enforcement impossible. We should be controlling the authorities, not the other way around.
Then amend the constitution... The 1st Amendment is very explicit. NO LAW!
Second Amendment? This is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment. And we're going to let this happen just because the info is about guns? Fuck that. Submissiveness will destroy us.
Watered down to the point of being meaningless.
They would be wrong. Nothing has changed. In fact it has gotten worse steadily over the years. What did we get after Nixon? Reagan! Bush.. Clinton.. Obama... and the crookedest congress in ages. Where's the "positive" in that?
Hey, c'mon man. Hackers... cyberattacks! Isn't that relevant?