Slashdot Mirror


User: AndrewBC

AndrewBC's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
51
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 51

  1. Re:Apply on Best Way To Land Entry-Level Job? · · Score: 1

    I second the importance of the portfolio. Resume-talk is just that: talk. I wasn't able to really get a foot in the door in development until I took a month to fill out my portfolio with job-related projects. Since then, I've been able to raise much more interest from the beginning of every time I contact someone about a job.

  2. Coincidentally... on Do Car Safety Problems Come From Outer Space? · · Score: 1

    This is the excuse I used on my Computer Science professor for why I didn't have my assignment. It didn't work.

  3. Re:still useless on International Longest Tweet Contest Seeks Entries · · Score: 1

    I suppose it's a good thing that none of us participate in some kind of news aggregation site, because that would render your ranting null.

    .. Oh wait...

  4. Re:I Smell Another Apple Ad on 90% of the Universe Found Hiding In Plain View · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whoosh.

    This is why we can't have nice things.

  5. Re:Slurm FTW on Details Emerge On Futurama's "Rebirth" (and Return) · · Score: 1

    If anyone needs me, I'll be in the happy dome.

  6. Re:Biased much? on Obama Administration Withholds FoIA Requests More Often Than Bush's · · Score: 1

    ... that I've been modded down so little I can count the negative point comments on one hand.

    Ah, but how many fingers are on that hand, eh?

    I'm on to you, mister.

  7. Re:Degeneration on Scientists Demonstrate Mammalian Tissue Regeneration · · Score: 1

    Somebody should suggest it as an experiment to perform on these knockout mice.

    "Last one to the bar has to pump the all of the mice penises!"

  8. Re:So on Scientists Demonstrate Mammalian Tissue Regeneration · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not like evolution makes the most badass things ever, you just have to be good enough to survive long enough to further your species through whatever means you have, and you've won.

  9. Only one sense left... on Blind Soldier Uses Tongue To "See" · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else think "Wow, if he wore earplugs and glasses to cover his eyes, he'd be just like the converts in Tommy, the rock opera."?

  10. Re:An easier plan on US Intelligence Planned To Destroy WikiLeaks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thanks! Generally I agree with you, I just would rather people made a list whenever they say secrecy is necessary, so they could perhaps see how much their government is overstepping their own list.

  11. Re:An easier plan on US Intelligence Planned To Destroy WikiLeaks · · Score: 1, Troll

    ... but there are definitely reasons that the government SHOULD have some secrets.

    I can't help but notice that you didn't list any, or are those secret too?

  12. Re:amazing. on Man Threatened Spam Attack In $200,000 Extortion Plot · · Score: 1

    Ugh, it's an insurance company, of course they have money.

  13. Re:i'm sick of this meme on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: 1

    Shhhh, no one disturb this post...

    It came from the past.

  14. Re:Ovation on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: 1

    I'm going to eat some candy, and I'm not going to share with you.

    I bet that makes you -so- mad.

  15. Re:IPEX Denies Being Original Source on NewEgg Confirms Shipping Fake Core i7s · · Score: 1

    Dirty deals, done dirt cheap?

  16. Guessing games on Time To Take the Internet Seriously · · Score: 1

    People who make predictions for the sake of making predictions are only doing so because they lack the required attributes to make their ideas reality, but want the smug satisfaction of thinking they're at least equal to or better than the person that does have those attributes because they thought of it first. If you want to be impressive, predict it and then make it happen (which, by the way, is a good way to be right about your predictions.)

  17. Re:Hydrophopic on New "Hairy" Material Is Almost Perfectly Hydrophobic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plus, the doctors are all quacks anyway.

  18. Re:Not yet on The Evolution of Reading In the Digital Age · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's even further off than that. It's unlikely to happen until everyone who comes across it already has one, and isn't just a prick. (There are lots of those...)

    It's more akin to leaving a bookshelf of all your books, and room for new books to be added as well, complete with a dolly for easy carrying by one person -- much more valuable than just one tattered eared paperback.

  19. Re:Automatically generate the technology? on YouTube Makes Captioning Available To All · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you're suffering from stuttering semantics -- Either that or you're an egregiously emotional eccentric.

  20. Re:Black on Gamma Ray Mystery Reestablished By Fermi Telescope · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see a red dwarf and I want it painted black...

  21. Re:Free Speech on A Second Lessig Fair-Use Video Is Suppressed By WMG · · Score: 1

    ...or me kicking you out of my house if you bust in raving about TimeCube.

    Be glad I don't know which corner four corners four cubed corners time cube world is a cube with four corners which corner of the world you live in!

  22. Re:They need less common terms eh? on Microsoft Behind Google Complaints To EC · · Score: 1

    I think you forgot the paleontologist with a Ph.D, tenure, Unagi, and a monkey. I don't blame you, though.

  23. Re:Yes, you are being a jackass on Killer Apartment Vs. Persistent Microwave Exposure? · · Score: 1

    The Elmers killed ham radio, not the internet.

    Luckily, video killed those radio stars.

  24. Re:Who are we kidding? ... on Space Exploration Needs Extraterrestrial Ethics · · Score: 1

    Yeah! Furthermore, what makes people think that we could get extra-terrestrial ethics right when we can't even get terrestrial ethics right amongst each other?

  25. Re:Lojack on FBI Probing PA School Webcam Spy Case · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they were really interested in theft recovery why didn't they use a system specifically designed for that purpose. Lojack costs $30/year per machine and I'm sure they would have gotten a volume discount.

    That's exactly what I was thinking. It almost certainly costs less than paying someone to set up the spycurity software, maintain it, watch kids, and that's not even getting into the lawyer fees and the possible damages.