Slashdot Mirror


User: g3k0

g3k0's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
15
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 15

  1. Re:Everybody aboard the tinfoilhat-train! on Linux Receives 20th Birthday Video From Microsoft · · Score: 1
  2. Considering the circumstances, I highly doubt Microsoft will have to pay the publishers a dime. Especially considering that it is promotional credit. I know Facebook doesn't pay for promotional credit, and would not be the least bit surprised if Microsoft had a similar clause. Really depends on the fine print the publisher agreed to which I am way too lazy to find so I will just concede. As far as rationalization is concerned, I was not trying to rationalize anything. Piracy is wrong. The argument I replied to was just very similar to what you see coming from companies upset over piracy and I don't agree with it.

  3. Those are sales lost as the person would normally use real money to buy the points to get the game. The codes were for only 160 points. But if you redeem a thousand of them...

    NONSENSE! Stolen bits != lost sale. Obviously if a persons wallet is not tied to their spending they will spend a lot more. Do you work for the RIAA? Though I am against piracy now, back when napster/limewire were cool, I may have downloaded some music/games. If the limewire option wasn't available to me, I promise I would not have had any interest in buying them. Honestly, it created interest in me for some music and I ended up buying some CDs because I like owning an original CD with a cover not made with a Sharpie.

  4. Re:It works for Google on Google Instant Announced · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Unfortunately it wouldn't help anyone fix their spelling mistakes.

    Nor would it help anyone fix his or her grammatical mistakes!

  5. Doesn't Micorosft do the same thing??? on FTC Introduces New Orders For Intel; No Bundling · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Microsoft force computer manufacturers to sell windows only? Why is this allowed? Or am I mistaken?

  6. Re:The real reason on Google Offers Encrypted Web Search Option · · Score: 1

    But will analytics still work since referrers are turned off?

  7. Re:Can this be legally challenged? on Conservative Textbook Curriculum Passes Final Vote In Texas · · Score: 1

    Violation of the separation of church and state? The separation of church and state has been completely warped to fit what today's "activist judges" want. The separation of church and state was about liberation, not about confining worship to private areas. Every Christmas there are lawsuits over nativity scenes. Read the original letter to Thomas Jefferson. The Danbury Baptists were not asking to have prayer banned in schools or any other issue it has been used as ammo for. "Our sentiments are uniformly on the side of religious liberty--that religion is at all times and places a matter between God and individuals--that no man ought to suffer in name, person, or effects on account of his religious Opinions" http://candst.tripod.com/tnppage/baptist.htm

  8. Re:Break out the champagne! on FTC Takes Out Porn- and Botnet-Spewing ISP · · Score: 1

    You should apply bound checking, otherwise someone could exploit it.

    Lol! Only on slashdot.

  9. The world needs more Richard Stallmans on Steve Jobs Hints At Theora Lawsuit · · Score: 2, Funny

    If there was only a Richard Stallman for every Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmer.... On second thought, a global epidemic of athletes foot may not be the best scenario either.

  10. Re:iFrame? on Proof of Concept For Ajax Without JavaScript · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apprently. I find this line interesting: the reason browser back buttons work in Gmail is an invisible, seamless use of iframes that create browser history. Isn't this actually due to the use of # in the URL when you click things?

    Actually it is a bit more complex than that. A Hash is just an link to an anchor on the current page. I am not sure how gmail works exactly, but I use extjs at work and it manages the history with an iframe as well. It needs a way to keep track of all the history tokens so it uses an iframe. Check out its source code if you are interested. http://www.extjs.com/deploy/dev/docs/source/History.html

  11. Re:Too bad... on C-Span Posts Full Archives Online · · Score: 0

    Half the health care debate wasn't on CSPAN at all... we could go back and see the insanity over and over again

    Theres was a debate?

  12. Oh no! pas les books! on Google Found Guilty of French Copyright Infringement · · Score: 0

    Sacre Bleu! Cordon Bleu! ArrrhHH!

  13. Re:What do you mean? on Aussie Scientists Find Coconut-Carrying Octopus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it an African or a European octopus?

    What? I don't know that! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  14. Re:Video Surveillance is Useless on Biometric Face Recognition At Your Local Mall · · Score: 0

    2006? That's almost 4 years ago. In 2006 Face recognition software was rated 10 times better than 2002 and 100 times better than 1995. So if that trend continued it should be 10 times better than when that article was written. PA and other states have successfully used it in catching identity thieves apply for licenses. I would write more or backup my claims, but I have a plane to catch.

  15. Ahah! on Company Trains the Autistic To Test Software · · Score: 1

    That's why they hired me!