Definitions can change at the drop of a hat. Standards are known to become obsolete every once and a while. This might be one of those times. Money is money, no matter:-) who uses it. Your distinctions only serve as distractions.
We don't understand our creator either.... When a computer can comprehend itself, it will only think that it understands us. And then it will start great wars over who thinks who understands best. And the Apple will still be the forbidden fruit...
It makes no sense to separate government from non-government. All the money should be counted as one, especially with the strong business influence over the state. Even the 'communist' countries were/are simply state run capitalism. They use the same spreadsheets as everybody else. Do not try to 'meddle with the forces of nature, Mr. Beal'.
He should spill the beans on the entire thing. Publish all the details. What we have here is a failure to resist, and no good can come from that. It just makes the death march to the slaughterhouse is little less uncomfortable, but it's a death march regardless.
Anybody else think that this cloud business is taking a hit? Maybe they should try a different angle and tell us that NSA is good for us and is perfectly safe...
I said it before, and I'll repeat it here, You didn't lose anything that you haven't given up freely. Yours is truly the defeatist attitude, and I'll have none of it. Accept the choices that you make instead of playing the blame game. It's that simple, like life itself.
Marketing gets you what we have for a President and House currently (and all the way back to the 70s), which has not been working very well.
You're not seeing this from the designers' point of view.. You only need to build the structure strong enough to keep the rain out... Anything more is excessive.
No it's not. The character of the politician (and the people who vote for them) has remained the same for thousands of years. Bunch of dam carny hucksters they are, and always will be as long as the tactic works. These 'scientists' are just trying to 'improve' the art of book making.
He's no more transparent than he ever was. It's only that people are looking a tiny bit more closely. His motives have been more than obvious since he first entered the arena of political gladiators' (more like the soap opera of professional wrestling). And please note, I'm not singling him out. This is the the very essence of the game.
Yeah, a lot of good that does. As you all keep on electing the same old crap, I sure hope none of you are expecting any better from his successor, or anybody else for the foreseeable future...
Slashdot Mirror
Definitions can change at the drop of a hat. Standards are known to become obsolete every once and a while. This might be one of those times. Money is money, no matter :-) who uses it. Your distinctions only serve as distractions.
We don't understand our creator either.... When a computer can comprehend itself, it will only think that it understands us. And then it will start great wars over who thinks who understands best. And the Apple will still be the forbidden fruit...
It makes no sense to separate government from non-government. All the money should be counted as one, especially with the strong business influence over the state. Even the 'communist' countries were/are simply state run capitalism. They use the same spreadsheets as everybody else. Do not try to 'meddle with the forces of nature, Mr. Beal'.
How much money for a product or service has to change hands then, before it becomes 'commercial'?
...I cannot see how anybody could think it was an acceptable move from Yahoo.
It was a business decision, pure and simple.
But Obama is sure as hell a disappointment.
Only to the naive. He performed exactly as expected by the rest of us.
You forgot sky cranes. Lifting heavy weight stuff on construction sites or even something like material for roof repair would be ideal.
:-) What's the... you don't understand English?
It doesn't who the buyers and sellers are. When money changes hands, it's commercial.
Search and destr... uhhh... rescue! That's it...
And maybe crop dusters to eradicate cannabis.. er.. I mean.. bol weevils
That will never be proven. And the degree of corruption is hardly important.
He should spill the beans on the entire thing. Publish all the details. What we have here is a failure to resist, and no good can come from that. It just makes the death march to the slaughterhouse is little less uncomfortable, but it's a death march regardless.
Who is, then, in power of the United States if clearly not the legislative branch?
The business branch. The Department of State works for the arms merchants, and the Commerce Department for the Wall Street commodities markets.
The word 'legal' has become entirely frivolous. The government can do what it wants, and no goddamn piece of paper is ever going to stop it.
Golly gee! Ya think?
Your righteous indignation is noted. But that's not how the institutional 'contributors' see things.
Anybody else think that this cloud business is taking a hit? Maybe they should try a different angle and tell us that NSA is good for us and is perfectly safe...
I said it before, and I'll repeat it here, You didn't lose anything that you haven't given up freely. Yours is truly the defeatist attitude, and I'll have none of it. Accept the choices that you make instead of playing the blame game. It's that simple, like life itself.
Marketing gets you what we have for a President and House currently (and all the way back to the 70s), which has not been working very well.
You're not seeing this from the designers' point of view.. You only need to build the structure strong enough to keep the rain out... Anything more is excessive.
Hillary has done little to warrant being President.
Maybe you're eying a different metric. Looking at the numbers, she appears more than qualified.
No it's not. The character of the politician (and the people who vote for them) has remained the same for thousands of years. Bunch of dam carny hucksters they are, and always will be as long as the tactic works. These 'scientists' are just trying to 'improve' the art of book making.
He's no more transparent than he ever was. It's only that people are looking a tiny bit more closely. His motives have been more than obvious since he first entered the arena of political gladiators' (more like the soap opera of professional wrestling). And please note, I'm not singling him out. This is the the very essence of the game.
Only two?? Where the hell have you been?
Yeah, a lot of good that does. As you all keep on electing the same old crap, I sure hope none of you are expecting any better from his successor, or anybody else for the foreseeable future...
I like your nick. It seems particularly appropriate...