Well there isn't a reasonble expectatation of privacy in voluntary use of a voluntary house or automobile. The goverment tracks who owns the ownership of both. If they suppect you of commiting a crime the dectective will look up you address and plate numbers. No warrent needed. Warrents are only needed to search your house or car. They can come by and stare at your house or follow your car without a warrent.
Barnes and Noble is fine. Their strategy is to convert their current customer base to digital. When these customers come into the store they see a big display case of Nooks with a saleman behind the desk to push them. They have the best location in the buisness to sell a tablet to a book buyer. Apple can only get the book buyers who are comparison shopping. Apple also can get people who want a tablet for video and gaming. But these people don't buy a ton of books a year. They are low volume customers for B&N.
I suppose I don't know the rule very well. Are we supposed to write an original summary? Next time I will be sure to add lots of bias and opinion. Tie it to apple and change the title to a stupid question. Not sure why I copy pasted from wrong article. ohh well
Your labels can totatlly be flipped if you look at it from another perspective.
Utopian believes:
1) That defects can fixed easy/quick recovery in production.
2) "Good code" will be written and be inherently understandable by the majority of those who will be making changes to it.
3) There will be budget and time to make changes based on user feedback after the product is shipped.
4) The needs of the user can be met.
Different Anon person.
Google+ is blocked at my employer along with facebook and twitter.
So these google+ articles are really frustrating. I click on the link and suddenly and I get a scary warning about social networking at work.
If your the type of person who hates math then your not going to be very happy programming. Solving equations and programming are very similar mental processes. The fact that you want to avoid advanced math is red flag that programming might not be a good fit. Of course I could be talking out of my ass. Does anyone know of someone who hates math and is happy as a programmer?
But these questions are answered over the phone. When someone calls in and the answer to the question is a long stream of random numbers and letters the call support person is not going to bother with you security questions. They are just going to let the attacker in when they give plasable sounding answers.
These security questions can be answered over the phone. Capitalization and spelling is ignored. If you put in random letters and numbers they would likely just listen to the first few characters before allowing you in.
No actual birth rates in the US hasn't changed much. Population growth is the US is based on our imagration laws.
Immigration has become the determinate factor in population growth. The 11.2 million immigrants who indicated they arrived between 1990 and 2000 plus the 6.4 million children born to immigrants in the United States during the 1990s are equal to almost 70 percent of U.S. population growth over the last 10 years.
If your not planning on killing someone you use what is at hand. If you are planning on killing someone you plan to do it an way that can't be tied back to you. A custom made gun is the exact opposite of that. If your in a gang then your gun is designed for show as much as it is for killing people. You don't want a gun that could be confused for a toy or a pipe welded to hand grip. You want something that looks expensive and deadly.
I would argue that Science is more than analysis. It is a paticular kind of anaysis that adheres to the scientific method. Analyis that involves observation and experiments. I haven't taken many political science courses in college so I won't argue it is not a science. But I can say with certianty that I am not a Pokémon Scientist.
And the people who drop out because the fail. What about them. Does their education stop because they can't pass algebra? Sorry we can't teach you how to draw until you learn some more math. No history for you learn some more math.
The article is talking about people who fail freshman Algebra and then drop out of college. Were talking about people who are kind of stupid when it come to math. They won't be taking physics. The article is asking why we are preventing stupid people from getting majors in poetry, politics, or history?
It is done all the time, just not by Hollywood. Here are some things to check out that are good: Initial D Movie, Extravagant Challenge(Skip Beat) series, Hollyland series, Nana 1 and 2 Movies. Some adaptations are so successful they get adapted again for different countries. Boys Over Flowers got made three times. Two seasons in Japan, 2 seasons in Taiwan, and a single season in Korea. Then there were two Japanese films. Akira will me made eventually in Japan and it will be worth watching.
Bleach also falls into the forever scaling power level trap. With characters needing to get more power/better swords to fight the more powerfull enemy. But this should not be an issue for first movie. First movie is just 6th sense + swords + teanager angst.
Do rich people buy Rhumba vacuum cleaners so they don't have to vacuum the floor themsleves? Or do they use maids? One of these options blindly bumps into all your furniture. The other wears a uniform, dusts, cleans windows, and possibly speaks Spanish.
Also why would a rich person want an self driving car? Wouldn't that be a step down from a chauffeur? Seems to me that self driving cars is a way to bring the benifits of a chauffeur to the middle class.
Slashdot Mirror
I think Groklaw was siding with all the patents being tossed. The Samsung and the Apple ones. They were rooting for a no one wins scenario.
Well there isn't a reasonble expectatation of privacy in voluntary use of a voluntary house or automobile. The goverment tracks who owns the ownership of both. If they suppect you of commiting a crime the dectective will look up you address and plate numbers. No warrent needed. Warrents are only needed to search your house or car. They can come by and stare at your house or follow your car without a warrent.
Barnes and Noble is fine. Their strategy is to convert their current customer base to digital. When these customers come into the store they see a big display case of Nooks with a saleman behind the desk to push them. They have the best location in the buisness to sell a tablet to a book buyer. Apple can only get the book buyers who are comparison shopping. Apple also can get people who want a tablet for video and gaming. But these people don't buy a ton of books a year. They are low volume customers for B&N.
I suppose I don't know the rule very well. Are we supposed to write an original summary? Next time I will be sure to add lots of bias and opinion. Tie it to apple and change the title to a stupid question. Not sure why I copy pasted from wrong article. ohh well
Your labels can totatlly be flipped if you look at it from another perspective.
Utopian believes: 1) That defects can fixed easy/quick recovery in production. 2) "Good code" will be written and be inherently understandable by the majority of those who will be making changes to it. 3) There will be budget and time to make changes based on user feedback after the product is shipped. 4) The needs of the user can be met.
Different Anon person. Google+ is blocked at my employer along with facebook and twitter. So these google+ articles are really frustrating. I click on the link and suddenly and I get a scary warning about social networking at work.
If your the type of person who hates math then your not going to be very happy programming. Solving equations and programming are very similar mental processes. The fact that you want to avoid advanced math is red flag that programming might not be a good fit. Of course I could be talking out of my ass. Does anyone know of someone who hates math and is happy as a programmer?
But these questions are answered over the phone. When someone calls in and the answer to the question is a long stream of random numbers and letters the call support person is not going to bother with you security questions. They are just going to let the attacker in when they give plasable sounding answers.
These security questions can be answered over the phone. Capitalization and spelling is ignored. If you put in random letters and numbers they would likely just listen to the first few characters before allowing you in.
Should be done in person with documentation. Not over the phone or online. Resetting you password should be slow and expensive.
In the US that is the purpose of copyright. I believe in some parts of Europe they believe that is a natural property right.
anyone familiar with the political process in America knows this information about registered voters is available and easily accessible to the public.
Just answer me this Tweek, what do you see as postive about toddler murder?
Ahh ahh... It is easy
Yes it easy.
Immigration has become the determinate factor in population growth. The 11.2 million immigrants who indicated they arrived between 1990 and 2000 plus the 6.4 million children born to immigrants in the United States during the 1990s are equal to almost 70 percent of U.S. population growth over the last 10 years.
Politicians protecting themselves from investigation. The legislators likely doesn't want the state to ever ask for their facebook credentials.
If your not planning on killing someone you use what is at hand. If you are planning on killing someone you plan to do it an way that can't be tied back to you. A custom made gun is the exact opposite of that. If your in a gang then your gun is designed for show as much as it is for killing people. You don't want a gun that could be confused for a toy or a pipe welded to hand grip. You want something that looks expensive and deadly.
I would argue that Science is more than analysis. It is a paticular kind of anaysis that adheres to the scientific method. Analyis that involves observation and experiments. I haven't taken many political science courses in college so I won't argue it is not a science. But I can say with certianty that I am not a Pokémon Scientist.
And the people who drop out because the fail. What about them. Does their education stop because they can't pass algebra? Sorry we can't teach you how to draw until you learn some more math. No history for you learn some more math.
The article is talking about people who fail freshman Algebra and then drop out of college. Were talking about people who are kind of stupid when it come to math. They won't be taking physics. The article is asking why we are preventing stupid people from getting majors in poetry, politics, or history?
So if i study Pokemon I can claim to be a Pokemon Scientist? Everyone who attends college is studying things. That doesn't make everything science.
It is done all the time, just not by Hollywood. Here are some things to check out that are good: Initial D Movie, Extravagant Challenge(Skip Beat) series, Hollyland series, Nana 1 and 2 Movies. Some adaptations are so successful they get adapted again for different countries. Boys Over Flowers got made three times. Two seasons in Japan, 2 seasons in Taiwan, and a single season in Korea. Then there were two Japanese films. Akira will me made eventually in Japan and it will be worth watching.
Why would an American not have a US centric view of Tintin? People have perspectives yoh. It is kinda of not their fault.
Bleach also falls into the forever scaling power level trap. With characters needing to get more power/better swords to fight the more powerfull enemy. But this should not be an issue for first movie. First movie is just 6th sense + swords + teanager angst.
I saw a trailer for live action Rurouni Kenshin. Not sure if it was a series or a movie. It looked really good.
Do rich people buy Rhumba vacuum cleaners so they don't have to vacuum the floor themsleves? Or do they use maids? One of these options blindly bumps into all your furniture. The other wears a uniform, dusts, cleans windows, and possibly speaks Spanish.
Also why would a rich person want an self driving car? Wouldn't that be a step down from a chauffeur? Seems to me that self driving cars is a way to bring the benifits of a chauffeur to the middle class.