Is Xiaflex not one of the standard procedures in the US? It's been approved as a standard procedure here in Sweden since 2011 due to overwhelming scientific evidence that it works.
From your link: "The Swedish police record each instance of sexual violence in every case separately, leading to an inflated number of cases compared to other countries. Sweden also has a comparatively wide definition of rape.[242][243][244] This means that more sexual crimes are registered as rape than in most other countries."
This is the main problem, every country have different laws and every country have different views of how to count the statistics. Here in Sweden if you where found guilty of raping your wife every day for 10 years then that is counted as 3650 separate accounts of rape in the national statistics. This is why out number are inflated when compare with countries who would count that as a single instance (or even zero since there are countries which does not count rape among married couples).
of course, but then you can create a private blockchain which is what TFA talks about that is not distributed and not public and then you don't need any ASICs or rapberrys in order to manipulate it at all. That is the difference. In order to reap the benefits of a blockchain you must have a large community, something that you don't have with a private blockchain.
And what use would that be for Walmart? The distributed part of the blockchain is it's entire benefit (so that it's hard for a single entity to manipulate it).
Exactly this yes. I.e the software that we supply to our customers are available as both deb or rpm repositories. At one time when we had a mandatory upgrade a huge chunk of the customers asked how they should proceed in order to get this mandatory upgrade... So for all the years between their initial install and this event they had not once run "apt update && apt upgrade" or "yum upgrade". People are insane is what they are.
And the previous forks was done with the consensus that the old forks should die and the new one would be Bitcoin while with Bitcoin Cash the community was divided and thus the consensus was to let the fork live it's own separate life. So with this fork there where also a fork in the community so to speak.
Because with the previous forks the new version was the new Bitcoin and the old was defunct but with Bitcoin Cash you have a fork that lives in parallel with ordinary Bitcoin so they are two different entities more like say US Dollars and Canadian Dollars.
And how should they be able to present any result from said unlawful search to a court (assuming a US court here)? I would think that getting away with murder as a cop (I swear that I saw him reaching for what I believed to be a gun) is orders of magnitude easier.
What for? You inspect the place after each visit and since you know who rented it you know who to go after if things are missing or broken.
If Hotels doesn't need this then AirBnB doesn't either.
From what I gather from TFA they where already burning the tires when the cryptominer company approached them about utilizing the otherwise wasted heat from the burning process.
I have never understood why the US have been so angry towards Iran and other such hard core sharia countries when they obviously share a lot beliefs. Or perhaps it's that very thing that creates the conflict.
Yes it does. Back in 1998 two boys (age 5 and 7) where determined by police to have murdered a 4 year old boy. Since they where both under the legal age or 15 the case was never tried in a court of law. Which in itself perhaps was not good considering that later research have pointed to them being completely innocent (and a court case might have been able to find that out).
The law does not apply to everyone. Now I don't know how it works in the UK but where I live you cannot take a 14-year old to court no matter what they do. This is not to say there children below the age of 15 can do what ever they like without consequences but they cannot be tried in a court of law (or a civil court).
That is not MY definition of NN, that is the common definition of NN. If any one else claims otherwise they are only using it as a scare tactic against NN aka FUD. Look at the actual NN legislation and you will see that there are nothing in there that prevents ISPs from filtering out bad traffic.
TLS Session Resumption even on Chrome is only possible if you do not close the browser since the TLS Session ID is not stored to disk. Cookies is a whole other mess that have nothing to do with TLS and works just as fine (for the trackers) if not better on plain HTTP.
Slashdot Mirror
Is Xiaflex not one of the standard procedures in the US? It's been approved as a standard procedure here in Sweden since 2011 due to overwhelming scientific evidence that it works.
From your link: "The Swedish police record each instance of sexual violence in every case separately, leading to an inflated number of cases compared to other countries. Sweden also has a comparatively wide definition of rape.[242][243][244] This means that more sexual crimes are registered as rape than in most other countries."
This is the main problem, every country have different laws and every country have different views of how to count the statistics. Here in Sweden if you where found guilty of raping your wife every day for 10 years then that is counted as 3650 separate accounts of rape in the national statistics. This is why out number are inflated when compare with countries who would count that as a single instance (or even zero since there are countries which does not count rape among married couples).
of course, but then you can create a private blockchain which is what TFA talks about that is not distributed and not public and then you don't need any ASICs or rapberrys in order to manipulate it at all. That is the difference. In order to reap the benefits of a blockchain you must have a large community, something that you don't have with a private blockchain.
Not accidentally, it's the only thing that makes it difficult (and verifiable).
Well great for Guardtime to scam an entire country into using their unnecessarily resource intensive technology I guess.
And what use would that be for Walmart? The distributed part of the blockchain is it's entire benefit (so that it's hard for a single entity to manipulate it).
Don't underestimate the buzzword-compliance factor. It drives a large portion of the IT industry!
Because this is about other uses for blockchains and not about cryptocurrencies or miners at all.
Exactly this yes. I.e the software that we supply to our customers are available as both deb or rpm repositories. At one time when we had a mandatory upgrade a huge chunk of the customers asked how they should proceed in order to get this mandatory upgrade... So for all the years between their initial install and this event they had not once run "apt update && apt upgrade" or "yum upgrade". People are insane is what they are.
I've heard of at least one person that went to Holland in order to meet up with one of these princes and no one have seen him since.
And the previous forks was done with the consensus that the old forks should die and the new one would be Bitcoin while with Bitcoin Cash the community was divided and thus the consensus was to let the fork live it's own separate life. So with this fork there where also a fork in the community so to speak.
potatoes where a functional currency long before we invented fiat currencies (and for a longer time period as well).
Because with the previous forks the new version was the new Bitcoin and the old was defunct but with Bitcoin Cash you have a fork that lives in parallel with ordinary Bitcoin so they are two different entities more like say US Dollars and Canadian Dollars.
Sure? https://answers.microsoft.com/...
And how should they be able to present any result from said unlawful search to a court (assuming a US court here)? I would think that getting away with murder as a cop (I swear that I saw him reaching for what I believed to be a gun) is orders of magnitude easier.
And how many of those issues are feature requests?
yeah right
What for? You inspect the place after each visit and since you know who rented it you know who to go after if things are missing or broken. If Hotels doesn't need this then AirBnB doesn't either.
From what I gather from TFA they where already burning the tires when the cryptominer company approached them about utilizing the otherwise wasted heat from the burning process.
I have never understood why the US have been so angry towards Iran and other such hard core sharia countries when they obviously share a lot beliefs. Or perhaps it's that very thing that creates the conflict.
Yes it does. Back in 1998 two boys (age 5 and 7) where determined by police to have murdered a 4 year old boy. Since they where both under the legal age or 15 the case was never tried in a court of law. Which in itself perhaps was not good considering that later research have pointed to them being completely innocent (and a court case might have been able to find that out).
The law does not apply to everyone. Now I don't know how it works in the UK but where I live you cannot take a 14-year old to court no matter what they do. This is not to say there children below the age of 15 can do what ever they like without consequences but they cannot be tried in a court of law (or a civil court).
That is not MY definition of NN, that is the common definition of NN. If any one else claims otherwise they are only using it as a scare tactic against NN aka FUD. Look at the actual NN legislation and you will see that there are nothing in there that prevents ISPs from filtering out bad traffic.
TLS Session Resumption even on Chrome is only possible if you do not close the browser since the TLS Session ID is not stored to disk. Cookies is a whole other mess that have nothing to do with TLS and works just as fine (for the trackers) if not better on plain HTTP.
Welcome to the world of software development :-)